These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Announcement From Gorila

First post First post
Author
Tyyler DURden
Mordechai and Sons Distribution Co.
#121 - 2014-12-27 00:40:25 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Tyyler DURden wrote:

Continue keeping it classy Kaarous.


Says the guy rushing to the defense of people threatening someone's life over a gank in a videogame? Looks like I'm in good company.

So where in this thread did I rush to the defense of people making threats?
I made a simple comparison of the stereotyping of various player groups ingame.

Tyyler DURden says "use soap"

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#122 - 2014-12-27 00:41:27 UTC
Alastair Ormand wrote:

Then why does CONCORD even exist in the first place? If this game is 100% focused on PvP why does CONCORD actively prevent it?


They don't prevent anything. If they did, I couldn't activate my weapons in highsec or wardec people.

Such ignorance.

Quote:

But they do stop unauthorized PvP from happening.


All PvP is permitted. It just so happens that some of it carries the consequences of a lost ship.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#123 - 2014-12-27 00:44:38 UTC
Alastair Ormand wrote:

But it's actively encouraged by CODE after completing a gank which is even worse.


What in the actual **** is wrong with you?

No, saying something akin to "nyah nyah I won" does not, in any way, equate to telling someone else to kill themselves, or threaten to assault their family. Nor does the former justify the latter.

For you to even have said such a thing is ******* disgusting.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Lady Areola Fappington
#124 - 2014-12-27 01:11:45 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Alastair Ormand wrote:

But it's actively encouraged by CODE after completing a gank which is even worse.


What in the actual **** is wrong with you?

No, saying something akin to "nyah nyah I won" does not, in any way, equate to telling someone else to kill themselves, or threaten to assault their family. Nor does the former justify the latter.

For you to even have said such a thing is ******* disgusting.



Here's my thought on it, Kaarous.

It takes a degree of intelligence, imagination, and mental maturity to "role-play". It's kind of the same thing that doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals do, "Don't get emotionally involved".

A good role-player doesn't get emotionally involved in what their character is doing. The character is it's own entity, operating with it's own (artificial) motives and such, entirely separate from the person playing said role. It's acting, but on a more involved scale.

So, doing this requires intelligence, creativity, mental maturity....things quite a few people don't have. Those sorts of people are just playing "themselves" in a game like Eve. They can't envision someone adopting a role for fun, because they just can't do it.

This causes conflict. Someone playing the role of "bad guy" rolls up, does a "bad" thing in game, and the unintelligent person instantly assumes that they themselves are being attacked. This gives them an excuse to turn around and be nasty towards the person behind the "bad" character. It's the equivalent of walking up to an actor and punching him in the face, because he once played a bad dude who killed a bunch of people in a movie.



The funny thing about it all, the vast majority of non-eve playing people get it. Back when my crazy Eve stalker called my workplace, my answer to the HR person who talked to me was "Yeah, it's just a videogame, I play a bad guy character there." HR person (who was also a gamer) just nodded, and said "what, like going renegade in Infamous?"

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Alastair Ormand
Mine all the things
#125 - 2014-12-27 02:51:26 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Alastair Ormand wrote:

But it's actively encouraged by CODE after completing a gank which is even worse.


What in the actual **** is wrong with you?

No, saying something akin to "nyah nyah I won" does not, in any way, equate to telling someone else to kill themselves, or threaten to assault their family. Nor does the former justify the latter.

For you to even have said such a thing is ******* disgusting.


Hey I'm not saying that threats and what not, are ok. What I'm saying is not ok are people provoking these kind of responses which is what CODE is out to do, then act like they've done nothing to contribute to the problem.

In response to the CONCORD part.
CONCORD does prevent one player being destroyed by another, not always 100% succesful though. This seems to be there to actively prevent the death of another player.

Highsec PVP is not permitted unless a wardec is in effect or both parties agree to a duel. This is true otherwise CONCORD would not respond at all. Don't know why you are trying to say otherwise.

I discourage running with scissors.

Skipper Huitzilopoch
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#126 - 2014-12-27 02:55:30 UTC
Alastair Ormand wrote:
[quote=Kaarous Aldurald][quote=Alastair Ormand]
Highsec PVP is not permitted unless a wardec is in effect or both parties agree to a duel.

Are you implying that CODE. elite PvPers are exploiting some kind of bug or design flaw by killing more than 1 ttrillion ISK worth of ships a month (October 2014 to be precise)?

If highsec PvP isn't permitted, how can CODE keep destroying hundreds of billions worth of ships every month for many months now? What makes CCP look other way during such obvious and blatant violation of highsec PvP design?
Vadim Radchenko
#127 - 2014-12-27 02:56:36 UTC
I have never seen a bigger hypocrite than this guy.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#128 - 2014-12-27 03:29:39 UTC
Alastair Ormand wrote:

Hey I'm not saying that threats and what not, are ok. What I'm saying is not ok are people provoking these kind of responses which is what CODE is out to do, then act like they've done nothing to contribute to the problem.


You're casting aside the notion that the offenders in this bear any personal responsibility for their own choice to break the EULA and threaten someone else's life.

They, and they alone are responsible for what comes out of their mouths, or what they type into local.

No one else.

You can try and blame the victims of their disgusting behavior all you want, but the fact remains that a legitimate in game action does not in any way excuse the kind of putrid slime who sling around death threats.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#129 - 2014-12-27 03:40:16 UTC
And you know what else?

All the vitriol, the hatred, the unreasoning rage against gankers and PvP in this game does not come from us. We have not cultivated it in any way, merely adapted to it with amusement to cope with your sick attacks.

Where it really comes from is poor attitudes, poor sportsmanship and rabid risk aversion. It comes from the pigheaded refusal to recognize ganking for the legitimate activity that it is, the selfish refusal to recognize that another player has every right to shoot at you if he feels like it.

It's stupid, stupid rationalization that you use to whitewash away a loss in a videogame. And why some of you freaking people need to rationalize like this in a freaking game is beyond me. To me, it resembles nothing more than a mental illness.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Waltaratzor
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec
#130 - 2014-12-27 04:33:40 UTC
Alastair Ormand wrote:


Then why does CONCORD even exist in the first place? If this game is 100% focused on PvP why does CONCORD actively prevent it? Not always succesfully. But they do stop unauthorized PvP from happening.


Concord does not prevent PvP. Concord changes the engagement profile of PvP. It gives a big boost to the defenders so they can do things that would be impossible to get away with in low or null sec and forces attackers to adapt.
Valkin Mordirc
#131 - 2014-12-27 04:34:39 UTC
Quote:
Highsec PVP is not permitted unless a wardec is in effect or both parties agree to a duel. This is true otherwise CONCORD would not respond at all. Don't know why you are trying to say otherwise.



Oh? Highsec PVP is permitted by who? CONCORD? Who is CONCORD to tell me what to do? Or any CODEdot member?

Yeah a new player mining barge gets blown up because it's anti-tanked. Is that somehow the Ganking players fault that the New-Bro doesn't know about ganking or tanking?

Or is it the corp he is it the corp he's apart of, fault for not explaining to him about D-scan, Gank ships, or how to properly tank a mining barge? Corps ARE the NPE right now. No amount of text will explain to a New-Bro what he needs to know. CODE would be far less effective if everyone wasn't worried about ISK per hour, or being able to watch some show on Netflixs while he let's his barge puff away.


Personally I say CODE does a service to the community by forcing out the stupid and willfully ignorant players from a game they shouldn't be playing, because in all honesty it's not the game for that type of person. EVE doesn't need a player that needs his hand held and every given moment and one that forever cries to be protected by his NPC 'Police' (Here's also a hint, CONCORD is not the police' they are more of a punisher type entity).

EVE needs the smart, tactile, players that learn. That want to be competitive and need to take risk. It needs players that want to have connections, build relationships and morph those relationships into powerful groups like CODE, the CFC, Pandemic, and many other large forces that shouldn't be messed around with.

If you are in EVE and you don't have you fingers in the pockets of other players. You doing it wrong. If you playing EVE and all you want to do is be left alone, you are doing it wrong. EVE is the most social game I've ever played. The Meta is so strong it's become it's own game mechanic.

Sure CODEdot has it's bunch of wee wee grable bunk. But so does every alice, corp and group. Personally I'm not a Ganker, I don't like the play style of it. But I think if you can have over 200 players in Highsec all go about and complete task with almost machine like efficiency you should find that a beautiful thing.

Whats ugly, is a bunch of whiners complaining about 'unfair' mechanics. Nothing in EVE is fair. Learn that quickly it's designed to be that way. You are given a choice. That choice decides how unfair it will be, weather in your favor or your opponent. The quicker New-Bros learn that. The quicker they will excel in the game.
#DeleteTheWeak
Tasspool Harp
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#132 - 2014-12-27 04:41:01 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
And you know what else?

All the vitriol, the hatred, the unreasoning rage against gankers and PvP in this game does not come from us. We have not cultivated it in any way, merely adapted to it with amusement to cope with your sick attacks.

Where it really comes from is poor attitudes, poor sportsmanship and rabid risk aversion. It comes from the pigheaded refusal to recognize ganking for the legitimate activity that it is, the selfish refusal to recognize that another player has every right to shoot at you if he feels like it.

It's stupid, stupid rationalization that you use to whitewash away a loss in a videogame. And why some of you freaking people need to rationalize like this in a freaking game is beyond me. To me, it resembles nothing more than a mental illness.


Thou dost protest too much
Tasspool Harp
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#133 - 2014-12-27 06:17:43 UTC
Valkin Mordirc wrote:



Personally I say CODE does a service to the community by forcing out the stupid and willfully ignorant players from a game they shouldn't be playing, because in all honesty it's not the game for that type of person. EVE doesn't need a player that needs his hand held and every given moment and one that forever cries to be protected by his NPC 'Police' (Here's also a hint, CONCORD is not the police' they are more of a punisher type entity).

...

Whats ugly, is a bunch of whiners complaining about 'unfair' mechanics. Nothing in EVE is fair. Learn that quickly it's designed to be that way. You are given a choice. That choice decides how unfair it will be, weather in your favor or your opponent. The quicker New-Bros learn that. The quicker they will excel in the game.


What I find ugly and also weirdly amusing is the spouting off by some players about who should or should not be playing Eve. As if there is a section of the player base who clearly are not leet enough to be hanging out with the cool kids and should do everyone a favour and go back to their Xbox or take up WoW, because their continued ineptitude or play style makes their presence insufferable and brings shame to the Eve community. Maybe CCP need a new server and you and all the like minded folks can ask to be migrated there to play Eve Online Elite , in your own exclusive universe free of dullards and weaklings such as myself.
Last I checked , stupid and willfully ignorant players were still contributing the same amount to play the game as anyone else , and while they may not have your respect in game, they are doing their bit to keep the lights on at CCP.
Tisiphone Dira
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#134 - 2014-12-27 07:04:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Tisiphone Dira
Valkin Mordirc wrote:
But I think if you can have over 200 players in Highsec all go about and complete task with almost machine like efficiency you should find that a beautiful thing.


HEY!

>8 (

There once was a ganker named tisi

A stunningly beautiful missy

To gank a gross miner

There is nothing finer, cept when they get all pissy

Lady Areola Fappington
#135 - 2014-12-27 08:05:59 UTC
Tasspool Harp wrote:


What I find ugly and also weirdly amusing is the spouting off by some players about who should or should not be playing Eve. As if there is a section of the player base who clearly are not leet enough to be hanging out with the cool kids and should do everyone a favour and go back to their Xbox or take up WoW, because their continued ineptitude or play style makes their presence insufferable and brings shame to the Eve community. Maybe CCP need a new server and you and all the like minded folks can ask to be migrated there to play Eve Online Elite , in your own exclusive universe free of dullards and weaklings such as myself.
Last I checked , stupid and willfully ignorant players were still contributing the same amount to play the game as anyone else , and while they may not have your respect in game, they are doing their bit to keep the lights on at CCP.



I don't mind having stupid and willfully ignorant people playing Eve. I love them! They're the easiest ones, overall, to blow up. They're the type who thinks hisec is safe, no need to tank, etcetc.

In short, the willfully ignorant are fodder for my playstyle.

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Dar'Nalaa
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#136 - 2014-12-27 08:39:16 UTC
[quote=Valkin Mordirc]

Personally I say CODE does a service to the community by forcing out the stupid and willfully ignorant players from a game they shouldn't be playing, because in all honesty it's not the game for that type of person. EVE doesn't need a player that needs his hand held and every given moment and one that forever cries to be protected by his NPC 'Police' (Here's also a hint, CONCORD is not the police' they are more of a punisher type entity).


Who do you think you are saying who can and can't play , eve is a sandbox and as in the real world, to work needs all types,
even people like you are needed, my time in eve is spent helping (as you call them stupid and ignorant) people, Look forward to seeing you in high sec and please let me find you afk at a gate....

All the best in eve Dar'nalaaTwisted

Black Pedro
Mine.
#137 - 2014-12-27 09:01:04 UTC
Tasspool Harp wrote:

What I find ugly and also weirdly amusing is the spouting off by some players about who should or should not be playing Eve. As if there is a section of the player base who clearly are not leet enough to be hanging out with the cool kids and should do everyone a favour and go back to their Xbox or take up WoW, because their continued ineptitude or play style makes their presence insufferable and brings shame to the Eve community. Maybe CCP need a new server and you and all the like minded folks can ask to be migrated there to play Eve Online Elite , in your own exclusive universe free of dullards and weaklings such as myself.
Last I checked , stupid and willfully ignorant players were still contributing the same amount to play the game as anyone else , and while they may not have your respect in game, they are doing their bit to keep the lights on at CCP.

There is nothing wrong with "bad" players playing Eve. There is always going to be a wide range of skill levels of people playing the game including new players who are learning, casuals who don't care enough to learn, and those that have been playing for years but just lack the the natural aptitude to master the game mechanics. This is all fine and I have seen no-one here saying these people shouldn't be allowed to play the game. Even Valkin is just presenting the HTFU argument, not that new/bad/casuals should be banned from the game or anything.

The problem is when these players (or sometimes even "good" Eve players) come to to forums and lobby to have the game changed because they got blown up, or for changes to isolate them from the sandbox so they can make ISK easier. Many times they just do not understand that Eve is a single-shard sandbox and that all their actions are in direct competition with other players so are confused/angry when other players want to stop them from making ISK/gathering resources. Or, they somehow get the false impression that highsec is suppose to be safe (see the CONCORD comment above in this thread) and don't understand that the ability for criminals to operate there has been built into the game on purpose by CCP to make the game more interesting.

So by all means, play the game how you want - good or bad, AFK or at the keyboard, solo or in a group, as predator or prey. But just make sure to actually play the game instead of trying to change it to your notion of what the game should be. And for the record, there are plenty of "bad" players enforcing the Code - players that are just learning the game or are ganking for the first time. All are welcome in the New Order.

But this seems all way off-topic. Therefore to try to get this back on track, I will therefore say that Gorila is an example of someone who plays the game - he fought CODE. using in-game means to battle his opponents. He did not fight CODE. by coming to the forums arguing for faster CONCORD response or the like to "defeat" his opponents.
Valkin Mordirc
#138 - 2014-12-27 09:09:52 UTC
Quote:
Who do you think you are saying who can and can't play , eve is a sandbox and as in the real world, to work needs all types,
even people like you are needed, my time in eve is spent helping (as you call them stupid and ignorant) people, Look forward to seeing you in high sec and please let me find you afk at a gate....

All the best in eve Dar'nalaaTwisted



Im only saying the willfully ignorant don't need to play the game, and then complain about it.


Easily more said as, if you don't enjoy the game. Don't play it.

Also as note, I do help people, but there are more than a few, who despite good information provided, willfully push away and remain in a small little bubble.

Also is AFK on a gate the only way you can kill something? =3
#DeleteTheWeak
Mag's
Azn Empire
#139 - 2014-12-27 11:47:23 UTC
Alastair Ormand wrote:
Mag's wrote:
People who call for RL violence against other players over game play, do not have any place in the gaming community. They are bad and trying to turn it around and justify their behaviour, only places you in their camp.

Twisted moral high ground dwellers, should be treated with the contempt they deserve.


But it's actively encouraged by CODE after completing a gank which is even worse.
I see you are again trying to justify calls for RL violence over game play. It seems to be your way. Oh well, each to their own I guess.

Alastair Ormand wrote:
Then why does CONCORD even exist in the first place? If this game is 100% focused on PvP why does CONCORD actively prevent it? Not always succesfully. But they do stop unauthorized PvP from happening.
They do not actively prevent PvP, or stop unauthorized PvP from happening. As seen by the fact it happens all the time.

They are a punishment and a balancing factor. They simply enforce greater risk in high sec.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Hiasa Kite
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#140 - 2014-12-27 13:27:31 UTC
Alastair Ormand wrote:
Then why does CONCORD even exist in the first place? If this game is 100% focused on PvP why does CONCORD actively prevent it? Not always succesfully. But they do stop unauthorized PvP from happening.

To support people with limited knowledge, skills, money and connections. If CONCORD's purpose was to prevent PvP then we'd just have a magical force field over all of HiSec to prevent us from even damaging each other.

"Playing an MMO by yourself is like masturbating in the middle of an orgy." -Jonah Gravenstein