These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Walking in stations

First post
Author
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1041 - 2015-07-30 17:09:16 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Misconceptions here:

1 that CCP allocated resources from EvE to WIS depriving EvE of resources.

2 that a poor implementation on an idea means the idea was bad.

3 that the "majority of players didn't want WIS"


While you may be right on items 2 and 3, item 1 is not a misconception, CCP blew at least 18 months of development time on WIS which would have been far better spent to fix what was broken in the base game of FIS.

People wanted the WIS they had been promised, not what was delivered.

Perhaps however that's dependent on 1 whether CCP allocated additional resources 2 whether those resources would hav been diverted to dust instead of WIS

My experience with project management would suggest it's likely additional resources were acquired to work on WIS and had WIS not been on the agenda those resources likely would not have been obtained in the first place. CCP might operate differently so I might be wrong.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

Freya Sertan
Doomheim
#1042 - 2015-07-30 17:12:56 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
My experience with project management would suggest it's likely additional resources were acquired to work on WIS and had WIS not been on the agenda those resources likely would not have been obtained in the first place. CCP might operate differently so I might be wrong.


*snort* Jesus, man. You're making yourself out to be a bigger polymath than da Vinci was. You're incredible. Please, never leave EvE; New Eden would be such a darker place without your special brand of content.

New Eden isn't nice. It isn't friendly. It isn't very hospitiable. Good thing there are people here to shoot in the face.

Want to make New Eden a nice place? Try this out.

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#1043 - 2015-07-30 17:14:33 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
What puts this game at risk is toxic members of the community like you who feel they are entitled to have a say over who else is and isn't allowed to express their opinions.


The rest is the standard Lucas kell BS. I'm familiar with it, I see it all the time, I call it "I don't get it because I don't want to get it" routine. It's wrong, but you have a right to be wrong.

But the above is just stupid. Telling someone what they believe and how they do things is wrong isn't the same thing as disallowing someone to express their opinions,. Hell, how could I stop you? You WiS people can live in whatever fantasy you wish, it's not hurting anyone. You can speak freely about what you want.

So can I, and I can also demonstrate that what you want is selfish and greedy and unrealistic.

Like I said, my function here (i won't speak for others, but I think some would agree) is to remind CCP that there is support for their focusing on the meat of EVE (spaceships, space and the player driven market). I like a focused game (and meat), not one that is all over the place. CCP used to be all over the place, now they aren't

Skins and asteroids as a sideline don't hurt and is skins make some extra cash, so be it.
Doing Valkyrie doesn't hurt either, it's "Ribs" to EVE's steak (WiS isn't Ribs, it's Tofu, and you can shove that non-meat soy bean crap up your Elite Spaceships exhaust hole). But We've seen what happens when CCP overextends itself.

EVE isn't the right platform for adding non-spaceship "new" stuff to, and CCP knows that now, no matter how many of the rest of you don't.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#1044 - 2015-07-30 17:16:12 UTC
Nana Skalski wrote:
Quote:
My 'side' is winning, and has won the war,

That does not mean you are fighting on the right side.


Actually it does. War doesn't determine who is right, it determines who is leftTwisted
Nana Skalski
Taisaanat Kotei
EDENCOM DEFENSIVE INITIATIVE
#1045 - 2015-07-30 17:27:26 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Nana Skalski wrote:
Quote:
My 'side' is winning, and has won the war,

That does not mean you are fighting on the right side.


Actually it does. War doesn't determine who is right, it determines who is leftTwisted

And who will be leaving too. Remember that.
Jenshae Chiroptera
#1046 - 2015-07-30 17:30:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenshae Chiroptera
Aralyn Cormallen wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:

slightly off topic, they sorted that whole situation out by ceasing to release demos and now all this "early access" bull so they can get away with releasing broken games/demos that you pay for. its a sad state these days

:Warning: I can rant for hours about this :Warning:

I think as gamers, we have let games developers get away with far too much crap. The genie is well out the bottle now, but Microtransactions, DLC (when has it even been right to release 80% of a game and demand more money for the rest!), paid for early-access, Beta releases, Alpha releases (and no, there is no such thing as a pre-Alpha - Star Citizen fans, show some goddamn self-respect and demand a game!) is all rubbish and cross the whole spectrum between cheeky to outright scamming. Bring back the days of paying your money, and getting a finished game :Rage:
I am still wondering why they keep adding new clothes and you can't actually stand around in a group and look at each other.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

Borascus
#1047 - 2015-07-30 17:53:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Borascus
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
It was simply stopped at one room because crybabies cried until they stopped developing it.


quick to forget, quicker to repeat;

You see, there was a furtherance beyond the single room

What we end up seeing in the comments section of that video, that was delivered as a presentation outside of fanfest and forum, is further development of a project element.

When you measure the comments in that youtube video;

It was dead then too. For 2 guys.

As someone who is qualified in Psychology, EVE has been a melting pot of suggestion, with many many forgotten failures, and many many floggings of the dead horse.

World of Darkness should have proven categorically that CCP hf. develops what CCP hf. wants to develop. There really has been demand for WiS, and throughout the demands there have always been 'died last year' posts, most of which were wrong.

If CCP hf. aren't tempted by people saying 'every other game does it, it will bring new players who will also leave the station, it's practical, it would be fun,..... etc' that's CCP hf.'s prerogative.

Over time, that leads to the same playerbase having opinions generated by face-to-face marketing (like the linked video) which is harmful. Future newbros also read about past development cycles and opportunity.

Our opinion is we would like for CCP hf. to continue working on this. There is another group that says WiS should remain dead.

Eventually; the second group will be the only players, having lost the 1st group and the new players that would have been attracted to an avatar based element.

That is a diminishing player base / market.

With a door you do not need to go through in the Captain's quarters, you will have the same opportunity as people that do not want to gain standings: skip that part.

tl;dr; There are still people that want CCP hf. to put more hours on WiS development.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#1048 - 2015-07-30 18:04:04 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
The rest is the standard Lucas kell BS.
I accept your concession of defeat

Jenn aSide wrote:
But the above is just stupid. Telling someone what they believe and how they do things is wrong isn't the same thing as disallowing someone to express their opinions,.
Which would be fine if that's wh you did. Buy you don't. You attack people, not their arguments, you talk down to them and you act like what they say is objectively wrong because it doesn't match your opinion. You then proceed down your "THIS IS MY EVE GET OUT" route when that doesn't work. Your aim is to get them to simply give up. What annoys you is that it doesn't work on me because what some random thinks about me personally on the internet is irrelevant.

Jenn aSide wrote:
I like a focused game (and meat), not one that is all over the place. CCP used to be all over the place, now they aren't
So you'll support me if I rase an idea to get rid of lowsec and wormhole space and focus on just safety in highsec and just ownership in null? That way everything is nice and focused.

Jenn aSide wrote:
Skins and asteroids as a sideline don't hurt and is skins make some extra cash, so be it.
I don;t believe having extra asteroid particles really brought in much income. It probably just caused a few more people to drop their graphics settings a bit.

Jenn aSide wrote:
Doing Valkyrie doesn't hurt either, it's "Ribs" to EVE's steak (WiS isn't Ribs, it's Tofu, and you can shove that non-meat soy bean crap up your Elite Spaceships exhaust hole). But We've seen what happens when CCP overextends itself.
Whatever you want to pretend it is, the effect is the same. Bringing in rib eaters or tofu eaters alongside steak eaters brings in more total people. Hell, some of the tofu eaters might even bring along new steak eaters.

Much like skins, I have no problem with CCP adding things that don't directly impact me but aid them in making more income so that the game can continue to improve. At some point down the line they will have to embrace the next generation of gamers or they will cease to exist.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#1049 - 2015-07-30 18:15:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Lucas Kell wrote:
Which would be fine if that's wh you did. Buy you don't. You attack people, not their arguments


You're supposedly a grown man, you ARE your arguments. Your arguments are wrong, and they come from your core beliefs...which are also wrong btw.

Quote:
you talk down to them and you act like what they say is objectively wrong because it doesn't match your opinion. You then proceed down your "THIS IS MY EVE GET OUT" route when that doesn't work. Your aim is to get them to simply give up. What annoys you is that it doesn't work on me because what some random thinks about me personally on the internet is irrelevant.


If you dind't care, you wouldn't have mentioned it. I've said this before and i won't belabor the point beyond saying this: you won't ever be able to admit it, but you know my criticism of you is correct, and you've signaled that with your own posts.

Things aren't right or wrong because of what i want, they are right or wrong because they are right or wrong ie based on their own merits and history. The reason you can't see that is because you have a personal 'culture' of spinning things to match your core belief (instead of matching your core belief to the reality, no matter whether you agree with it or not). In other words, you're a natural politician, I just happen to despise most politicians.

Lastly, I don't care whether you get out or not...though to use your term, it would be nice lol. But that isn't going to stop my general opposition to your type (in game, and in life in gneral), the type willing to see a good thing that works ruined because of an unrealistic and greedy belief in 'what could be'.


I'll leave off here, as I understand that this isn't a difference of opinion but a difference of nature. Your nature is wrong Twisted
embrel
BamBam Inc.
#1050 - 2015-07-30 18:27:04 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
the type willing to see a good thing that works ruined because of an unrealistic and greedy belief in 'what could be'.


sounds quite conservative.

why develop jets when we have propellers that work perfectly fine?
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#1051 - 2015-07-30 18:30:00 UTC
embrel wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
the type willing to see a good thing that works ruined because of an unrealistic and greedy belief in 'what could be'.


sounds quite conservative.

why develop jets when we have propellers that work perfectly fine?


Why develop the jets when your spaceship already has warp engines?

And to keep it WiS related, why develop LEGS when you have warp engines? If you want to walk around, why not go outside lol?
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#1052 - 2015-07-30 18:48:55 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
You're supposedly a grown man, you ARE your arguments. Your arguments are wrong, and they come from your core beliefs...which are also wrong btw.
Lol, my arguments are right to me, you just disagree with them. That doesn't make them wrong. And that's not where I mean you attack the person, I mean when you start on directly insulting people which on most occasions you do.

Jenn aSide wrote:
If you dind't care, you wouldn't have mentioned it.
Classic. I mentioned it in an attempt to get you back on topic, but it seems you've decided against that.


Jenn aSide wrote:
Things aren't right or wrong because of what i want, they are right or wrong because they are right or wrong ie based on their own merits and history. The reason you can't see that is because you have a personal 'culture' of spinning things to match your core belief (instead of matching your core belief to the reality, no matter whether you agree with it or not). In other words, you're a natural politician, I just happen to despise most politicians.
Yes, they are right and wrong based on their merits. Wrong is having an entire development team focussed on one feature for a long period of time. CCP learned that and now run shorter development cycles. You're extrapolating that to mean "Wrong is WiS" which it isn't. The existence and length of this thread and countless others on the subject shows that there's a real desire to see WiS continue. The fact that CCP haven't dropped the CQ out is a clear sign they aren't dropping the tech from the engine.

Jenn aSide wrote:
Lastly, I don't care whether you get out or not...though to use your term, it would be nice lol. But that isn't going to stop my general opposition to your type (in game, and in life in gneral), the type willing to see a good thing that works ruined because of an unrealistic and greedy belief in 'what could be'.
You don't even know what my type is. You know literally nothing about me. You've got your own ideas based on what you've made up thinking you are reading between the lines. You've stated before that you consider me a SJW for example, yet if you were to suggest that to anyone that actually knows me they'd laugh in your face. I don't have a general opposition to "people like you", I take each situation as it comes and I don't presume to know what people are like based on limited views from their forum posts.

And I don;t want a good thing ruined. I just see no problem with one good thing being added to another good thing to attract a more varied playerbase. You would seemingly be happy to see EVE restricted to it's current dwindling playerbase until it ceases to exist.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Aralyn Cormallen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#1053 - 2015-07-30 18:54:49 UTC
Nana Skalski wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Nana Skalski wrote:
Quote:
My 'side' is winning, and has won the war,

That does not mean you are fighting on the right side.


Actually it does. War doesn't determine who is right, it determines who is leftTwisted

And who will be leaving too. Remember that.


However, you have to bear in mind that arguement cuts both ways. As much as your convinced that failing to move in this direction will kill EvE, others of us are convinced that it wont survive another attempt at something that very near killed it last time. You can't call Jenn out as "threatening the life of the game" when in his eyes thats exactly what you and Lucas are doing.
embrel
BamBam Inc.
#1054 - 2015-07-30 19:20:18 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
embrel wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
the type willing to see a good thing that works ruined because of an unrealistic and greedy belief in 'what could be'.


sounds quite conservative.

why develop jets when we have propellers that work perfectly fine?

If you want to walk around, why not go outside lol?


because the door is closed, of course...
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#1055 - 2015-07-30 19:21:18 UTC
Aralyn Cormallen wrote:
Nana Skalski wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Nana Skalski wrote:
Quote:
My 'side' is winning, and has won the war,

That does not mean you are fighting on the right side.


Actually it does. War doesn't determine who is right, it determines who is leftTwisted

And who will be leaving too. Remember that.


However, you have to bear in mind that arguement cuts both ways. As much as your convinced that failing to move in this direction will kill EvE, others of us are convinced that it wont survive another attempt at something that very near killed it last time. You can't call Jenn out as "threatening the life of the game" when in his eyes thats exactly what you and Lucas are doing.


Well said as usual.

To believe as they do, you have to ignore history. I'm not trying to be mean to the wonderful people at CCP when I say that almost EVERYTHING they've done that isn't spaceships has failed or fizzled, I'm simply stating an observable fact. CCP has had 2 successes, the Danger Game and EVE. WoD was cancelled , DUST has been lack luster, Legion isn't even mentioned and many in-EVE projects that deviated from the Core of EVE (Incarna including EVA exploration, Atmospheric Flight, Planetary interaction, the EVE Dust link) failed or fizzled.

But somehow these people believe that the key to success in this case is to do more and more of what failed? This is why I mention the word greed, because these people are so greedy for a certain entertainment experience that they cannot see the dangers inherent in what they are trying to manipulate CCP into reconsidering. CCP stopped doing this WiS stuff for good reasons.

It's irresponsible. If CCP does that and it's a big success against all odds, that's great , but unlikely. If it (a renewed push to tack on Avatar gameplay to this old game) fails and drags the company down, it's not Lucas Kell looking for another job. Side note, this is why in real life I tend to not suggest things about what other people should do, even if they ask, at least without the qualifier "This is why I would do, you ain't me though"
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#1056 - 2015-07-30 19:22:06 UTC
embrel wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
embrel wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
the type willing to see a good thing that works ruined because of an unrealistic and greedy belief in 'what could be'.


sounds quite conservative.

why develop jets when we have propellers that work perfectly fine?

If you want to walk around, why not go outside lol?


because the door is closed, of course...


If you are being held prisoner in real life, get off the computer and dial 911 or whatever you country calls it Big smile
Jenshae Chiroptera
#1057 - 2015-07-30 19:32:25 UTC
No need to be melodramatic.
CCP just needs some devs that are good at making interiors to work on the station. It doesn't have to be announced, there can be all the usual song and dance about the usual developments until one day, "Surprise! We made stuff!"

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#1058 - 2015-07-30 20:51:10 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
To believe as they do, you have to ignore history.
And to believe as you do you have to ignore the fact that CCP have changed their entire approach. With the new development processes there's no reason to assume that working towards WiS wouldn't be achievable, especially when you consider the only reason it didn't get off the ground last time was angry screaming overly entitled children.

I get it though. Other viewpoints aren't valid and what CCP should do is cater to just people like you, which they have done for years while their sub numbers continue to drop.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Borascus
#1059 - 2015-07-30 21:10:34 UTC
We're all here talking about what CCP hf. should do in relation to something they tabled as something they were doing.

It's their call, we're saying we want it.

Others are saying they own the direction CCP hf. wants to go, and any deviation will be the end, it wont be. If the content was possible with the steep climb to a VR game in Valkyrie, they'd work on two things at once.

We're still saying we want it, and others are still saying CCP wont.

CCP hf. should avoid the peaceful slumber and resting on laurels approach to dedication and divert some of their excess capital towards new features (drifter incursions are a new feature - one that was discussed openly amongst players and devs alike some time ago).

Hell, I'll probably let my subscription lapse resub and lapse again. When/If WiS is released a great number of people will rejoin to see what it's like. New players that are put off from EVE will also subscribe to see what it is like.

Telling us that it is not worth CCP hf attracting new players is like telling Starbucks to limit their number of customers per day, because coffee is special.

The more people CCP hf. can get into the game the more people there are to form coalitions, corps, fleets, sales on the ingame markets - Health!
Avvy
Doomheim
#1060 - 2015-07-30 21:16:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Avvy
I actually stood in the captains cabin on one occassion, then I went back to my ship.