These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors

First post First post First post
Author
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#741 - 2013-10-16 19:27:07 UTC
Din Chao wrote:

My account expires in one day, so that's one less voice of dissent you'll get in your skewed, condescending "survey."
Congratulations, CSM 8 just made it's mark of irrelevancy.


I hate to break it for you, but if you check the last years scandals, every single time the CSM was not asked for an opinion and got just completely bypassed.

An istitution that is bypassed at every relevant / game changing decision is a smokescreen, not an institution. X
Anya Klibor
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#742 - 2013-10-16 19:28:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Anya Klibor
CCP believed that the whole Monoclegate fiasco was also "isolated", and that the rage was "very predictable feedback". He [Hilmar] also said that it was more important to see what we did with our actions, not what we said. Five-thousand-plus accounts unsubscribed later in under a week, Hilmar came out and said, "****, bluff called!" and relented. Once again, I am not saying this is on-par with the "Golden Ammo"/"Golden Scorpion" issue, but it does show how CCP tends to shove their heads in the sand and claim anything that elicits rage because of their business practices and shadiness is "isolated rage".

They are not doing very good with that track record of predicting that sort of thing.

Leadership is something you learn. Maybe one day, you'll learn that.

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#743 - 2013-10-16 19:34:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Argus Sorn
Anya Klibor wrote:
CCP believed that the whole Monoclegate fiasco was also "isolated", and that the rage was "very predictable feedback". He also said that it was more important to see what we did with our actions, not what we said. Five-thousand-plus accounts unsubscribed later in under a week, Hilmar came out and said, "****, bluff called!" and relented. Once again, I am not saying this is on-par with the "Golden Ammo"/"Golden Scorpion" issue, but it does show how CCP tends to shove their heads in the sand and claim anything that elicits rage because of their business practices and shadiness is "isolated rage".

They are not doing very good with that track record of predicting that sort of thing.



Anya, you are incorrect (no offense). It IS on par. In fact it is worse.

By giving items to a RMT'ing entity, in particular one that uses GTC's sales as the RMT vehicle, CCP is selling their golden ammo.

They have created a microtransaction market, but this time they are using an RMT'ing player corp to do it. That, combined with the very fact that they would do this in spite of the prior anti-microtransaction outrage makes it even more egregious in my mind.

It's basically the same thing, only sneakier and unethical to boot.
Anya Klibor
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#744 - 2013-10-16 19:45:35 UTC
I'll admit to being ignorant of the other issues in that I don't know the specifics, but I know of them. The only one I am aware of and know the details of is the members of Blink receiving Ishukone Watch Scorpions, so if you wouldn't mind linking me to the other issues at hand for me to look through, that'd be terrific!

Leadership is something you learn. Maybe one day, you'll learn that.

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
#745 - 2013-10-16 19:48:52 UTC  |  Edited by: raven666wings
Well, at least next year you know on who you have to vote for CSM to make your votes count and not let these FUBAR situations happen.

I told you... vote PB for CSM... she will defend our interests... but no one ever listens to big chief raven666wings Oops
Anya Klibor
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#746 - 2013-10-16 19:55:19 UTC
raven666wings wrote:
Well, at least next year you know on who you have to vote for CSM to make your votes count and not let these FUBAR situations happen.

I told you... vote PB for CSM... she will defend our interests... but no one ever listens to big chief raven666wings Oops


That's because you're insane, you doofus.

Leadership is something you learn. Maybe one day, you'll learn that.

Miss Ladybird
Doomheim
#747 - 2013-10-16 19:57:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Miss Ladybird
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:
A quick status report from the CSM side.

We had a 30 minute meeting with CCP Dolan on Monday about a CSM initiative to survey the community. The result of that meeting was constructive, and resulted in a 90 minute meeting Tuesday with CCP Dolan, CCP Navigator and CCP Guard.

During the second meeting, it was agreed that the first step in the process of resolving these issues is to get a better read on community opinions about acceptable practices.

To do this, CSM will be running two forum surveys, in a manner similar to our crowdsourcing initiatives. These will focus on Appropriate Fansite Incentives and Acceptable Fansite Business Models, and will be structured in a way that we hope will encourage good debate.

At the same time, CCP will be running identical surveys through their established subscriber survey methods, so that we have data on the opinions of the general community in addition to the forum community.

We are currently working with CCP to finalize the list of survey questions. We hope this will be completed in a few days, and the forum surveys will go live as soon as possible thereafter. However, things may slip a bit because of EVE Vegas.

CSM welcomes your input as we finalize the survey questions. Our current plan is that each question will be a statement, with 4 possible responses: "This is OK", "This is a grey-area", "This should not be allowed", and "I have no opinion".

Here are some sample statements to give you an idea of the style:

Fansite incentives:

* CCP can provide PLEX as prizes for contests on fansites.

* Fansites should receive incentives in proportion to their benefits to the community.

Business Models:

* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me ISK.

* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me real money.

We are particularly interested in questions that explore the grey areas.


You guys are totally useless.

So you had a 2 hour discussion and all you have to show us is NOTHING.

All you had to do was read all these posts with a pad and pen to jot down the essential arguments and state each to Ccp and ask for action points. We don't need a survey as all the points have now been made about one hundred times in here. Albeit with little Ccp response.

Hell on the topic of not caring about this thread, the csm is taking the same approach as Ccp - little by way of commentary and absolutely no progress.

Is SOMER still RMTing? For not pulling the offer in light of this debate shows either a total lack of prudence, that Ccp have skyped and given assurances or that I'm mad.

I'm not resubbing screw this survey. I just wish I was at the meeting. The csm needs to not fear a hard encounter because that is what is being asked for by the players.
Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#748 - 2013-10-16 20:04:24 UTC
Lotta people out for blood. Here's a list of things that will NOT happen:

  • SOMER (the RL human) facing repercussions (aside from possibly changing the way he incentivizes affiliate clicks)
  • SOMER (the RL human) Ending his affiliate relationship w/ CCP
  • SOMER (the spaceship barby) significantly altering his gambling site or game organization under duress
  • Any previously issued game items being taken back (under duress, CCP could ask.)
  • The CSM actually influencing anything. They just get to talk. It's a core business decision. I just don't see it happening. ...but it might look like CCP is "in talks"
  • Second Life-style RMT getting legitimized. That's just too radical a move for CCP... all other consequences aside.
  • An answer before 2014.
  • CCP confining itself on "limited edition" issuance
  • Players will be ultimately happy with how it all works out
  • Punishment for anyone for what is in the past with regards to this issue/event/whatever
  • This issue/event/whatever having an effect on unsanctioned RMT

I could explain in a wall of text why I think those are all true... a lot of them should be obvious. I've got better stuff to do though... think it just goes here 'for the record'.

Signatures should be used responsibly...

Anya Klibor
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#749 - 2013-10-16 20:05:14 UTC
Here's a question:

Why is the CSM, once again, the go-to group for cleaning up the mess? Why hasn't the CSM been involved to begin with?

Oh, right...because CCP doesn't care about them unless it's to shut us the hell up! Go ahead CCP, respond to me (we know you won't).

Leadership is something you learn. Maybe one day, you'll learn that.

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#750 - 2013-10-16 20:13:48 UTC
Anya Klibor wrote:
I'll admit to being ignorant of the other issues in that I don't know the specifics, but I know of them. The only one I am aware of and know the details of is the members of Blink receiving Ishukone Watch Scorpions, so if you wouldn't mind linking me to the other issues at hand for me to look through, that'd be terrific!


This stuff has been all over the forums of late, but here's a few threads to get you started:

CCP reintroducing the Gold Magate and adding in new Guardian-Vexors through Somer Blink

A review of player giveaways with CCP and third party sites

CSM Statement on the SOMER Promotion (with reply from CCP Pokethulu)

SomerGate - Questions.

Ishukone Ships and Surrounding issues... Coming SOON (TM)

And a few articles from player-run sties:

SOMERblink: Serving the Eve Community, Not a Community Service

SOMER of rage

Rare Item Lottery Sparks Controversy

CCP Changes Somer Blink Giveaway

CCP Secretly Gifted SOMER Blink Ishukone Scorpions


There's a lot of material to get through; most of the relevant stuff isn't in the first posts, but in conversations that develop in the responses. The thread we are currently in, being one of the latest, probably has the most comprehensive information, but it is still a lot to dig through. Basically though, there are multiple allegations of actions of favoritism of CCP towards SOMER Blink, compounded with the RMT-like nature of SOMER's operation, CCP's choice of a for-profit organization over true community services as a target for giveaways, CCP upsetting the balance of the sandbox by giving SOMER Blink a clear advantage over their competitors, possible connections between CCP employees and SOMER (devs who may have been former members of SOMER Blink before being hired, etc.), and the list goes on.

The bottom line is that there is certainly the appearance of a lot of impropriety going on between CCP and SOMER Blink. How much of it is substantiated has yet to be fully discovered, but there is enough evidence to warrant concern, and we may all still be surprised at exactly how far this goes.

Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.     _ - Kina Ayami_

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#751 - 2013-10-16 20:15:06 UTC
Anya Klibor wrote:
I'll admit to being ignorant of the other issues in that I don't know the specifics, but I know of them. The only one I am aware of and know the details of is the members of Blink receiving Ishukone Watch Scorpions, so if you wouldn't mind linking me to the other issues at hand for me to look through, that'd be terrific!



A number of people have posted explanations but you can refer to mine on this page (post #510):

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=285492&p=26

But in short:

Basically, every time you buy GTC you get 200M in "SOMER isk". This has created some confusion for some - as they think that this intermediate currency prevents this from being RMT, but it actually makes no difference since that intermediate currency (which was obtained with cash) is redeemable for isk and in game items through raffles. \

Because SOMER gets cash for every GTC sold, you are basically buying somer isk from them by purchasing a GTC. This also means that whenever you purchase somer isk, CCP and MarkeeDragon also profit.

Now, to simplify things, suppose an item is completely bid on using SOMER isk. Basically, SOMER has converted that item entirely into cash, since they get no real isk for it. You bought it with your SOMER isk, which is basically an intermediate currency you purchased with cash.

In fact the item need not exist since you could potentially take the isk buy out. In which case SOMER just turned isk into cash. This is especially important when it comes to high end items like SOE ships, IW Scorps, etc., since these items draw bids, yet in the end if SOMER is able to convince you to take the isk instead, they get to use the ship over again as a promotional (although I am not sure if this actually happened or not).

Now, because CCP is giving them items to sell and because those items are unique and only available through SOMER, SOMER is basically a proxy aurum market, a micro transaction market. And if one of those items "sells" for somer isk then some amount of cash is made by SOMER, CCP, and MarkeeDragon. All three profit from the raffling of the item.

And because you may choose to take the buy out, they can continue to raffle the same item again.

Many of the arguments against this view of the situation revolve around the fact that there is an element of "chance" involved in the raffle. But this is not really relevant from the SOMER/CCP/MarkeeDragon side of things. They assume ZERO risk. The item is "sold" as far as SOMER is concerned, as they get exactly what they want for it. They've effectively sold it to the group of people who have bid on the item. The only people taking any risk are those poor folks. Hell, even in Vegas the house assumes some risk, but not SOMER, and by association, not MarkeeDragon or CCP.
Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
#752 - 2013-10-16 20:23:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Money Makin Mitch
well, i personally did not have any issues with Somer's GTC / 200mil credit policy but i did find it extremely interesting how CCP tried to skirt around the issue once it was brought up. a look at the EULA does seem to define Somer's bonus isk incentives as illegal game behavior. i am curious to see how that will be resolved under the current EULA because it seems under current rules they must be censured. i predict either a 'clarification' in the EULA which will legitimize the bonus credit practice, or a stop to the practice but no real punishment/consequences for the transactions up-to-date. the only issue i personally had with Somer was the insider trading with SIW for the ~6 weeks between gifting and TMC breaking the story, but that in itself isn't a crime within eve, although it does illustrate how some people's concerns about Somer's honesty might have merit. in my opinion, the full responsibility for this debacle falls entirely upon CCP. they have a CSM and IA that are supposed to prevent this from happening, yet happen it did. so, who watches the watchman? the players do. this is why we can't let this issue just go away. if we give them an inch, they will take the whole mile. this will only be the start if we fold.
Miss Ladybird
Doomheim
#753 - 2013-10-16 20:23:46 UTC
Yeh so players have made at least two thousands posts on this now. Frankly, most of them are well reasoned logical posts, definitely good material for the CSM to work with.

CCP has done nothing.

CSM has had a 2 hour meeting and agreed with CCP 'not enough feedback has been received we need a survey'.

Guess who is deciding what questions make it into the survey?

Every time I log on to check if my game is ok again, I end up having to get up off the floor after falling of my chair laughing.

CCP please please please employ some competent staff. At least staff that doesn't have an addiction to spawning items and gifting them to in game entities...
Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#754 - 2013-10-16 20:27:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Argus Sorn
Money Makin Mitch wrote:
well, i personally did not have any issues with Somer's GTC / 200mil credit policy but i did find it extremely interesting how CCP tried to skirt around the issue once it was brought up. a look at the EULA does seem to define Somer's bonus isk incentives as illegal game behavior. i am curious to see how that will be resolved under the current EULA because it seems under current rules they must be censured. i predict either a 'clarification' in the EULA which will legitimize the bonus credit practice, or a stop to the practice but no real punishment/consequences for the transactions up-to-date. the only issue i personally had with Somer was the insider trading with SIW for the ~6 weeks between gifting and TMC breaking the story, but that in itself isn't a crime within eve, although it does illustrate how some people's concerns about Somer's honesty might have merit. in my opinion, the full responsibility for this debacle falls entirely upon CCP. they have a CSM and IA that are supposed to prevent this from happening, yet happen it did. so, who watches the watchman? the players do. this is why we can't let this issue just go away. if we give them an inch, they will take the whole mile. this will only be the start if we fold.



I am curious Mitch, and this is not meant as a challenge - I respect your opinion, but just some food for thought:

How would people feel if I sold GTC cards for "Sorn Isk" and then allowed you to trade that isk directly (no raffle) for real isk or in game items?

Now what if some of those in game items are rare items provided to me by CCP?

Because there is functionally no difference on the RMT side of this with SOMER. The fact that you might not get the item does not change the fact that SOMER has basically sold it to someone.

So do people think that players should be able to sell items and isk for cash as long as that cash is the cash gained from a GTC sale?

I think a lot more people will be selling GTC's if this is the case.

I am also curious how other GTC sellers feel about this whole thing, since clearly you'd be silly not to buy your GTC's from SOMER/MarkeeDragon since those come with an extra 200M isk.
Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
#755 - 2013-10-16 20:36:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Money Makin Mitch
Argus Sorn wrote:
Money Makin Mitch wrote:
well, i personally did not have any issues with Somer's GTC / 200mil credit policy but i did find it extremely interesting how CCP tried to skirt around the issue once it was brought up. a look at the EULA does seem to define Somer's bonus isk incentives as illegal game behavior. i am curious to see how that will be resolved under the current EULA because it seems under current rules they must be censured. i predict either a 'clarification' in the EULA which will legitimize the bonus credit practice, or a stop to the practice but no real punishment/consequences for the transactions up-to-date. the only issue i personally had with Somer was the insider trading with SIW for the ~6 weeks between gifting and TMC breaking the story, but that in itself isn't a crime within eve, although it does illustrate how some people's concerns about Somer's honesty might have merit. in my opinion, the full responsibility for this debacle falls entirely upon CCP. they have a CSM and IA that are supposed to prevent this from happening, yet happen it did. so, who watches the watchman? the players do. this is why we can't let this issue just go away. if we give them an inch, they will take the whole mile. this will only be the start if we fold.



I am curious Mitch, and this is not meant as a challenge but just food for thought:

How would you feel if I sold GTC cards for "Sorn Isk" and then allowed you to trade that isk for real isk or in game items?

Now what if some of those in game items are rare items provided to me by CCP?

Because there is functionally no difference on the RMT side of this with SOMER. The fact that you might not get the item does not change the fact that SOMER has basically sold it to someone.

So do you think that players should be able to sell items and isk for cash as long as that cash is the cash gained from a GTC sale?

I think a lot more people will be selling GTC's if this is the case.

I am also curious how other GTC sellers feel about this whole thing, since clearly you'd be silly not to buy your GTC's from SOMER/MarkeeDragon since those come with an extra 200M isk.


when the facts are laid out like that, in a logical progression, i have no choice but to agree with the people saying that this is an RMT activity. you buy the GTC from Somer (obviously you're doing it for the bonus blink credit), take the 200mil, you buy a ticket (or all of them) on some item(s), and then cash them out... you've basically received free stuff for your GTC purchase. adding rare items to the mix only makes the offense more egregious. it pains me to say all of that, because i have played Somer Blink myself, have won items through them, etc. and found some of the staff to be pretty friendly people overall. regardless of that though, i do not think CCP should be vouching for them or giving them any preferential treatment, and i definitely do not agree with devs spawning rare items for them, either to be used a lotto item, or as a token of appreciation. Somer has enough isk to purchase rare ships to auction off and to compensate their employees generously.
DarkDecay
Real money traders
#756 - 2013-10-16 20:40:34 UTC  |  Edited by: DarkDecay
Argus Sorn wrote:
I think a lot more people will be selling GTC's if this is the case.


I was serious when I posted earlier that I want to know how to do this so I can cash in my two trillion for $48,000. I will be offering 200million and adding an extra .01 ISK with mine...

edit: 200 million IN GAME ISK.
Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#757 - 2013-10-16 20:48:32 UTC
There is part of me, that is willing to concede that MAYBE not even SOMERblink meant this to be an RMT scam. They have overheard for hardware and bandwith I am sure, and may have been interest in simply recouping some of the costs. Who knows?

I find it somewhat hard to believe however, partly because of their involvement with MarkeeDragon, who is known to have violated or skirted EULA's before. Indeed he admits that he even talks to game companies about ways to make money off of the secondary market without violating the EULA. Did he discuss this with CCP? It just seem odd that SOMER picked that time code seller of all people.

I mean, why not use evetimecodes? They are perhaps the single most trusted GTC seller after all and wholly committed to the ECE community. Instead however, they basically undercut evetimecodes, and that to me raises a great number of questions about their 'altruism'.

Funny that CCP do a devblog on Diana Dial when all this time they've been funding and endorsing unfair competition in the GTC market by allowing SOMER to hand out isk with its GTC's.

As I said - this stuff goes deep. Surveys are lip service. This is the sort of thing that requires an investigation into SOMER, CCP, the devs that have been giving items to SOMER, connections to MarkeeDragon, etc..

David Reid and Hilmar are about the only opinions I trust on this at all from within the walls of CCP. Everything else is just damage control - bad damage control at that.
Din Chao
#758 - 2013-10-16 21:00:50 UTC
Miss Ladybird wrote:
CSM has had a 2 hour meeting and agreed with CCP 'not enough feedback has been received we need a survey'.

Let me correct you here. I'm listening to Crossing Zebras right now, the "CSM8: October Interview" with Trebor.

The CSM didn't agree with CCP that a survey was needed.

It was the CSM's ******* idea!!

Hundreds of posts, and they still can't decide what their own ******* opinion is without a survey.
DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad
#759 - 2013-10-16 21:13:20 UTC
https://eve-games.net/

I guess the trend is growing.
raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
#760 - 2013-10-16 21:14:53 UTC
Vote Senator McLaughlin for CSM! Don't get caught on the wrong side of the fence! Twisted