Player Features and Ideas Discussion

No, posting with an alt just means there is no evidence they are telling the truth. Its a tactic used in countless arguments by people who clearly have no experience in the subject or are telling outright lies. We have already debunked his arguments several times now.

Griffons are a good support ship, they are not a good solo ship and they do not get rid of trollceptors or are fun to fly. All they will manage is to jam the enemy then die when a few ceptors gather to get rid of it before returning to their entosising.

Your tactic sucks balls and won't work, best it will manage is to entertain the trollceptors.

They weren't meant to "get rid" of trollceptors, just to make them completely meaningless with the rarest actual application.
Getting rid of entosis ceptor is like getting rid of any other ceptor and isn't a subject worth touching normally, unless we're talking with someone too gewn to be at least average at the game of actually piloting his spaceship.
Just as you were being butthurt at the prospect of losing a griffin, I gave you an idea of fielding a Kitsune with a tackle so when ceptors come for you, you can actually get rid of them. Your response was equally nonsensual and stood somewhere inbetween "buh it's not fun to fly qqqqqq" and "ahhhhh 3 weeks training for Kitsune is impossible qqqqq".

You haven't even gotten to the tactic yet and just gewned ahead with nonsense. As usual.

Once again, tears are not debunking.

WTB Posting Alliance.

Orca's posting is analogous to the trollceptor, consistent in coming in to annoy and accomplish nothing, then quickly escaping when attention is given (in his case to an NPC corp).

Defending isn't a problem, the issue is that trollcepters are even more boring than the old sov mechanics.



Such as?



Post with your main or all you say is rubbish. I call bullshit on you having ever held anything in any sov mechanic given your utter lack of knowledge in your posting

[/quote]

There's nothing to argue, read the guy's posts. From moment one he's just been "Grr goons". Even outside of these threads. Based on his posts here he's not used the system.

If he actively refuse to post with his main, then obviously he either isn't confident enough in what he says or he's actively lying, otherwise he'd put his name to it.

And in this thread we learn that baltec1 has never heard of travel ceptors. Maybe somebody will be kind enough to educate you.

Edit:
And to save you a post, yes posting from an alt. That way you can just go for making flawed arguments without thinking about adapting instead of issuing threats. Since you are one of the only entities in the game playing FozzieSov as intended you shouldn't need to be doing all of this you know.

The worst part of FozzieSov is that it's made me agree with Snot Shot post. THAT is a good enough reason to post with an alt.

Attacking sov with effectively travel fit ceptors is depressingly accurate.

Okay, what is the obsession with Rube Goldberg machines around here? Every time CCP or the playerbase suggests a rebalance to address broken mechanics, everyone seems to want to make it as complicated as possible.

You want to eliminate trollceptors in this instance? Change the entosis link this way. Maintain the mass penalty. Add a new thing - activating the entosis link now incurs a 5% speed boost. And just 5%. With the already-existing game mechanic that you cannot activate more than one speed module, now they can't try to burn off the grid before you arrive. Done. Simple. That ship is as much as committed to the capture.

(I do want to stop and give kudos to all the feedback that was given before the release, so most problems with this system never had to see the light of day)

By the way, nullification is a truly terrible mechanic, but it is necessary with anchorable bubbles. Effortless shutting down of gates with that is bad gameplay. Commit dictors to it and you have my blessing. But if you don't have a ship on grid (or even just long enough to launch a sphere) then you don't deserve to have that gate effectively shut down. And another thing, the idea of ceptors being nullified so they can tackle large prey for roaming fleets doesn't work because those fleets (unless T3) aren't getting through those bubble gates any time this century, so by the nature of bubbles you mandate that hundreds of ceptors swarm for the kill.

You want less ceptors? You want nullification dropped? Petition for it along with an end to anchorable bubbles. Then real fleets, much more catchable fleets, will roam null. Until then, nullified ceptors is the monster you guys created.

In what way?

The whole point of the sov changes was to get us fighting more, using ships to attack sov while avoiding fights is the exact opposite of the goal CCP have.