Player Features and Ideas Discussion

You nerv Supers useless for small Corporations and small Alliances.
Stop nerv them or remove them finally from the game.

HELL NO WE WONT GO! KEEP FIGHTERS ASSIST!

This class of drones will lose your chip (unique class), then it makes no sense to use expensive drones and build them, throw full hold T1 or T2 drones, and forget about the fighters. I am personally against it.


Данный класс дронов теряет свою фишку (уникальность класса), тогда смысла нет использовать дорогостоящие дроны и строить их, закинуть полный трюм т1 или т2 дронов, и забыть о файтерах. Я лично против.

If you are going to nerf figher assist to make Supercapitals be on-field ships, remove Supercapitals from the game altogether. They are too big, slow, expensive and take too long to build for any small to medium sized corporation to be able to risk losing them. Don't bother nerfing fighter assist unless you plan to remove supercapitals from the game, they are already a big enough target as is. Finally, stop breaking Sovereignty and Supercapitals and start fixing Jove space and these new tactical destroyers.

whow how to wreck a class of ship completely, its like you don't even like null, or small corps or those trying to survive in the wilds. might as well stop construction and head to empire..or low..low is safer.

Cheers CCP yet another reason to stop having one of those pilot coffins

Я давно играю в эту игру, и постоянно наблюдаю крик недовольства по отношению к супер-капиталам, в частности к носителям дронов. У меня складывается мнение, что многие игроки просто не хотят тратить время и учить эти корабли, тратить деньги на покупку книг навыков, им лень, они ведь охотники одиночки, и им такие возможности игры излишни, достаточно T3 корабля и всё, ну и малость мелочи фригатной. Разработчики, если вам не интересна вообще концепция вами разработанного продукта и вы хотите скатиться к второсортному шутеру на истрибителях, то делайте что хотите, но бои огромных кораблей в EVE Online уже практически миф, вы слишком ослабили весь капитальный флот, он уже не актуален, а дальше своими вмешательствами вы совсем убьёте их, всего хорошего вам в вашем творчестве.

I had to smile when I refreshed the thread and saw the CTA style posting lol.

Thing is this change does impact a lot deeper than skynet type use (which most people will agree is broken - even those who want fighter assignment to stay like myself).

истребитель is the correct singular, meaning fighter :)

against removing fighter assist from carriers.

the why is because we players, we happy few, we band of brothers that are doing our thing in nullsec, dont *all have big alliances to rely on.

This game was made for all, theres no good solution, but a compromise. We players introduced renters so small groups of players could be introduced to nullsec. Not thanks to CCP.

We players introduced freightcontainer mining because we had too. A player solution is the best solution, its like nature u dont mess with the natural balance of things!

If CCP are the janitors then forcing us to swallow this nerf would be more like a puppet master trick. If this is the stick wheres the carrot?

Yes we are all looking forward of getting a 200 man roam gang showing up in our systems and no way to defend it, because we have been properly nerfed.. copyright ccp. /include emo icons.

Now i do NOT play at such a level where i encounter fighters.


BUT why not allow carrier to assign fighter individualy, with a cap to the amounts of fighter that can be assign based fleet mate ship size

For example, if you have a freind ina frigate, or destroyer, they can only have a single fighter assigned to assist them, basically, wingman, if a person is in a cruiser or battlecruiser, allow two fighters to be assigned to them(basically a escort), if a person is in a battlship, allow 3 fighter to be assigned to them (a complimentary wing), remove the ability of bombers to be set to assist (instead force the carriers to be on grid if they wish to use bombers)