EVE Information Portal

Yeah every small group wants to invite the wrath of the CFC by stepping into the blue donut of protection.
(don't care what you call your selves now - You will always be CFC)

There are currently 58 alliances with 5 or fewer systems owned, seems there is room for "little guy".
There are 25 alliances that own sov with fewer than 200 members, which is smaller than your alliance.
What is holding you back?
Is there something particularly special about us, that you will only throw your hat in the ring if you can have the space we own and not any other?

Does this mean Provi won't be the most poor kid anymore???

And just think - more people per system - means we might not run as much when reds show up...

absolutely not, under the wise leadership of Maximilian Singularity Providence will enter a new age of prosperity

you won't be around to benefit from it of course, but such is the price of the march of progresss

As though a new sink would be needed with a 20-30% playerdrop?

No.

A certain type of space will never be your trophy grounds while at the same time, you are having almost perfect control of where and how your home wormhole is connected to, therefore, ensuring perfect safety for your PvE activities.

All you are proposing is to make null farming grounds whenever you feel like going and ganking ratters.

Nullsec does not exist to gratify your effortless lolpwnmobile playstyle. You will not get to choose where your hole connects to by ragerolling it continuously until you get a connect to the certain null constellation you wish to trophy in.

If you are in need of such easy gratification, why don't you go and cancel the non-invasion treaties between your wormhole alliance and other large wormhole alliances? (w-space blue donut)

Raising the property value of large parts of null - good!

WH changes - terrible. Awful. Seriously, if anything, it should be changed the other way, and null-null connections should be even more common. If you want to reward stewardship of space, and people actually 'living" in their constellations, then you should encourage people to find and deal with problematic WHs in their backyard, instead of just removing them. With how spread and thin people are becoming on the map, you want to give as many ways to force interaction as possible, not remove them. The Phoebe capital changes have made it incredibly hard to counter or punish capital usage on a local level, with good WH connections being one of the only ways to actually weave a more complex local conflict. It's actually engaging that people have to look and even possibly fight for WHs before a major fight, because that is literally the only way help for either side will arrive. It was bad before with the entire server showing up, but you don't want the opposite effect where conflict is so localized and one dimensional that fewer people choose to even fight. You absolutely need WHs if you are to fight locally against an entity that has more capitals than you. This threatens even more post-phoebe stasis.

It's still a terrible idea to live in null. Even if you raise the bar of the bad true-sec systems, you still haven't addressed that higher, less hassle income than the best true-sec systems is available elsewhere, namely FW space or HS. Why would I ever want to deal with a 2 hour commitment everyday defending against entosis for less isk/hr opportunities than I could find elsewhere? A single character carrier ratting is only turning about 100m/hr before escalations, which as others have mentioned, has killed the exploration profession due to how saturated deadspace loot is at the moment.

Let's try expressing this another way. Currently....

WH>FW/HS Incursions > Null.

It needs to be...

WH> Null > FW > HS Incursions/L4 blitz.

The way it was worded, it seems to imply all WHs in null will be affected. At any rate, I finally have the tools to daytrip into C5s now, and this happens out of nowhere for no discernible reason?

nerf diplomacy

We are making the antidote for finger pointing