These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Catch 22.

First post
Author
Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association
#1 - 2013-12-07 02:33:47 UTC
I'm gonna say a few things here. The first of which is that for the first time in many years I saw a ragequit thread that was actually understandable.

When the usual forum BS stopped and we took a serious look at the player's complaint, we made several disheartening discoveries.

199 characters and 2 corporations names contain the word '******' This word may be censored, but it's also a pile of kindling, or an offensive term for gays and lesbians.

The person ragequitting had just received a ban, apparently, for calling out a target with that name in it in local. and spelling it out to bypass the language filter.

I have to ask, but all moral and ethical issues aside, would not having a name that is automatically censored by chat be an exploit?

I mean, stop and think about it, anyone who called you out as a target risks getting a ban if they try and bypass the filter .

I'm curious what the CSM and CCP have to say about this.
Slymah
DorpCorp
#2 - 2013-12-07 02:38:18 UTC
Quote:
I'm curious what the CSM and CCP have to say about this.


I would assume something like this -


Quote:
10. Discussion of warnings and bans is prohibited.
Such matters shall remain private between CCP and the involved user. Questions or comments concerning warnings and bans will be conveyed through email or private messaging. CCP respect the right of our players to privacy and as such you are not permitted to publicize private correspondence (including petition responses and emails) received from any of the aforementioned parties.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#3 - 2013-12-07 02:41:20 UTC  |  Edited by: James Amril-Kesh
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:
but it's also a pile of kindling

Nobody uses that definition for any purpose other than trolling or making excuses for their own childishness.

While it's possible he was using the name of a player, corporation, or alliance, I very much doubt that was the case.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association
#4 - 2013-12-07 02:43:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Cygnet Lythanea
Slymah wrote:
Quote:
I'm curious what the CSM and CCP have to say about this.


I would assume something like this -


Quote:
10. Discussion of warnings and bans is prohibited.
Such matters shall remain private between CCP and the involved user. Questions or comments concerning warnings and bans will be conveyed through email or private messaging. CCP respect the right of our players to privacy and as such you are not permitted to publicize private correspondence (including petition responses and emails) received from any of the aforementioned parties.


That's interesting, but on this issue I think it better that we have a direct answer. Because it effectively forces you to risk a ban to perform what would otherwise be a normal action in game. So the question is, would that be a defacto exploit?

James Amril-Kesh wrote:
[\
While it's possible he was using the name of a player, corporation, or alliance, I very much doubt that was the case.



Regardless of the individual case, from what I can see so far in the rules, there's no extenuating circumstances.
Xavier Higdon
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#5 - 2013-12-07 02:46:04 UTC
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:
I'm gonna say a few things here. The first of which is that for the first time in many years I saw a ragequit thread that was actually understandable.

When the usual forum BS stopped and we took a serious look at the player's complaint, we made several disheartening discoveries.

199 characters and 2 corporations names contain the word '******' This word may be censored, but it's also a pile of kindling, or an offensive term for gays and lesbians.

The person ragequitting had just received a ban, apparently, for calling out a target with that name in it in local. and spelling it out to bypass the language filter.

I have to ask, but all moral and ethical issues aside, would not having a name that is automatically censored by chat be an exploit?

I mean, stop and think about it, anyone who called you out as a target risks getting a ban if they try and bypass the filter .

I'm curious what the CSM and CCP have to say about this.


His post was quite ambiguous, and as such it is unclear if he was calling out intel or just being a moron. Furthermore he could have used a variety of means to report spotting them if they were a corp and not just reds to him. He could use their corp ticker, a shortened version of their corp name, a nickname or even "those idiots." Also, CCP often erases corp names that are offensive and he could have easily reported them. I find it more likely that he was just throwing out slurs, however, as evidenced by the fact that it was a seemingly recurring theme with him. But since you've already done the leg work, perhaps you would be so kind as to report those corporations you found?
Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association
#6 - 2013-12-07 02:49:47 UTC
Yeah, the individual case is muddy, I grant, but that's not what I'm talking about. It just brought it to my attention.

The question is, is this not an exploit?
Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#7 - 2013-12-07 02:53:09 UTC
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:
Yeah, the individual case is muddy, I grant, but that's not what I'm talking about. It just brought it to my attention.

The question is, is this not an exploit?


I hate to say this again, but I'm sure the helpful General Discussion community will band together to give you an answer to your problem.

Also, I'm sure an ISD will sticky this thread instead of locking it.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Enyalie
Sanguine Legion
#8 - 2013-12-07 03:07:14 UTC
How can a word be censored if it appears in corp or character names. I may totally not be following this as it's late.
Make the word legit or censor it completely.
Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#9 - 2013-12-07 03:31:47 UTC
Just because CCP hasn't been taking care of all the things that break the EULA doesn't somehow mean you can just do it without repercussion. "Sorry officer, you haven't caught and trailed all murderers yet so you can't arrest me for killing these here people".

Also, I highly doubt that the OP from that thread told us all the info and wouldn't be surprised if he in fact worded his sentences in a way to try and paint a different picture of what actually happened.
SeenButNotHeard
Perkone
Caldari State
#10 - 2013-12-07 03:51:15 UTC  |  Edited by: SeenButNotHeard
Ban this


Come on guys - let us get real. BAN CHRISTMAS! Christmas is clearly anti gay.

Or not.

Edit for those folks with a tiny attention span - contains the *** word
Xavier Higdon
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#11 - 2013-12-07 04:12:51 UTC
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:
Yeah, the individual case is muddy, I grant, but that's not what I'm talking about. It just brought it to my attention.

The question is, is this not an exploit?


The fact is that unless you want corporation creation to take a week and also face strong and, frankly, oppressive naming rules the only means CCP has to monitor corp names is through the slow in-house process of elimination and the much quicker process of community involvement. It is not an exploit, as CCP will gladly remove the offending corp name, which is why you see names like "EVE Corporation 0123456789." Report the offending corps so that CCP can remove their names instead of being a 12 year old who screams the dirty word between giggles.
Vicky Somers
Rusty Anchor
#12 - 2013-12-07 04:24:25 UTC
On one hand, it bothers me a bit how pc and kiddie friendly Eve online is while trying to be all HTFU y'all. Harden then what up exactly? Apparently, that's obscene. But then on the other hand Eve would be just /b/ in space and maybe that's not the alternative we're looking for. Catch 22 indeed. But then again if you're creative you can dance the fine line between pretending to be correct and being absolutely horrible. *sniggers*
Xen Solarus
Furious Destruction and Salvage
#13 - 2013-12-07 05:40:59 UTC
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:

The question is, is this not an exploit?


An interesting question. I had never considered the fringe benefit of a player with a dirty name being hard to call out as a target. Though, it would only be an exploit for as long as it takes for someone to petition it, and then he's Caldari Citizen 08578390 and the problem is solved!

Doesn't take long when searching dodgy words under characters to find quite a few players with some fairly bad names.

I can't comment of the specific case of that guy getting banned for saying the other players name, there seems to be some disagreement on the events. Though, if the target hadn't have had a dirty name then I'm sure none of this would have been an issue in the first place! Shocked

Post with your main, like a BOSS!

And no, i don't live in highsec.  As if that would make your opinion any less wrong.  

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#14 - 2013-12-07 06:07:10 UTC
Vicky Somers wrote:
On one hand, it bothers me a bit how pc and kiddie friendly Eve online is while trying to be all HTFU y'all. Harden then what up exactly? Apparently, that's obscene. But then on the other hand Eve would be just /b/ in space and maybe that's not the alternative we're looking for. Catch 22 indeed. But then again if you're creative you can dance the fine line between pretending to be correct and being absolutely horrible. *sniggers*

There's a difference between being harsh and being a complete scumbag.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Vicky Somers
Rusty Anchor
#15 - 2013-12-07 06:43:59 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
There's a difference between being harsh and being a complete scumbag.


That's just lawyer talk.
Jarod Garamonde
Jolly Codgers
Tactical Narcotics Team
#16 - 2013-12-07 07:47:41 UTC
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:
(redacted: inane drivel)


I don't care about ANY of what you said. I just wanted to remind everyone that Catch 22 was an awesome book, and everyone should read it.

Also, IB4L; ranting is prohibited. ISD Ezwal gonna lock da s**t outta you...

That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right...

    [#savethelance]
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#17 - 2013-12-07 07:58:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Mara Rinn
Vicky Somers wrote:
On one hand, it bothers me a bit how pc and kiddie friendly Eve online is while trying to be all HTFU y'all. Harden then what up exactly? Apparently, that's obscene. But then on the other hand Eve would be just /b/ in space and maybe that's not the alternative we're looking for. Catch 22 indeed. But then again if you're creative you can dance the fine line between pretending to be correct and being absolutely horrible. *sniggers*


When pugilists are exchanging blows in the ring, they are discouraged from using pejorative terms relating to gender, race or religion. The game of EVE is no different: you are encouraged to engage in space combat and scams, because that's the nature of the game. Calling each other offensive names is not part of the game and is thus discouraged.

It's really not that hard to understand, and there is an old word which relates to this issue, even if the word tends to not be used particularly often in these dollar-driven times. That word is sportsmanship. Sportsmanship is why we say "gf" in local after someone has defeated us in lowsec, rather than resorting to insults and crying like a baby because someone showed us the folly of our ways.

I am a hisec carebear, and even I understand how to behave like a grown-up.
Lady Naween
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#18 - 2013-12-07 07:59:58 UTC
yeah there are quite a few players with that word in their name, kinda ... strange.. that they get to keep the name if that person really was banned for saying it .
Vicky Somers
Rusty Anchor
#19 - 2013-12-07 08:26:54 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:
When pugilists are exchanging blows in the ring, they are discouraged from using pejorative terms relating to gender, race or religion. The game of EVE is no different: you are encouraged to engage in space combat and scams, because that's the nature of the game. Calling each other offensive names is not part of the game and is thus discouraged.

It's really not that hard to understand, and there is an old word which relates to this issue, even if the word tends to not be used particularly often in these dollar-driven times. That word is sportsmanship. Sportsmanship is why we say "gf" in local after someone has defeated us in lowsec, rather than resorting to insults and crying like a baby because someone showed us the folly of our ways.

I am a hisec carebear, and even I understand how to behave like a grown-up.


I don't know why you posted this because it hasn't got anything to do with what I said. I perfectly understand the point of having rules and etiquette because they set the stage for wit and fun and playful behaviour. One can be very offensive while being well spoken, polite and lighthearted at the same time. But that doesn't really mean we need pc protection from idiots who spew random profanity. A game like Eve takes care of that by design. I understand from a corporate point of view that being labeled as a racist or homophobic company is definitely not a good thing but still. The social justice warriors make me want to go full ****** on their sensitivity. It's just... They make such wonderful victims.
I Love Boobies
All Hail Boobies
#20 - 2013-12-07 10:12:27 UTC  |  Edited by: I Love Boobies
If you have issues with names in game, petition it. They get taken care of if they are against the rules. I know I seen a couple of corps that blatantly referred to pedophilia, had disgusting things in their bio and so on, reported them, and CCP took care of them.

EDIT: I petitioned the 2 corp names. I mentioned the 199 other characters in those petitions. Feel better OP?
12Next page