Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center

There are still lots of places that are not highly entrenched. Those would seem to be a good place to set up initially. I seriously hope no one thinks that small or medium alliances should start out attacking the largest coalitions in the game. That is a recipe for failure.

Sov little thing, revert to Dominion sov. Thanks.

Ban fitting of entosis links on ceptors. No one is going to realistically take sov from any serious null alliance using just ceptors. Ceptors are simply being used for sov trolling, which is hugely annoying, with next to no risk for the pilot, while they have no intent to take sov, just to annoy. ( It is also capable to blue all those that attempt to contest a capture event, by simply entosising everything, but not fighting at all. This is true for both attackers and defenders.)

Even better, ban them completely from frigates (except maybe assault frigates, they need a role).

At the start of a capture event, spawn 10 at the start, not 5. It is god awful boring to sit around waiting capturing nodes, while other pilots sit around twiddling their thumbs for the next five nodes to spawn. While no one is contesting the nodes none the less.

This needs to be addressed and fixed. It is seriously pissing off a lot of people.

Make the initial entosis attack cycle require 5 complete cycles (can be done all at once by five entosis linked ships).

This will curb entocepter use considerably. Or, I can also just keep killing them.

just make it so when your entosis module is cycling your ship can barely move, im talkin interceptors moving at 1km/sec max with mwd on. that will end all the trolling real fast.

also needing to capture 10 nodes if theres conflict or not is very annoying, what happened to "whoever wins the fight wins the timer" why is it that i still need to put in over 2 hours of time to re secure a system that got trolled and has absolutely no one fighting to take it?

Do systems with lower levels of development really have to exit reinforcement any significant amount of time away from an alliance's designated prime time?

Would be helpfull if the command node beacons would show up on the overview icluding there name/ID. It's a bit strange that they only show up on the overview.

Maybe I'm imaging this, but I'm sure there used to be a "Sovereignty" button on the info window for solar systems.

It was extremely convenient for quickly checking who owns systems in FW space and I'd like to see it return!

Either that or a Sov holder icon on the solar system info window for a quick point of reference :)

If the system has time to "decay" then many nodes will already be spawned and you can entosis them all at the same time by splitting your small fleet.

As already mentioned in this thread, please bring back the killmails for TCU an IHub.

The reason is quite simple, the former TCU and IHub generated killmails and to motivate the crowd some FCs decided to host lotterys or raffles and used the done damage to determine the winner(s).
As far as i observed fleets with "guaranteed killmail" (and raffles) got a higher participation.

The problem is there is no longer "damage done" which results in no killmails as we know...
My proposal is to implement a new version of killmail.
The thing is quite simple, the system already checks if you are on the blue (ally who owns the TCU / IHub) or red side.
Now the system would need to take notes which char successfuly captures a node.
For every successfuly captured node the char gets 1 point.
That way even the deffender has the opportunity to get on the killmail and maybe shows that they have just barely not managed to deffend their space.

And at the end of the day, we have the most important thing in eve.
A notification to brag with.

Maybe you should even be able to see the time when the first node spawned to tell if this system was ambushed or had already nodes for weeks...