These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

WiS pledge fundrising

First post First post
Author
Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
#81 - 2014-05-01 06:00:33 UTC
IMO; remove WiS, admit it was a mistake (like they did with WoD) and put this money towards FiS (or what used be known as EVE Online)

And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit.

Erufen Rito
The Dark Space Initiative
Scary Wormhole People
#82 - 2014-05-01 06:02:02 UTC
Webvan wrote:
Erufen Rito wrote:
I'm not so sure about breaking Eve, but I agree with this. I've seen the tech demos on WoD and stuff, and man it was an interesting concept, as far as the character simulation and stuff. It would've absolutely put a good chunk of the player base between a rock and a hard spot, as far as upgrading their hardware or having to opt out of eve.
They did a lot of work on it, but you can see it was still missing core systems. That's because they spent most of their time just trying to get it to work. They certainly had to add onto the Carbon system, and that is probably where all the R&D money and time went into. Going over and over it again trying to figure out what was wrong, why the engine would buckle under it. Probably plagued with memory leaks and crashes, possible, probable. I mean no idea on specifics, but 1. it had to be built upon, expanded, and 2. something horrible happened in that progress stopped.

I've come to the conclusion from seeing the work to some degree, that this would have been a bad fate for EVE if WiS had continued. Certainly we wouldn't have seen all the nice improvements to the internet spaceship part of the game as has happened in recent years since they stopped WiS. The problem is, once you put something into the game, it's not always possible to roll it back. So fixing WiS could have been a decades work in the making... if it could be fixed that is.

I'm more of the idea that WiS was scrapped after the Jita riots and unsubs that basically told CCP to take their microtransaction model and shove it up an exhaust pipe. Although you are correct, WiS is here to stay as is, and it probably wont be taken out, I seriously doubt that expanding upon it would've killed Eve.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not one to play Sims in Space, but I would like to be able to see more of the nice space from within a contained environment. My POS sort of does the trick for me, but alas.

I do think though, that if WiS is prioritized with no other objective in mind other than to "Lol Sims in Space, go stand with your make believe ManFace RocketTits Girlfriend over there", would be very very terrible for the health of the game.

This is as nice as I get. Best quote ever https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4137165#post4137165

Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#83 - 2014-05-01 06:08:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Webvan
Gogela wrote:
It's not that it can't be done.
But that is just hopeful thinking, no? Sometimes things are just not possible. I've seen plenty of projects wash out, especially in indie dev projects. But even big companies (CCP being fairly small still) scrap projects that just couldn't work. I think we lucked out with EVE, in that WoD became the proverbial ginnie pig for the disaster.

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12

Marsha Mallow
#84 - 2014-05-01 06:15:53 UTC
Fair play to the WiS supporters for commitment and enthusiasm. I'm not a fan for various reasons but really can't see any need to go mental at those who are as long as WiS supporters don't demand attention is immediately diverted away from developing/fixing FiS. Superficially a proposal like this seems to be something which could be developed alongside Eve, but what happens if it fails to deliver? What would the impact be on CCP and what would the consequences be for the rest of Eve?

Having said that, if they developed an avatar based proposal where the gameplay wasn't mandatory, didn't require hardware upgrades from users, which would be available to PC as well as console users and had actual gameplay I think the wider playerbase would cautiously support it. I'm thinking something like the proposed EVA minigame rather than just vague notions of wandering about station bars and gambling. If mass character rendering is such an issue, perhaps something modest to start where only small numbers interract.

As a long term player whose subs have already been gobbled up by various side projects I'd be reluctant to 'donate' anything further, and I imagine a significant number of others would feel the same. Funding games via kickstarter without any guarantee of success seems slightly barmy to me anyway, particularly when you consider the number of pre-release flops in the last few years.

£500 is a fair chunk of cash - how much do you think will be needed in total? 20m would require 40,000 donations of the same amount. Is that a reasonable number, can we even guess? Where's that 40k going to come from, existing subscribers or potential new players? Alternatively, if you have so much cash to spare, why not just go to fanfest and speak to the Devs direct about the future of WiS?

Ripard Teg > For the morons in the room:

Sweets > U can dd my face any day

Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#85 - 2014-05-01 06:24:14 UTC
Erufen Rito wrote:

I'm more of the idea that WiS was scrapped after the Jita riots and unsubs that basically told CCP to take their microtransaction model and shove it up an exhaust pipe. Although you are correct, WiS is here to stay as is, and it probably wont be taken out, I seriously doubt that expanding upon it would've killed Eve.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not one to play Sims in Space, but I would like to be able to see more of the nice space from within a contained environment. My POS sort of does the trick for me, but alas.

I do think though, that if WiS is prioritized with no other objective in mind other than to "Lol Sims in Space, go stand with your make believe ManFace RocketTits Girlfriend over there", would be very very terrible for the health of the game.

Well from my perspective I disagree to what would have happened if WiS continued, but that is probably more based on the Carbon system. Now if WiS had been built differently, less experimental, who knows? My objection isn't purely on WiS in itself, but the results of the existing system, a system of which was used to develop another game which resulted in it being abandoned there. And we know they tried... that's a lot of money for an R&D project, complete games have been built with far less.

Yeah I think they will just maintain what is already there, maintenance cycles. For those wanting WiS to actually be developed, that's not good though. If I were leading the plea for WiS to be worked on one day, I'd be stressing for a replacement, not a continuation. You know what the most obvious sign of insanity is? Doing the same thing over and over but expecting a different outcome.

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12

Sibyyl
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#86 - 2014-05-01 06:53:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Sibyyl
Hasikan Miallok wrote:
You had no hope. My sister in law and her ex and several friends used to multibox that game and talk on team speak. Basically looking for tables where there would be one other person and all the other players would be one of them or one of there alts. They made a lot of money.

Needless to say people who cheat at poker tend to cheat in real life as well, they are not married anymore :D

Oh, god. I hadn't even thought of this possibility. This completely ruins it for me.

This quote from one of my favorite Ed Norton movies comes to mind: "If you can't spot the sucker in the first half hour at the table, then you are the sucker."

You know.. if gambling was implemented with WIS, the exact same thing would happen!

Edit:

Marsha Mallow wrote:
didn't require hardware upgrades from users

I am hardly ever home and my only computer is a Windows potato. I love that the game's requirements aren't very high. Requiring a more powerful computer would kill EVE for me..

Joffy Aulx-Gao for CSM. Fix links and OGB. Ban stabs from plexes. Fulfill karmic justice.

Erufen Rito
The Dark Space Initiative
Scary Wormhole People
#87 - 2014-05-01 07:14:50 UTC
Sibyyl wrote:
Hasikan Miallok wrote:
You had no hope. My sister in law and her ex and several friends used to multibox that game and talk on team speak. Basically looking for tables where there would be one other person and all the other players would be one of them or one of there alts. They made a lot of money.

Needless to say people who cheat at poker tend to cheat in real life as well, they are not married anymore :D

Oh, god. I hadn't even thought of this possibility. This completely ruins it for me.

This quote from one of my favorite Ed Norton movies comes to mind: "If you can't spot the sucker in the first half hour at the table, then you are the sucker."

You know.. if gambling was implemented with WIS, the exact same thing would happen!

Edit:

Marsha Mallow wrote:
didn't require hardware upgrades from users

I am hardly ever home and my only computer is a Windows potato. I love that the game's requirements aren't very high. Requiring a more powerful computer would kill EVE for me..

Well, let's be fair. You can't expect a game to continue along the innovation path, and ask them to keep in mind museum pieces.
There is nothing wrong with running a potatosaur, but when they released Incarnia, a lot of us *myself included* had to upgrade our hardware a bit. The requirements are low enough that a cheap, low end PC will still run the game at a decent rate, but I don't see the situation remaining like this much longer.
I for one, am all for a full Directx 11 implementation. Now, i know we have one, but come on, it's not as good as it could be.

This is as nice as I get. Best quote ever https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4137165#post4137165

Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld
#88 - 2014-05-01 07:28:51 UTC
Rhes wrote:
This thread is hilarious.


If you have nothing productive to say either for or against, you shouldn't say anything.

Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction...

Aralyn Cormallen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#89 - 2014-05-01 07:49:50 UTC
The problem WiS has now, is that for many of us, it falls into the "fool me twice" catagory. We gave them their chance and they squandered it in the most ludicrous way imaginable.

For many of us, the "18 months" snub was shocking (really, why did they bother having a CSM that year if the answer to every question was "no EvE developement this year"), but we swallowed it down as a cost of this massive, innovative mission CCP was on. And at the end of that 18 months, what we were served up was pathetic and insulting. It was like waiting three hours at a restaurant, and finally being served up a reheated tin of Heinz soup (and being charged a £10 surcharge for a spoon). The most embarrassing part of it was CCPs seemingly genuine surprise at our anger. It wasn't like they couldn't have seen it coming - the forum was filled for that 18 months with peoples hopes, expectations, and straight-up requirements for walking in stations. Sure, most peoples expectations were in the sky, but they could have got a general feel for what was an expected baseline, and that was not "single bedroom, with ludicrously overpriced microtransaction shop", and they should have seen the impending pile-up, and either managed expectations, or re-evaluated their priorities. But instead, they plowed on regardless, insulted our intelligence, then insulted us personally in internal memos, and got exactly what they ******* well deserved.

I wanted WiS. I do not want it now. CCP poisoned the well, and lost any good will or forbearance on this project. They had their chance and blew it, and there is absolutely no way I will tolerate another "18 months" on the belief that CCP can get it right this time. I might say I would only support another approach to WiS with a solid plan, and roadmap of what they intend, and in what timeframe. But, you know what, the second I considered that, I had a flashback of a photo of a whiteboard crammed with CCPs roadmap for sov. Was that 2 years ago now, was it longer? Actually, no, I'm not sure I would trust another "roadmap". Wolf has been cried one too many times.

Aralyn Cormallen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#90 - 2014-05-01 07:53:18 UTC
That said, I feel CCP got things right with this Industrial revamp - had they shown their hand last year, I would have laughed mockingly, and assumed it would never happen. Instead, they kept their mouths shut, and appear to be producing a solid, much-needed revamp. Seriously, well done - I have spent two paragraphs giving CCP **** for their faliures, so I will commend them for their success. But they need to learn from this - no more insane plans or nebulous roadmaps. If they want to try WiS again, for gods sake, just get on with it, and give us no expectations, because I don't think the game would survive this ball being dropped again in the same way, and having seen a good two years of the game being brought back on the rails, it definitely wouldn't survive another "18 months".
Erufen Rito
The Dark Space Initiative
Scary Wormhole People
#91 - 2014-05-01 08:03:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Erufen Rito
Aralyn Cormallen wrote:
The problem WiS has now, is that for many of us, it falls into the "fool me twice" catagory. We gave them their chance and they squandered it in the most ludicrous way imaginable.

For many of us, the "18 months" snub was shocking (really, why did they bother having a CSM that year if the answer to every question was "no EvE developement this year"), but we swallowed it down as a cost of this massive, innovative mission CCP was on. And at the end of that 18 months, what we were served up was pathetic and insulting. It was like waiting three hours at a restaurant, and finally being served up a reheated tin of Heinz soup (and being charged a £10 surcharge for a spoon). The most embarrassing part of it was CCPs seemingly genuine surprise at our anger. It wasn't like they couldn't have seen it coming - the forum was filled for that 18 months with peoples hopes, expectations, and straight-up requirements for walking in stations. Sure, most peoples expectations were in the sky, but they could have got a general feel for what was an expected baseline, and that was not "single bedroom, with ludicrously overpriced microtransaction shop", and they should have seen the impending pile-up, and either managed expectations, or re-evaluated their priorities. But instead, they plowed on regardless, insulted our intelligence, then insulted us personally in internal memos, and got exactly what they ******* well deserved.

I wanted WiS. I do not want it now. CCP poisoned the well, and lost any good will or forbearance on this project. They had their chance and blew it, and there is absolutely no way I will tolerate another "18 months" on the belief that CCP can get it right this time. I might say I would only support another approach to WiS with a solid plan, and roadmap of what they intend, and in what timeframe. But, you know what, the second I considered that, I had a flashback of a photo of a whiteboard crammed with CCPs roadmap for sov. Was that 2 years ago now, was it longer? Actually, no, I'm not sure I would trust another "roadmap". Wolf has been cried one too many times.


Let's not forget that now their main focus is new player space, new worlds and whatnot. And their roadmap is oddly reminiscing of the sov roadmap we had 2 years ago.

Personally, I would preffer if WiS was scrapped all together, and we could just move on from this sour patch. The last time I bothered with the Captain's Quarters was when someone released a tool to convert videos into eve compatible files, and you could make your TV or whatever is called play your messed up weird and freaky ****. I personally had some anime going, and it was funny and interesting to watch for the first 10 minutes. After that, every single time I've entered the Quarters has been by mistake, or a new toon/fresh client install. There is no use to it, no incentive for me to stumble with my shot out knees across the hall, and no reason for me to stay docked staring and my toon oddly shift and shuffle and blink.

This is as nice as I get. Best quote ever https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4137165#post4137165

Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#92 - 2014-05-01 08:08:42 UTC
Erufen Rito wrote:

I'm more of the idea that WiS was scrapped after the Jita riots and unsubs that basically told CCP to take their microtransaction model and shove it up an exhaust pipe.
Oh I should probably address that... I refer you to this thread post.
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:
Rhes wrote:
This thread is hilarious.


If you have nothing productive to say either for or against, you shouldn't say anything.

Nah, he speaks truth on this but with little words. Every two days these threads start, often by the same people and/or their alts. So it just gets recycled over and over again, and the same old talking points like a war of nutrition. It is hilarious this thread, considering a collection plate is bogus, and as if CCP would be tricked into it and wind up with all the players paying for the idea in the end, not any collections. It's not thought through, it's not practical, and not with a game where the majority of players already had spoken on the direction of where the game really needs to go. Discussions are discussions, just because you don't like what someone said, doesn't mean that they shouldn't post it. This isn't a one way discussion full of pink glittery unicorns trailing rainbows out their arse as they leap through the sky.

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#93 - 2014-05-01 08:11:27 UTC
OP is ridiculous

Thread is redundant

Please lock

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld
#94 - 2014-05-01 08:15:19 UTC
Webvan wrote:
Erufen Rito wrote:

I'm more of the idea that WiS was scrapped after the Jita riots and unsubs that basically told CCP to take their microtransaction model and shove it up an exhaust pipe.
Oh I should probably address that... I refer you to this thread post.
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:
Rhes wrote:
This thread is hilarious.


If you have nothing productive to say either for or against, you shouldn't say anything.

Nah, he speaks truth on this but with little words. Every two days these threads start, often by the same people and/or their alts. So it just gets recycled over and over again, and the same old talking points like a war of nutrition. It is hilarious this thread, considering a collection plate is bogus, and as if CCP would be tricked into it and wind up with all the players paying for the idea in the end, not any collections. It's not thought through, it's not practical, and not with a game where the majority of players already had spoken on the direction of where the game really needs to go. Discussions are discussions, just because you don't like what someone said, doesn't mean that they shouldn't post it. This isn't a one way discussion full of pink glittery unicorns trailing rainbows out their arse as they leap through the sky.


I would agree with your point had Rhes bothered to explain his point of view.

Posting that something you don't like is hilarious just because you don't like it is not a contribution to the thread.

It's actually just trolling, worse than that it's cowardice and ego fluffing.

Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction...

Erica Dusette
Division 13
#95 - 2014-05-01 08:15:50 UTC
Webvan wrote:
...often by the same people and/or their alts.

Keep telling yourself that. Blink

Nobody wants WiS, right?

Jita riots were all about WiS, right?

All the money dumped into WoD was purely used to develop the graphics engine, right?

The failure of WoD directly collates to WiS's future, right?

Etc etc.

The thing is all of that is false. Completely false misnomers or purposefully misleading to try and give an anti-WIS argument some credence beyond a simple opinion.

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss

Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#96 - 2014-05-01 08:25:47 UTC
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:


I would agree with your point had Rhes bothered to explain his point of view.

Posting that something you don't like is hilarious just because you don't like it is not a contribution to the thread.

It's actually just trolling, worse than that it's cowardice and ego fluffing.
I'm not pouncing on you or anything, nothing personal. It's just it's been said over and over the past couple years, and there already is another active thread where it has been all said. If you want to understand Rhes pov a little better, then those threads are a better place to start. Just like this thread should have just been a post on that thread, still suggested, but not another redundant thread on it's own.

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12

Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#97 - 2014-05-01 08:29:25 UTC
Erica Dusette wrote:


Jita riots were all about WiS, right?
What, this again? See the link I provided on the post a few posts up. The link to the active WiS thread. You are replying to my posts here but not actually reading them, obviously. More one way conversations there...

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12

Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting
#98 - 2014-05-01 08:50:58 UTC
Me taking a coffee and rolling a new smoke while blueballing the enemy fleet = WiS.
Erica Dusette
Division 13
#99 - 2014-05-01 09:24:29 UTC
Webvan wrote:
Erica Dusette wrote:


Jita riots were all about WiS, right?
What, this again? See the link I provided on the post a few posts up. The link to the active WiS thread. You are replying to my posts here but not actually reading them, obviously. More one way conversations there...

Yay, now I have a keyboard Big smile

Even though my post contained a quote of one sentence you wrote it wasn't just addressed to you solely. But in a way you're right - I don't read your posts that closely anymore after I noticed them consistently littered with the misnomers and falsehoods of the ilk I mentioned above (even after being addressed/refuted by others you still roll them out again later), but I did visit your link, but honestly had trouble discerning exactly what post you were linking (the forums aren't helpful like that - ISD Ezwals was the one that popped up) and couldn't be ****** reading through the whole page to ascertain the point you were trying to link to - As you say much of these discussions are circular and personally I've participated in these threads for a very long time and am tired of investing too much time in them anymore.

Why? Because I've come to realize what's really at the core of this whole WiS issue, and it actually has nothing to do with all the debates and arguments peddled by people in any of the threads. It's actually got everything to do with the culture of EVE itself, the "HTFU or get out of my harsh, unforgiving spaceship game". People who relish this attitude simply cannot stand the thought of people in "their" game running around playing space-barbie. So they come to threads like this to argue against WiS but need to find, or create, some form of factual argument to do so rather than just an opinion. Thus we see all the bullshit arguments that circulate again and again.

And here's why I believe this is the real issue ...

What is the most commonly posted reason that people would not like to see development of WiS? Because they believe that putting dev resources into it will somehow harm, hamper or detract from the 'spaceship game'. In essence they have no faith in CCP to balance development.

But this isn't true, because when you ask these same people "So, if CCP announced tomorrow that they would no longer be doing any more development of EVE, and said the game as it is today is how it will always be, would you leave, or stay?".

If you said you'd leave then I'd ask wtf are you even doing here now? Aren't you enjoying EVE today already? You mustn't be having much fun if your enjoyment and longevity within the game hinges solely off what's to come with development.

If you said you'd stay, and keep playing EVE as it is right now, then I'd ask wtf is your problem if time and energy is spent developing WiS then?

This is where a lot of people become disarmed, because by contemplating this they realize that it's actually not development concerns at all that are really the basis of their opposition.

So what is? Well that's the one million dollar question, and my personal opinion is that it comes down to culture, like I mentioned. For reasons more egotistical than anything else (including some healthy fear of change) they just do not like the idea of people playing WiS in their big-boy's game and need a way to project that in an argument somehow. It's also likely got a little to do with people's fear of being absolutely no good at, or disconnected from, avatar gameplay - thus worrying them that they might be missing out on something (or failing at it) if WiS ever came to fruition.

Now that's just my opinion. I'm not trying to peddle any absolutes or facts of certainty - I'm just a person who loves the idea of WiS and would love to see it, so enjoy posting to encourage it. Like the OP, and like many other players, I don't need any facts to project that viewpoint, but those in opposition do.

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss

Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#100 - 2014-05-01 09:25:58 UTC
Erica Dusette wrote:
Yay, now I have a keyboard Big smile

Wonderful!
tl;dr

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12