These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Prototype: Dojos

First post First post First post
Author
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#721 - 2014-09-26 17:34:59 UTC
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Yun Kuai wrote:


FFS, get that stick out of your ass. It's for a finite time that changes locations at all times. 5mins, maybe 10 tops, and you're getting your panties all in a bunch. Really, you feel it's necessary to ruin someone's 5-10mins of organized gameplay...selfish prick is what you are when you can't accept that some people would okie to play a different way


1st of all, my back side itches and needs a slight bit of kissing to solve that problem

2ndly. I'm not a ganker. I wouldn't try to scan down folks to kill if i could, unless their name as "Dread Guristas".

We are talking about the SPIRIT , the concept, the purpose of this game and it's rule set, not some selfish need to screw with frig duels. Some of us CARE about what EVE Online ( is and want it to be something that is consistent and of high quality.


Who are you, that eschews PvP utterly and refuses to engage in it, to comment on the "spirit" and "purpose" of EVE Online?


I don't eschew PVP at all. When I keep someone from killing my in a low sec plex, I'm pvping, when I sell my loto I'm pvping. When i'm on my alt (in a null alliance) in a fleet fight , I'm pvping.

But at heart, I am a PVE player, yet one who UNDERSTANDS the game I'm in is a non-consensual open world pvp game. So i don't complain when people try to pew pew me, I WIN (by not exploding).

That's what EVE is, thinking and DOING , not expecting the game to 'do' it for you.

You want honorable 1v1. make a friend, go to some backwater system, and 1v1. But be prepared to be disrupted if you do, because in EVE sandbox does't mean you can do what you want, it means EVERYONE can do what they want.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#722 - 2014-09-26 17:36:37 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:

If you want to be "safe" from other people, be docked. There should be no exceptions.


Because God knows, when I'm cloaked up, I'm totally not 100% safe while I...

...watch your staging system movements to report intel...
...angle in behind you in the ice belt as a warp-in for a gank fleet...
...creep around nice and safe in the w-space system I scanned out 3 hours earlier to get into position for my buddies to warp in with their brawler Proteii and shred your triaged carrier in the anom you're clearing...


... and a host of other thing. Totally not safe at all.


Being cloaked is being docked by other means. You can't do jack to anyone while cloaked.
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#723 - 2014-09-26 17:38:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Alvatore DiMarco
Jenn aSide wrote:
You want honorable 1v1. make a friend, go to some backwater system, and 1v1. But be prepared to be disrupted if you do, because in EVE sandbox does't mean you can do what you want, it means EVERYONE can do what they want.


Apparently it actually means "everyone else can do what they want and you can just play a different game if you don't bring a blob."

Honestly, I hope to every god ever that this comes to TQ simply because of how furious it will make all the right people.

A fight that can't be screwed with will ruin the day of so very, very many people and there's nothing more eve-like than that.
Regnag Leppod
Doomheim
#724 - 2014-09-26 17:39:40 UTC
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
I'm almost completely sure that CCP can't financially afford for their sole product to die simply because a few bittervets are offended.

Just saying.


And that's part of the core problem really. People are so obsessed with the sandbox going by their own rules, that they will go to any length to avoid change, even if it means killing the game.

They literally are so self-centered that they will cling to their obsession of being a "bad guy" even if it means hundreds of people in a foreign country losing their jobs in RL.
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#725 - 2014-09-26 17:39:44 UTC
Bamboozlement wrote:
Sturm Gewehr wrote:
I don't think people realize that the tools for arena/tournament style pvp are just not in the game unless CCP is directly organizing and running it. You cannot regulate fits, implants, boundary violations, countdowns to prevent early locking, time limits, tidi, spectator cameras that don't interfere with or can be interfered with, pod immunity, etc. If eve was "real" it would be trivial for organizations to run tournaments with these restrictions in place. You can make all the rules in the world but you have no seamless way to enforce them without the tools something like the dojo would introduce. There are mechanics for sov, facwar, dueling, pos bashes, wormholes etc. in the game but there is nothing for tournaments without CCP interaction.

There is a playerbase that highly values tournament/arena style pvp. Unfortunately this only exists on the live server twice a year in NEO and AT. Many players only pvp during these time periods because EVE otherwise does not support their style of play.

To everyone complaining about how this shouldn't be implemented because of potential XYZ exploit, this is a prototype on a test server. If we are already recognizing it now you can be sure CCP will fix it before it does go live IF it goes live. If they don't all the proponents of it will be slamming CCP for not doing something about it when it was a known issue day 1 along with the rest of you. I don't think CCP wants another monoclegate.

Giving players the tools to run their own tournaments (assuming dojos evolve to support this) is a huge boon to the small competitive pvp community and will drastically improve the quality and skill level of participants in the AT and NEO because teams will be more practiced and CCP will have more opportunities to evaluate their rules and craft a more competitive meta.

And if you don't like dojos robbing you of your content then go blow them up! It is interesting how many players here who are complaining about losing out on content belong to organizations that deliberately deny content with blue lists/NAPs/not engaging without massive superiority and also use content denial as a form of warfare.

For everyone complaining about eve becoming safe just remember that losses do occur and the are REAL, AT runs can cost into the hundreds of billions. The ships are REAL, the ammo is REAL, when they blow up there is a REAL wreck just like anywhere else. Just because arena style combat is introduced does not mean CCP or the players are just going to pack up sov, NPC 0.0, FW, dueling, wardecs, suicide ganking, wormholes, etc. and just focus on dojos.

Also keep in mind if this becomes a well implemented function within the game it could draw more subscribers. Not everyone who starts playing eve because they heard about a giant sov fight actually goes into sov warfare. Not everyone who does dojos will do dojos 100% of the time.


Finally a post from someone relevant to the topic, I agree with everything said here there is no valid and logical argument against the dojos implementation.

This is really important, and while it's obvious that people shouldn't be able to screw with people fighting inside the dojo we should be able to interact with the dojo itself since it's a deployable and with the people deploying it.



Not empty quoting.

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

Bienator II
madmen of the skies
#726 - 2014-09-26 17:40:47 UTC
any ETA when connecting to duality will work again? When i want to connect to it the launcher ends up rendering nothing, just a white, empty rectangle.

would like to test it

how to fix eve: 1) remove ECM 2) rename dampeners to ECM 3) add new anti-drone ewar for caldari 4) give offgrid boosters ongrid combat value

Priscilla Project
Doomheim
#727 - 2014-09-26 17:40:57 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:

If you want to be "safe" from other people, be docked. There should be no exceptions.


Because God knows, when I'm cloaked up, I'm totally not 100% safe while I...

...watch your staging system movements to report intel...
...angle in behind you in the ice belt as a warp-in for a gank fleet...
...creep around nice and safe in the w-space system I scanned out 3 hours earlier to get into position for my buddies to warp in with their brawler Proteii and shred your triaged carrier in the anom you're clearing...


... and a host of other thing. Totally not safe at all.

Hey, that's my style! XD
  • All incoming connection attempts are being blocked. If you want to speak to me you will find me either in Hek local, you can create a contract or make a thread about it in General Discussions. I will call you back. -
Toriessian
Helion Production Labs
Independent Operators Consortium
#728 - 2014-09-26 17:41:16 UTC
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
When the core principles of EVE are resulting in people logging off and playing other games, roaming for three hours and finding no fights or not even undocking because everyone else's ability to interfere completely kills your own ability to do what you want in the game in the first place, perhaps it's time to revisit those core principles.


This and it comes from both sides...

Suggest a war dec mechanic that might increase people's willingness to undock and you'll be accused of wanting "Cheap gank kills" and wanting risk free indy corp farming.

Suggest a mechanic that might get more people to TRY PVPing in a controlled environment - "Screw off you're ruining the sandbox"

Personally I'm tired of it because I want a better GAME with people UNDOCKING. The ability to run mini PVP tournaments would be such a boon for content creators I'm stunned that there is there are this many tears over the mockup. How many motivated people could do more with a few toys to play with in the sandbox? I think this is a situation where the good of the game needs to be given a little priority over ideological sandbox purity.

Every day I'm wafflin!

Arrendis
TK Corp
#729 - 2014-09-26 17:42:12 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Arrendis wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:

If you want to be "safe" from other people, be docked. There should be no exceptions.


Because God knows, when I'm cloaked up, I'm totally not 100% safe while I...

...watch your staging system movements to report intel...
...angle in behind you in the ice belt as a warp-in for a gank fleet...
...creep around nice and safe in the w-space system I scanned out 3 hours earlier to get into position for my buddies to warp in with their brawler Proteii and shred your triaged carrier in the anom you're clearing...


... and a host of other thing. Totally not safe at all.


Being cloaked is being docked by other means. You can't do jack to anyone while cloaked.


If you think that I'm not doing anything to anyone while I'm arranging for the murder of everything from solo miners to 150-man T3 fleets, please, keep making my job easier, thanks.
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#730 - 2014-09-26 17:42:57 UTC
Bienator II wrote:
any ETA when connecting to duality will work again? When i want to connect to it the launcher ends up rendering nothing, just a white, empty rectangle.

would like to test it

theres a thread regarding that in the test server sub forum
Toriessian
Helion Production Labs
Independent Operators Consortium
#731 - 2014-09-26 17:43:20 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:

Being cloaked is being docked by other means. You can't do jack to anyone while cloaked.


The hunters in my black ops fleets disagree with this statement.

Every day I'm wafflin!

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#732 - 2014-09-26 17:44:02 UTC
the first mmo i played was city of heroes and the arenas in that game were only used for "roleplay" which was quite distressing to discover when i finally found a room that hadn't disabled 'observer' mode

beyond that, i had a bad feeling about the thread when i saw it announced, but i can't vocalise the bad feeling into a rational reason why i shouldn't like the concept. so it's not really a feeling worth expressing, is it?
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#733 - 2014-09-26 17:45:28 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
the first mmo i played was city of heroes and the arenas in that game were only used for "roleplay" which was quite distressing to discover when i finally found a room that hadn't disabled 'observer' mode

beyond that, i had a bad feeling about the thread when i saw it announced, but i can't vocalise the bad feeling into a rational reason why i shouldn't like the concept. so it's not really a feeling worth expressing, is it?

ill echo that
Bamboozlement
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#734 - 2014-09-26 17:46:44 UTC
Toriessian wrote:
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
When the core principles of EVE are resulting in people logging off and playing other games, roaming for three hours and finding no fights or not even undocking because everyone else's ability to interfere completely kills your own ability to do what you want in the game in the first place, perhaps it's time to revisit those core principles.


This and it comes from both sides...

Suggest a war dec mechanic that might increase people's willingness to undock and you'll be accused of wanting "Cheap gank kills" and wanting risk free indy corp farming.

Suggest a mechanic that might get more people to TRY PVPing in a controlled environment - "Screw off you're ruining the sandbox"

Personally I'm tired of it because I want a better GAME with people UNDOCKING. The ability to run mini PVP tournaments would be such a boon for content creators I'm stunned that there is there are this many tears over the mockup. How many motivated people could do more with a few toys to play with in the sandbox? I think this is a situation where the good of the game needs to be given a little priority over ideological sandbox purity.



It's the same people against dojos over and over, some of them probably using alts, people with a metagame agenda ruining eve yet again. Roll

Same happened when CCP introduced duels : http://i.imgur.com/5v1zptC.jpg

I have a Ph.D

Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#735 - 2014-09-26 17:53:06 UTC
Bamboozlement wrote:


It's the same people against dojos over and over, some of them probably using alts, people with a metagame agenda ruining eve yet again. Roll

Same happened when CCP introduced duels : http://i.imgur.com/5v1zptC.jpg

actually you have been talking much more than anyone else
http://eve-search.com/stats/thread/375485-1
Bamboozlement
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#736 - 2014-09-26 18:03:32 UTC
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
Bamboozlement wrote:


It's the same people against dojos over and over, some of them probably using alts, people with a metagame agenda ruining eve yet again. Roll

Same happened when CCP introduced duels : http://i.imgur.com/5v1zptC.jpg

actually you have been talking much more than anyone else
http://eve-search.com/stats/thread/375485-1


And that's bad because? Honestly if people with an agenda against dojos weren't posting false informations and logical fallacies I wouldn't need to post.

You are free to post your opinion, posting stuff like "eve will die because I said so" or "consensual pvp is alien to eve" is ridiculous, especially for people that aren't the target demographic for dojos.

I have a Ph.D

Sturm Gewehr
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#737 - 2014-09-26 18:11:49 UTC
There is no sweeping generalisation you can make about what type of players this change positively affects. It isn't just good for casual, new players, vets, hardcore players, carebears, blob f1ers, small gang and solo enthusiasts, unemployed people who can play all day or people who have busy work/family lives. This caters to everyone from every section of eve who wants to get a quick fix, work on their piloting mechanics, or are interested in trying their hands in tournament style formats without waiting for CCP.

There is on demand content for sov (go shoot a structure/or wait for jabber pings), facwar (orbit a button), miners (warp to belt/site), ratters (warp to belt/site), mission runners (talk to agent, undock, warp to mission), trading (you don't even have to undock!) and I can go on.

Tell me where I can go for tournament style PvP? Because it doesn't exist unless CCP devotes their spare personal time to do it. It just doesn't. Why can't we have content that you can interfere with? We are open to that.

The structure is destroyable, probably won't be hard to make it so that when put into RF mode ships in the arena get moved on grid with the structure to be vulnerable. Ships will be vulnerable when filling the dojo and moving to/from it. There are mechanics in eve where ships are made invulnerable by structures until the structures are destroyed, this is not a new precedent. There is so much "immersion" and sandbox breaking stuff currently in game because it improves gameplay and balancing. This in turn makes the game fun and enjoyable for people. I couldn't care less if this game introduced changes that improved the quality of life of other players while also providing me potential content because it is good for the health of the game and CCP. In fact I WANT players in all walks of them game to be happy and have their gameplay supported.

Currently in AT/NEO it is impossible for players to leave the arena because there is a death field and warp interdiction bubble that works on all ship types. If you burn out manually you die and you cannot initiate warp at all. You only leave if you get moved out. A similar system could be introduced to prevent a lot of the abuse.

Anyone saying this shouldn't be introduced because potential exploitation needs to realize that there will be months or years of development on this put into preventing possible exploitation before it goes live if it does at all. That is why it gets tested.





Noriko Mai
#738 - 2014-09-26 18:24:29 UTC
Bienator II wrote:
any ETA when connecting to duality will work again? When i want to connect to it the launcher ends up rendering nothing, just a white, empty rectangle.

would like to test it

CCP Veritas wrote:
Folks can use "/build:828481" instead of "/server:Duality" in the launcher shortcut to patch. Directions should work from that point forward.

Hopefully the stated directions will start working later, but for now that'll workaround.


It is working.

Use " /build:828481" for launcher shortcut. Let it patch. Use " /server:Duality" for .../bin/exefile.exe shortcut to launch eve.

"Meh.." - Albert Einstein

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#739 - 2014-09-26 18:25:33 UTC
If this has anything to do with instanced PVP, then nope. Hell no, not one little piece of it thank you. EVE has always been a single-shard environment, that's what makes it unique. Take that away and what's left?

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

newfage
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#740 - 2014-09-26 18:34:25 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
If this has anything to do with instanced PVP, then nope. Hell no, not one little piece of it thank you. EVE has always been a single-shard environment, that's what makes it unique. Take that away and what's left?


Good, don't use dojos then.