EVE General Discussion

I call these people "Perpetual Malcontents". The kind of mental children who haven't figured out yet that change for it's own sake is historically guaranteed to be a bad thing.

This should sum much arguementing here, if I wanna play EvE I play EvE, if I feel like playing another kind of space game I go play Elite Dangerous...

And when I wanna play Football Manager or Civilization i play them. But won´t demand that EvE should have character transfer markets between corps, or that our weaponry should just keep on getting deadlier (read "more OP") as technology advances...

And then there is this thing that is very hard to understand for me, why on earth here null/high sec residents and/or PvP/PvE people would be any way against other players playing styles? In a sandbox?

Wouldn´t it be rather more constructive to try each areas of game better, together? You know, with constructive criticism and ideas..

This does not alter how illogical and uncomprehending you are.

Oh I can answer that easily. It so happens that the majority of the kinds of ideas like the one Chunks was floating earlier come from one particular kind of player.

No, it is not always a good idea to have more players around, because quantity does not matter more than quality. One thousand players who whine, play isolationists and PvE only are less valueable than 50 smart players who do many things.

PvP+PvE players do far more things than PvE players do, which makes them more valueable to the game. They're smarter, they don't isolate gameplay and they create far more content for others than any pure PvE player ever could.

So, again, no, it's not a always a good idea to have more players around, especially if one does not differentiate between the idiots and the smart people.

I bet panic mongering goes both ways, judging from this thread some people feel EvE has not have (radical) changes enough yet.

And well "EvE is dying" is same as all those previous end of the world predictions, that (predicting incoming doom) for some reason seem to appeal to some people.

Maybe because they really are worried about losing the game they so much love. Maybe because they just like to troll and feed other people fears, or get kicks about seeing something falling apart, maybe because they really would like to see game fail in amount that would give them enough of an excuse to stop playing... I bet reasons are many.

But one thing is sure, EvE will not "die" no matter what numbers, until CCP says so, and last employee Hilmar ( or who ever then?) pulls the plug from CCP´s new office in his apartment.
Subscription based games with very loyal fanbase ("niche" founding from EvE exactly what they were looking for) are good that way.

In other words, EVE won't die till the last person willing to pay for it dies. Life expectancy in my country is 78.74 years and I just turned 41 last month. So mathematically speaking EVE Online only has 37.7 more years of life left.

PANIC! the year 2053 will be here before you know it!!!!!

2053, isn't that when Greece has to pay back their debt now? Coincidence? I think not.

I wish you all the best of luck, to have a blast with Fozziesov and roll in by the thousands for years to come...

...so the developers eventually focus on High Sec, dammit!

And a safer part of nulsec you couldn't ask for. (all nestled up surrounded by your allies and defenders must give you a nice warm fuzzy feeling)

> Preparing for fozziesov if you don't belong to a blue donut - Move all major assets to lowsec.

>Preparing for Fozziesov when you know you have nothing to fear from it - Carry on as usual.

Malcanis, I wonder if you and your alliance would be so casual about the changes if you didn't have half of nulsec set to blue.
Sure most of your allies couldn't hold sov without all the allies to do it for them - Where does "everything that matters is blue or paid off" leave your little band?



I often wonder when the few decent alliances in the CFC will wake up and leave the bads to it, then and only then will we have a nulsec worth fighting for.

-- - -- - -- - -- - --
The Imperium reminds me of the group on a beach who spread their towels out in a huge area so no-one else can get near the best spot to sit. They are just selfish, entitled nobodies who "think" they are better than everyone else - In reality, they only control "their" part of the beach by intimidation and threat. As individuals they are of little to no consequence and need the group to maintain control.

Would seem by definition, The leader of the Imperium, has his subjects just where he needs them to be - Subjugated.

By historical definition, most members of the Imperium are little more than slaves to a self serving master. (and many boast about it )

-- - -- - -- - -- - --
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode - Don't know what you removed but if you'd read this thread - Nothing is really off topic.
Out of context, associated, sort of relevant, even "just quit" have all found a place in the thread..
So if you felt it needed to be removed it must have been pretty out there