These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Shrinking Sandbox - Eve by numbers

First post First post First post
Author
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
#1601 - 2015-06-25 20:12:50 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
(...)That'll be the majority that Ishtanchuk would have us believe solely resides in hisec and only does PvE. People of her ilk seem to conveniently forget that we're given 3 character slots and that most players have an alt that specialises outside of their normal playstyle, normally in hisec.


I thought you were a slow learner... no. You're just a bigot.

I already posted CCP's data on what individuals do with all their accounts and all their characters.

Here is the truth.

You can try and spin as you please; but the hard cold fact is that 62% of the individuals paying a EVE subscription barely do PvP.

Quote:
These are the same people who are also conveniently ignoring that:

  • PCU is not subs
  • It's June, one of the months that falls into the season of summer in the northern hemisphere, a traditionally quiet time in Eve
  • The ban on input broadcasting has had an effect on the amount of multiboxers, further depleting the PCU numbers
  • Services for PLEX are starting to alter the number of accounts people hold, unless you absolutely need to have the ability to run multiple characters simultaneously, or train more than 3 characters, there is no longer a need to hold multiple accounts for the purposes of training multiple characters.


PCU haves a strong correlation to subs and a even stronger correlation to "content"
Yes, it's June. And exactly 2015's June is the worst June since 2008. Also you ignore that June is not the worst month for PCU.
Input broadcasting is barely a thing in real EVE. Multiboxers who took a break in January were back by February. Just now they either don't ISBox, or haven't been caught...

The fun part with "skilqueueing and PCU" is that, as skillqueueing is a fast activity (how long may take? 5,10 minutes?) the amount of character logged in to skillqueue in a given snapshot are few... either they all would be visibly gone by the next snapshot once they logged out. So either EVE is Skillqueue Online and all those 5 minute logins make a big impact in game PCU across all snapshots, or their impact is neglectable and so most PCU comes from people actually playing... be them 55,000 or 35,000.

Roses are red / Violets are blue / I am an Alpha / And so it's you

Dersen Lowery
The Scope
#1602 - 2015-06-25 20:44:27 UTC
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
Input broadcasting is barely a thing in real EVE.


Someone's already posted that graph where multiboxing accounts plunged after the policy change, right?

CCP posted that right up on screen at FanFest. They were happy about a graph showing a precipitous decline in the number of accounts in their own game. Think about why that could be. Then consider the fleet warp change.

To pick just one consequence off the top of my head, the strong discouraging of large multiboxed mining fleets is a straight buff to general mining income at the expense of the income of a handful of players. There will be more incentive for more people to mine, which means more people out living in their space, which is an explicit goal of CCP's current set of changes. Whether that actually happens is anyone's guess, but the reasoning is clear.

I don't buy the inductive reasoning that because the PCU is drooping it can only go down. There are a lot of variables in play right now, and that in itself will depress the PCU somewhat. However, it means that we can't get a clear sense of how the game is doing until things settle down. (Consider what happens if CCP finds a fun use for caps and supercaps in the new normal.)

Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.

I voted in CSM X!

Marech Bhayanaka
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#1603 - 2015-06-25 20:46:43 UTC
Libby Tazinas wrote:
Facts are the subscriptions and player numbers are down, you can clearly see this on all available graphs out, but CCP doesn't care because they have been generating more income from selling plex and other areas outside of subscriptions[...]


Plex are not revenue on top of subscriptions. They are revenue FOR subscriptions. Remember every Plex some day becomes a month of subscription.

Marech.
Marsha Mallow
#1604 - 2015-06-25 21:04:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Marsha Mallow
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Is this majority you speak of possibly based upon your alliance of Low Sec dwellers who roam into Null Sec occasionally and think that it would be hilarious to troll structures with magic wands, by any chance? Blink

Er, no? I was in null before moving Marsha to lowsec, and I don't speak for this alliance. It is possible to have alts in multiple areas ingame and it's also possible to talk to people outside your corp/alliance. I doubt lowsec pirate alliances will come 'troll structures with magic wands' but they'll probably come and shoot you in the face. Again. Actually I'm struggling to work out who this horde of structure trolls will be and how long they'll keep it up for before getting bored, because it sounds laughably dull. Pizza? CODE?? UAE???

Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Marsha Mallow wrote:
Sorry but Provibloc are not 'hardened nullsec veterans' and if they are going to implode because someone might trollceptor their space, they should pack up and run away now. There are plenty of scrub newbro alliances who can occupy that space.
Roughly a decade of the same space being held by the same people disagrees with you.

Apart from that time they lost it and had it given back because no one wanted it. 10 years of holding the same space is a sign of a problem to some of us, not something to celebrate. To be fair the region has historically been crap, and last time it was 'accidentalied' it was handed back probably because Provibloc themselves aren't particularly disliked. The rest of the terribad nullsec alliances who became entrenched during Dominion sov and whose only defensive requirement is to fellate their overlords and click a paplink deserve to be set on fire. Some of them might even enjoy it. You don't seem to be doing that badly vs NCdot at the moment, maybe you should stop posting and go join a fleet or something?

Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
SOV was given to two alliances this year.

This summarises the problem nicely. Sov is supposed to be fought over, not gifted by bads to bads who are outraged at the prospect of being expected to defend it. Learn to fight or die gloriously. Either will do.

Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
I am not giving examples from players who have been in Null Sec for a few weeks and think the change will be too sudden after they are just getting used to what we currently have. I am giving examples of what people are saying who have lived in Null Sec for multiple years, some of them going over a decade.

I don't personally know any long term Proviblock vets, but you're presenting them as a bunch of entitled crybabbies who should probably pull back to somewhere less challenging if they can't handle Fozziesov. Squatting on sov for lengthy periods does not make people nullsec veterans btw. Fighting sovwars does.

Ripard Teg > For the morons in the room:

Sweets > U can dd my face any day

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#1605 - 2015-06-25 21:20:04 UTC
Bottom line is that the game is trying make 2015 income with 2009 resources. A GTC worth $34.95 in 2009 is worth $38.74 now, and way less are being purchased.

I had already consolidated accounts before they banned ISB. But they nerfed the **** out of my mineral income, so my industry toon is now useless. That also makes my exploration toon worthless. That was also my PvP toon, who now has way less targets. I have to play the game many more hours a month to buy a PLEX than I did before and its just not worth it. It IS like a job again, thanks to no actions of my own.

Yeah some of that comes from banning, but most of it is just ****** game design.

I really liked Soundwaves vision of Eve. Its too bad he wasn't given the resources to make it happen.

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it

Raven Jita
Doomheim
#1606 - 2015-06-26 01:48:31 UTC
I don't understand the "I must isk/PLEX my account," mentality at all. If you "consolidate," onto a single account the monthly fee is trivial. The same inflation rate that caused game currency grinding to become harder makes out of time real cash worth more by the same relative exchange. So are many eve players just complete loafers without a job or what? And where are you flying that there's nobody to shoot at. It took me 10 seconds to open the map and find a system within half a dozen jumps where I could get a fight. Lowsec border systems still house plenty of pirates. FW home systems still gather hoards of pilots. Nullsec chokepoints are still camped and fought over multipul times a day. Busy empire systems are still bursting at the seems with creative gankers. Wormholes are just about as sporadic as it gets, but even there I don't have to make more than 2-3 connections before I find a target.

Your mineral and industrial income is **** because people are willing to sell their minerals for less than you. That means they've got a more efficient setup and/or they simply like doing it more than you do and are willing to make less. Exploration, same deal. Lots of people are enjoying it, the drops are now commonplace. Supply and demand dictates that if you want to continue selling something lucrative, you'd better find something more scarce or in higher demand at the moment. Sorry if your calcified playstyle and entitled attitude prevents you from seeing this, but you need to remember where the content comes from in this game, the players who aren't bellyaching about patches, but bringing new content with every or in spite of every change.
Pixie Tickle
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1607 - 2015-06-26 01:59:08 UTC
Cipher Jones wrote:
Bottom line is that the game is trying make 2015 income with 2009 resources. A GTC worth $34.95 in 2009 is worth $38.74 now, and way less are being purchased.

I had already consolidated accounts before they banned ISB. But they nerfed the **** out of my mineral income, so my industry toon is now useless. That also makes my exploration toon worthless. That was also my PvP toon, who now has way less targets. I have to play the game many more hours a month to buy a PLEX than I did before and its just not worth it. It IS like a job again, thanks to no actions of my own.

Yeah some of that comes from banning, but most of it is just ****** game design.

I really liked Soundwaves vision of Eve. Its too bad he wasn't given the resources to make it happen.


We have plenty work in latvia. You find job, you pay game. No need for poor, two hour work not much. You try, no fear. This game no communist heaven for lazy people.
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#1608 - 2015-06-26 02:56:29 UTC
Marech Bhayanaka wrote:
Plex are not revenue on top of subscriptions. They are revenue FOR subscriptions. Remember every Plex some day becomes a month of subscription.

Or it falls victim to the EVE Gods when carelessly transported...

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Sgt Ocker
What Corp is it
#1609 - 2015-06-26 03:17:47 UTC
Marsha Mallow wrote:
Blah Blah Blah

Jump on Duality, catch up on recent Reddit Eve - Oh and having a tiny idea of how some groups historically play the game - Most of the "troll with wand" groups, stand out quite clearly.

And I too spent quite a few years in nul before selling off what are now excess accounts and letting others unsub, which is why I post with 1 of the 2 accounts I stupidly paid 1 year in advance for.

Fozziesov can't "fix" sov - The base mechanic is focused on trolling and griefing and not on taking and holding sov for meaningful gain.

Player groups in highsec and lowsec are increasing in size by a mainly AFK population of subscribers. They have moved all assets out of nul or into NPC nul because suit case carrier travel is just no longer viable without spending weeks to get somewhere. Unless you belong to a large group (and can join mass move op's) moving personal or corp assets is just not worth the risk involved. Better to just keep everything somewhere relatively safe, than risk losing everything because it just takes so long to get anywhere.

Small independent groups who ventured into nul a few months ago (some a few years ago) have been pushed to either blue everyone they can or (many) have just given up and moved out. Griefing the new or smaller guys is a lot of fun - Until they just get tired of being griefed and move on, or blue to the local group your size, you won't fight - Because they are as big as you and might win.

Provi Block - Will survive - As you said, no-one really wants the crappiest space in new eden except provi block. It creates content for the groups too afraid to risk fighting the larger better organised groups in their own league.
Proviblock vets - "Entitled cry babies" ?? They have provided content for the large dominating groups, who think it fun to grief smaller groups with little to no risk for many years.
Proviblock - Entitled to anything? not really but to discount what they are to nulsec is naive.

It is a shame so much of the new "content" has mechanics designed specifically for griefing.

There is a big difference between griefing sov and sov wars - What we are getting with Fozziesov is first and foremost griefing mechnics, taking and or holding sov is secondary.

My opinions are mine.

  If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - - Just don't bother Hating - I don't care

It really is getting harder and harder to justify $23 a month for each sub.

Market McSelling Alt
Doomheim
#1610 - 2015-06-26 03:22:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Market McSelling Alt
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
Marech Bhayanaka wrote:
Plex are not revenue on top of subscriptions. They are revenue FOR subscriptions. Remember every Plex some day becomes a month of subscription.

Or it falls victim to the EVE Gods when carelessly transported...


Or it is used for transfer of characters
Or it is used for dual skill queues
Or it is used to make your character look pretty
Or it is horded by speculators.


Or it sits in one of the two holding accounts Team Security has for banned assets. Remember there was trillions of isk and trillions of plex/ships/assets in those accounts.

CCP can actually generate their own income by banning accounts with lots of Plex, and never having to fulfill their end of the contract. That is if your tin foil isn't thick enough.

CCP Quant: Of all those who logon in Eve, 1.5% do Incursions, 13.8% PVP and 19.2% run Missions while 22.4% mine.

40.7% Join a fleet. The idea that Eve is a PVP game is false, the social fabric is in Missions and Mining.

Sgt Ocker
What Corp is it
#1611 - 2015-06-26 03:55:50 UTC
Raven Jita wrote:
I don't understand the "I must isk/PLEX my account," mentality at all. If you "consolidate," onto a single account the monthly fee is trivial. The same inflation rate that caused game currency grinding to become harder makes out of time real cash worth more by the same relative exchange. So are many eve players just complete loafers without a job or what? And where are you flying that there's nobody to shoot at. It took me 10 seconds to open the map and find a system within half a dozen jumps where I could get a fight. Lowsec border systems still house plenty of pirates. FW home systems still gather hoards of pilots. Nullsec chokepoints are still camped and fought over multipul times a day. Busy empire systems are still bursting at the seems with creative gankers. Wormholes are just about as sporadic as it gets, but even there I don't have to make more than 2-3 connections before I find a target.

Your mineral and industrial income is **** because people are willing to sell their minerals for less than you. That means they've got a more efficient setup and/or they simply like doing it more than you do and are willing to make less. Exploration, same deal. Lots of people are enjoying it, the drops are now commonplace. Supply and demand dictates that if you want to continue selling something lucrative, you'd better find something more scarce or in higher demand at the moment. Sorry if your calcified playstyle and entitled attitude prevents you from seeing this, but you need to remember where the content comes from in this game, the players who aren't bellyaching about patches, but bringing new content with every or in spite of every change.


"" Supply and demand dictates"" and there it is - supply is too high and demand decreasing.

Consolidating accounts and paying a monthly sub is fine and relatively cheap (depending on your exchange rate) but then you have 3 characters on one monthly sub and can only train one at a time - Unless you buy plex.
Somewhat defeats the purpose doesn't it?

Buying plex in game with isk - (Unless your a successful scammer who relies on the stupidity and greed of others) takes far longer now than in the past due to in game inflation and no increase in income streams. I used to make enough to plex all my accounts in 3 or 4 days, doing the same thing now would take me the best part of 2 weeks to plex those same accounts.
I don't want my leisure time to be a part time job. I also won't pay CCP $25 for the privilege of training an additional character for a month.

You are right about the current content trends - The single most unfriendly play styles are dominating due to such low player numbers and as long as those same play styles have such a hold on the game it will continue to decline. Eventually leaving only those who's play style is at the expense of others.
When the sandbox is totally focused on only the worst aspects of game play - It has the potential to break the sandbox.

My opinions are mine.

  If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - - Just don't bother Hating - I don't care

It really is getting harder and harder to justify $23 a month for each sub.

Jenshae Chiroptera
#1612 - 2015-06-26 04:42:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenshae Chiroptera
Marsha Mallow wrote:
I don't personally know any long term Proviblock vets, but you're presenting them as a bunch of entitled crybabbies who ...
My presentation might be bad but I just had another convo:
Quote:
Start date, 2005
First main corp, Shinra (Development of corp, mostly members went on to became Pandemic Legion)
Provi presence: 3+ years
Other notible experiences, 4 years in Noir.
Quote, "I have packing my bags. I might join Waffles and hang out with Jeff in Low Sec" and "It looks like EVERYONE will be in High Sec July 7th."
The message is pretty clear.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#1613 - 2015-06-26 05:31:50 UTC
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Marsha Mallow wrote:
I don't personally know any long term Proviblock vets, but you're presenting them as a bunch of entitled crybabbies who ...
My presentation might be bad but I just had another convo:
Quote:
Start date, 2005
First main corp, Shinra (Development of corp, mostly members went on to became Pandemic Legion)
Provi presence: 3+ years
Other notible experiences, 4 years in Noir.
Quote, "I have packing my bags. I might join Waffles and hang out with Jeff in Low Sec" and "It looks like EVERYONE will be in High Sec July 7th."
The message is pretty clear.


So one guy who's been playing a long time fancies a change? OK

Well here's another anecdote for you to call data: I've moved one of my two hisec alts into Tenal, and all 11 of her job slots are humming away productively as you read this.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Pixie Tickle
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1614 - 2015-06-26 07:22:36 UTC
Trolling using entosis needs same mindset like trolling with bumping or any other, but different. Trolling with entosis does not give responses, means not really attractive for worthless peoplescum. Point of most griefing is enjoyment of miserability of others to make self feel better without consequences. Entosis trolling not offering this at all. Peoplescum need people for fun, but people not care enough in long run.
Harrison Tato
Yamato Holdings
#1615 - 2015-06-26 07:27:35 UTC
tl:dr. EvE ain't worth paying real world currency for. I would only play if I can pay with in-game money.
Pixie Tickle
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1616 - 2015-06-26 07:29:41 UTC
Harrison Tato wrote:
tl:dr. EvE ain't worth paying real world currency for. I would only play if I can pay with in-game money.

Is peoplescum who think that and still play. No want, no need for them.
GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#1617 - 2015-06-26 07:58:59 UTC  |  Edited by: GankYou
Dersen Lowery wrote:
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
Input broadcasting is barely a thing in real EVE.


Someone's already posted that graph where multiboxing accounts plunged after the policy change, right?


Ishtanchuk, it's barely a thing - anymore. Blink

As usual with CCP, we get no Y axis scale charts & graphs in order not to fuel any holy wars and reveal how precarious the entire situation had been.

Twenty percent of your PCU - leveraged bot accounts that should not be? Not a problem, we'll brush that under the carpet.

One day, they ran out of carpet it would seem.

Malcanis wrote:

Well here's another anecdote for you to call data: I've moved one of my two hisec alts into Tenal, and all 11 of her job slots are humming away productively as you read this.


Shoo, that doesn't fit in with their fantasies. P

Marsha Mallow wrote:

Also, be a bit more specific with your accusations about player devs. Fozzie is ex PL, not Test (some of you seem a bit confused on this). If he was going to buff their playstyle he'd be pushing for T2 Supercaps, capital only entosis links and wearable Taylor Swift avatars (for all genders). Only a complete imbecile would try to dump major gameplay changes on a single dev or CSM, but apparently some of you are indeed daft enough to try this.


Implicating devs in corruption, that can only function at the expense of EVE's long-term health, is rather hilarious in this & other threads.

While ISK is Eternal and gud, the monies beyond the EVE Gate can oftentimes be better. Blink
Sgt Ocker
What Corp is it
#1618 - 2015-06-26 08:16:25 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Marsha Mallow wrote:
I don't personally know any long term Proviblock vets, but you're presenting them as a bunch of entitled crybabbies who ...
My presentation might be bad but I just had another convo:
Quote:
Start date, 2005
First main corp, Shinra (Development of corp, mostly members went on to became Pandemic Legion)
Provi presence: 3+ years
Other notible experiences, 4 years in Noir.
Quote, "I have packing my bags. I might join Waffles and hang out with Jeff in Low Sec" and "It looks like EVERYONE will be in High Sec July 7th."
The message is pretty clear.


So one guy who's been playing a long time fancies a change? OK

Well here's another anecdote for you to call data: I've moved one of my two hisec alts into Tenal, and all 11 of her job slots are humming away productively as you read this.


Your anecdote clearly shows Fozziesov = Failsov.
If Fozziesov were at all a valid threat to established entrenched complacent alliances, nobody would be increasing their manufacturing etc in sov space - It is supposed to shake things up and have everyone fearing the worst - Your expanding your holding in Sov nul right on the verge of what is supposed to be the most important change to sov since Dominion indicates, there is something fundamentally wrong with the plan.

My opinions are mine.

  If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - - Just don't bother Hating - I don't care

It really is getting harder and harder to justify $23 a month for each sub.

GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#1619 - 2015-06-26 08:20:11 UTC  |  Edited by: GankYou
Sgt Ocker wrote:

If Fozziesov were at all a valid threat to established entrenched complacent alliances, nobody would be increasing their manufacturing etc in sov space


Your logic is at fault: They would be increasing their strategical reserve stockpiles, along with ramping up production in crucial areas of the empires, PRECISELY because FozzieSov threatens their demise.

Quote:
It is supposed to shake things up and have everyone fearing the worst - Your expanding your holding in Sov nul right on the verge of what is supposed to be the most important change to sov since Dominion indicates, there is something fundamentally wrong with the plan.


Where do you see expansion, man? Smile

Fountain & other regions were abandonedâ„¢.
xxxTRUSTxxx
Galactic Rangers
#1620 - 2015-06-26 08:50:56 UTC  |  Edited by: xxxTRUSTxxx
Sgt Ocker wrote:


I used to make enough to plex all my accounts in 3 or 4 days, doing the same thing now would take me the best part of 2 weeks to plex those same accounts.



then ISboxer got banned. now you have to fly all 10 accounts,, ooopps not so easy. this is why you don't have 10 accounts anymore, no other reason.

there has been some points raised in this thread worth talking about, but also a lot not worth even thinking about.
a lot of it is based on your experience in the past with the old sov system. , you've admitted to not playing for a long time while in null. how can you believe you can make this call and say this new sov system will be so bad and maybe the end of EVE sov as we know it to the point that null will die.

it may die as we know it but i have no reason to believe someone will be happy to take the space regardless of what anyone thinks. people will adapt to the changes faster than you think and it will create something better than what we currently have.
you can't just say no no no,, it's all bad and it's going to end badly.
the time i've spent here in EVE i've seen nothing but people evolving to changes from day one. big changes coming and i don't think for one second that people won't change and adapt. lol they already have. Big smile