These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Aegis] More balance! - Ishtars, DDAs and the Tempest

First post First post First post
Author
Tara Read
Blackwater USA Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#381 - 2015-06-23 15:39:40 UTC
Skyler Hawk wrote:
Tara Read wrote:
Augustus Risalo wrote:
Tara Read wrote:
not being able to warp to someone



You can still warp to fleet members...?


In CCP's brilliance to make the game difficult (aka more bothersome and annoying) they'll probably do away with warping all together. Instead we'll have to buy a third party extention that plugs in via USB cable where we peddle our ships closer to our enemies like some Flintstone abomination for sake of immersion.

forcing eve nerds to get some exercise while flying their spaceships sounds like an excellent idea tbh


Can you imagine a bunch of PL neckbeards huffing and puffing trying to move their precious Aeons from gate to gate? Why next you'll be suggesting for them to shower, go outside and socialize outside of Fail Heap, and dare try to tackle the most elusive prey of all for them: a female with a pulse.
Oddsodz
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#382 - 2015-06-23 15:42:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Oddsodz
Am I the only one that sees this a a possible BUFF to the Ishtar? You take one slot away from the mid and but it in the low? Oh great.

Now let me type out this long post about why this is a buff.


The main issue as I see it (and I am sure some here will not agree with me) is that in the null sec blob wars. The main thing is that the Ishtar is just too dam hard to kill due to kite tactics. Biggest culprit is the fact that it can sig tank so well. Now take away that dam off grid booster and then see how good the Ishtar is. Right now. If you try to kill an Ishtar it just giggles at you as all your damage just does not hit the thing in the 1st place. So by taken away a mid slot that would in most cases have a resist or shield extender in it is not going to do that much as most damage that is thrown at an Ishtar misses anyway (even more so if you don't have that extra shield extender blooming up your sig now). So now we have an extra low slot. Lets just put a extra DDA or drone tracking enhancer in that low. Now the drones hit even harder or track even more than before. This in turn makes the nerf to the DDA at the start a full on waste of time as it hurts all the rest of the drone ship lineups but not the intended target that is the Ishtar.

Sentry drones are not the issue. Off Gird Boosting is the issue. Take the dam off grid boosts away and then you will be able to hit and kill an Ishtar.
Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#383 - 2015-06-23 15:46:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Iroquoiss Pliskin
Oddsodz is right in part.

There's also the fact that Ishtar still won't be competing with other HACs due to the weapons system and it will be ignored for as long as possible by CCP.

They tried to downsize Sentries on this cruiser hull to Medium Turret levels but they can't - not with the projection & application double bonus in place. Smile

Oops.
Seven Koskanaiken
Shadow Legions.
SONS of BANE
#384 - 2015-06-23 15:49:13 UTC
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:
That's because drone bandwidth of the classes unmentioned is in line with the fact of DDAs & base drone stats.

Rattlesnake should be "third", or first, regardless, and Napos or TFIs in the lead for Faction Battleships.


Sure. Not that anyone can tell that from that useless, incomplete "data".
Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#385 - 2015-06-23 15:50:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Iroquoiss Pliskin
What's your point exactly? Smile

Data is irrelevant if it doesn't meet your viewpoint apparently. Someone escort the Facts out of the Courtroom, please.
Seven Koskanaiken
Shadow Legions.
SONS of BANE
#386 - 2015-06-23 15:52:42 UTC
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:
What's your point exactly?

Data is irrelevant if it doesn't meet your viewpoint apparently. Someone escort the Facts out of the Courtroom, please.


Well if you're releasing something about "PVP damage per month leader per class" then yea, you need to use all the classes.

This is not a "viewpoint", this is Statistics 101.
Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#387 - 2015-06-23 15:57:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Iroquoiss Pliskin
You ignored the fact that all of the other classes are balanced with Drone Bandwidth.

The VEXOR, VNI, ISHTAR - Or the VEXOR line isn't.

No one could see 1k DPS Tech 1 Cruisers being broken. No one.

No one could see 850 DPS, 110k EHP, 2.2 km/s Tech 1 Pirate cruisers being Top 1. No one.

Point taken?

The fact that Domi & Armageddon are both in the lead tells you everything you need to know about DDAs. There's only two ways out of this shebang: Fix DDA or Fix the Legacy 50% hull Hitpoint/Damage bonuses, because the base drone attributes are out of whack.
Seven Koskanaiken
Shadow Legions.
SONS of BANE
#388 - 2015-06-23 16:00:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Seven Koskanaiken
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:
You ignored the fact that all of the other classes are balanced with Drone Bandwidth.

The VEXOR, VNI, ISHTAR - Or the VEXOR line isn't.

No one could see 1k DPS Tech 1 Cruisers being broken. No one.

No one could see 850 DPS, 110k EHP, 2.2 km/s Tech 1 Pirate cruisers being Top 1. No one.

Point taken?

The fact that Domi & Armageddon are both in the lead tells you everything you need to know about DDAs.


I'm not ignoring it. In fact, that's exactly the sort of conclusion you come to when all data is considered.

When it isn't you get things like "OMG DELETE SENTRIES".

I mean, I'm largely agreeing with you, so like, maybe wind ya neck in and get some sun, or something...
Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#389 - 2015-06-23 16:03:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Iroquoiss Pliskin
You never know who's who nowadays, Always dron mafia lurking around.

Pirate battleships weren't included because most likely Rattlesnake is No 1 and Commandships along with T3 and Recons have less bandwidth than that bloated Vexor cruiser family.

Thanks to people in the North for making a Dream Come True for every pilot. ♥

Special thanks also goes out to our Minmatar Bretheren for 330 mi TFIs, but that is off topic.

See? TFIs 330 mil is not news anymore. Turret battleships, please. Big smile
Leoric Firesword
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#390 - 2015-06-23 16:23:41 UTC
CCP Rise wrote:
Alexander McKeon wrote:
Rise, I believe at this point that you're deliberately missing the root cause of the problem: the Ishtar breaks the rule regarding size-appropriate weapons on hulls. Sentry drones are fundamentally a battleship-sized weapon system, and aren't game-breaking when used on such; perhaps in need of tuning like the DDA effectiveness reduction, but that's all. The combination of cruiser-class signature and speed, T2 resists (remember that no T2 battleships are viable for fleet combat) and the long-range projection of sentries are what push the Ishtar over the top in combat situations.

For whatever it might be worth, making the Ishtar into an improved version of the VNI, with fast enough drone travel times to be useful, seems a more practical situation, and allows for fleets deploying heavy smartbomb contingents to be an effective counter.


This is suggested so often but it just isn't the case. Drones not being locked to the size of their owner ship is one of the most consistent and distinct things about them. Vexors, VNIs, Myrmidons, Eos's, and Ishtars (at least) all use 'battleship sized' drones, and everything bigger than a destroyer can use 'frigate sized' drones. This flexibility is part of what makes drones really interesting and while sentries have become a big part of what makes certain hulls so strong, we don't want to lock drone ships into drones that match their ship size.


So wait, let me get this right, you don't see the issue with BS weapons on a cruiser hull? Let's break out Tach's for the Maller then!

I agree with the DDA nerf.

I don't agree with sentries on Vexors/VNI/Myrm/Eos/Ishtar/Stratios/etc

Read that again, I don't agree with SENTRIES on those hulls, and I fly those hulls quite a bit (minus the eos/ishtar...noob and all)

I'm not saying we lock them into using drones for their size, but there should be a drawback for going bigger. Currently for sentries there isn't one.

Heavy drones are slower and track more poorly than mediums, and mediums are the same when compared to small. The fact that sentries don't move isn't an issue, cause well, lets be honest if you and 30 of your friends are all in Ishtars or whatever you're going to be in optimal and have low traversal against at least one group of those drones, where if they were flying heavies the drones would (most likely) have an issue catching/tracking you (omg balance!).

Also, I'd like to point out there's a reason that drones are the only weapon system that you've limited to T1 in the Alliance Tournament...just sayin.
Terra Chrall
Doomheim
#391 - 2015-06-23 16:33:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Terra Chrall
Iyacia Cyric'ai wrote:
Torei Dutalis wrote:
I also always worry about changes that effect an entire weapon class, although in this case I do think that the DDA tweak here is within reason.
As you stated, there's definitely good reason for the entire drone class to be nerfed: Drone boats do the most damage across all classes of ships.

The text use for the link is misleading as not all ship classes are dominated by drones.

Here are the ones not dominated: T2, Navy Frigates; T1, T2, T3 Destroyers; T3 Cruisers; T1, T2, Navy Battler cruisers; T2, & Navy Battleships. Are drones strong and dominant in many classes? Yes. But exaggerating the facts makes you look like you are hiding things or have a hidden agenda.

Edit: I have no issue with the DDA change, but I don't like exaggeration because it can cause others to join in mob mentality with false information.
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#392 - 2015-06-23 16:54:05 UTC
You could always make Sentries "not a drone" similar to how fighters and fighter bombers used to be not drones.
Then anything that doesn't specifically state that it benefits Sentries then it doesn't.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Arrendis
TK Corp
#393 - 2015-06-23 17:06:07 UTC
Oddsodz wrote:
So by taken away a mid slot that would in most cases have a resist or shield extender in it is not going to do that much as most damage that is thrown at an Ishtar misses anyway (even more so if you don't have that extra shield extender blooming up your sig now). So now we have an extra low slot. Lets just put a extra DDA or drone tracking enhancer in that low. Now the drones hit even harder or track even more than before.


I'd say put in another Omnidirectional Tracking Enhancer, but yeah, with drone ranges as far as they are, and then 120-140 km drone control range... yeah, I don't think this is going to slow down the ishtars much.
afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#394 - 2015-06-23 17:32:38 UTC
You still can't use that chart, I'm sorry. It's too little data, not enough legend.

For a start, structures are probably in there so that's massive skew off the bat. No better thing than drones for that.

It amounts to a picture and saying 'see, the math shows this'
God's Apples
Wilderness
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
#395 - 2015-06-23 18:34:53 UTC
Terra Chrall wrote:
Iyacia Cyric'ai wrote:
Torei Dutalis wrote:
I also always worry about changes that effect an entire weapon class, although in this case I do think that the DDA tweak here is within reason.
As you stated, there's definitely good reason for the entire drone class to be nerfed: Drone boats do the most damage across all classes of ships.

The text use for the link is misleading as not all ship classes are dominated by drones.

Here are the ones not dominated: T2, Navy Frigates; T1, T2, T3 Destroyers; T3 Cruisers; T1, T2, Navy Battler cruisers; T2, & Navy Battleships. Are drones strong and dominant in many classes? Yes. But exaggerating the facts makes you look like you are hiding things or have a hidden agenda.

Edit: I have no issue with the DDA change, but I don't like exaggeration because it can cause others to join in mob mentality with false information.


That's because there are no drone boats in those classes. Are you actually that stupid?

The only t2 frig that is a "drone boat" is the ishkur but it doesn't even have a bonus to drones so you can't count it. There is no drone navy frig. The comet is the only navy frig capable of using drones and tbh it probably is the most popular navy frig anyway so you're still wrong.

In t1 dessies the catalyst and thrasher only outdamage the algos because of the prevalence of suicide ganking. In real combat I'd wager the algos has top usage. There are no drone t2 destroyers. There are no drone t3 destroyers.

The only drone t3 cruiser is the proteus (no the legion doesn't count) and that isn't dominant because it has only 100m3 bandwidth combined with awful slot layout.

For the few remaining people that use t1 BCs I'm fairly certain there's a consensus that the myrm and proph are dominant. There is no drone navy BC.

I don't think anyone uses navy BS anymore when pirate are only 50 mill more. The only navy BS I would image used more than the domi would be the napoc because mega pulses are great and the napoc has essentially ishtar bonuses but for pulses. There is no drone marauder. BLOPs are mostly used for ganks where the slightly higher dps and instant application of the redeemer is better suited. In terms of actual combat where you don't outnumber your enemy 5 to 1, the sin is by far better. There are quite a few videos of solo active shield sin action on youtube as well as RR sin gangs.

In conclusion, the only classes where drone ships aren't dominant are the classes that have no drone ships.

"Hydra Reloaded are just jealous / butthurt on me / us because we can get tons of PVP action in empire while they aren't good enough to get that." - NightmareX

Perihelion Olenard
#396 - 2015-06-23 18:40:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Perihelion Olenard
CCP Rise wrote:
...
First of all, the Ishtar
...
  • Power grid lowered from 780 to 740
  • ...

    There goes my plated Ishtar fit. Wish advanced weapon upgrades V and a 1600mm Federation Navy plate there was only .6 PG left before the change.
    Orca Platypus
    Pator Tech School
    Minmatar Republic
    #397 - 2015-06-23 18:44:37 UTC
    I hate the change.

    I couldn't care less about PvP, it's boring anyway, but my PvE boats take a very serious hit from this change.
    Drone PvE boats were already heavily behind all turret and missile based PvE ships after the last round of nerfbatting (well, nerfbat habitually avoided gewns, but catering to gewns by nerfing everyone else is what CCP is all about).

    Can I get a drone SP refund? With this change drone boats become useless in PvE and that's the only kind of Pv I care about.
    Disposable Hashur
    Royal Amarr Institute
    Amarr Empire
    #398 - 2015-06-23 18:50:54 UTC
    Well i read everyone's post talking about damage and slots etc. Maybe drone ships are first in stats because they need no ammo??? Anyone??

    Its only logical to use the ONLY weapon system in game that needs no ammo. Even crystals for amarr ships take dmg (though only faction). But atm I believe most ppl use drone ships ALSO because they require no ammo
    Brokk Witgenstein
    Sebiestor Tribe
    Minmatar Republic
    #399 - 2015-06-23 18:54:46 UTC
    Orca Platypus wrote:
    I hate the change.
    Drone PvE boats were already heavily behind all turret and missile based PvE ships after the last round of nerfbatting


    No they are not. PvE = ISK farming and you're using drones because you can deploy dentries and laugh in their face with no ISK spent on ammo. Please be more precise as to which drone carrier you're using and how it's "behind" because I fail to see it.

    As a frame of reference, I'm using a Muninn for my misssioning for pretty much the same reasons: artillery doesn't cost too much in ammo, and the speed keeps me alive. What are you fielding? Elaborate on why your favourite droneboat is behind. Then we'll talk.
    Jenn aSide
    Soul Machines
    The Initiative.
    #400 - 2015-06-23 18:59:54 UTC
    I just find it amazing that a company known for heavy handed nerfing is tip-toeing around the Ishtar. What is this, the 4th or 5th minor tweak?