These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Prototype: Dojos

First post First post First post
Author
Nicolai Serkanner
Incredible.
Brave Collective
#641 - 2014-09-26 13:19:02 UTC
Bamboozlement wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
+1

Bolded the truth here..

No one is trying to poo poo on anyone's fun. We're just asking for smart development. OF COURSE if you make instant gratification stuff people will flock to it. If you need to do that, why not just shut down EVE and make some LoL/Tanks style game and rake in the cash?


Nice logical fallacy, there is a difference between adding more options to eve, especially when it's relevant to an under-designed part of the gameplay (see AT/NEO tournaments, solo pvp community) and making a lol game.

"if you don't agree with me eve is lol"Roll


Says the champion in this topic of logical fallacies.
Bamboozlement
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#642 - 2014-09-26 13:24:10 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:

Sea Change

I'm not a fan of the readily available arena pvp thing but I could live with it. But yea, to me the main problem is the deadspace thing, NOTHING in space except a noob in a noob system should be "un-screw-with-able" and i say this as someone not inclined to 'screw with' anyone. What EVE is matters.

They get rid of the unscannable pocket in space thing and (while i don't like the idea of arenas ,EVE's Arena is called EVE Online) I'm more or less cool with it. Even if that pocket was 'damn near' impossible to scan down with the best skills and gear, that would be in keeping with the 12 year tradition of this game.


I think you don't understand that the point of having dojos is to provide fair and controlled fights, fair and controlled fights existed in eve for a long time (the first AT was in 2005) just because CCP only used funny stories about betrayal, awox, theft and big 10% tidi battles to market eve till now doesn't mean it's not a valid part of the gameplay.

I mean, CCP is working hard to provide a good and professional AT stream, you don't like it fine it's a sandbox you can go do something else.

Look at the eve numbers after big battles : http://eve-offline.net/?server=tranquility now look what happens months after that..
We are literally back to 2008 tier of average people online, CCP listened to people like you for years I hope they are tired of listening to people with metagame agendas.

I have a Ph.D

Nicolai Serkanner
Incredible.
Brave Collective
#643 - 2014-09-26 13:26:02 UTC
Bamboozlement wrote:


Look at the eve numbers after big battles : http://eve-offline.net/?server=tranquility now look what happens months after that..
We are literally back to 2008 tier of average people online, CCP listened to people like you for years I hope they are tired of listening to people with metagame agendas.


... and another one. You really can't stop, can you?
S'No Flake
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#644 - 2014-09-26 13:26:23 UTC
X4m wrote:
bye bye free pvp eve.
bye bye pirates,
bye bye solo pvp,
bye nullsecs,
bye bye pvp,
bye bye eve.

go to cosmic WOW arenas

HATE YOU !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


and....can I destroy this structure?


Seriously... do you think there are so many people willing to set up Dojo everywhere in EVE and supply them with their funds so, 27k people from 30k logged will do arena all day long and nothing else?

Can't you imagine the funds and logistics needed for something like this?
And even if people have enough money and enough people are willing to move around and supply these things... 27k people doing arena all day long will drain the entire market of t1 frigs and t1/meta mods in matter of weeks.

This is not going to happen.
These things will be used for fun and giggles by a small part of the player base.

And if you read the damn thread you will see that this structure have a reinforcement timer and you can blow it up.
S'No Flake
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#645 - 2014-09-26 13:28:08 UTC
Zappity wrote:
I don't understand this. On TQ where would the ships and modules come from? Would they have to be bought and then stocked into the whatsit? Surely they wouldn't be spawned. Do the participants then pay for them?


Did you read the damn thread?
Whoever deploys the Dojo will have to fund it from his pocket with ships and mods bought from market.
Plus, somebody will have to move all that stuff to the dojo.
Bamboozlement
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#646 - 2014-09-26 13:28:33 UTC
Nicolai Serkanner wrote:

Says the champion in this topic of logical fallacies.


Feel free to highlight my logical fallacies and say why I'm wrong, you know like I just did for him. Roll

Unlike you, I don't just post "you're wrong because I don't agree with you", right now you're just circlejerking.

I have a Ph.D

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#647 - 2014-09-26 13:29:31 UTC
Bamboozlement wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:

Sea Change

I'm not a fan of the readily available arena pvp thing but I could live with it. But yea, to me the main problem is the deadspace thing, NOTHING in space except a noob in a noob system should be "un-screw-with-able" and i say this as someone not inclined to 'screw with' anyone. What EVE is matters.

They get rid of the unscannable pocket in space thing and (while i don't like the idea of arenas ,EVE's Arena is called EVE Online) I'm more or less cool with it. Even if that pocket was 'damn near' impossible to scan down with the best skills and gear, that would be in keeping with the 12 year tradition of this game.


I think you don't understand that the point of having dojos is to provide fair and controlled fights, fair and controlled fights existed in eve for a long time (the first AT was in 2005) just because CCP only used funny stories about betrayal, awox, theft and big 10% tidi battles to market eve till now doesn't mean it's not a valid part of the gameplay.

I mean, CCP is working hard to provide a good and professional AT stream, you don't like it fine it's a sandbox you can go do something else.

Look at the eve numbers after big battles : http://eve-offline.net/?server=tranquility now look what happens months after that..
We are literally back to 2008 tier of average people online, CCP listened to people like you for years I hope they are tired of listening to people with metagame agendas.


There should never be anything close to an enforced fair fight in EVE outside of events like the AT and NEO. That belongs in other games like LoL or tanks.
Bendy Profane
Hologram Eyes
#648 - 2014-09-26 13:29:46 UTC
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
Let's not forget how so-called 1v1 virtually requires you to have an offgrid boosting alt (because the other guy does)

This is simply not true. You can have lots of good solo fights without offgrid boosting.
Evora Pirkibo
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#649 - 2014-09-26 13:30:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Evora Pirkibo
Bamboozlement wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
+1

Bolded the truth here..

No one is trying to poo poo on anyone's fun. We're just asking for smart development. OF COURSE if you make instant gratification stuff people will flock to it. If you need to do that, why not just shut down EVE and make some LoL/Tanks style game and rake in the cash?


Nice logical fallacy, there is a difference between adding more options to eve, especially when it's relevant to an under-designed part of the gameplay (see AT/NEO tournaments, solo pvp community) and making a lol game.

"if you don't agree with me eve is lol"Roll


Funny, using the word logical fallacy. You've established a predictable pattern of oversimplifying and/or exaggerating an argument of the opposition, and then comparing it to the sentiment of "agree with me or your dumb" or some variation to similar effect. Funnier still, in almost every post you wrote the words "logical fallacy" you engage in one yourself.

Be that as it may, AT/NEO style structured combat isn't part of the gameplay, it never has been.

And you do not speak for the solo community. As someone who has enjoyed the fruits of solo pvp for a few years I can say from experience you never have to roam 1-4 hours for a fight. Solo pvp has been quite alive.

Edit: By solo, i mean single account pvp

On a long enough timeline, the life expectancy of everyone drops to zero.

S'No Flake
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#650 - 2014-09-26 13:31:58 UTC
handige harrie wrote:
Depending on how you have to insert ships into the unit and how big of the Deadspace pocket is, this can be exploited so bad it's not even funny. Safespots for Supercaps that can't be probed down here we come.

But plz implement it, it will make using low skilled alts for FW plexing much easier with lesser people hunting for you and give people a new way to transfer across the galaxy without using Jump Clones.


A match lasts 5min. After that the pocket it's gone.
Even if you use an interceptor and burn the pocket it will still take you a few minutes to reach out. By the time you do that and cyno in your caps to move them in the pocket, the pocket will be already gone.

Have fun doing that.

Also, you can't move around without clones. From the station you spawn in the pocket. You die or the match ends in 5min, you end back in the station. You can't even warp out of the damn thing.
Bamboozlement
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#651 - 2014-09-26 13:33:46 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:

There should never be anything close to an enforced fair fight in EVE outside of events like the AT and NEO. That belongs in other games like LoL or tanks.


This is just your opinion, people like the AT/NEO and solo pvp, CCP is providing content for this part of the population and they obviously want to promote competitive eve gameplay.

It always existed, but for years we had no real platform to train and grow our community, CCP is fixing this.

This isn't relevant to you fine, but your way to play eve isn't the only way.

I have a Ph.D

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#652 - 2014-09-26 13:38:58 UTC
Bamboozlement wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:

There should never be anything close to an enforced fair fight in EVE outside of events like the AT and NEO. That belongs in other games like LoL or tanks.


This is just your opinion, people like the AT/NEO and solo pvp, CCP is providing content for this part of the population and they obviously want to promote competitive eve gameplay.

It always existed, but for years we had no real platform to train and grow our community, CCP is fixing this.

This isn't relevant to you fine, but your way to play eve isn't the only way.


You're like a simplicity bot. Why do you think anyone cares about how you play? Who exactly do you think you are that anyone would care.

You do have a platform, it's called EVE, it's the same platform the rest of us have. What stops "your community" from going to any of the thousands of empty systems and soloing each other to your hearts content? No one needs to alter EVE's flying in space concept to make a tournament.

Hopefully the fine people at CCP (and our CSM reps) will wise up and let this prototype (as it's currently imagined) hit the scrap heap (like most prototypes do) so they can spend time building something fun for people that stays within EVE's established lines.
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#653 - 2014-09-26 13:41:21 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
so they can spend time building something fun for people that stays within EVE's established lines.


Oh I'm sorry, Jenn. I didn't realize you were an expert on what constitutes "fun" for everyone, nor was I aware that you were there when Hilmar & Friends created the concept of EVE and what it is or isn't based on.
Bamboozlement
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#654 - 2014-09-26 13:42:12 UTC
Evora Pirkibo wrote:
Funny, using the word logical fallacy. You've established a predictable pattern of oversimplifying and/or exaggerating an argument of the opposition, and then comparing it to the sentiment of "agree with me or your dumb" or some variation to similar effect. Funnier still, in almost every post you wrote the words "logical fallacy" you engage in one yourself.

Be that as it may, AT/NEO style structured combat isn't part of the gameplay, it never has been.

And you do not speak for the solo community. As someone who has enjoyed the fruits of solo pvp for a few years I can say from experience you never have to roam 1-4 hours for a fight. Solo pvp has been quite alive.

Edit: By solo, i mean single account pvp


I'm using their own arguments against them, I can't oversimplify their flawed logic.

It's always the same :

- eve will die because of this (people were saying the same when they introduced duels, obviously pvp and eve died)

- open world pvp died in wow, so same will happen to eve (terrible analogy since wow has no incentive to go open-world unlike eve)

- it's "un-eve" because I don't like it (the first AT was in 2005, structured pvp is part of eve)

And now you're saying ridiculous stuff like structured combat isn't part of the gameplay, it's not like this is a sandbox or anything, your way to play isn't the only way to play, people tried to fraps "fair" fights for years, CCP is giving us a proper platform, deal with it.

There is a difference between roaming hours for a fight and roaming hours for a "good" fight, dojos will provide "good" fights, how many times I suicided my ships into targets out of my engagement profile or gangs out of boredom.

This isn't a feature for you fine, too bad your way to play isn't the only way to play, CCP is adding more options so HTFU and adapt like we say in Eve Online.

I have a Ph.D

Tirke
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#655 - 2014-09-26 13:45:48 UTC
Dojos 'll kill this sandpit like game. You wouldn't need to undock. Wow arenas, are u seriously?Shocked
Bamboozlement
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#656 - 2014-09-26 13:47:24 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
You're like a simplicity bot. Why do you think anyone cares about how you play? Who exactly do you think you are that anyone would care.

You do have a platform, it's called EVE, it's the same platform the rest of us have. What stops "your community" from going to any of the thousands of empty systems and soloing each other to your hearts content? No one needs to alter EVE's flying in space concept to make a tournament.

Hopefully the fine people at CCP (and our CSM reps) will wise up and let this prototype (as it's currently imagined) hit the scrap heap (like most prototypes do) so they can spend time building something fun for people that stays within EVE's established lines.


What you don't understand is that people have been soloing and gimping their gameplay for years and it's not viable on the long run, CCP is fixing this just like they will (hopefully) fix POS management, just like they fixed the industry UI.

Consensual pvp existed since 2005 in eve, you must be new or something but consensual pvp isn't a less valid gameplay than hotdropping people or mining, welcome to the sandbox. Bear

I have a Ph.D

Bamboozlement
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#657 - 2014-09-26 13:48:33 UTC
Tirke wrote:
Dojos 'll kill this sandpit like game. You wouldn't need to undock. Wow arenas, are u seriously?Shocked


Just like duels killed pvp and eve. http://i.imgur.com/5v1zptC.jpg

LolLolLol

I have a Ph.D

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#658 - 2014-09-26 13:56:14 UTC
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
so they can spend time building something fun for people that stays within EVE's established lines.


Oh I'm sorry, Jenn. I didn't realize you were an expert on what constitutes "fun" for everyone, nor was I aware that you were there when Hilmar & Friends created the concept of EVE and what it is or isn't based on.


Show me where I said, Fun for EVERYONE. I said "fun for people", yet in your zeal to watch CCP violate their own principles you lost the ability to read English.

I'm simply saying (and I'll type slow so yo can understand this time...) that CCP doesn't need to introduce things that go counter to their clearly established game concept to eveole and grow the game. They did that with incarna (seeking to take EVE from "spaceship game" to "more in depth sci-fi simulation") and overall that was a mistake.

For 12 years, EVE Online has had as a FACT the principle that ANY ship in space that was not cloaked and was not a newb piloted ship in a noob system (or in the SOE Arc) could be tracked down and attacked.

These Dojos add a new exception, they say "you can be in space in a special deadspace pocket that no one else can get to and the worst thing you have to worry about is someone shooting your dojo". That's wrong for this game, BASED ON it's 1st 12 years of existence and it's developers constantly saying that you should not be safe unless docked or cloaked.

New exceptions should not be added to a games rules except in special circumstances (like how the "no noobs getting shot in nob systems came about). Exceptions should NEVER come from mere content additions if one wants to maintain the integrity of their own development process.
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#659 - 2014-09-26 13:59:44 UTC
Bamboozlement wrote:
Nicolai Serkanner wrote:

Says the champion in this topic of logical fallacies.


Feel free to highlight my logical fallacies and say why I'm wrong, you know like I just did for him. Roll

Unlike you, I don't just post "you're wrong because I don't agree with you", right now you're just circlejerking.

Bamboozlement wrote:
Tirke wrote:
Dojos 'll kill this sandpit like game. You wouldn't need to undock. Wow arenas, are u seriously?Shocked


Just like duels killed pvp and eve. http://i.imgur.com/5v1zptC.jpg

LolLolLol

you were saying...
Bamboozlement
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#660 - 2014-09-26 14:04:24 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
so they can spend time building something fun for people that stays within EVE's established lines.


Oh I'm sorry, Jenn. I didn't realize you were an expert on what constitutes "fun" for everyone, nor was I aware that you were there when Hilmar & Friends created the concept of EVE and what it is or isn't based on.


Show me where I said, Fun for EVERYONE. I said "fun for people", yet in your zeal to watch CCP violate their own principles you lost the ability to read English.

I'm simply saying (and I'll type slow so yo can understand this time...) that CCP doesn't need to introduce things that go counter to their clearly established game concept to eveole and grow the game. They did that with incarna (seeking to take EVE from "spaceship game" to "more in depth sci-fi simulation") and overall that was a mistake.

For 12 years, EVE Online has had as a FACT the principle that ANY ship in space that was not cloaked and was not a newb piloted ship in a noob system (or in the SOE Arc) could be tracked down and attacked.

These Dojos add a new exception, they say "you can be in space in a special deadspace pocket that no one else can get to and the worst thing you have to worry about is someone shooting your dojo". That's wrong for this game, BASED ON it's 1st 12 years of existence and it's developers constantly saying that you should not be safe unless docked or cloaked.

New exceptions should not be added to a games rules except in special circumstances (like how the "no noobs getting shot in nob systems came about). Exceptions should NEVER come from mere content additions if one wants to maintain the integrity of their own development process.


Except you're wrong, CCP provided ways for people to fight with no interruption : AT/NEO tournaments.

Now CCP is giving us tools to host our own tournaments and to pvp in the same conditions.

This won't remove non-consensual pvp since there is an incentive to be subject to non-consensual pvp, mainly :

- getting isk for pve players

- getting fun for corp roams/solo roams against the odds

- defending your territory for null

- attacking people for "tears"

- defending your corp in wardecs

- defending your faction/corp for fw

etc

Dojos won't remove all this, it's an added option that will bring more content to eve.

I have a Ph.D