These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Out of Pod Experience

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Star Citizen v EVE

First post First post First post
Author
Aspalis
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#1021 - 2014-04-29 23:04:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Aspalis
raven666wings wrote:
DaReaper wrote:

Ok lets do a comparison.
...
Compairing the two is a joke.
...
If we take chris Roberts track record
...
The point is, as no one has played squat of SC...


Comparisons, track records and rants apart, this is what it boils down to:

Chris Roberts and CIG managed to get $50 million in their pockets without even releasing a playable game.
CCP has a playable game but is facing financial trouble, getting loans and laying off 100 employee teams.

CIG commited to deliver the game that the majority of space mmo enthusiasts wants to play.
CCP had the chance to do it in 10 years in EVE Online development but chose not to.

CCP managers enjoy having a working game while going bankrupt. CIG would rather have a game in development and be wealthy.


There is a problem with that picture you are painting. It is all (wishful) speculation at this point and true, grim news did come from CCP recently but do you know exactly what is going on at CIG? I don't and nor will I ever claim I know what is going on at either CCP or at CIG but when my reaction to a incredibly wonky demo of the dogfightning at PAX East is far from a positive one, I have to wonder if the bar set by Chris Roberts is simply out of reach.

Now if we look at EVE Valkyrie, it is a game with a much smaller scope, it is more simplistic, was initially made by a bunch of CCP employees in their spare time and basically became the poster child for Oculus Rift. Quite an achievement.

Personally though, I am more jazzed for Elite Dangerous, at least that has a playable alpha... with dogfighting against other players in it.

Marcus Gord: "Aspalis is an onion. Many layers, each one makes you cry."

Grimpak
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1022 - 2014-04-29 23:12:00 UTC
I still say that the shills in this thread are making me want the game to crash and burn so hard that it won't leave even a scorch mark.

It's not the game's fault tho, it's the shills that make it like the game like it was the next best thing after sliced bread because of some sort of deranged brand loyalty to a game that it's even less complete than EVE.

[img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]

[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right

Aspalis
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#1023 - 2014-04-29 23:23:35 UTC
Grimpak wrote:
I still say that the shills in this thread are making me want the game to crash and burn so hard that it won't leave even a scorch mark.

It's not the game's fault tho, it's the shills that make it like the game like it was the next best thing after sliced bread because of some sort of deranged brand loyalty to a game that it's even less complete than EVE.


Though, are you really surprised? If you spend real money on something or someone that you have a lot of faith in, it is kind of given that you want to believe you have made the right choice and matter of fact is that you will go to great lengths convincing yourself (and others) that you made the right choice.

Kinda like religion, Mac users and dirty peasants really.

Marcus Gord: "Aspalis is an onion. Many layers, each one makes you cry."

Grimpak
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1024 - 2014-04-29 23:24:10 UTC
Aspalis wrote:
Grimpak wrote:
I still say that the shills in this thread are making me want the game to crash and burn so hard that it won't leave even a scorch mark.

It's not the game's fault tho, it's the shills that make it like the game like it was the next best thing after sliced bread because of some sort of deranged brand loyalty to a game that it's even less complete than EVE.


Though, are you really surprised? If you spend real money on something or someone that you have a lot of faith in, it is kind of given that you want to believe you have made the right choice and matter of fact is that you will go to great lengths convincing yourself (and others) that you made the right choice.

Kinda like religion, Mac users and dirty peasants really.

scary thought reallyShocked

[img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]

[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right

digitalwanderer
DW inc
#1025 - 2014-04-30 01:35:58 UTC
That cuts both ways you know....I've seen plenty here that want this game to crash and burn because they're dedicated EVE fans to the highest degree, and having other options out on the market bother them immensely, especially if said games do certain things that were promised in eve but never delivered:



Looks at walking in stations as an example.....Roll
DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#1026 - 2014-04-30 03:29:55 UTC
digitalwanderer wrote:
That cuts both ways you know....I've seen plenty here that want this game to crash and burn because they're dedicated EVE fans to the highest degree, and having other options out on the market bother them immensely, especially if said games do certain things that were promised in eve but never delivered:



Looks at walking in stations as an example.....Roll


Honestly, what most eve players, and SC players for that matter should realize is both games are really nothing alike. Star Citizen will not work or run anywhere near what eve does and visa versa. Its basically the difference between the WII and PS3, both do things there own way, they have fan boys, but honestly they are not the same. you get a different experience from each and can easily play both with no issues.

SC could, infact help eve, if it inspires CCP. I'm railing against SC because the hype is too damn funny its not even funny. "oh its going to kill eve, but i have not played it, but yea eve is done" makes me laugh, anyone who thinks this should leave now.

The game play from what i am reading is totally different. Both could easily complement each other, hell even Chris has said he is not making an eve 2 and that his game and eve are not the same.

SC could be fun for it is. I will prolly try it when its actually released. And i have no interest in tossing my money into a fire. As i won;t see any return for my investment, which is what paying for the stretch goals are.

SC could come out and flop, it could give wow a run for its money, it could cause massive subs to vanish form eve, or it could cause eve to get more subs. We just dunno. I just boggle at the hype and the god like prowless SC backers give Chris, when all you have is paper.

I will say eve needs to borrow the modular game design but only to link dust, valk, eve and WiS as one giant game. But i digress.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

digitalwanderer
DW inc
#1027 - 2014-04-30 03:53:58 UTC
DaReaper wrote:
digitalwanderer wrote:
That cuts both ways you know....I've seen plenty here that want this game to crash and burn because they're dedicated EVE fans to the highest degree, and having other options out on the market bother them immensely, especially if said games do certain things that were promised in eve but never delivered:



Looks at walking in stations as an example.....Roll


Honestly, what most eve players, and SC players for that matter should realize is both games are really nothing alike. Star Citizen will not work or run anywhere near what eve does and visa versa. Its basically the difference between the WII and PS3, both do things there own way, they have fan boys, but honestly they are not the same. you get a different experience from each and can easily play both with no issues.

SC could, infact help eve, if it inspires CCP. I'm railing against SC because the hype is too damn funny its not even funny. "oh its going to kill eve, but i have not played it, but yea eve is done" makes me laugh, anyone who thinks this should leave now.

The game play from what i am reading is totally different. Both could easily complement each other, hell even Chris has said he is not making an eve 2 and that his game and eve are not the same.

SC could be fun for it is. I will prolly try it when its actually released. And i have no interest in tossing my money into a fire. As i won;t see any return for my investment, which is what paying for the stretch goals are.

SC could come out and flop, it could give wow a run for its money, it could cause massive subs to vanish form eve, or it could cause eve to get more subs. We just dunno. I just boggle at the hype and the god like prowless SC backers give Chris, when all you have is paper.

I will say eve needs to borrow the modular game design but only to link dust, valk, eve and WiS as one giant game. But i digress.



First off, star citizen has real physics, even to the point of being able to fly backwards and still fire your weapons, or go into third person view and see the maneuvering thrusters work, and if maneuvered too aggressively the player and will pass out, not to mention the ship also alter it's behavior and overall performance depending on how damaged it is, which both the pilot and other players that shot can see parts missing after a fight, the ship can also be destroyed by hitting an asteroid and also some have the ability to land on planets as well as fly on planet surfaces.


It's so beyond eve it isn't even funny anymore as it doesn't do A-N-Y-T-H-I-N-G like this, period.


There was a video of eve showing a frigate and it was flying on planetary surface in 2004( yup 10 years ago), did anything come of that, nope.

There was walking in stations, which started in 2006 and did anything come out of that.....Only the officers quarters and that was it, no moving within the station or checking out businesses within the installation or making shady deals with less than reputable individuals....


CCP has been spinning it's wheels for so long and not knowing which direction to take the game, always changing small things but never really expanding the universe to the point that the lore within the game allows... We still have no clue who the jove are and what their motivations may be to help the other 4 factions with certain technology, the sleeper systems are a mystery of it's own, no attempt have been made to re open the eve gate....The list just goes on and on.


So comparing both games to that of differences between 2 consoles is hysterical, especially since star Citizen is PC exclusive and too demanding to run on even the new consoles, never mind the older PS3 or X360.....What this game represents is taking the next big and risky step in space sims, and if pulled off, might be the benchmark to beat for any other developer that wishes to make a space sim.
DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#1028 - 2014-04-30 04:22:37 UTC
digitalwanderer wrote:


First off, star citizen has real physics, even to the point of being able to fly backwards and still fire your weapons, or go into third person view and see the maneuvering thrusters work, and if maneuvered too aggressively the player and will pass out, not to mention the ship also alter it's behavior and overall performance depending on how damaged it is, which both the pilot and other players that shot can see parts missing after a fight, the ship can also be destroyed by hitting an asteroid and also some have the ability to land on planets as well as fly on planet surfaces.



How much of this has been played? How much of this has been played in a multiplayer setting. Whats that? nothing yet? That's what i thought. This above is speculation at this point. Now once you actually do the dog fight you might see that some of this is not possible, it might be possible as well. Once the game actually comes out, a lot of this could be cut. That's the thing you really just don;t know. IMO that sounds like a lag fest that will have noobs frustrated and will be exploited, as already a group of eve players is ready to ram and put the 'real physics' to the test.

Quote:

It's so beyond eve it isn't even funny anymore as it doesn't do A-N-Y-T-H-I-N-G like this, period.


Nor does SC, as there is nothing to play.

Quote:

There was a video of eve showing a frigate and it was flying on planetary surface in 2004( yup 10 years ago), did anything come of that, nope.

There was walking in stations, which started in 2006 and did anything come out of that.....Only the officers quarters and that was it, no moving within the station or checking out businesses within the installation or making shady deals with less than reputable individuals....


Your point is what? They came of with ideas, that went flat, i never said ccp was perfect. Besides landing on a planet is not something that makes or breaks eve for a player like me. WiS was a flop because they screwed up and panicked, you can blame the players for WiS being dead in the water.

Quote:

CCP has been spinning it's wheels for so long and not knowing which direction to take the game, always changing small things but never really expanding the universe to the point that the lore within the game allows... We still have no clue who the jove are and what their motivations may be to help the other 4 factions with certain technology, the sleeper systems are a mystery of it's own, no attempt have been made to re open the eve gate....The list just goes on and on.


Again not really game breaking, i don;t care if i eve play the jove, nor do i care about the sleeper ai or the eve gate opening. I would rather my game be working, and old crap that was left behind on the race to make new crap be finished and fixed. which is what ccp is doing. so i'm quote happy with that.

Quote:

So comparing both games to that of differences between 2 consoles is hysterical, especially since star Citizen is PC exclusive and too demanding to run on even the new consoles, never mind the older PS3 or X360.....What this game represents is taking the next big and risky step in space sims, and if pulled off, might be the benchmark to beat for any other developer that wishes to make a space sim.



bolded your key word. IF. as of this writing what do you have of SC to confirm that everything CR and his company is saying is going to work how he says it will... what that? nothing. Right. Even the dog fight alpha will not work how he thinks it will. Why? Because its alpha and one part of the whole. Where as the dog fight module could be a blast, it might not mesh with the rest of the game. or it could be so buggy and poorly made that it does;t work. Thats the thing, as of this writing you have zero idea what SC will be like. I heard people tell me that Star Wars the old republic was going to be so awesome! the greatest mmo ever, it was going to blow the competition away. And it came out, and the same people hyping immediately told me 'it sucks balls, i stopped playing after a week' or 'STO will be awesome! the game star trek fans have been waititng... crap this one sucks too' What you have is paper. Even when the Dog fight moduel comes out you will still have paper. "oh guys wait till we combine this mod with the rest it will be awesome, you just have to wait 2 more years, but keep playing and giving me money!" The comparison works, not due to graphics when you clearly did not understand what i was saying. The point is, they are both space sims, both mmo's though i don;t think SC is much of an mmo but meh, beyond that they are different experiences, and that ok. Does it mean one will kill the other? nope. Does it mean it might? sure. You see, you could have these mods for SC that are great alone, but once you add 10-50k people on a server you find out its not what was advertised. But hey its your money to burn.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

digitalwanderer
DW inc
#1029 - 2014-04-30 04:39:33 UTC  |  Edited by: digitalwanderer
DaReaper wrote:


How much of this has been played? How much of this has been played in a multiplayer setting. Whats that? nothing yet? That's what i thought. This above is speculation at this point. Now once you actually do the dog fight you might see that some of this is not possible, it might be possible as well. Once the game actually comes out, a lot of this could be cut. That's the thing you really just don;t know. IMO that sounds like a lag fest that will have noobs frustrated and will be exploited, as already a group of eve players is ready to ram and put the 'real physics' to the test.


It's so beyond eve it isn't even funny anymore as it doesn't do A-N-Y-T-H-I-N-G like this, period.


Nor does SC, as there is nothing to play.



Everthing I described is in this video which was shown a couple of weeks ago and will be released in may for players to play it on their own computers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TWQFSzQyeM


Have fun making excuses now....



Quote:

There was a video of eve showing a frigate and it was flying on planetary surface in 2004( yup 10 years ago), did anything come of that, nope.

There was walking in stations, which started in 2006 and did anything come out of that.....Only the officers quarters and that was it, no moving within the station or checking out businesses within the installation or making shady deals with less than reputable individuals....


Your point is what? They came of with ideas, that went flat, i never said ccp was perfect. Besides landing on a planet is not something that makes or breaks eve for a player like me. WiS was a flop because they screwed up and panicked, you can blame the players for WiS being dead in the water.



It went well beyond ideas and they spent a lot of resources developing to the point they did, since we have the captains quarters and it was hinted that more would be added, so how the heck is this players fault I have no clue.




Quote:

Again not really game breaking, i don;t care if i eve play the jove, nor do i care about the sleeper ai or the eve gate opening. I would rather my game be working, and old crap that was left behind on the race to make new crap be finished and fixed. which is what ccp is doing. so i'm quote happy with that.



Doesn't take much to satisfy you then...Since I've been with the game front the start, and even at the start of the game, it was suggested that eventually, pilots could become Jove....Well 11 years later and still nothing.
DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#1030 - 2014-04-30 04:55:51 UTC
digitalwanderer wrote:
DaReaper wrote:


How much of this has been played? How much of this has been played in a multiplayer setting. Whats that? nothing yet? That's what i thought. This above is speculation at this point. Now once you actually do the dog fight you might see that some of this is not possible, it might be possible as well. Once the game actually comes out, a lot of this could be cut. That's the thing you really just don;t know. IMO that sounds like a lag fest that will have noobs frustrated and will be exploited, as already a group of eve players is ready to ram and put the 'real physics' to the test.


It's so beyond eve it isn't even funny anymore as it doesn't do A-N-Y-T-H-I-N-G like this, period.


Nor does SC, as there is nothing to play.



Everthing I described is in this video which was shown a couple of weeks ago and will be released in may for players to play it on their own computers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TWQFSzQyeM


Have fun making excuses now....



Quote:

There was a video of eve showing a frigate and it was flying on planetary surface in 2004( yup 10 years ago), did anything come of that, nope.

There was walking in stations, which started in 2006 and did anything come out of that.....Only the officers quarters and that was it, no moving within the station or checking out businesses within the installation or making shady deals with less than reputable individuals....


Your point is what? They came of with ideas, that went flat, i never said ccp was perfect. Besides landing on a planet is not something that makes or breaks eve for a player like me. WiS was a flop because they screwed up and panicked, you can blame the players for WiS being dead in the water.



It went well beyond ideas and they spent a lot of resources developing to the point they did, since we have the captains quarters and it was hinted that more would be added, so how the heck is this players fault I have no clue.




Quote:

Again not really game breaking, i don;t care if i eve play the jove, nor do i care about the sleeper ai or the eve gate opening. I would rather my game be working, and old crap that was left behind on the race to make new crap be finished and fixed. which is what ccp is doing. so i'm quote happy with that.



Doesn't take much to satisfy you then...Since I've been with the game front the start, and even at the start of the game, it was suggested that eventually, pilots could become Jove....Well 11 years later and still nothing.


to your video. As of the time of me writing this, can you play whats in the video?

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

digitalwanderer
DW inc
#1031 - 2014-04-30 05:06:17 UTC
DaReaper wrote:


to your video. As of the time of me writing this, can you play whats in the video?



That's it?.....That's all you got left as an argument when it shows everything I described earlier, and that those who subscribed will be playing it in a couple of weeks.


Are you for real?
DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#1032 - 2014-04-30 05:45:49 UTC
digitalwanderer wrote:
DaReaper wrote:


to your video. As of the time of me writing this, can you play whats in the video?



That's it?.....That's all you got left as an argument when it shows everything I described earlier, and that those who subscribed will be playing it in a couple of weeks.


Are you for real?



sigh... first you are avoiding my question which i asked before you asked yours, so again. As of RIGHT NOW, not a few weeks from now, right this moment, is there ANYTHING you personally can play that shows everything in said video is going to work as described?

The answer is ofc no. SC is still paper.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#1033 - 2014-04-30 06:01:09 UTC
digitalwanderer wrote:



Everthing I described is in this video which was shown a couple of weeks ago and will be released in may for players to play it on their own computers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TWQFSzQyeM


Have fun making excuses now....


I already addressed this, but you were not paying attention. there is a video, big whoop. You STILL can NOT play anything described in SC besides the hanger mod, as of this date. Now in a few weeks, when and if the dog fight alpha is released then you cna say 'why yes i am playing the dog fight alpha and its xxx' Till then your answer is.. no. so there is no excuse. Its just a fact. And i have already admitted that it could be awesome. IDK i have not played the damn thing. Nor have you.


Quote:



It went well beyond ideas and they spent a lot of resources developing to the point they did, since we have the captains quarters and it was hinted that more would be added, so how the heck is this players fault I have no clue.



Your eve birthdate is 2009, so i can;t blame your noobness for not knowing your eve history. WiS was stopped because of the 'greed is good' news letter and the jita riots plus the mass unsubscribe that followed. This forced CCP's hand and they put all other game play except space based on hold. That was in 2011. you were clearly playing then. Unless your corp is an alt corp and you just recently came back. The customers told CCP to stop being idiots and fix there stuff. Mostly they rejected microtransactions but whatever. Thats neither here nor there. And you do realize that posting a video about how the dog fight is suppose to work, at this time, is kinda like using the planetary flight for eve video. As until you can play it, you do not know how or if it will work as advertized.


Quote:



Doesn't take much to satisfy you then...Since I've been with the game front the start, and even at the start of the game, it was suggested that eventually, pilots could become Jove....Well 11 years later and still nothing.


Correct, i have been in eve since 2004, 10 years, i have only unsubed a total of 6 months. IF that. Not once did i go 'well gee CCP promised i could play jove, i have not seen any jove.. maybe i'll just quit' CCP never said we could play as jove, they said possibly. But they have not found a reason for us to use or be jove. Thats the thing, CCP never officially said we would get planetary flight, it was a fanfest video of something they were working on, but that was all we got. A mock up done by the team for fan fest. Prolly took a few hours to slap together. Not once did they say 'we going to do this for Cold war, red moon rising, etc.' The other difference is.. i can play eve now. The point of trying to show you that just because CR says SC will play this way, is not true is clearly lost on you. Nothing is set in stone until you can actually play it. As i said WAY earlier, another game he made, he had to sell to another a company to finish. Why? because ti was too bloated and he kept adding stuff that would never work. So he bailed, and the other company took what he had, polished it up and it was a hit.

There comes a time, when being a perfectionist, and adding more and more is not a success. Hell steve jobs messed up several times with the lisa and the MAC. But he did have a smash with the imac and the ipod and ipad. You just have to wait and see if this will be a smash hit or a bloated game that doens;t work at all like CR and the rapid player base thought it might. you never know, something you think sounds 'really awesome and better then eve' now may be the bane of your existence when the game goes live. All i am saying is a little perspective is good. Worshiping at the alter blindly of some dude who made a few good games, but also had a few flopps is not the best way to do things.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#1034 - 2014-04-30 07:32:10 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
raven666wings wrote:
DaReaper wrote:

Ok lets do a comparison.
...
Compairing the two is a joke.
...
If we take chris Roberts track record
...
The point is, as no one has played squat of SC...


Comparisons, track records and rants apart, this is what it boils down to:

Chris Roberts and CIG managed to get $50 million in their pockets without even releasing a playable game.
CCP has a playable game but is facing financial trouble, getting loans and laying off 100 employee teams.

CIG commited to deliver the game that the majority of space mmo enthusiasts wants to play.
CCP had the chance to do it in 10 years in EVE Online development but chose not to.

CCP managers enjoy having a working game while going bankrupt. CIG would rather have a game in development and be wealthy.


*Snip* Please refrain from discussing warnings and bans. ISD Ezwal.

CCP isn't facing financial trouble at all, they simply took the financial hit of dropping WOD and stating as such in the books. It's a previous investment they wrote off, not an actual/current loss of money.
Erica Dusette
Division 13
#1035 - 2014-04-30 07:42:51 UTC
Is it just me or do the posters who support SC seem super defensive, aggressive and arrogant in most of their replies here?

Way to woo folks to the game?

I also like how a subculture seems to have already formed where those who take a leap and invest in SC now are broskis and those who prefer to wait and try the finished product are scrubs.

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss

Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#1036 - 2014-04-30 07:47:37 UTC
Erica Dusette wrote:
Is it just me or do the posters who support SC seem super defensive, aggressive and arrogant in most of their replies here?

Way to woo folks to the game?

I also like how a subculture seems to have already formed where those who take a leap and invest in SC now are broskis and those who prefer to wait and try the finished product are scrubs.



Per usual; low self esteem wannabees grasping for relevance. Kinda like Apple users.
Aspalis
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#1037 - 2014-04-30 08:32:20 UTC
digitalwanderer wrote:
That cuts both ways you know....I've seen plenty here that want this game to crash and burn because they're dedicated EVE fans to the highest degree, and having other options out on the market bother them immensely, especially if said games do certain things that were promised in eve but never delivered:



Looks at walking in stations as an example.....Roll


I am not against having other options on the market but nor am I willing to spend money on something that is nothing but really wonky demo after two years of development, unlike EVE Valkyrie that made everyone want a Oculus Rift or how Elite Dangerous is shaping up to the point where I am like "shiiiiiiit.. I need a joystick!"

Marcus Gord: "Aspalis is an onion. Many layers, each one makes you cry."

Grimpak
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1038 - 2014-04-30 11:18:34 UTC
digitalwanderer wrote:
That cuts both ways you know....I've seen plenty here that want this game to crash and burn because they're dedicated EVE fans to the highest degree, and having other options out on the market bother them immensely, especially if said games do certain things that were promised in eve but never delivered:



Looks at walking in stations as an example.....Roll

while it cuts both ways, the truth is that at the moment, we can play EVE, we can't play SC.

Now stop being a shill, don't put your panties in a bunch, sit tight and let's just hope that SC doesn't flop like Daikatana.

[img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]

[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right

Mashie Saldana
V0LTA
WE FORM V0LTA
#1039 - 2014-04-30 11:55:19 UTC
Grimpak wrote:
digitalwanderer wrote:
That cuts both ways you know....I've seen plenty here that want this game to crash and burn because they're dedicated EVE fans to the highest degree, and having other options out on the market bother them immensely, especially if said games do certain things that were promised in eve but never delivered:



Looks at walking in stations as an example.....Roll

while it cuts both ways, the truth is that at the moment, we can play EVE, we can't play SC.

Now stop being a shill, don't put your panties in a bunch, sit tight and let's just hope that SC doesn't flop like Daikatana.

Or STO or SWTOR...

I hope SC is successful but they do promise and aweful lot of stuff and keeps promising stuff at a rate that is way above the rate they are delivering.
Grimpak
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1040 - 2014-04-30 11:58:14 UTC
Mashie Saldana wrote:
Grimpak wrote:
digitalwanderer wrote:
That cuts both ways you know....I've seen plenty here that want this game to crash and burn because they're dedicated EVE fans to the highest degree, and having other options out on the market bother them immensely, especially if said games do certain things that were promised in eve but never delivered:



Looks at walking in stations as an example.....Roll

while it cuts both ways, the truth is that at the moment, we can play EVE, we can't play SC.

Now stop being a shill, don't put your panties in a bunch, sit tight and let's just hope that SC doesn't flop like Daikatana.

Or STO or SWTOR...

I hope SC is successful but they do promise and aweful lot of stuff and keeps promising stuff at a rate that is way above the rate they are delivering.

STO or SWTOR flops have nothing on the daikatana flop tbhP

[img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]

[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right