These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Prototype: Dojos

First post First post First post
Author
Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#781 - 2014-09-27 01:07:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Zappity
I support this as long as the deployable is destructible without a criminal flag in highsec.

Those who are complaining that this is contrary to the spirit of EVE should also think about B0TLRD. These dojos are basically highsec thunderdomes which, in principle, are exactly what your glorious leaders have chosen to inflict on the game at a much larger scale. Go do something about that if you truly care about the spirit of EVE.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#782 - 2014-09-27 01:10:32 UTC
Zappity wrote:
I support this as long as the deployable is destructible without a criminal flag in highsec.

Those who are complaining that this is contrary to the spirit of EVE should also think about B0TLRD. These dojos are basically highsec thunderdomes which, in principle, are exactly what your glorious leaders have chosen to inflict on the game at a much larger scale. Go do something about that if you truly care about the spirit of EVE.


Those cursed Accords are about as un-EVE as it gets.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#783 - 2014-09-27 01:14:31 UTC
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:

Those cursed Accords are about as un-EVE as it gets.


Something players build and agree upon between one another is against the spirit of the sandbox? If you don't like B0TLRD, do something about it. Foment unrest. Engage in covert activities designed to undermine them. Claw your way up the ranks in one of the parties to B0TLRD and then tear them to little pieces.

I dunno, seems to me complaining about something someone else has wrought, rather than actively trying to blow it up, is the un-EVE activity.
Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#784 - 2014-09-27 01:38:07 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:

Those cursed Accords are about as un-EVE as it gets.


Something players build and agree upon between one another is against the spirit of the sandbox? If you don't like B0TLRD, do something about it. Foment unrest. Engage in covert activities designed to undermine them. Claw your way up the ranks in one of the parties to B0TLRD and then tear them to little pieces.

I dunno, seems to me complaining about something someone else has wrought, rather than actively trying to blow it up, is the un-EVE activity.

Tell yourself that if it makes you feel better. Supporting B0TLRD while complaining about this is hypocritical in the extreme.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Erutpar Ambient
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#785 - 2014-09-27 03:28:42 UTC
Wow!

I think this is a great idea!

The best parts are this:

1. It's small scale pvp: 1v1. So it's not going to replace standard pvp in any significant way.
2. It's not "free". You still have to buy your deployable module and the ships still get blown up. It will positively affect the economy.
3. Allows for totally fair dueling. Easy to run bets with and allows players to test their skill against each other.

I do wonder though, does this have a spectator function? Maybe allow people to watch by placing them in cloaked pods or unfit noob ships. And does the module allow everyone in the system to duel at any time? or is there a way to limit who can use it? Also, when the fight is over, do you have to fly back to station? Or does it automatically take you there?
Bienator II
madmen of the skies
#786 - 2014-09-27 03:59:06 UTC
Noriko Mai wrote:
Bienator II wrote:
any ETA when connecting to duality will work again? When i want to connect to it the launcher ends up rendering nothing, just a white, empty rectangle.

would like to test it

CCP Veritas wrote:
Folks can use "/build:828481" instead of "/server:Duality" in the launcher shortcut to patch. Directions should work from that point forward.

Hopefully the stated directions will start working later, but for now that'll workaround.


It is working.

Use " /build:828481" for launcher shortcut. Let it patch. Use " /server:Duality" for .../bin/exefile.exe shortcut to launch eve.


oh right i didn't know that the exe itself can read arguments, thought it only works with the launcher. Works perfectly, thanks!

how to fix eve: 1) remove ECM 2) rename dampeners to ECM 3) add new anti-drone ewar for caldari 4) give offgrid boosters ongrid combat value

Condamor
New Eden Job Department
#787 - 2014-09-27 05:11:28 UTC
EvE online is one of those games that is closer to a sandbox than any of its competition can hope to be. Now as much as reading forum rage is entertaining, it is not at all productive. I have read the 779 posts so far on this topic and seen a few interesting ideas and suggestions. Although I want to say 85% of it is just rage and whining. How about we look at the potential pros and cons of this topic and discuss those so that CCP understands our opinions on this topic and can better weigh the risks/advantages of such a mechanic. Please note that saying it will kill eve online sandbox is not a valid point BE SPECIFIC, address the reason as to why in depth enough so that the other side of the discussion can provide an alternative or be more swayed toward your opinion.

As with anything, there are always advantages and disadvantages. Most if not all of disadvantages or flaws can be fixed or avoided with a bit of work.

I agree that an unscannable deadspace pocket is flawed, and tbh it wouldn't be fun at all. I would love to be able to watch these fights and to bet on them. Now the idea has been suggested that it be like a POS bubble but those inside can fight and those outside cannot. The purpose of this would be to prevent outside aid from interfering (remote repair fleets for example), and it should prevent fleet boosts from working. This would effectively level the playing field enough so that it comes down to the players' skill, fits, and implants. Now people are arguing that "well if I can't lock you and shoot you it's against the EVE" well to this I say yes and no. I can see all sorts of potential shiny and loots behind a pos shield but I can't shoot at it unless I take down the POS, or furthermore all those people who ship spin all day long as they horde iskies. Now I'm not against ship spinning as a pastime, but saying Dojos are going to kill EvE or the sandbox, is like saying you are mortally wounded from a paper cut. What this could do is offer an opportunity for fresh PvP pilots to get the feet wet and get a little experience so they can be a little better equipped for High sec PvP (war decs) and Low sec (Piracy), I leave out null because its a whole different ball game out there. Who I see being affected by this the most are those people that do duel bait, the ones who call in logi and use maxed out boosts off grid to get kills. There are a few people who honor the concept of a true 1v1, this system could truly test a pilot's skill and mettle.

Somebody mentioned this being a simulator and or being solely in station, perhaps instead it become something you can warp to like a celestial body or a POCO (CCP can come up with something clever for it) so that people can view the fight and enjoy the spectacle. Secondly everything on tranquility should be subject to destruction so a simulator is not a good idea, if somebody wants to test a fit without losing isk or reputation try singularity. Destruction is one of the driving forces in this game, even if nobody lost ships and just shot at rats all day you still are destroying something and creating a demand for ammunition. Any time I PvP in EvE I get an adrenaline rush because there is that feeling that I could lose the ship that I am in and I don't know how the battle will turn out. Anybody in a corp or alliance together have a certain code and trust that you can do a 1v1 easily, but what this will do is allow two random people to engage each other with no interference from outsiders. Granted I see this system is better suited for High sec because anywhere else you can shoot with no interference from the popo. One of the two people fighting in the Dojo should lose a ship yes, and yes they should need to undock and find their own way to the Dojo. Most people understand losing ships, losing ships because your opponent has loki boosts and guardians is what upsets people.

If they implement this correctly this could have an unprecedented effect on the EvE universe whether it is good or bad is a matter of whose side you are on but its not gonna destroy the "sandbox." When you lose ships you need money to replace them and for most people that means undocking thus making them prone to suicide gankers or war targets. There are some really easy solutions to most of the points brought up against it. You can complain about how wrong it is all you want but if all you do is rage and yell at each other then nobody is going to take you seriously.
Mike Azariah
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#788 - 2014-09-27 05:16:42 UTC
Erutpar Ambient wrote:


I do wonder though, does this have a spectator function? Maybe allow people to watch by placing them in cloaked pods or unfit noob ships.


If only Eve was compatible with twitch. Then anybody could watch.

oh, wait

m

Mike Azariah  ┬──┬ ¯|(ツ)

eatingbadies
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#789 - 2014-09-27 05:42:13 UTC
I really like the idea of a 125km POS type arena that you could warp to and spectate(or fight each other), with the combatants maybe spawned in or warping in from a pos somewhere.

I actually got a dojo battle to work on duality but I can't get the moveme channel to work, so there's no good way to stock it with everything I need...
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#790 - 2014-09-27 07:04:37 UTC
Zappity wrote:
Arrendis wrote:
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:

Those cursed Accords are about as un-EVE as it gets.


Something players build and agree upon between one another is against the spirit of the sandbox? If you don't like B0TLRD, do something about it. Foment unrest. Engage in covert activities designed to undermine them. Claw your way up the ranks in one of the parties to B0TLRD and then tear them to little pieces.

I dunno, seems to me complaining about something someone else has wrought, rather than actively trying to blow it up, is the un-EVE activity.

Tell yourself that if it makes you feel better. Supporting B0TLRD while complaining about this is hypocritical in the extreme.

a player-crafted and player-enforced organisation and a mechanically-enforced system are pretty obviously different concepts regardless of one's opinion on the dojo
Captain Semper
Fusion Enterprises Ltd
Pandemic Horde
#791 - 2014-09-27 07:25:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Captain Semper
I hope this is a joke.
CCP realy want add arenas in SANDBOX?
With no outside effect?!

So tell me plz, why ppl should fly at 0sec after this change?
Here world of space ship come... Button "to battle" become reality.

CCP if you like sandbox, dont ruin it with arenas and battlegrounds!
Bamboozlement
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#792 - 2014-09-27 11:33:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Bamboozlement
Zappity wrote:
I support this as long as the deployable is destructible without a criminal flag in highsec.

Those who are complaining that this is contrary to the spirit of EVE should also think about B0TLRD. These dojos are basically highsec thunderdomes which, in principle, are exactly what your glorious leaders have chosen to inflict on the game at a much larger scale. Go do something about that if you truly care about the spirit of EVE.


What do you mean by the spirit of EVE, competitive and consensual pvp exist in EVE since 2005 and since it's a sandbox there is no lesser gameplay.

Are you comparing AT participants to the nullsec blue donut?

And what's the point if there is no criminal flag, how can we defend against you? See if you go criminal it's interesting for everyone, you get content, I get content but I'm not surprised to see a "true EVE player" that knows the true xXx"SPIRIT OF EVE"xXx yet again ask for risk averse pew pew.

How ironic. Roll

I have a Ph.D

Bamboozlement
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#793 - 2014-09-27 11:40:28 UTC
Captain Semper wrote:
I hope this is a joke.
CCP realy want add arenas in SANDBOX?
With no outside effect?!

So tell me plz, why ppl should fly at 0sec after this change?
Here world of space ship come... Button "to battle" become reality.

CCP if you like sandbox, dont ruin it with arenas and battlegrounds!


Why do you fly in nullsec and not lowsec or even highsec? The appeal of nullsec is unique; have your OWN part of space, your name on the map, a space to afk rat in your ishtar, a moon goo network, etc

Dojos won't remove any of this, not only that but it's 5min timer you can join at any time it won't destroy the rest of your gameplay.

I don't understand your thought process (or lack thereof).

I have a Ph.D

Noriko Mai
#794 - 2014-09-27 12:34:22 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Noriko Mai wrote:
All the talk about scannable dojo, reinforce timer, etc... If only one of you would log in on Duality, he/she would see that the "Dojo" is just a mobile depot with the dojo feature attatched to it. It's a prototype of the dojo function. There actualley are exactly zero facts about its stats. It's a freakin mobile depot with huge cargo. Really people.. so mutch shittalk and anger about nothing. But don't let facts interrupt your discussion. (BTW. This is the first real fact since page 32)


True, but as it exists now, those are the facts about its stats. They may change in the future, they may not.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVfkYZmXHAg

"Meh.." - Albert Einstein

Dreksl
Screaming Hayabusa
#795 - 2014-09-27 12:49:50 UTC
Rin Valador
Professional Amateurs
#796 - 2014-09-27 14:18:21 UTC
Terrible. Scrap it.

"There will be neither compassion nor mercy; Nor peace, nor solace For those who bear witness to these Signs And still do not believe." - The Scriptures, Book of Reclaiming 25:10

Bamboozlement
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#797 - 2014-09-27 14:57:16 UTC
Rin Valador wrote:
Terrible. Scrap it.


Good arguments. Roll

I have a Ph.D

Sephira Galamore
Inner Beard Society
Kvitravn.
#798 - 2014-09-27 15:05:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Sephira Galamore
Overview of former and present CSM quotes/opinions on this:

"This is the most eve-like implementation of "structured fights" that you can possibly get, and it's awesome."
- mynnna, CSM 8+9, CFC/Nullsec

"I cannot wait to see this on TQ."
- Xander Phoena, CSM 9, CFC/Nullsec

"This has a considerable amount of promise"
- Mangala Solaris, CSM 8+9, RvB/Hisec

"I like the idea . . . in case you cannot tell but I like something even MORE
CCP is floating an idea past you without promises, without fanfair, without you all signing an NDA"
- Mike Azariah, CSM 8+9, RP/Hisec/Incursions

"It's a way to let people have consensual fights in a place where loss is meaningful. "
- Steve Ronuken, CSM 9, Fuzzworks/Industry

"sounds neat"
- Sala Cameron, CSM 8, PL/Nullsec

"I think this is great, as long as actual ships are lost when things blow up, I am totally fine with it"
- Two step, CSM 6+7, NOHO/Wspace

"Given that he only had a few weeks to work on it, it's kinda primitive but bad-ass and workable."
- Ripard Teg, CSM 8, Rote Kapelle/Jester's Trek (on Failheap)

"Its not going to ruin anything you dreadful twerp"
- Malcanis, CSM 8, INIT/Nullsec (on Failheap)

"I will fight anyone that doesn't think dojos are awesome in honorable 1v1 combat."
- Sion Kumitomo, CSM 9, CFC/Nullsec (on Twitter)


Tho I wonder if the lack of some voices from the current CSM is a sign of quiet disagreement or just a "I dont forums much" thing
Chirality Tisteloin
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#799 - 2014-09-27 15:20:42 UTC
I am trying this on duality. But when I select in the dropdown my stocked Dojo and click on "Select Dojo" nothing happens What?
Anyone else got this problem?

See you at my blog: http://spindensity.wordpress.com/

Chirality Tisteloin
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#800 - 2014-09-27 15:23:23 UTC
Mike Azariah wrote:
Erutpar Ambient wrote:


I do wonder though, does this have a spectator function? Maybe allow people to watch by placing them in cloaked pods or unfit noob ships.


If only Eve was compatible with twitch. Then anybody could watch.

oh, wait

m


No no, Mike. It is not about players watching. It is about characters watching. Yes there is twitch obvioulsy. But what if we could make people undock to watch? For example by letting them push the red button of boundary violation ;)

See you at my blog: http://spindensity.wordpress.com/