These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Shrinking Sandbox - Eve by numbers

First post First post First post
Author
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#1841 - 2015-07-06 18:30:48 UTC  |  Edited by: La Rynx
simple rebalance changes just keep ppl playing.
but eve needs a lot of fresh blood and not some minor nerfs or buffs on some mechanics.

thats not thinking out of the box,thats thinking in a mosquito cigarette box...

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."

0bama Barack Hussein
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#1842 - 2015-07-06 19:14:16 UTC
La Rynx wrote:
simple rebalance changes just keep ppl playing.
but eve needs a lot of fresh blood and not some minor nerfs or buffs on some mechanics.

thats not thinking out of the box,thats thinking in a mosquito cigarette box...


I have done some (collateral) advertising on Elite Dangerous + Star Citizen forums about EvE... (once they have bought the game, it really does not hurt those games even if people go play EvE).

I bet some have/will have catch(ed) the bait, and some of those will stay in a hook even, for a long time.

EvE were pretty often mentioned at forums, and so well known at ED forums during alpha/beta testing..

Where do you think that spike at last December in new EvE players came from?
From "offline-gate" after FD announced ED wont have (yet) offline version (I wont even go into jokes or irony here)...
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#1843 - 2015-07-06 19:27:35 UTC  |  Edited by: La Rynx
mentioning eve in ed forums leads to spikes in new players?
seems very far fetched for me.

sc and ed show, that game studios neglected spacegames for other, more money promising games. eve has proven, that there is a market and ppl where playing it, despite some shortcomings eve has.

eve could have been a stronger player, if not that much money would have been destroyed with dust and this ***** vampire game.

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."

0bama Barack Hussein
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#1844 - 2015-07-06 19:35:11 UTC
La Rynx wrote:
mentioning eve in ed forums leads to spikes in new players?
seems very far fetched for me.

.



When you start to think about it...

People buy and play many different games, and when they find out about others, through game or forums, many wanna test it.

I bet same goes here, think Chris Roberts and David Braben should thank me now (don´t worry, non-subscription games are no danger to EvE, epecially as EvE is pretty unique kind of game)... Big smile
Market McSelling Alt
Doomheim
#1845 - 2015-07-06 20:15:00 UTC
La Rynx wrote:
simple rebalance changes just keep ppl playing.
but eve needs a lot of fresh blood and not some minor nerfs or buffs on some mechanics.

thats not thinking out of the box,thats thinking in a mosquito cigarette box...



I see what you are saying I guess.

I find it frustrating that most changes to the game are based on Nerfs and almost everything we have in game is based on Bonus.

Ships get bonuses to things, skills give bonuses to things, CCP patches in Nerfs.

It is a very rare thing to have a ship with a negative trait. I think CCP missed the boat in thinking too much about bonuses to stats instead of trade off stats.

I would love to see ships that have a natural immunity to webs but be very susecptable to ECM (-50% webifier effectiveness against this ship and +50% bonus to ECM used against). Something like that.

Now we have a very one dimensional way of thinking, Falcon is good at jamming, Curse is good at Neuting.. etc.

CCP Quant: Of all those who logon in Eve, 1.5% do Incursions, 13.8% PVP and 19.2% run Missions while 22.4% mine.

40.7% Join a fleet. The idea that Eve is a PVP game is false, the social fabric is in Missions and Mining.

GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#1846 - 2015-07-07 00:18:51 UTC  |  Edited by: GankYou
http://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/3c0hi9/almost_absurdly_funny/ Smile

Re-posting this, because true! Other things unmentioned is that, in theory, Entosis mechanics should also work towards making conflict local, as the former periphery EHP buffer zones become free for all.

Genuine capital brawls in genuine ca-pi-tal systems, along with other strategically important areas, is the desired outcome here.
Jenshae Chiroptera
#1847 - 2015-07-07 02:46:45 UTC
Phoenix Slayton wrote:
... that really set Eve apart from other games, is its community...
Anarchy Online had / has the best MMO community that I have come across.
WoW, Last Chaos, DDO, Neverwinter, Star Trek, Ultima, Champions, Ryzom, (Wurm comes a close second) and obviously EVE.

That didn't / isn't saving it but has prolonged its demise.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#1848 - 2015-07-07 04:47:43 UTC
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Phoenix Slayton wrote:
... that really set Eve apart from other games, is its community...
Anarchy Online had / has the best MMO community that I have come across.
WoW, Last Chaos, DDO, Neverwinter, Star Trek, Ultima, Champions, Ryzom, (Wurm comes a close second) and obviously EVE.

That didn't / isn't saving it but has prolonged its demise.

Right!

Good point!
Lets take battlefield as a example:
there are guys who like it that much, that they talk in forums about the game, but i was surprised, how many did NOT read the forums. Similiar in EvE. in my new alliance ppl do not post much in forums. a little in corps and alliance boards and almost not here.

in eve lots of questions are repeated again and again in the newbie chats. that shows, that gamers do expect answers, without hopping into forums.

an eve problem:
frigatism
almost everything can be done with a frigate. sorry thats the most stupid thing ever.
frigates can poop out bubbles, ecm and more.

bad idea. a thing could have been, that only bigger ships can drop bubbles since they use a lot of energy. bumping in a non newtonian environment? eve the space ocean, where you need constant engines running to move, but a bump that throws you out ignoring any logical behavior, since bumping behaves more newtonian than the regular propulsion? and the list does not end here.

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."

Dark Reignz
Four-Q
#1849 - 2015-07-07 07:06:12 UTC
Just a random post to tag on the end of the thread.

From the perspective of a player who started at the end of 2005 who drifted in and out of the game until recent years when I barely came back at all.

Why ? Quite a number of reasons.

Firstly, Nerfing and rebalancing killed the game for me, many of old eve friends said the same things when they started to lose interest. I'd come back to the game and be like "yea guys so we have a new update, whats new ?" and my friends were like "ya new expansion.. Nerf hammer strikes again and bullshit rebalancing"

Anyways

Back in the day when you could for example, fly a Raven out in dangerous areas, bump into pirates and tank 2 frigs, a couple of cruisers and Mach BS for 10 mins and only just loose the fight.

The days when one lone frig or cruiser could not obliterate your battleship.

The days when a battleship could wtfpwn anything smaller that had no support.

The days when torps and missiles had incredable range.

The days when you could destroy a mission npc battleship at a 150km before they even got close.

The days when hisec exploration was exiting and you didnt have to spend a lifetime looking for good sites to run or watch as some prick warps in a steals the bounty.

The days when null sec wasnt totally clusterfcked and you felt like you were exploring desolate and unforgiving territory.

The days when skill training didnt take the best part of a fckin year. (yea we were all new once :))

The days when drones were a very optional addition to loadouts and not totally necessary.

Not just this but think of how many people including new players have tried to bond and form nice corporations only for some twisted nuts or spys to join and fckin ruin the party, stupid greif wardecks. This one kills the game for many potential long term players and noobs imo.

There are so many reason why long term and noobie retensions is fcked in eve but another important one for a drop in active player numbers is the declining trend for needing to be "tied into" the game with subscriptions and the rise of FREE2PLAY.
Seriously, you still, after all these years cannot even post on the forums unless you are subscribed! which is just crazy as many people drift in and out, being able to interact with the community on forums would keep people more interested in the game and subbing rather than drifting further and further away.

And last but not least.. the size of new eden. Will we ever see the size of the universe increased ? not just for null /lowsec but also highsec or do we have to wait until the game is dead before the EVe universe feels big, open and less clusterfcked ? Clusterfcked also goes for high low and null....


Just a thought.

PS. I had to pay £9.99 to post this... totally absurd for 2015 gaming

Troll Mode - ON

Sgt Ocker
What Corp is it
#1850 - 2015-07-07 08:21:01 UTC
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:
You know ****'s gettingg real when the "politically correct" minority of people can't accept that they are and always have been a minority, but a few people in charge caved in to the whining and bullshit arguments, forcing everyone around to suffer for the weaknesses of the few, hateful people.

Reallife really spills into the game too mich sometimes.

Not sure what you class as "politically correct" but if it is those who whine about things like skynet being OP and breaking the game, knowing CCP can't balance perceived problems without swinging the nerf bat.

Or is it the minority who complained bitterly about rapid light missiles destroying game play for every frigate pilot, again knowing CCP can't actually "balance" missiles without removing a large part of their functionality.

Or is it the minority who own highend hardware that have new icons designed specifically for them that will/can never be as user friendly on hardware with lower specs.

Maybe it is the minority group who believe complete annihilation of your target is the only direction Eve should focus on.

What about the minority group (very large one right now) who only log in to the game in response to batfones or pings. The same group Fozziesov is supposed change change the game so much for, they need to actively play.

Or are the "politically correct" minority, those who post on the forums about how bad everyone else who has an opinion is.

People who live in glass houses..............

My opinions are mine.

  If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - - Just don't bother Hating - I don't care

It really is getting harder and harder to justify $23 a month for each sub.

Angelica Dreamstar
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1851 - 2015-07-07 08:24:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Angelica Dreamstar
Good morning folks! I responded to a post on the first page. Roll

Coffeetime! Lol

bingo, his pig not being a goat doesn't make the pig wrong, just him an idiot for shouting at his pig "WHY ARENT YOU A GOAT!" (Source)

-- Ralph King-Griffin, about deranged people playing EVE ONLINE

Angelica Dreamstar
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1852 - 2015-07-07 08:49:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Angelica Dreamstar
Sgt Ocker wrote:
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:
You know ****'s gettingg real when the "politically correct" minority of people can't accept that they are and always have been a minority, but a few people in charge caved in to the whining and bullshit arguments, forcing everyone around to suffer for the weaknesses of the few, hateful people.

Reallife really spills into the game too mich sometimes.

Not sure what you class as "politically correct" but if it is those who whine about things like skynet being OP and breaking the game, knowing CCP can't balance perceived problems without swinging the nerf bat.

Or is it the minority who complained bitterly about rapid light missiles destroying game play for every frigate pilot, again knowing CCP can't actually "balance" missiles without removing a large part of their functionality.

Or is it the minority who own highend hardware that have new icons designed specifically for them that will/can never be as user friendly on hardware with lower specs.

Maybe it is the minority group who believe complete annihilation of your target is the only direction Eve should focus on.

What about the minority group (very large one right now) who only log in to the game in response to batfones or pings. The same group Fozziesov is supposed change change the game so much for, they need to actively play.

Or are the "politically correct" minority, those who post on the forums about how bad everyone else who has an opinion is.

People who live in glass houses..............

You don't know what "politically correct" means. Please look up the official meaning. It's hard talking to people who can't even look up the meaning of some words.

Teenager. Lol

bingo, his pig not being a goat doesn't make the pig wrong, just him an idiot for shouting at his pig "WHY ARENT YOU A GOAT!" (Source)

-- Ralph King-Griffin, about deranged people playing EVE ONLINE

Angelica Dreamstar
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1853 - 2015-07-07 08:58:07 UTC
Quote:
PS. I had to pay £9.99 to post this... totally absurd for 2015 gaming

And you don't feel dumb for doing so? Lol

bingo, his pig not being a goat doesn't make the pig wrong, just him an idiot for shouting at his pig "WHY ARENT YOU A GOAT!" (Source)

-- Ralph King-Griffin, about deranged people playing EVE ONLINE

GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#1854 - 2015-07-07 09:54:49 UTC
The subscription topic for EVE is an interesting one - Will it survive, will it adjust in the future?

Expansions have always been free, and that is the undeniable: Ever since the Second Genesis, which is when I started playing. Now, how much of the sub model is "supported" by the need to Skill up in real time in order to "progress" in EVE - is the real question. Blink

IIRC, on a few occasions, I used to have an active acc for a half a year or more just to get Skills going, which wasn't used for any other purpose in-game except this.
Crystal Jade
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1855 - 2015-07-07 10:47:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Crystal Jade
.
0bama Barack Hussein
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#1856 - 2015-07-07 19:23:37 UTC  |  Edited by: 0bama Barack Hussein
Dark Reignz wrote:


PS. I had to pay £9.99 to post this... totally absurd for 2015 gaming


So you subscribed just to write on a thread?

Here you see! EvE still gains enough revenue to run (from everywhere)!!! Big smile

And really, CCP worked as a small company at early years, and judging from old blabberings of some drunken old crazy vets, those were best years ever.
Dark Reignz
Four-Q
#1857 - 2015-07-07 20:07:49 UTC
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:
Quote:
PS. I had to pay £9.99 to post this... totally absurd for 2015 gaming

And you don't feel dumb for doing so? Lol


Well no, because i'll probably re-download the game and activate another 6yr training skill while I play other games...
No but really, trolling aside you missed one of my points. This is 2015 and restricting the forum to subscribers is bad EVE period. I can't recall off the top off my head another gaming forum that requires an active sub to post and interact.

Barrack of course the game generates enough revenue currently, but its in decline with the lowest average active accounts since 2008. In the last few years the game has taken huge step backwards and that is something which needs to watched and addressed.

You feel me ?

Troll Mode - ON

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#1858 - 2015-07-07 21:27:53 UTC
Oh hey, Ockles, did you read this?

CCP Rise wrote:

Single system Alliance Capitals

The one exception to the 7 day waiting period for Capital systems is that anytime an Alliance only has Sovereignty over one star system (as determined by TCUs) that one system will automatically become the Alliance capital. This means that Alliances taking their first system will not need to wait a week to gain the benefits of the Capital system defensive bonuses. It also ensures that when an Alliance is pushed to a final stand in its last system, that system will always gain the capital defensive benefits.

Any other changes to Capital systems will always require 7 days in order to take effect. This includes cases where an Alliance that controls multiple systems has lost its previous capital and is setting a new one.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Angelica Dreamstar
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1859 - 2015-07-07 21:47:15 UTC
Dark Reignz wrote:
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:
Quote:
PS. I had to pay £9.99 to post this... totally absurd for 2015 gaming

And you don't feel dumb for doing so? Lol


Well no, because i'll probably re-download the game and activate another 6yr training skill while I play other games...
No but really, trolling aside you missed one of my points. This is 2015 and restricting the forum to subscribers is bad EVE period.
Many open forums of free2play games prove you wrong. Besides, the barrier is there intentionally. It keeps out the scum, the target audience for all those companies who just want to rip the money out of their customers.

Sadly it seems there had been an influx of these people and now we need to get rid of them again. Turning EVE into a shallow "I want fun, fast" experience will not work, because the citizens of new eden won't just let themselves be replaced by people who easily get their asses kicked out again anyway. Like BRAVE, for example.


The point is that CCP is smart enough to keep out the masses who would literally kill the game with their stupidity.

bingo, his pig not being a goat doesn't make the pig wrong, just him an idiot for shouting at his pig "WHY ARENT YOU A GOAT!" (Source)

-- Ralph King-Griffin, about deranged people playing EVE ONLINE

Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
#1860 - 2015-07-07 22:25:20 UTC
Dirk MacGirk makes some interesting points about Trollsov:

https://www.themittani.com/features/7-days-and-counting-stop-clock

Priceless bit:

Quote:
(...)

Attackers may be at a relative disadvantage in terms of the on-field mechanics, specifically as it relates to entosis timers. However, they have the absolute advantage when it comes to flexibility in how and when they play the game. Today? Sure. Tomorrow? Sure. The next day? Nah, it’s a work day, but just let them think we’re coming again. Keep them busy chasing shadows. Nullsec residents have one choice during their vulnerability windows: always be ready to scramble the alert fighters or be prepared to go to whack-a-mole across the constellation. Every single day, be prepared. Yeah, being a resident defender sounds great compared to the flexibility given to attackers. I sure hope you’re with a big, active alliance.

(...)


Sounds like fun, yes.

Roses are red / Violets are blue / I am an Alpha / And so it's you