EVE Information Portal

Too often read here about unoccupied space.

To clarify: The systems that are actually empty are not worth anything which is the reason why they are, were and will be empty.

If the new sov system goes live even the slighly better system that are just good for 3 corpmembers will be empty aswell because there is absolutely no way to be online for 4h each day with 3 members and defend against a 20 fleet.

A system with -0.8 for example is just good for 10 simultanous operating corpmembers.

I came to the same conclusion about target lock.

I would agree with you on keeping the warp disruption while the module is running, that would be better, so agree.

I would prefer it going back to 0, but a timer going back to zero over time would work too.

Nulldeal did ask for more npc space. If ccp wont oblige why not have players provide the service. No missions but then again running missions is the slow death of small red crosses.

Also CCP, with this account started in 2009 how can you limit how often I can post.

Just some idle thoughts from a bored and idle mind..

Maybe there is way to limit the ability of large bloks to simply roll over whom ever they choose.
Everything to do with sov, taking, losing, reinforcing, or anything else to do with sov all comes down to fleet composition. Simply make it so that the largest single entity is the one who gains benefit from any single engagement.

The bloks work by utilizing allies to cover areas they can't, defend space when they can't (or don't want to). So remove that ability to an extent by adding penalties.

If alliance A wants to take sov they need to do the work to take it, nodes will be on timers. The timers are increased for every member of the offensive fleet who is not a member of the alliance seeking to take the system or constellation. The 1st alliance to shoot the node becomes the dominant alliance (they are vying for sov) for every fleet member who is not in that alliance 10 mins is added to the timers for the capture or reinforce or whatever.
You come with a mixed 100 man fleet from different alliances (a coalition), you can still take sov, it is just going to take you a hell of a lot longer to do it

Remove selective sov -
Alliance B can't go out and do most of the work then let alliance A finish it to claim sov. If a new group comes to attack nodes or Ihub or whatever once they have been reinforced, the timers reset as if they were the 1st to attack it.
Remove "sov transfers" - You want sov, you fight for it ,not pay the landlord to let you put an ihub up

This is directly contrary to the goal of forcing OWNERS to defend their own things.

Except that they did defend their own things. By killing the guy who tried to contest it.

Once the active influence of the attacker is gone, so should the effects be gone.

The warp disruption needs to stay on regardless of whether you lose targeting, should stop cloaking and should not be able to be deactivated by overheating. It would be tragic if null was inflicted with anything like FW stabbed and cloaky farmers.

In two minutes? I doubt that very much.

No it wouldn't. FW would finally get their ships with bonuses to core stabs

I agree the timer not changing would be the worst option, I would prefer a full re-set but the tick back works too. It would be a pain to make them grind it back to zero as a chore, but in a way that would be a good thing as the defender has to be vulnerable too, though not within a POS shield I hope.

I noticed one box in the flow chart stating that the capture progress is paused if no Entosis links are active, so my base assumption is leaning towards having to use an Entosis link to set it back to 0 so that would mean the defender setting it back to 0 by doing a win cycle.