These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[April] [Updated] Confessor and Svipul Balance Tweaks

First post First post
Author
Torei Dutalis
IceBox Inc.
Rogue Caldari Union
#41 - 2015-04-02 03:38:45 UTC
Just doing some quick numbers on my personal fits, the biggest nerf here is the speed and agility nerf to the confessor, by a _long_ shot. If we are looking at usage metrics the svipul is being used more than twice as much as the confessor is at least from looking at zkill. This would seem to indicate the svipul is a much bigger problem ship. From a personal perspective the main issue I see with the svipul is that it just does _too much damage_ comparatively. It is easily pushing cruiser level dps with a decent tank and a tiny pricetag.

The confessor is going to be much _much_ less nimble than before which may see a significant drop in its usage (alas sweet confessor you will dance no more), but the svipul is still going to be a monster of a brawler. As has been mentioned, lasers and armor tanks are very PG intensive so the relatively even ending numbers on these two ships don't make a lot of sense. In fact, I don't feel these numbers probably go far enough to curtail current fits (they don't change mine a lot fitting wise). In addition, the cost increase seems laughable. Why would I ever spend 25mil on an assault frigate when I can get one of these for 50? If these ships were more on the order of 100mil you would definitely see some price balance kick in.

Overall would like to see a little more batting of the svipul, and maybe a little less on the confessor, but a good start.
Ned Thomas
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#42 - 2015-04-02 03:45:15 UTC
The Sabre is more used than the Heretic.

That has a lot to do with why the Svipul is used more than the Confessor.

If you look at them both individually, they have a roughly 10 to 1 kill to death ratio. They're in pretty much the same place.
Zakatka Night
#43 - 2015-04-02 03:46:34 UTC
nerf 10mn ab please - they give too much speed and are immune to scramble
Ned Thomas
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#44 - 2015-04-02 03:49:04 UTC
Zakatka Night wrote:
nerf 10mn ab please - they give too much speed and are immune to scramble


Think about what you just said.
PanykButton
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#45 - 2015-04-02 03:49:53 UTC
I mean, call me crazy, but wasn't the initial price goal 40m isk?
Ned Thomas
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#46 - 2015-04-02 03:51:54 UTC
PanykButton wrote:
I mean, call me crazy, but wasn't the initial price goal 40m isk?


IIRC, 60 mil.

And plenty of people said they were insane for thinking that once the build requirements were revealed.
Bienator II
madmen of the skies
#47 - 2015-04-02 03:59:40 UTC
Ned Thomas wrote:
Bienator II wrote:
i think you overnerfed the grid on the confessor. If you compare the powerlevel of them both they don't deserve equal treatment IMO


The whole point is to kill 10mn AB fits. It doesn't matter how they compare to each other in that regard.

it does

how to fix eve: 1) remove ECM 2) rename dampeners to ECM 3) add new anti-drone ewar for caldari 4) give offgrid boosters ongrid combat value

Ned Thomas
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#48 - 2015-04-02 04:03:36 UTC
Bienator II wrote:
Ned Thomas wrote:
Bienator II wrote:
i think you overnerfed the grid on the confessor. If you compare the powerlevel of them both they don't deserve equal treatment IMO


The whole point is to kill 10mn AB fits. It doesn't matter how they compare to each other in that regard.

it does


The Confessor will have more PG than the Svipul and will be able to fit Guns, Prop, and Tank with proper skills. What's the problem?
Torei Dutalis
IceBox Inc.
Rogue Caldari Union
#49 - 2015-04-02 04:06:43 UTC
Ned Thomas wrote:
The Sabre is more used than the Heretic.

That has a lot to do with why the Svipul is used more than the Confessor.

If you look at them both individually, they have a roughly 10 to 1 kill to death ratio. They're in pretty much the same place.



The sabre is better than the heretic??? The margins between those two ships are more extreme than the svipul and confessor by the way. There are also ships with higher success ratios than both of the t3 destroyers *cough* mordu ships *cough* but those are clearly balanced.
Ned Thomas
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#50 - 2015-04-02 04:09:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Ned Thomas
Torei Dutalis wrote:
Ned Thomas wrote:
The Sabre is more used than the Heretic.

That has a lot to do with why the Svipul is used more than the Confessor.

If you look at them both individually, they have a roughly 10 to 1 kill to death ratio. They're in pretty much the same place.



The sabre is better than the heretic??? The margins between those two ships are more extreme than the svipul and confessor by the way. There are also ships with higher success ratios than both of the t3 destroyers *cough* mordu ships *cough* but those are clearly balanced.


The Sabre is more used than the Heretic. Never said it was better.

EDIT: Actually, I take this back. Interdictors kill way more than they lose.

Faction ships have nothing to do with this discussion.

Anything else?
Torei Dutalis
IceBox Inc.
Rogue Caldari Union
#51 - 2015-04-02 04:17:57 UTC
Ned Thomas wrote:


The Sabre is more used than the Heretic.

That has a lot to do with why the Svipul is used more than the Confessor.


Explain

Ned Thomas wrote:
If you look at them both individually, they have a roughly 10 to 1 kill to death ratio.


This brings in any ship's effectiveness really.

Just to clarify.


Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc
Tactical-Retreat
#52 - 2015-04-02 04:50:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Altrue
Well that's.. Harsh, to say the least!

I completely agree about the price change, but the rebanlance here? Not so much. Saying that T3Ds were able to fit 10MN a bit too easily is quite false as these choices where made at the cost of the ability to fit the best guns. Or by fitting autocannons, but I'd like to remind you that the svipul was never made for ACs, which is by itself another drawback.

I do understand the need to tune them down, but while I flew them a lot, in practice I never thought there were "OP". We are talking about the only T2 destroyer really made for (and only viable in) combat. OF COURSE they are a bit more powerful that interdictors, otherwise what's the point?

The good thing about T3 dessies is that they are... dessies. You cannot blob with them and expect to steamroll everything, simply because they do not win as much against larger ships. With the enthosis stuff happening soon, I can understand that they become a concern... But that's still harsh

Signature Tanking Best Tanking

[Ex-F] CEO - Eve-guides.fr

Ultimate Citadel Guide - 2016 EVE Career Chart

Prometheus Exenthal
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#53 - 2015-04-02 04:51:11 UTC
The Confessor changes are *okay*.
I'd much prefer the ship to be slower still.

The Svipul changes are a joke.
The grid nerf does very little other than hinder artillery fits. AC fits are still broken as ****.
The speed nerf is laughable. What is that, 10% when overloaded in speed mode?
The Svipul needs to be SLAPPED.


Perhaps the more important question is, what the hell are these ships supposed to be comparable to?
Even @ 50mil, the insurance payout makes them comparable to T1 Cruisers (with T2 mods), which other than a gimp fit, are woefully inept when it comes to taking on even a single T3D.

Hell, even with dual webs, a vanilla Svipul can still chug along @ 400+m/s in defensive mode
No cruiser is tracking that.

And you want to give us more?
Keep the nerfs coming.

https://www.youtube.com/user/promsrage

DO YOUR JOBS, CCP DEVS. FIX THE GAME INSTEAD OF FKING IT

Triksterism
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#54 - 2015-04-02 04:55:14 UTC
Prometheus Exenthal wrote:
The Confessor changes are *okay*.
I'd much prefer the ship to be slower still.

The Svipul changes are a joke.
The grid nerf does very little other than hinder artillery fits. AC fits are still broken as ****.
The speed nerf is laughable. What is that, 10% when overloaded in speed mode?
The Svipul needs to be SLAPPED.


Perhaps the more important question is, what the hell are these ships supposed to be comparable to?
Even @ 50mil, the insurance payout makes them comparable to T1 Cruisers (with T2 mods), which other than a gimp fit, are woefully inept when it comes to taking on even a single T3D.

Hell, even with dual webs, a vanilla Svipul can still chug along @ 400+m/s in defensive mode
No cruiser is tracking that.

And you want to give us more?
Keep the nerfs coming.



This ^^^ to be honest.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/30dr3i/svipul_is_balanced/
Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#55 - 2015-04-02 05:12:13 UTC
Ned Thomas wrote:
Drew Li wrote:
Slightly off topic, but could you add a rig that reduces the powergrid of propulsion modules? That could allow a handful of ships to fit oversized prop mods, possibly even 100mn battlecruisers. That would still allow 10mn T3 destroyers, but they would be giving up rig slots to do so. The rigs would have to be more effective than stacking on a bunch of current routers and reactor controls to get grid.


..............you can't be serious.


I think he's serious.

He can't be tho?

He is.

Shocked
Tear Jar
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#56 - 2015-04-02 05:49:39 UTC
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
Much needed tweaks. Cant wait until tomorrow so I can believe them.

CCP Fozzie wrote:
We're also increasing the build requirements of both of these ships to bring them closer to our original target price and to help ensure that the value you get for the cost of the ship is reasonable.


Still trying to balance with price huh... thought you learned that lesson..


Price balancing works fine on things that actually die.
Spugg Galdon
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#57 - 2015-04-02 06:13:09 UTC
I guess I was abusing the shite out of these hulls then seems as almost all of my fits are now impossible.

Sigh, guess it was needed
Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#58 - 2015-04-02 06:20:56 UTC
Prometheus Exenthal wrote:
The Confessor changes are *okay*.
I'd much prefer the ship to be slower still.

The Svipul changes are a joke.
The grid nerf does very little other than hinder artillery fits. AC fits are still broken as ****.
The speed nerf is laughable. What is that, 10% when overloaded in speed mode?
The Svipul needs to be SLAPPED.


Perhaps the more important question is, what the hell are these ships supposed to be comparable to?
Even @ 50mil, the insurance payout makes them comparable to T1 Cruisers (with T2 mods), which other than a gimp fit, are woefully inept when it comes to taking on even a single T3D.

Hell, even with dual webs, a vanilla Svipul can still chug along @ 400+m/s in defensive mode
No cruiser is tracking that.

And you want to give us more?
Keep the nerfs coming.



Have to agree with this fine gentleman regarding the Sviipul - Even with the PG reduction, I think 10MN AB with the smallest caliber ACs is still possible with a good/great tank to boot. Smile

Someone run the numbers, please.

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ -----> ┬──┬ ノ( ゜-゜ノ)
Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc
Tactical-Retreat
#59 - 2015-04-02 06:37:51 UTC
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:
Have to agree with this fine gentleman regarding the Sviipul - Even with the PG reduction, I think 10MN AB with the smallest caliber ACs is still possible with a good/great tank to boot. Smile


The whole point of AC is to not use much powergrid. The only way to make AC svipuls very hard to fit would be to make Arty IMPOSSIBLE to fit.

I'd like to point out that ACs have a meh theoretical DPS and an even more meh actual DPS. But at least it hits most of the time.

Signature Tanking Best Tanking

[Ex-F] CEO - Eve-guides.fr

Ultimate Citadel Guide - 2016 EVE Career Chart

Vlad Vladimir Vladinovsky
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#60 - 2015-04-02 06:55:16 UTC
God dammit CCP, why did you increase the cap recharge time on the confessor? it already had cap problems to begin with

why does the svipul get the same cap regen as the confessor? did you guys forget autocannons use zero cap and lasers are still garbage with your crutch bonuses of 10% to cap usage per level?