These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Ewar drones - "Gecko" them

Author
afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#1 - 2014-05-27 09:16:54 UTC
I'm thinking of the little used EWAR drones [Not ECM, though potentially a contender too] here. When I say EWAR drones forget about ECM, that's a different beast

Given the advent of the gecko, I've decided this is now a thing and these other drones should be gecko'dâ„¢

As we know, geckos are just scaled up heavy drones - bigger, more grunt, higher bandwith allowing limited numbers to be deployed.

So...to EWAR drones, these are hampered for two reasons - DPS drones are universally better and the stacking penalties kill their usefulness.

So, we apply the Gecko method to them: By this I mean what about increasing their effects (to the point they might be worth using over DPS drones in certain circumstance/hulls), size and bandwidth to mitigate the stacking issues that make them worthless. So instead of 5 light painter drones, you would launch one "light drone" with a size/bandwidth of 25 and commensurate HP increase and effect increase to boot.

ECM drones....I'm undecided. It might work here and would probably be a nerf since less jammers would be cycling. I'd be inclined to leave them out for now and just stick with the web/painter/vamp/TD/damp drones.


I'm sure there's a good reason we wont do this, but I cant think of it right now - so....tell me why it sucks (or if it's a cool idea :) )
Velicitia
XS Tech
#2 - 2014-05-27 10:36:55 UTC
1. You do realize that the gecko drones already have their "post-Kronos" stats, right?
2. You also realize that all other drones do not have this treatment completed, right?

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#3 - 2014-05-27 10:39:31 UTC  |  Edited by: afkalt
You've entirely missed the point What?

It is about upsizing the drones to alleviate the crazy stacking penalty issues.

So instead of 5x5% light web drones, a single (25m3) 20% drone would actually be more effective - as an example. Precise numbers could be messed with were this to happen, of course.


The whole "gecko-them" thing was about the conecept of the gecko being 2x heavy drones in all BUT physical number in space.
Velicitia
XS Tech
#4 - 2014-05-27 10:49:02 UTC
No, I see where you're going with it ... it's just early in the morning...

was thinking ecm drones (which are not stack penalized), as opposed to general ewar drones (which apparently are - although quick checks through wiki don't really say either way on these guys).

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#5 - 2014-05-27 10:55:59 UTC
No worries Smile

Just hoped my post was clear enough the first time, mostly irked at myself. They're definitely hit (well, vamps wont be). Those 5x5% ewar drones as an example come out to <15% iirc.

I think it would be a relatively easy and interesting way to breath some life back into these drone types.
Jezza McWaffle
Lazerhawks
L A Z E R H A W K S
#6 - 2014-05-27 11:05:57 UTC
Any upgrade to the existing ewar drones would be welcome :D Including the neut variants, while I wouldnt mind keeping with using 5 light ones I would buff their EHP massively and also increase their strength by about 25%

Wormholes worst badass | Checkout my Wormhole blog

Ix Method
Doomheim
#7 - 2014-05-27 11:16:59 UTC
Decent idea, would make them a lot easier to balance effectively too.

Travelling at the speed of love.

Corraidhin Farsaidh
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2014-05-27 11:45:32 UTC
Good idea, any rework of ewar drones would be welcome.
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#9 - 2014-05-27 12:31:59 UTC
+1 if not to ecm drones.

duelled an honey bee orca in my nightmare on sisi. got jammed by medium ecm drones 5 times. 5!!

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#10 - 2014-05-28 07:46:43 UTC
Are we allowed to bump on this board? I can't be the only one who wants to use the EWAR drones more. Well....ok....at all would be good Smile
Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
#11 - 2014-05-28 07:56:58 UTC
Wow. This is actually a good idea. That never ******* happens. Congratulations.
Dave Stark
#12 - 2014-05-28 08:23:42 UTC
no, because many ships have a drone bay below 25m3, which basically means they'd no longer be able to use ewar drones.
Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
#13 - 2014-05-28 08:27:07 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
no, because many ships have a drone bay below 25m3, which basically means they'd no longer be able to use ewar drones.


Right, because as of now everyone uses light web drones over warriors/hobs/ecms, right?
afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#14 - 2014-05-28 08:35:28 UTC
It's a valid concern though, and arguably a very good reason to keep ECM drones out of this. Or a reason to add them, depends on how much you hate them I suppose Smile
Justin Cody
War Firm
#15 - 2014-05-28 09:14:11 UTC
Yes I could see this being a possibility. Good job using the new concepts and reapplying them.
Justin Cody
War Firm
#16 - 2014-05-28 09:17:42 UTC
For ECM however the real issue is that their cycle time for attempting to jam is faster than the jam cycle itself. So if you're jammed for 20 seconds they still keep attempting to jam you ever 5 seconds or so. Also there is no stacking penalty on ecm drones...i.e. its the same chance per jam regardless of the number of drones resulting in disproportionate utility.

Most ewar drones have diminishing returns via said stacking penalty...ecm only grows in effectiveness with more being added. Those are the two main issues.
Velicitia
XS Tech
#17 - 2014-05-28 11:14:33 UTC
Dug it up, and I don't see any indication that there's a stacking penalty in the same way as modules. However, drones appear to just alter the result exponentially, rather than multiplying their effect.

multiple effect--> 0.05 * 5 = 0.25 = 25% reduction in sensor strength/speed/etc
exponential effect --> 0.95 ^ 5 = 0.77 = 77% of "base" (i.e. 23% reduction) sensor strength/speed/etc.

This would coincide with the other "negative" bonuses that we can apply to our ships (e.g. 5% reduction in cycle time), assuming they're not also subject to stacking penalties.

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#18 - 2014-05-28 11:46:30 UTC  |  Edited by: afkalt
This is interesting, I'll need to try and test it further when I get a chance.

Using EFT projected effects a cerberus going 1614 ms has the following results (allowing for rounding, about what I'd expect)

[1 light web drone] 1533 94.9814126394052% of max
[5 light web drone] 1397 86.55514250309789% of max


Unless EFT is wrong?

Edit:

5 Light painter drones push it from 181 sig to 202 (~12% increase)
Velicitia
XS Tech
#19 - 2014-05-28 12:19:02 UTC
or my working of the maths is wrong -- I am not accounting for stacking penalties, because the drones themselves do not say they are affected by it.

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

unnownrelic
Unholy Knights of Cthulhu
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#20 - 2014-05-28 13:48:31 UTC
The drones don't say they're affected by it strictly but the same rules as multiple pilots applying the same kind of ewar still applies as far as I know.
12Next page