These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Faction Warfare farming has to end - we want war instead of the Cloak & Stabs -game

First post First post
Author
Burtakus
Lone W0lf Society
#341 - 2013-12-12 21:58:59 UTC
Thanatos Marathon wrote:
Hikaru Inumakari wrote:
Well i have not been much for FW till recently and have lead my corp into it. After roughly a week i can understand the farming aspect of things, i think TIMER rollbacks should be implented.

The only other thing i believe should be implented ust for FW plexes is the fact that ONLY FW militia should be able to enter them....no nuetral parties should be allowed.

Sure they can camp and blob the gates, or belts or what not......but every single outpost site and FW mission ite should be regulated to FW Milita pilots only. Then you can keep all the other stuff since only FW pilots will be fighting mostly over the things they should be fighting over.

Such implentation would prevent persons that are not militia from ganging groups that are focused in actually playing the FW aspect.....defending or attacking outposts so they can dontae LP to the hubs for system control. Not having to worry if high end alts or mains are going to jump them for no reason at all but to pad their KB's.

Then if you want in the damn outpost sites then you will have to join FW.


I disagree. Letting them into the plex makes for much better Pew. Just have the rats attack them as well and give em a suspect timer when they activate the gate.



This. I like the neutrals/pirates that occupy FW plexes. They are looking for the same thing I am (minus the LP/WZ control)
Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld
#342 - 2013-12-12 22:10:05 UTC
Hikaru Inumakari wrote:
Well i have not been much for FW till recently and have lead my corp into it. After roughly a week i can understand the farming aspect of things, i think TIMER rollbacks should be implented.

The only other thing i believe should be implented ust for FW plexes is the fact that ONLY FW militia should be able to enter them....no nuetral parties should be allowed.

Sure they can camp and blob the gates, or belts or what not......but every single outpost site and FW mission ite should be regulated to FW Milita pilots only. Then you can keep all the other stuff since only FW pilots will be fighting mostly over the things they should be fighting over.

Such implentation would prevent persons that are not militia from ganging groups that are focused in actually playing the FW aspect.....defending or attacking outposts so they can dontae LP to the hubs for system control. Not having to worry if high end alts or mains are going to jump them for no reason at all but to pad their KB's.

Then if you want in the damn outpost sites then you will have to join FW.


if you allow that then you'd have to allow mission runners to only be allowed in any mission locations they are in. You'd break the sandbox by denying people access.

Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction...

Starbuck05
Abiding Ormolus
#343 - 2013-12-12 22:14:14 UTC
Fourteen Maken wrote:
Starbuck05 wrote:
Just to tell a little story myself relative to the matter, earlier today i opened up a medium plex in nenna,me beeing cal mil it was offensive plexing. For all the right reasons of fw i was hoping to get a good fight but if none came i was happy to get the lp. In the course of 15 out of the 20 minutes i was visited frequently by 3 other cal mil guys from the npc miltia corp in t1 frigs. Around 3 mins left on the plex they suddenly left , i was not looking at d-scan, only to see seconds later a gal mil punisher and fed navy comet came in(i was in a comet aswell) and because i wasnt watching d-scan i got tackled,somehow i managed to pull a win by fending of the comet and close orbit kiling the punisher after. And quickly after that my 3 " buddies" came back right before plex was done... Yey for pro cal mil ( leachers )...

Conclusion, because the curent plex mechanics is so bad it has given birth to these types of players ( whom i can easly assume they had stabs ). God knows if the standing hit was not affecting my corp from beeing booted and looking bad id be shooting npc miltia blues all day long because that is what they deserve!

You wanna join fw to make isk?,fine by me but go run missions damnit.
You wanna join fw to make isk BUT also care to defend your plex or help take systems? Great! Lemme throw out the red carpet you ar more then welcomed to share my plex!

We need a change!


This is very common at the minute, I lost my standings for running fw missions over shooting at those guys, I know of at least 20 players and thats all they do. Stabs and cloaks are not the only way to do it, all you need is a safe spot and an atron, just warp in look at the timers warp out sit in safe spot while the other poor sap runs down the timer, then come back at the last few seconds for LP. I would rather see a neutral come into the plex than another caldari guy because if you awox your militia bro you lose standings and probably the guy will be able to warp off anyway. Even If you do manage to kill him he made more isk from the LP he stole off you than he lost in his ship. I really do hate that and there seems no way to stamp it out, not even these changes.

I've started moving outside the 30km area to stop the clock for a couple of minutes when I see someone try it, that way when he comes back you still have a few minutes to kill him before he can take your lp, no way around the standings loss though Blink




True that

Just because i am blond does not make me stoopid !

Iudicium Vastus
Doomheim
#344 - 2013-12-12 22:26:55 UTC
Doesn't anyone think if the FW isk was made harder to get with FW alts, then the mains that these stabbed alts feed might PvP less as a side-effect. Or least pvp much more cheaply, and probably herd towards the blob for more safety.

Who knows if that deadspace fit Vindi you and your pals were so hyped up after taking down was paid by a FW alt? (Stabbed or not)

[u]Nerf stabs/cloaks in FW?[/u] No, just.. -Fit more points -Fit faction points -Bring a friend or two with points (an alt is fine too)

Thanatos Marathon
Moira.
#345 - 2013-12-12 22:34:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Thanatos Marathon
Iudicium Vastus wrote:
Doesn't anyone think if the FW isk was made harder to get with FW alts, then the mains that these stabbed alts feed might PvP less as a side-effect. Or least pvp much more cheaply, and probably herd towards the blob for more safety.

Who knows if that deadspace fit Vindi you and your pals were so hyped up after taking down was paid by a FW alt? (Stabbed or not)


They will still be able to farm, Timer Rollbacks will just dent em a little bit, not put them out of business. Also, plenty of PVP is to be had grinding plexes, if mains had to do more of it there would be even more plex fighting in 1 v 1 or small gang.

Also, I assume your signature is because you are a farming alt?
Iudicium Vastus
Doomheim
#346 - 2013-12-12 22:40:59 UTC
Thanatos Marathon wrote:
Iudicium Vastus wrote:
Doesn't anyone think if the FW isk was made harder to get with FW alts, then the mains that these stabbed alts feed might PvP less as a side-effect. Or least pvp much more cheaply, and probably herd towards the blob for more safety.

Who knows if that deadspace fit Vindi you and your pals were so hyped up after taking down was paid by a FW alt? (Stabbed or not)


They will still be able to farm, Timer Rollbacks will just dent em a little bit, not put them out of business. Also, plenty of PVP is to be had grinding plexes, if mains had to do more of it there would be even more plex fighting in 1 v 1 or small gang.

Also, I assume your signature is because you are a farming alt?


Because I totally farm Amarr FW in a Gallente corp.

[u]Nerf stabs/cloaks in FW?[/u] No, just.. -Fit more points -Fit faction points -Bring a friend or two with points (an alt is fine too)

Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#347 - 2013-12-12 23:38:49 UTC
Starbuck05 wrote:
.....True that

There is also the issue of sec loss with regards to neutrals .. perhaps it is time to ask for plex grids to be treated as null space, complete with ability to bubble so that one can kill whomever one choses with no ill effects other than possible hatred Big smile
Annie Anomie
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#348 - 2013-12-12 23:56:49 UTC
Iudicium Vastus wrote:
Doesn't anyone think if the FW isk was made harder to get with FW alts, then the mains that these stabbed alts feed might PvP less as a side-effect. Or least pvp much more cheaply, and probably herd towards the blob for more safety.

Who knows if that deadspace fit Vindi you and your pals were so hyped up after taking down was paid by a FW alt? (Stabbed or not)


No.

Easier farming just = inflation as far as I can see :/

People are still as risk averse as ever even with the farming.
IbanezLaney
The Church of Awesome
#349 - 2013-12-13 02:30:06 UTC
Interesting.

When Caldari had to deal with the Gallente stabbed/cloaked farmers earlier in the year we were told 'working as intended - HTFU'. You had no problem with it when these farmers were on your side.

We would have slightly less farmers at the moment than the Gals had during their wz push.
I do not see many Amarr in our region at teh moment.
However when the Gallente pushed they had every cloaky stabby Minmatar in eve helping them. Once again - they had no issue with FW mechanics during this time.


I am not saying there is no issue or HTFU.
I personally believe that plex gates should restrict all ships with cloaks and stabs just as they restrict oversized ships.
This is a true fix.

Timer roll backs will result in a stagnant warzone. It's a good idea in theory but in practice will result in the same amount of farming.
The difference is that dplexs will be the most farmed which will cause the stagnation.


Dplexing will be a matter of chase wt. Write down how long till the plex finishes rolling back. Dock. Go back when timer has rolled back and finish the plex.
Just another form of risk free farming that also makes home systems 100% safe by reducing the time investment (by up to 1/2) required to defend it.

Burtakus
Lone W0lf Society
#350 - 2013-12-13 02:33:53 UTC
IbanezLaney wrote:
Interesting.

When Caldari had to deal with the Gallente stabbed/cloaked farmers earlier in the year we were told 'working as intended - HTFU'. You had no problem with it when these farmers were on your side.

We would have slightly less farmers at the moment than the Gals had during their wz push.
I do not see many Amarr in our region at teh moment.
However when the Gallente pushed they had every cloaky stabby Minmatar in eve helping them. Once again - they had no issue with FW mechanics during this time.


I am not saying there is no issue or HTFU.
I personally believe that plex gates should restrict all ships with cloaks and stabs just as they restrict oversized ships.
This is a true fix.

Timer roll backs will result in a stagnant warzone. It's a good idea in theory but in practice will result in the same amount of farming.
The difference is that dplexs will be the most farmed which will cause the stagnation.


Dplexing will be a matter of chase wt. Write down how long till the plex finishes rolling back. Dock. Go back when timer has rolled back and finish the plex.
Just another form of risk free farming that also makes home systems 100% safe by reducing the time investment (by up to 1/2) required to defend it.



I pretty much abhor not farmers but their ridiculous impact on the WZ for the risk they are taking regardless of what side they are on.

IbanezLaney
The Church of Awesome
#351 - 2013-12-13 02:49:00 UTC  |  Edited by: IbanezLaney
Veshta Yoshida wrote:
Starbuck05 wrote:
.....True that

There is also the issue of sec loss with regards to neutrals .. perhaps it is time to ask for plex grids to be treated as null space, complete with ability to bubble so that one can kill whomever one choses with no ill effects other than possible hatred Big smile


I once liked the idea of bubbled plexes - (the plex button having a 30km bubble around it).
The problem is that it gives kitey fast ships a massive advantage.
'Oh I dropped point with my Hookbill' - 'Doesn't matter the bubble will keep them there till I get it back'

Overheated point + Claymore links + Hookbill = Fly around the bubble able to warp out at will while the target is 100% screwed and cant escape even if I derp my point.
Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#352 - 2013-12-13 03:54:30 UTC
I don't FW anymore, but I know if they nerfed it, then lowsec would become even more barren than it is.

Consider it the price to pay for you to have targets.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Thanatos Marathon
Moira.
#353 - 2013-12-13 04:05:04 UTC
IbanezLaney wrote:
Interesting.

When Caldari had to deal with the Gallente stabbed/cloaked farmers earlier in the year we were told 'working as intended - HTFU'. You had no problem with it when these farmers were on your side.

We would have slightly less farmers at the moment than the Gals had during their wz push.
I do not see many Amarr in our region at teh moment.
However when the Gallente pushed they had every cloaky stabby Minmatar in eve helping them. Once again - they had no issue with FW mechanics during this time.


I am not saying there is no issue or HTFU.
I personally believe that plex gates should restrict all ships with cloaks and stabs just as they restrict oversized ships.
This is a true fix.

Timer roll backs will result in a stagnant warzone. It's a good idea in theory but in practice will result in the same amount of farming.
The difference is that dplexs will be the most farmed which will cause the stagnation.


Dplexing will be a matter of chase wt. Write down how long till the plex finishes rolling back. Dock. Go back when timer has rolled back and finish the plex.
Just another form of risk free farming that also makes home systems 100% safe by reducing the time investment (by up to 1/2) required to defend it.



I supported Timer Rollbacks when we pushed to Tier3 and I support them now.
XOr Brasil
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#354 - 2013-12-13 04:09:40 UTC
Captain Tardbar wrote:
I don't FW anymore, but I know if they nerfed it, then lowsec would become even more barren than it is.

Consider it the price to pay for you to have targets.

They are not targets unless we're gatecamping in multiple insta-locking arty thrashers, so I guess ppl interested in pvp'ing would not miss those...

Preventing neutrals from entering the plex would be awful! We want more fights, not less. And who needs (positive) sec status, anyway? Cool Same goes for cloaks and stabs: I hate them, but they are part of the game and preventing ships from entering a plex based on their fits is not a good choice, but the risk/reward ratio must be corrected! Buff the rat tank and you can make ppl either have to fit decent dps (and having less space for defensive items like those) or teaming up. Both options brings the risk/reward closer to a balance.

And I really don't think timer rollbacks would make the warzone become stagnant: I've capped a lot of plexes where either no one came for me, or they came, we fought and I survived to close it down. Risk and reward! Capturing a system shouldn't be an easy task anyway.
Tzenick
Boomer Humor
Snuffed Out
#355 - 2013-12-13 04:19:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Tzenick
Deplexing will absolutely not be reduced to chasing the WT docking and deplexxing at the appropriate time. Maybe that would be the case with a reset but the only thing the timer rollback would do that doesn't occur now is that the plex would slowly drift back to neutral while the person cloaked or bounced. It would only really cause said individual to have some urgency in restarting the timer or conclude that it is better to move to another plex or area. Anyone who has actually dealt with these farmers on a frequent basis knows that even when the plexes are rolled back to 39 minutes, the afk farmers will still decloak and run that full 39 minutes if allowed. This isn't speculation, this happens all the time.

Regarding FW now being way more relevant than 2 years ago, no one is saying it isn't. What they are saying is that there is still a flaw in the current system as well. Timer rollbacks wouldn't break the dynamic of plexxing as it is today but it would make it a bit more challenging for individuals looking for nothing more than the afk ISK. The availability of it would still be there for new.militia members and even the farming crowd wouldn't be put out that greatly. Many of us depend on our FW income for our ability to PvP. This isn't asking for a one sided fix, we would have to adjust to it as well, and so far
Andre Vauban
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#356 - 2013-12-13 05:14:26 UTC
Hikaru Inumakari wrote:
Well i have not been much for FW till recently and have lead my corp into it. After roughly a week i can understand the farming aspect of things, i think TIMER rollbacks should be implented.

The only other thing i believe should be implented ust for FW plexes is the fact that ONLY FW militia should be able to enter them....no nuetral parties should be allowed.

Sure they can camp and blob the gates, or belts or what not......but every single outpost site and FW mission ite should be regulated to FW Milita pilots only. Then you can keep all the other stuff since only FW pilots will be fighting mostly over the things they should be fighting over.

Such implentation would prevent persons that are not militia from ganging groups that are focused in actually playing the FW aspect.....defending or attacking outposts so they can dontae LP to the hubs for system control. Not having to worry if high end alts or mains are going to jump them for no reason at all but to pad their KB's.

Then if you want in the damn outpost sites then you will have to join FW.


I disagree. Neutrals in FW lowsec are a big part of what makes FW lowsec fun.

.

Andre Vauban
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#357 - 2013-12-13 05:30:13 UTC
IbanezLaney wrote:
Interesting.

When Caldari had to deal with the Gallente stabbed/cloaked farmers earlier in the year we were told 'working as intended - HTFU'. You had no problem with it when these farmers were on your side.

We would have slightly less farmers at the moment than the Gals had during their wz push.
I do not see many Amarr in our region at teh moment.
However when the Gallente pushed they had every cloaky stabby Minmatar in eve helping them. Once again - they had no issue with FW mechanics during this time.


I am not saying there is no issue or HTFU.
I personally believe that plex gates should restrict all ships with cloaks and stabs just as they restrict oversized ships.
This is a true fix.

Timer roll backs will result in a stagnant warzone. It's a good idea in theory but in practice will result in the same amount of farming.
The difference is that dplexs will be the most farmed which will cause the stagnation.


Dplexing will be a matter of chase wt. Write down how long till the plex finishes rolling back. Dock. Go back when timer has rolled back and finish the plex.
Just another form of risk free farming that also makes home systems 100% safe by reducing the time investment (by up to 1/2) required to defend it.



Can you elaborate on why you think it would cause the warzone to stagnate?

Can you suggest another way to deal with people who whose tactics that force you to waste more time than they invested? In other words, the root of our argument is that a plex farmer that runs a plex and then does one of two things when you try and defend.

1) Cloak up and play the waiting game. Odds are good that you will have to invest up to 2 times the amount of time they did to close the plex. Farmer wins because they waste up to 20 minutes of their time for 10 minutes of their time. Plus they can easily multibox with disposable alts.

2) They warp to another plex. This forces the defender to either stay in the plex to defend it while the farmer can capture 1-2 plexes somewhere else in the same time period. If the defender chases, the farmer can just bounce back to the first plex and continue to run it with no invested time lost. This can be repeated until the defender either gives up or brings another 2-3 characters to be able to run all the plexes in the system.

In other words, I think the farmer should slowly lose time disproportionately to the defender on plexes where they refuse to fight instead of the other way around. This should be a slow loss to give the farmer time to mount a strategic withdrawal and mount a new attack if they are actually not a pure farmer without losing all their invested time if they can counter attack fast enough.


.

Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#358 - 2013-12-13 05:47:19 UTC
Veshta Yoshida wrote:
Starbuck05 wrote:
.....True that

There is also the issue of sec loss with regards to neutrals .. perhaps it is time to ask for plex grids to be treated as null space, complete with ability to bubble so that one can kill whomever one choses with no ill effects other than possible hatred Big smile


As a neut in FW space I take a sec status hit no matter who I agress. When I recently posted this idea in features and ideas, the militia pilots disagreed, working as intended.

Now I'm ok with it and it should stay as is. If I agress first, sec status hit to me. If you agress first, sec status hit to you.
Xuixien
Solar Winds Security Solutions
#359 - 2013-12-13 05:55:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Xuixien
Burtakus wrote:
PvP is not lacking in FW. No one ever said that, you have assumed that.


Nope I based it comments people posted. Like I said go back and read.

Burtakus wrote:
Why is this an issue: Because our ability to enjoy the game we like (or used to like in some cases) and the aspect that we as a group like most about it (FW) is directly affected by those who have no interest in that aspect other than abusing the risk/reward ratio to isk gain. We all want a healthy FW aspect of Eve and blowing up ships is just one part of it.


So why is FW systems flipping control ruining your fun? You realize that's what FW is, right? And whatever side has the numbers will have the advantage, right? I mean... you're crying for CCP to effect change when it's an issue entirely in the hands of the players.

Burtakus wrote:
Back to the Root cause of our issue: The risk/reward for "farming" and the impact is has on WZ control is creating an imbalance between factions that if persists will be to the detriment of the FW aspect of Eve.


Yeah. Well the factions were never meant to be balanced. That's up to the players. And what will you whine to CCP about when they "fix" the issue - and it's still imbalanced and one side has an advantage over the other? Acceleration gates on iHubs so caps can't be dropped? I mean really. RIght now GalMil is QQcatting cuz TEST joined the Caldari.

FW is dynamic. Caldari have the advantage today, tomorrow it will be the Gallente. Amarr had the advantage when FWEDDIT and other groups joined - now Minmatar call the shots. That's FW.

Burtakus wrote:
All we are asking for a relatively small adjustment in FW plex mechanics that begin to address the imbalanced risk vs. reward of farming FW solely for the purpose of making isk.


You're asking CCP "pls nerf something player driven cuz other players are not playing fair."

Burtakus wrote:
The only folks impacted by this are the pure isk farmers and even then it would at most be a minor inconvenience.


Everyone who used plexes would be affected. Even those who run it for WZ control.

Epic Space Cat, Horsegirl, Philanthropist

Xuixien
Solar Winds Security Solutions
#360 - 2013-12-13 05:59:21 UTC
Burtakus wrote:
I could be wrong, but it appears the only ones against this minor suggestion of altering the timer roll back are those defending the incredibly low risk/reward of farming FW plexes provides and are either not in FW or are themselves taking advantage of this abuse.


It doesn't matter what their "hidden agenda" is. You have no valid argument and it's been pointed out over and over.

Epic Space Cat, Horsegirl, Philanthropist