These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Shrinking Sandbox - Eve by numbers

First post First post First post
Author
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#1741 - 2015-06-30 13:02:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Malcanis
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Sgt Ocker wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Look, just log in and play the damb game. Ocker, if you don't think the new sov system will be fun for you, then you can do stuff in hi-ec, lo-sec, FW zones, W-space or even Thera.

I do login, every day and do, what some might call "play the game".

That doesn't change the fact devs are releasing a biased unbalanced sov system, it also doesn't change the fact I don't like it, I like the sov game but dislike griefing.


It also doesn't change the fact that you are powerless to stop it. In fact, complaining about it too much has the opposite effect of what you intend. Developers are human and humans tend to double down when repeatedly told they are stupid for doing something.

You're wasting your time. The only thing you will gain from this 'forum effort' is access to an "I told you so" card in a few years if (when) Fozziesov doesn't work. I don't care for the concept either (it seems wrong for sov null, the kinds of people who do low sec/FW pvp ("warrior types) aren't the same kinds of people who live in Sov null (soldier types) and fozzie sov resembles FW to me, and did on duality). in fact I think it may end up being worse than our Dominion experience, but I've had my say and gained my "I told you so" card for later already.

Quote:

If everyone just sits back and lets bad change happen, it does and we the players get stuck with crappy game play for another 5 or 6 years.


If you pay to be bored for 5-6 years the problem isn't the game....


Heck, I already got my dig in, it's on the front page of this thread. I have little else to weigh in on for Fozzie sov, they will go on with their plan regardless of my input, and that's really the end of it. Now I just sit back with a bucket of popcorn. There really is no need for a threadnaught.



If it turns out to be good fun after all, PM me and I'll vouch. We can always use another US TZ small gang experienced player, more so than ever in a couple of weeks.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Shiloh Templeton
Cheyenne HET Co
#1742 - 2015-06-30 14:51:47 UTC
Sgt Ocker wrote:
Fozziesov is going to suit some groups perfectly but at the expense of anyone who doesn't "fit in" to the griefing play style.
As bad a Dominion is, it discouraged griefing because it was just too time consuming to grief someones sov if you didn't have plans for it - Fozziesov is the exact opposite - Griefing others sov is more valid than holding it.
CCP has stated their design goals for Fozziesov and I don't think it includes making griefing king. If the initial implementation turns out that way they've said they'll have lots of levers they can use to tune Fozziesov towards their design goals. Hopefully, that's the way it plays out -- without too much hemorrhaging in the meanwhile.
xxxTRUSTxxx
Galactic Rangers
#1743 - 2015-06-30 18:48:09 UTC  |  Edited by: xxxTRUSTxxx
Sgt Ocker wrote:
xxxTRUSTxxx wrote:
Sgt Ocker wrote:

But they too aren't wrong - Everything dies eventually, it may take a year it may take 10 but it will happen.


so bottom line is people will come, people will go, same shite different day.

if this thread was indeed about the fozzie sov changes then why not call it something like sov and you and how you feel?
No?
i guess that title just doesn't grab peoples attention like an EVE is dead or dieing thread.
or perhaps CCP took your toys away,, what ya gonna do about it?
No?
yea i guess what ya went with was better suited to your agenda.



It was never meant to be solely about Fozzie's attempt at doing something valid for nulsec dwellers.
The thread is essentially about the ability of players to play whatever game style they prefer (sandbox). For me (and many others) the ability of using capital ships I spent years training for and buying, has all but been removed from the game. I don't want to belong to some mega group, so using my capitals is far less an option than before.

There are many examples of play styles being eroded or removed by changes being introduced due to perceived problems that have far wider reaching affects and some of them just don't address the problem so much as appear to have done something.

You have presumably (by the amount of posts) read a good deal of the thread and once again only picked a certain line of a post to respond to.



And yeah I suppose "they took my toys away" is part of it for me but then again, there are a lot of others feel the same way so it could be a valid topic.
What I did about it, was stopped subbing all the accounts I no longer need. My unsubbed cyno accounts don't add up to much on their own - but how many others have also let subs die on accounts they no longer need?




Do you really believe fozzie alone is responsible for the changes coming? Isn’t that just a tad leaning towards it's all his fault? Do you really believe these changes are not being driven by a team effort on behalf of CCP?
I'd be careful with them assumptions, it wouldn't be the first time a dev drew the short straw and took the flak for something he's a part of but not in control of.
Players are playing how they want. They’ve adapted to said changes over the years and got on with it. There was a time when there was no capitals. You’re just not willing to entertain the possibility that CCP has a good idea what they are doing and has plans for said capitals.
You’d just rather sing out doom and gloom and claim capitals are not being used any more.
I can’t believe you just said there has been many changes that have eroded or removed play styles, no it hasn’t, people adapted, used another ship or fit and changed tactics. Something you just refuse to do because you believe you’ve a right to keep the game as you see fit and not as CCP sees fit.
Then this joke, 1’ve presumably (by the amount of my posts) read a good deal of the thread and once again only picked a certain line of a post to respond to. What flavour of donkey shite is that?
I’ve read the entire thread and responded when I felt the need to, I’m not just responding to your comments, If I have something I want to say to you that’s directed only at you and not your opinion it wouldn’t have happened on here. You know this. So please, knock off that shite.
you’ve stopped subbing accounts because you no longer need them but refuse to believe others would dare use their alts for other purposes beyond a cyno alt.
Too negative man, I know not every change is going to be a good one, that’s just expecting way too much. You’ve a very negative attitude towards change and I can't help but wonder how you've lasted as long as you have without quitting a lot sooner. There has been nothing but change from day one, that's not about to stop ever!
You adapt or stagnate and die. It’s that simple. I’ve said this many times on here, the second I’m bored of it all I’m out of here (not happening anytime soon) It’s just a game and the people I play EVE with play many other games that I play with them also. I can’t even remember the amount of games we’ve all played over the years that are gone the way of the dodo... Love it while it lasts man and when the time comes bow out with grace.
xxxTRUSTxxx
Galactic Rangers
#1744 - 2015-06-30 19:12:44 UTC
Shiloh Templeton wrote:
Sgt Ocker wrote:
Fozziesov is going to suit some groups perfectly but at the expense of anyone who doesn't "fit in" to the griefing play style.
As bad a Dominion is, it discouraged griefing because it was just too time consuming to grief someones sov if you didn't have plans for it - Fozziesov is the exact opposite - Griefing others sov is more valid than holding it.
CCP has stated their design goals for Fozziesov and I don't think it includes making griefing king. If the initial implementation turns out that way they've said they'll have lots of levers they can use to tune Fozziesov towards their design goals. Hopefully, that's the way it plays out -- without too much hemorrhaging in the meanwhile.


it's a fine balance always isn't it,, no matter what the game is,, you just can't please all of the people all of the time.
all we can do is wait and see how things turn out when the changes hit. change is needed that's for sure.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#1745 - 2015-06-30 19:28:59 UTC
Are people still unironically claiming that "no one uses capitals"?

They are using them differently and they dont get to grief small groups on the other side of the map with them and be home again i 30 minutes any more, but they sure are still using them.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Cyborg Girl86
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#1746 - 2015-06-30 19:39:52 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Are people still unironically claiming that "no one uses capitals"?

They are using them differently and they dont get to grief small groups on the other side of the map with them and be home again i 30 minutes any more, but they sure are still using them.


^This, not to mention that not using capitals in a fleet that is capable of fielding them is the equivalent of a tank crew not bothering to use the main gun
Sgt Ocker
What Corp is it
#1747 - 2015-06-30 23:49:26 UTC
Malcanis - If it turns out to be good fun after all, PM me and I'll vouch. We can always use another US TZ small gang experienced player, more so than ever in a couple of weeks.

* Thanks; 1st off I'm an Aussie and only available in US TZ sometimes. 2nd, it would take me nearly a month just to move my assets out there, probably more as I don't have cynos sitting around anymore.
-- - -- - -- - -- - --
Shiloh Templeton - CCP has stated their design goals for Fozziesov and I don't think it includes making griefing king.

* Have you actually read the blogs? Did you get on Duality during the "testing"? Do you understand how the new mechanics work?

-- - -- - -- - -- - --
xxxTRUSTxxx - Do you really believe fozzie alone is responsible for the changes coming?

* Not at all, I couldn't give him anything like that much credit - But it is his name on it and the mechanics themselves do suit a niche play style, which does point in a certain direction as to how the proposal may have taken the direction it did.

- Do you really believe these changes are not being driven by a team effort on behalf of CCP?
* Of course they are and a good salesman can sell a bad product to others, if it is presented in the right way. Someone had the idea, sold it to others who then designed mechanics to suit, the individuals idea.

Coming changes to how fleets operate is another example - A change that is designed to enhance a specific style of fighting, makes the option to use anything other than those doctrines much harder.

Seeing changes put into the game that appear to favor player groups that have known affiliations with Devs - Maybe having players as designers has drawbacks when it comes to balance for the wider community.

-- - -- - -- - -- - --
xxxTRUSTxxx - it's a fine balance always isn't it

* It is and no you can't ever please everyone but you can try to find a balance that at least offers hope.

-- - -- - -- - -- - --
Malcanis - Are people still unironically claiming that "no one uses capitals"?

* Did you look at any of those lossmails?
Does losing a travel fit capital pass as "using" it?
Is the largest group in the game awoxing one of their own classed as "using" capitals?
Sure there are still capitals being lost every day but most are not lost in a fight, so much as being unlucky to get caught trying to move them. Few if any groups will form a 100 man fleet so a guy can move his nyx, 90% of the time your on your own and if you get spotted, your dead.

-- - -- - -- - -- - --
Cyborg Girl86 - ^This, not to mention that not using capitals in a fleet that is capable of fielding them is the equivalent of a tank crew not bothering to use the main gun.

* What makes a group "capable" of fielding capitals?
Group A has 20 carriers and dreads, they could use them quite effectively - Except group B has 20 supers and 50 carriers and dreads. Group B won't send 20 of their carriers and dreads to fight 20 others, they will send everything they have. Now if Group A is known to have a batfone to someone who has 50 supers and 100 dreads and carriers - Those groups won't use them because no-one wants to risk losing. The groups who are still using capitals effectively are the same large groups who always did so, just not from one side of TQ to the other in 30 mins.



My opinions are mine.

  If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - - Just don't bother Hating - I don't care

It really is getting harder and harder to justify $23 a month for each sub.

Izabella Li
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#1748 - 2015-07-01 00:27:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Izabella Li
The best thing would be for CCP to work on a new EVE.

The reasons number falls is because older players get commitments and leave and the ones coming through are not there because of the zero skills at beginning and the 2 yr wait to fly a nice t2 ship or anything nice and you have to ask as a new player, is this game really worth the investment of time, probably not in most cases.

No one can just pick this game up and get stuck in, it may eventually go the same way UO did.

It would be nice to reset EVE, everyone has SP reset and ISK reset, basically all existing pilots deleted, assets deleted, everything deleted.

And begin again, EVE2, don't change much, but enough to make it different, accessible and exiting for vets and new players


Or alow players to buy skill point, or let us grind them
Taniel Rah
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1749 - 2015-07-01 00:58:42 UTC
Izabella Li wrote:
The best thing would be for CCP to work on a new EVE.

The reasons number falls is because older players get commitments and leave and the ones coming through are not there because of the zero skills at beginning and the 2 yr wait to fly a nice t2 ship or anything nice and you have to ask as a new player, is this game really worth the investment of time, probably not in most cases.

No one can just pick this game up and get stuck in, it may eventually go the same way UO did.

It would be nice to reset EVE, everyone has SP reset and ISK reset, basically all existing pilots deleted, assets deleted, everything deleted.

And begin again, EVE2, don't change much, but enough to make it different, accessible and exiting for vets and new players


Or alow players to buy skill point, or let us grind them




I dont think ccp needs to work on a new Eve there is a lot of time/code/dev effort sunk into the existing game. But it feels like the stuff they are working on is simply making the game less fun, or things are being nerfed.
When they announced the new sov it feels like my alliance/coalitions simply stopped doing stuff until this get rolled out. All of a it just make EVE really boring.


No SP reset would not be nice. Why not allow players to buy a PLEX worth of skill point you can allocate to what ever skill you need. I know this has some downsides that would need to be ironed out.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#1750 - 2015-07-01 01:30:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Izabella Li wrote:
The best thing would be for CCP to work on a new EVE.
Nope. Eve is fairly unique in the MMO world, its reputation has been hard earned and like WoW it is somewhat of an outlier in terms of longevity.

It's a niche game, the mainstream market for spaceship games is/will be covered by Elite Dangerous and Star Citizen if it ever materialises. A new Eve would require substantial time and fiscal investment, which is why it would more likely be aimed at the mainstream audience, and thus competing with ED and SC, than the niche it currently fills. CCP have done well from filling that niche, I mean no disrespect to CCP but I don't think that they would do so well in the mainstream marketplace.

Quote:
The reasons number falls is because older players get commitments and leave and the ones coming through are not there because of the zero skills at beginning and the 2 yr wait to fly a nice t2 ship or anything nice and you have to ask as a new player, is this game really worth the investment of time, probably not in most cases.
An awful lot of those older players are still playing Eve, despite their commitments; the new ones are often used to games where everything is handed to them on a plate. The 2 year thing is a nonsense, you can fly some pretty nice t2 stuff competently, with decent support skills, within 6 months if you specialise.

Many make the mistake that bigger is better when it comes to ships and rush into BCs etc, it's simply not true. Nice, and often very effective, stuff exists from frigates upwards, as does the T2 stuff.

Quote:
No one can just pick this game up and get stuck in, it may eventually go the same way UO did.
Why not? Many of us did just that. Eve is far easier to get into now than it used to be.

Quote:
It would be nice to reset EVE, everyone has SP reset and ISK reset, basically all existing pilots deleted, assets deleted, everything deleted.

And begin again, EVE2, don't change much, but enough to make it different, accessible and exiting for vets and new players
Nothing would change, null would be moved into and occupied on the first day by the same people who live there now, the only difference would be that the fights would involve frigates, destroyers and cruisers instead of battleships, triage carriers etc. There goes CCP's "(the isk equivalent of) $300,000 of internet spaceships destroyed in epic battle" headlines.

CCP can't reset the extensive player networks that exist in meatspace, nor can they reset the knowledge held by players.


Quote:
Or alow players to buy skill point, or let us grind them
Character Bazaar for your first point, WoW is that way Arrow for your second.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

0bama Barack Hussein
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#1751 - 2015-07-01 09:59:04 UTC
Yes Character Bazaar works for new players that wanna get skills fast, but unfortunately we don´t get to change char names too (eventhough character is forced to quit corporation, and there are also other measures to prevent "infiltration" of new player with old char)...

That name thing most likely turns down much of potential char purchasing (especially for new players).
Vishanka
White Ops
#1752 - 2015-07-01 11:29:59 UTC
Izabella Li wrote:
and the ones coming through are not there because of the zero skills at beginning and the 2 yr wait to fly a nice t2 ship or anything nice
My character is about 3 months old and I'm quite happy with the Skills I have. I like the character progression and watching her 'grow'. I'm happy about every 'skill training completed'-message. Wouldn't like to have the possibility to just 'buy' skillpoints.
Sometimes I think Vishanka is quicker at learning than me.
I've made the experience that even my young character can already be useful in this game, and that's what I love about EVE.
GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#1753 - 2015-07-01 11:44:15 UTC  |  Edited by: GankYou
Malcanis wrote:
Are people still unironically claiming that "no one uses capitals"?

They are using them differently and they dont get to grief small groups on the other side of the map with them and be home again i 30 minutes any more, but they sure are still using them.


These megaphone whambulances just have far too much invested in the Art of 3 Supers Accounts with 6 cyno alts, and they genuinely expected the Batphone to ring-ring-ring-ring-bananaphone till EVE's demise at their own hands, as the rest of New Eden was choked for their amusement alone.



If this 11-12% percent is deleveraged with the (probable) 2.5-3 accounts per real person, you'd get something like 4% of EVE's players being present in Nullsec right now. CCP has all the data in as perfect form & quality as it can be possibly gotten, and the "feedback" is "ignored" for a very good reason.

Null used to drive this game - now they have become irrelevant in the grand schemes of EVE, but they also are a mere effect, with the cause being the prime systems put in place & maintained by CCP.

The Ying & The Yang. Ready your female receptacles for July 14th. Blink
0bama Barack Hussein
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#1754 - 2015-07-01 14:05:33 UTC  |  Edited by: 0bama Barack Hussein
I´m pretty sure most of complaining is because of (practical) removal of whole one of available playing styles from EvE, with bigger ships in it (there are many of us who started to play EvE dreaming of the day we get to fly our own first "big ship"), rather than complaining about what they will lose (or what game will get in "balancing"), pretty sure they can do also other things than just fly big ships...
Azure Rayl
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#1755 - 2015-07-01 18:24:33 UTC
Dean Wong
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#1756 - 2015-07-01 20:18:00 UTC
Azure Rayl wrote:
http://n4g.com/news/1751076/eve-onlines-player-population-at-its-lowest-since-2008


Not conclusive enough. Anyone can type anything online these days without any solid evidence.

So what if EVE Online is dying. It is only a game and should be enjoyed as one, as long as it last. Afterall, if EVE online disappear from the face of the planet tommorrow, I will still live on.
Cancel Align NOW
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#1757 - 2015-07-01 20:33:45 UTC
Azure Rayl wrote:
http://n4g.com/news/1751076/eve-onlines-player-population-at-its-lowest-since-2008


That "article" has been incredibly well researched. Step 1. Read general discussion forum threads about eve dying. Step 2. Click link to eve offline. Step 3 interpret data. Step 4. Create click bait.
Cidanel Afuran
Grant Village
#1758 - 2015-07-01 20:57:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Cidanel Afuran
Azure Rayl wrote:
http://n4g.com/news/1751076/eve-onlines-player-population-at-its-lowest-since-2008


Honest question, is that players who simply logged in, or players who were actively playing the game?

If someone just logged in to change a skill queue and then sat in a station, or logged out immediately, those people shouldn't be included in the older numbers.
Dersen Lowery
The Scope
#1759 - 2015-07-01 21:07:54 UTC
Dean Wong wrote:
Azure Rayl wrote:
http://n4g.com/news/1751076/eve-onlines-player-population-at-its-lowest-since-2008


Not conclusive enough. Anyone can type anything online these days without any solid evidence.


That, and nobody has any idea how many players EVE has had at any given time, not even CCP. The title is completely wrong.

Logged-in accounts are down to 2008 levels, but that could mean a great number of things.

Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.

I voted in CSM X!

GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#1760 - 2015-07-01 22:24:46 UTC  |  Edited by: GankYou
0bama Barack Hussein wrote:
I´m pretty sure most of complaining is because of (practical) removal of whole one of available playing styles from EvE


Keep up with the glamourous and sensationalist Headlies. Smile

Dreads not needed for POSes then?
Carriers useless as support to any size groups?

Supers are cancer, no argument.

Regards,