These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors

First post First post First post
Author
Frying Doom
#1161 - 2013-10-22 09:55:53 UTC
The Legendary Soldier wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:

They are apparently doing a survey and are taking months to NOT resolve the matter.

Funny it does not take them months to stop RMT when it doesn't involve Somer.


There, fixed that for you :p

Thank you for your correction of my obvious mistake.

I wonder if we will get to have a player elected body to oversee these types of crisis and to check up on the CCP Devs, Internal affairs and the current CSM?Lol

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Xeen Du'Wang
Perkone
Caldari State
#1162 - 2013-10-22 11:03:37 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
The Legendary Soldier wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:

They are apparently doing a survey and are taking months to NOT resolve the matter.

Funny it does not take them months to stop RMT when it doesn't involve Somer.


There, fixed that for you :p

Thank you for your correction of my obvious mistake.

I wonder if we will get to have a player elected body to oversee these types of crisis and to check up on the CCP Devs, Internal affairs and the current CSM?Lol


Now that is funny!!

I still demand an apology from Hellmar and 6 months of subscriptions for everyone to prove he is sincere this time.
Sugar Von MurdererTits
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#1163 - 2013-10-22 12:21:54 UTC
Thanks for the info. What a shame though; I was really hoping they would do the right thing by their players but I guess that was too much to hope for. Ugh
DarkDecay
Real money traders
#1164 - 2013-10-22 12:44:23 UTC
Damn, two hours left on my last account and I cant think of anything good/funny to say in what could be my last ever post, this will have to do...

Saw the reason CCP closed DNS's thread and it had nothing to do with rmt.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3755219#post3755219
So if you sell a character for $$$ without using a lottery it is ok?

---

I cant haz a sig so http://www.eve-search.com/thread/285492-1/page/35#1035
Frying Doom
#1165 - 2013-10-22 13:19:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
DarkDecay wrote:
Damn, two hours left on my last account and I cant think of anything good/funny to say in what could be my last ever post, this will have to do...

Saw the reason CCP closed DNS's thread and it had nothing to do with rmt.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3755219#post3755219
So if you sell a character for $$$ without using a lottery it is ok?

I am sure I will see you else where, have fun in non-RMT games.

Interesting they closed the thread on the lottery angle but I suppose if they closed it for RMT too many people would be laughing our asses off at them Lol

The other question is of course was the transfer successful? or did they dig them selves a bigger pit, deleting the character while Somer still RMTs?

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Xeen Du'Wang
Perkone
Caldari State
#1166 - 2013-10-22 13:32:42 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
DarkDecay wrote:
Damn, two hours left on my last account and I cant think of anything good/funny to say in what could be my last ever post, this will have to do...

Saw the reason CCP closed DNS's thread and it had nothing to do with rmt.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3755219#post3755219
So if you sell a character for $$$ without using a lottery it is ok?

I am sure I will see you else where, have fun in non-RMT games.

Interesting they closed the thread on the lottery angle but I suppose if they closed it for RMT too many people would be laughing our asses off at them Lol

The other question is of course was the transfer successful? or did they dig them selves a bigger pit, deleting the character while Somer still RMTs?


Yeah no ****, "lets point at something obscure and avoid RMT."

Frying Doom
#1167 - 2013-10-22 14:01:26 UTC
Xeen Du'Wang wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
DarkDecay wrote:
Damn, two hours left on my last account and I cant think of anything good/funny to say in what could be my last ever post, this will have to do...

Saw the reason CCP closed DNS's thread and it had nothing to do with rmt.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3755219#post3755219
So if you sell a character for $$$ without using a lottery it is ok?

I am sure I will see you else where, have fun in non-RMT games.

Interesting they closed the thread on the lottery angle but I suppose if they closed it for RMT too many people would be laughing our asses off at them Lol

The other question is of course was the transfer successful? or did they dig them selves a bigger pit, deleting the character while Somer still RMTs?


Yeah no ****, "lets point at something obscure and avoid RMT."


They should have just said he failed to write the post with orange text, it would make about as much sense.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
#1168 - 2013-10-22 14:18:46 UTC  |  Edited by: raven666wings
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3755219#post3755219

CCP Falcon wrote:
Lotteries for character sales are not permitted under the Character Bazaar Rules.

As such, this thread is locked.

Quote wrote:

17. Lottery style sales are not permitted. Auctions and buyouts are the appropriate method for selling a character.


https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=285492&p=51

Money Makin Mitch wrote:
he didn't lotto the character. he lotto'ed a chance to bid on the character.


raven666wings wrote:
You're missing the point. Just like MMMitch told you before, he didn't directly raffle the character, he raffled a chance to get a Buyout on it. So he didn't sell it using a Lottery, he still sold it using an Auction and Buyout in the Character Bazaar forum section, just like the normal procedure endorsed by CCP for character exchange. The object of the raffle being a character buyout, plexes, ships or isk doesn't matter according to Somer Blink, Eve-Games.net and other unsanctioned in-game item raffling conducts, as long as they're all transferred by the CCP designated trading mechanisms.


raven666wings wrote:
You're still missing the point. They aren't "hiding behind details". They are using the same procedure used by Somer Blink and others that has not only been unsanctioned, but also supported and advertised by CCP.
raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
#1169 - 2013-10-22 14:22:33 UTC
CCP Falcon wrote:
Moving your thread is not endorsement, it's making sure that it's in the correct forum for the topic.

Discussion is still ongoing internally regarding this kind of practice.

Reference to any endorsement of this by CCP Staff have been removed until an decision is made regarding it rather than misinformation.

Don't put words in my mouth in future.


We don't need to put words in your mouth. Your actions speak louder.
Xeen Du'Wang
Perkone
Caldari State
#1170 - 2013-10-22 14:24:55 UTC
raven666wings wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:
Moving your thread is not endorsement, it's making sure that it's in the correct forum for the topic.

Discussion is still ongoing internally regarding this kind of practice.

Reference to any endorsement of this by CCP Staff have been removed until an decision is made regarding it rather than misinformation.

Don't put words in my mouth in future.


We don't need to put words in your mouth. Your actions speak louder.


Loud and clear
Kate stark
#1171 - 2013-10-22 17:15:07 UTC
is eve vegas still going? i assume not.

so, any chance of an update since we've been waiting quite a while for one?
even better; how about that survey?

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#1172 - 2013-10-22 18:37:01 UTC
EVE Vegas is over, and the readers of this thread may find this interesting:

http://evenews24.com/2013/10/22/jesters-trek-sponsor-and-gamble/

Xeen Du'Wang
Perkone
Caldari State
#1173 - 2013-10-22 19:45:44 UTC
Argus Sorn wrote:
EVE Vegas is over, and the readers of this thread may find this interesting:

http://evenews24.com/2013/10/22/jesters-trek-sponsor-and-gamble/



I call it Damage Control

lol or as one of the responders posted... DCII

Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
#1174 - 2013-10-22 19:53:27 UTC
CCP will never receive another real life penny from me.

No you can't have my stuff. I'm switching to plexing 3 accounts for a couple months then wondering why the hell I play just to be able to buy plex and then quit so come back and ask me in a couple months.

Not today spaghetti.

Josef Djugashvilis
#1175 - 2013-10-22 20:19:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Josef Djugashvilis
Surely it would be better for folk to await the outcome of the Somer Blink et al - 'freebies to friends of CCP' debacle, then make a decision to quit or stay?

It seems to me that CCP have accidentally stumbled into this mess, rather than gone into it with malice aforethought, and are now considering their options, which will be based in part on the feedback from the proposed survey.

One always has to bear in mind that Eve Online is a game to us, but in reality Eve Online is a business model to generate money for CCP.

My gut feeling is that CCP will weigh up the cost of the money gained from their association with the likes of Somer Blink against the potential financial cost of lost accounts and act accordingly.

I sincerely hope I am wrong and that CCP stop favouring in-game corps with valuable in-game assets, simply because it is wrong.

This is not a signature.

Xeen Du'Wang
Perkone
Caldari State
#1176 - 2013-10-22 20:30:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Xeen Du'Wang
I would agree that it could be worth waiting out...

But this has happened before, at least twice that I am aware of.

We have no reason to wait it out again.
The Legendary Soldier
United.
#1177 - 2013-10-22 20:34:31 UTC
Xeen Du'Wang wrote:
I would agree that it could be worth waiting out...



CCP is waiting it out - if we wait it out too - that will be the last we hear of it.

Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corps standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread

Kate stark
#1178 - 2013-10-22 21:20:11 UTC
The Legendary Soldier wrote:
Xeen Du'Wang wrote:
I would agree that it could be worth waiting out...



CCP is waiting it out - if we wait it out too - that will be the last we hear of it.


i fear this is the truth.

while people are still feeding them subscriptions they have no reason to address the issue.
however if those that have dropped their subscriptions don't get a say in these elusive surveys and ccp goes "hey look guys; you all said it was fine!" and still don't address the issue...

well, well played ccp you managed to not bother fixing an issue. round of applause. **** me this game is making me even more cynical than usual.

and to think; all of this could have been avoided if they'd just created a community rewards program before giving out community rewards... just like getting dressed before you leave the house, rather than afterwards...

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.

Frying Doom
#1179 - 2013-10-22 22:17:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
Something more sinister than RMT is occuring here

Now I have from time to time played Somer Blink. I have gotten my isk from in game and sent them to Somers Corp and received my Somer Credit in return. I have gambled my isk and won it back and been happy.

My fake in game isk went in and I got fake in game isk out. Now I thought nothing more of this until the whole Gold Magnate, Ishukone Watch Scorpions and finally RMT came up.

Now why is it fake isk

EULA wrote:
B. Selling Items and Objects

You may not transfer, sell or auction, or buy or accept any offer to transfer, sell or auction (or offer to do any of the foregoing), any content appearing within the Game environment, including without limitation characters, character attributes, items, currency, and objects, other than via a permitted Character Transfer as described in section 3 above. You may not encourage or induce any other person to participate in such a prohibited transaction. The buying, selling or auctioning (or any attempt at doing so) of characters, character attributes, items, currency, or objects, whether through online auctions, newsgroups, postings on message boards or any other means is prohibited by the EULA and a violation of CCP's proprietary rights in the Game.


So the in-game isk are the property of CCP.

Now I will admit I did not think anything of this, until in one of the many posts on Somers RMT, someone proudly stated that they had over time purchased over 1000 GTC and received the extra isk and converted the Plex into isk for gambling, they even showed their winnings.

Now how is this wrong, I hear you ask?
Well people are gambling real money, in this case over $35,000 USD to gamble on Somer Blinks site. They Buy the GTC and convert them to Blink Credit as well as get the bonus credit as well, they gamble winning some and losing some and then convert it back to in game isk, at which point it becomes the property of CCP. I am sure like all gambling there are many more stories like this out there.

So people are gambling real money with no ability to receive real money back, they are throwing tens of thousands of dollars into gambling with all of the thrills and enticements of gambling but they have no ability to win anything back.

That is a scam pure and simple. It picks on those people who do not have the ability to control their gambling while at the same time allowing children to gamble on their site.

Now is CCP responsible as Somer Blink is its own separate entity? Well yes as CCP is an integral part of the chain as they provide the means to convert real money into Somer Credits. The fact that they do not run the gambling site its self matters little, they are the banker as it where. To the point you even have to have a valid EvE account to sign up for Somer Blink as it has to be done within the game.

Now CCP has turned a blind eye to Somer blink with the EULA, even if they were not in breach of the EULA in relation to ETC/GTC RMT sales, they are most definitely in breach of

EULA wrote:
Accounts may not be used for business purposes. Access to the System and playing EVE is intended for your personal entertainment, enjoyment and recreation, and not for corporate, business, commercial or income-seeking activities. Business entities and anyone who is acting for or on behalf of a business or for business purposes may not establish an Account, access the System or play EVE. Accessing the System or using the Game for commercial, business or income-seeking purposes is strictly prohibited.

So CCP have very much broken their own rules in this and become a partner in Gambling.

Now given that CCPs servers are located in the UK, they are required to be licensed by the Gambling Commission they are not.

This of course leads to the question, at what point does EvE stop being a game and start to be a gambling site and should be forced to follow all of the rules and laws governing such sites. Well frankly when people are spending tens of thousands of dollars to gamble.

This is not one of my normal pick on CCP threads, this is a real issue effecting real people, RMT is pale in comparison to the damage uncontrolled gambling can do.

Edit: I would also like to add this from Wikipedia
Wikipedia wrote:
Legality
United States
On April 15, 2011, in U. S. v. Scheinberg et al. (10 Cr. 336), three online poker companies were indicted for violating U.S. laws that prohibit the acceptance of any financial instrument in connection with unlawful Internet gambling, that is, Internet gambling that involves a "bet or wager" that is illegal under the laws of the state where the bet is made.
The indictment alleges that the companies used fraudulent methods to evade this law, for example, by disguising online gambling payments as purchases of merchandise, and by investing money in a local bank in return for the bank's willingness to process online poker transactions.
The companies argue that poker is a game of skill rather than a game of chance, and therefore, online poker is not unlawful Internet gambling. There are other legal problems with the government's case; and, interestingly, the indictments did not mention the Wire Act. On July 31, 2012, it was announced that two of the three companies indicted for money laundering and forfeiture settled with the Manhattan U.S. Attorney for $731 million without legally admitting guilt. The government also asked the judge to approve a settlement with the third defendant, Absolute Poker.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_gambling

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
#1180 - 2013-10-23 00:09:11 UTC  |  Edited by: raven666wings
In this particular case I don't think you'll be able to get back at CCP on illegal gambling grounds. For all effects, they are merely selling their business product, the Game Time Codes (albeit through a 3rd party referral system to increase sales and even rewarding it for the effort).

They are indeed not enforcing their own EULA and Term of Service rules to certain costumer(s), but I don't think that there is anything forcing them to. These EULA and ToS documents are created by these companies to act as legal backup that gives them full legitimacy to do whatever they want with the game and the costumers' accounts, they aren't created to protect the costumers in case the company decides to not enforce its own rules. There is no rule in the whole documents that forces them to enforce any of the other rules.

However there might be national laws written in the Business Code (either in Iceland or in Britain) that forbid a service providing company to have double standards when serving its costumers. It's a matter of contacting the Icelandic Consumer Defense Agency and inquiring them about the existance of such or related regulations and find out whether a lawsuit under such grounds may be filed. If the costumer service double standards are a violation of any existing Icelandic Business law and CCP's practice can be proven in court, then there is the possibility that the judge will deem them guilty of such practice.

Regarding Somer Blink, the best way to legally get back at him at the moment is to contact the Tax Administration Office of the country where he lives and inform them of his activity. He's most likely not declaring any of the income he's getting from the GTC referrals and just that situation has the potential to confiscate a big part (if not the total) of his profits. Like CCP he wont be susceptible of being sued for illegal gambling because he's merely doing it with fake money inside the game, while receiving a real money fee for the referral of the GTC sales.