These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors

First post First post First post
Author
raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
#501 - 2013-10-12 10:21:33 UTC
Oh cmon guyz give CCP a break they are on vacation and will come back soon™ Twisted
Kate stark
#502 - 2013-10-12 10:27:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Kate stark
The Legendary Soldier wrote:
Judging by the post numbers, 5 posts have been removed from this thread in the last few hours.
I would love to know which ones...


the ones about having lots of alts as "staff" just to get more scorpions, and my post about the "irrelevant link roulette" where ccp close the thread and redirect us to unrelated threads for us to continue to give feedback in.

since we know they're here, think they'll bother letting us have an update?

also, regardless of how mocking my posts were. it's still a legitimate point that more staff = more rewards, which means are all 30 blink staff actually needed and deserving of rewards. and what's to stop current community services to say "oh and all of these guys do cool stuff for us, give them free isk too!"

deleting posts that still convey the obvious need for guidelines is counterproductive to this thread.

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
#503 - 2013-10-12 10:40:07 UTC  |  Edited by: raven666wings
Seriously though, Guard already sorted out and aligned the previous matter to a point where discussion and suggestions can be made to determine the rewards given to community services and fansites.
The prizes still need to be settled and the guidelines that will qualify the entities to receive them still have to be written and publicly disclosed, but that matter is partially out of the way.

However the matter regarding Somer Blink's use of isk tokens to reward those who buy a GCT through their referral system still needs to be addressed by Guard and/or other CCP representatives.
We are aware that if CCP wants to they can turn a blind eye on this matter and interpret and/or change the game's EULA and specifically the rules of conduct about selling game currency/items for real money in a way that it won't make Somer Blink's actions illegitimate.
This will however further confirm their favoritism and support of Somer Blink's actions within the sandbox and the game, so the question about whether other players will be able to engage in similar conducts still stands and requires their pronunciation on it so that an agreement can be aligned in the same way that it was for the community services and fansite rewards issue.


Gogela wrote:



ATTN: CCP Guard



I would like to put up a link on a web property I own that sells 30, 60, and 90 day GTCs via affiliate link. I would like the same return on referrals that SOMER gets, and I want to offer 150, 300, and 450 million isk to players who purchase GTCs via my affiliate link. Is this possible?
Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#504 - 2013-10-12 11:30:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Argus Sorn
StuckAtTheLock wrote:
People are forgetting that blink makes a cut of successful transactions through 3rd party sales through referrals. Since somer has more isk than anybody knows wha to do with- what can they do with it in game? The answer is nothing. What about out of game? Well, if somer could find a way to offload his extra isk as cash, then he'd be sitting pretty.

This is exactly what he is doing. He is losing out on 200m isk for each successful plex sale and pocketing a percentage of the Cash transaction(through mar dragon). Since he is providing a plex for the same cost as ccp- but giving the purchaser +200m isk over current market value- who wouldn't take advantage of this?

Somer is losing 200m isk for every plex purchase through their site, but gaining real money. Convenient way to offload a basically worthless supply of infinite isk?

This is absolutely RMT. You can split hairs however you like but you can't deny that somer's model is to give up 200m isk to gain real cash.

The worst part is not that ccp sanctioned this action publicly- but they encouraged it and labelled it as the most deserving(helpful) community service project. Disgusting.



No the worse part is CCP gave them SOE ships, trips to Iceland, and other goodies so they could RMT more.

CCP sactioned, supported and funded their RMT. And we can't trust CCP to investigate their RMT because they've created a massive conflict of interest...
Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#505 - 2013-10-12 11:31:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Argus Sorn
Pingu wrote:
Argus Sorn wrote:
Pingu wrote:
DNSBLACK wrote:
Running a penny lottery is not hard CCP so why don't you run it yourself?


Montmazar wrote:
In other news, we still don't know why CCP loves Somer so much. We did at least get to find out eventually why they loved BoB. Looking forward to future leaks, because the explanations given so far do not make sense.


*sigh*

CCP are not legally permitted to set up any form of lottery themselves due to Icelandic law.

Gambling attracts real life cash from morons who gamble away all their in game isk and need to spend more real life cash than they should.

Greed is good.

CCP want to have gambling in their game because it makes them money and since they cannot do it themselves Somer Blink are a godsend to them.



Can SOMERblink legally give away prizes that have real cash value in the "real world"? These items are subject to taxes in the United States and there are other laws regarding their distribution that have the potential to be violated as well. What is the mailing address for SOMERblink should I have a grievance? Who can I call?

If what you say about icelandic law is true, then is SOMERblink being used as a dummy corporation in order to circumvent Icelandic law? Sounds crazy, but if CCP can't run the auction because of Icelandic law, and instead they use a corporation that only REALLY exists in a game they created to run the same auction... well yeah, that's sketchy no? Not sure if that whole "Icelandic Law" thing is true tho to be fair.

Frankly I am surprised any US based member of SOMER would want the attention of this because if they are paid enough game time/isk as 'payment in kind' it also could be subject to taxes (although I admit I am not an accountant, so correct me if I am wrong).

Why not have the casino help run the lottery for the items? They can legally raffle off whatever they want, and have actual "out of game" credentials to do so. Or why not the EVE Vegas folks themselves?

The point is, CCP screwed up bad by getting into bed with SOMER and the only acceptable course of action is to get out. Going ahead with this lottery through SOMER, is a bad path to go down. Yet all we get from devs is "but... but... but...". No confidence here.


Read the Icelandic legal position on this for yourself: http://eng.innanrikisraduneyti.is/laws-and-regulations/english/lotteries/

I found this to be an interesting read too, http://www.frixo.com/sbook/regions/iceland.asp especially these quotes:

-According to Articles 183 and 184 of the Criminal Code, in effect since 1998, “it is a punishable offense to engage in gambling and betting on a professional basis, to encourage others to participate in these activities and to derive direct or indirect income from having the activities take place on one’s premises."

-For all gambling activities, proper licenses must be obtained from the Ministry of Justice. Revenues must go toward helping not-for-profit charitable causes, such as philanthropic activities and sports clubs. Raffles without the permission of a police commissioner are absolutely forbidden.

(see also the original articles http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=190914 )

Do CCP have a gambling license? Nope. Are they likely to get one? Nope. You sure? Yip. The 'encouraging others' part is also very relevant here and makes me wonder who at CCP authorised a link to Somer.



Did CCP basically used SOMER as a front to violate Icelandic law? Is there something worth reporting to Icelandic legal authorities here or is it all smoke?

But CCP Guard will probably argue that SOMERblink is a charity, lol.
Lucy Alfrir
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
#506 - 2013-10-12 11:50:13 UTC
I'm all for supporting out of game websites. I use Battleclinic a lot and think the best present CCP could give them is an api server that actually works properly. You know one where ALL the killmails get reported in a nice easy to use fashion.

Giving out shiny scorps to Somer staff is a nice gesture (for the staff) but doesn't really help anyone. A working api server on the other hand would be a boon to all.
Goggles Deudigren
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#507 - 2013-10-12 11:50:19 UTC
The way I see it, CCP is a business. The items you have to promo are game time, stuff, and stuff in game. I am a user not a stock holder as are most if not all EVE players. Give away what you like as long as it doesn't greatly affect some aspect of the game. A few ships don't do that. If they did we would be overrun by tourny prizes and we are not.


Eve players gotta moan.

Pingu
Cosmos Butt Pirates
#508 - 2013-10-12 11:54:19 UTC
Shad Duken wrote:
---Somer and CCP white knighting---


A quick recap for you.

This is not really about somer or even secrecy. Both these are still important though.

It is about transparency, the wtf value of stuffz given out, the lack of all eve players ability to participate, questions about the fairness of this and CCP's inability to explain who gets what and why, and CCP's out-and-out endorsing of any entity (or player) to name but a few of the issues that arose.

It is about trust. What else have CCP given out that no one knows about? Do you trust CCP to be honest about what they have given out after all this? I know I dont trust what CCP Guard said earlier about secret give aways ; 'what have you given away secretly ccp guard?', "Secretly...nothing. ", yet more weasel words and he could be thinking that it is not secret as *someone* knew; tell us what has been given out, when and why and dont try to "jedi mind trick" us by saying you answered this when you did not as the answer we want is a list containing who/when/why and nothing else will do.

I want to hear from IA about this; how, why and when their mandate to protect the game from this sort of thing changed.

I will say a little about the Somer problems.

Rmt is important as many see what somer do as rmt, somer being given stuffz and endorsed because they sponsor things is a rather spurious argument, somer making a profit is fine but making a profit without actually playing the game is a lot less fine.

The values of the ships, and prizes, is fairly critical for me. I have made around two trillion in assets in about nine years, for CCP to give somer 600 billion in Scorps, easily 2 trillion+ in five unique ships for nothing is like a kick in the balls to me.

(changed to 3 unique ships and 2 all expenses paid trips, still with a potential worth of, what, 1.4 trillion?)

Can you understand this? Nine years gameplay versus a few server clicks to generate some space pixels. If you cannot see why this is wrong then we have no common ground. Dont get me started on how the actual wealth it made somer was possibly 35 trillion (which becomes close to a potential eight hundred thousand US dollars of rmt, oh, and the endorsement and advertising from CCP made them how much in real life cash?).

CCP Guard wrote:
We may make mistakes here and there but we're not dumb enough to think we can use Jedi mind tricks on you guys :)


Every answer from CCP is like a jedi mind trick. Getting the information we want from you is like pulling teeth. Will give you an example to illustrate this, here are three easy questions for you to (not?) answer...

Big list of all the give aways please, by this I mean ships or things created by CCP that were not given to the entire playerbase. You have said nothing was given away in secret, so because it is not a secret there is nothing stopping you from telling us. Pop it all in this thread in one convenient post for people to see, as it is not a secret. If the list is too massive then a link to where you have published it will do. Can we see that which is not secret?

Could you could also tell us how many GTC's have been sold by Somer (or their related gtc selling site). What is their $ value profit per GTC sold and how many have they sold; how real life profitable are they?

I have two trillion I could convert to ISK so how do I get to become an affiliate to rmt my isk as gtc's for $48,000?

Three easy questions to answer: what has been given away, how much has somer/their-rmt-site made and how do I get on the isk to $ conversion gravy train. Let's see how CCP do on these easy questions.
Kate stark
#509 - 2013-10-12 11:54:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Kate stark
Goggles Deudigren wrote:
Give away what you like as long as it doesn't greatly affect some aspect of the game. A few ships don't do that.


erm, that's exactly what it does.

spawning anything out of thin air for a select subset of players affects some aspect of the game. that's why it's a dumb idea.

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#510 - 2013-10-12 12:18:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Argus Sorn
As for the RMT, just because it doesn't seem clear to everyone.

First, you need to step back and think globally - it's not about what you as a customer of blink are doing, you are not 'buying isk for cash' (well you are but only in small amounts/percents). It is about what SOMER is doing and they are most definitely converting in game items and currency to ISK. People seem to be lost in the idea that the person who bids using GTC gained currency may not win the auction, but they don't have to.

First, there is a GTC sale. In a way SOMERblink serves as the broker for this sale (although for all we know the people who run SOMER are also the GTC sellers out of game) and gets a percentage. Let's assume for arguments sake he gets $1 for the transaction.

In return he gives you 200M isk. Ok, it's not real isk, but on the website it is listed as real isk. SOMER treats it like real isk (although I assume they are smart enough to not let you outright refund it). It's SOMER isk. In fact this is better than them giving you 200M isk, because they don't even have to give you real isk. You have no 'account' at SOMER remember, just a record of how many credits you have with them where 1 credit = 1 isk. So they can just create 200M SOMERisk from nowhere and give it to you.

So now you have 200M make believe SOMER isk that cost you, at least to SOMERblink, $1.

Now let's say you bid on an item. And we'll assume you are not the only bidder. Let's use a Rorqual. I will use that because when I've seen them on blink the 'bids' go for 200m isk. So they are basically selling one 'bid' for a dollar - at least when it comes to the Rorqual.

It is interesting to note at this point that what SOMERblink is doing is not really a lottery, nor is it an auction. What they are actually doing is selling an item, at an increased cost, to the EVE community for 200M isk per share. What you are buying is a share, or a chance to own, a rorqual (or not, as we will see below). There is no game of chance in this transaction. There is no risk assumed by SOMERblink at all. They are selling you and the other 'bidders/shareholders" the item and then helping you randomly determine who gets to keep it. There are certainly some semantics involved, but the point is there is a distinct difference basically amount to this: SOMERblink assumes no risk, there is no game of chance from their perspective. They sell a group of people an item and then the item is randomly given to one of the group. So all of you who bid on the rorqual are basically buying it for 3.2 billion isk and then randomly giving it to one of you.

But back to our auction. Assume you manage, with your SOMERisk to buy half the bids at 200m each, which you have paid $1 for per 200M. Now let's say the other bids sell to people who have used "real isk" (in reality they are using SOMERisk they bought with real isk, but that's not terribly important). Now the item "sells". At this point it is totally irrelevant who the item goes to. It sold. SOMER no longer owns it, one of the bidders does. They could just as easily share it.

There were 16 bids, so SOMER has now received 8 dollars plus 1.6 billion isk for the rorqual.

SOMER has sold that rorqual for 8 dollars and gotten 1.6 billion isk as well. They have RMT'ed the rorqual.

They can then take the 1.6 bil and use it to buy other items that they can do the same with. If SOMER wants to they could eventually convert ALL of their isk into cash, but because they maintain a nice profit margin they are able to increase their isk holdings all while converting some of it, slowly, into cash.

Another interesting side of this is that there need not be any rorqual. It can be a completely virtual item, because they now have the isk to go out and buy one and give it to you should you want it, but you could also just as well take the buyout in isk. So SOMER need not actually have items to auction, they just need to know they can buy the item. They then buy it, and give it to you (after you and others have already paid for it). So they are basically auctioning off the right to broker an item. Like Neo's spoon, the item doesn't even have to exist.

And what if you take the buyout of 2.9 billion isk? Well then CCP has just sold you 1.3 billion isk for a eight dollars. If all of the bids are bought using SOMERisk gained through GTC purchasing, then they have sold you 1.3 billion isk for 16 dollars. From the buyer perspective it's not a great deal, but for SOMER it's 16 dollars per 1.3 billion isk. I'll leave the multiplicative math to someone else, but I would imagine it results in a not insignificant amount of cash. And either way, the amount doesn't matter: it's RMT'ing.

But look a little further. Say no SOMERisk is involved and all of the bids are purchased with real isk. The EVE community has just bought 2.9 billion isk for 3.2 billion isk. Good job folks.

So SOMERblink definitely participates in what amounts to RMT'ing. What is astonishing though is not this fact, but the fact that a bunch of community devs who thoroughly investigated them were not able to see this. They do not run a "gambling" site, despite the claims of the same devs. AND, the same devs gave these guys thousands of dollars in real world items and in game items to sell via SOMERblink under the guise of them being a "gambling site" when they are not. Items which eventually will basically be sold off for cash. In other words, our community devs have provided SOMERblink, an in game corporation they have deemed "trustworthy" with free items, worth thousands of dollars, for SOMERblink to sell off for cash.

And their defense remains the amount of isk SOMERblink throws around in game. Clearly SOMER's campaign has worked, their sponsorships have not only led to them having customers, but the approval of CCP devs.
Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#511 - 2013-10-12 12:25:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Argus Sorn
(continued)

As I have stated earlier - the problem with giving stuff to an in game corporation and calling them trustworthy is that even a perceived conflict of interest is a problem. And now that has come to fruition.

The perceived conflict of interest has now become a real one because how can we as players now trust CCP to investigate RMT by SOMERblink? Had CCP had no contact with them, and then investigated it and come back with something akin to "yes they are using a loophole but there is nothing we can really do to enforce it", while that would be rather unbelievable and intolerable, at least CCP would not be able to be accused of wrong doing and bias.

Instead however CCP gave them items, isk, and endorsements. They claimed that they are trustworthy despite the fact that they are not only scamming people in and out of game, and as you see above - engaging in a EULA violation.

But now, unfortunately, no answer we get from CCP in SOMERblinks' favor can be trusted.

CCP Guard and other devs, by extolling the virtues of SOMERblink have rendered themselves and CCP untrustworthy in this regard. And by emphasizing the amount of isk that SOMER hands out as a reason for their feelings - they have basically confirmed themselves as bought.

Good work.

I urge everyone who has an alt to at least unsub it pending a response from someone at CCP we can trust. I will say that such people do exist. I trust Jon Lander, Hilmar, David Reid, etc.. and I am sure there are others who fit the same mold. I have sat and had conversations with these men and they are intelligent, thoughtful and forward thinking individuals. We need a response from a CCP executive who understand this problem and can think objectively because even if Guard and his fellow community devs are not flat out corrupt (and I still like to think they are not) , they are most decidedly in over their heads.
DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad
#512 - 2013-10-12 12:28:51 UTC  |  Edited by: DNSBLACK
Pingu wrote:
Shad Duken wrote:
---Somer and CCP white knighting---
A quick recap for you. This is not really about somer or even secrecy. Both these are still important though. It is about transparency, the wtf value of stuffz given out, the lack of all eve players ability to participate, questions about the fairness of this and CCP's inability to explain who gets what and why, and CCP's out-and-out endorsing of any entity (or player) to name but a few of the issues that arose. It is about trust. What else have CCP given out that no one knows about? Do you trust CCP to be honest about what they have given out after all this? I know I dont trust what CCP Guard said earlier about secret give aways ; 'what have you given away secretly ccp guard?', "Secretly...nothing. ", yet more weasel words and he could be thinking that it is not secret as *someone* knew; tell us what has been given out, when and why and dont try to "jedi mind trick" us by saying you answered this when you did not as the answer we want is a list containing who/when/why and nothing else will do. I want to hear from IA about this; how, why and when their mandate to protect the game from this sort of thing changed. I will say a little about the Somer problems. Rmt is important as many see what somer do as rmt, somer being given stuffz and endorsed because they sponsor things is a rather spurious argument, somer making a profit is fine but making a profit without actually playing the game is a lot less fine. The values of the ships, and prizes, is fairly critical for me. I have made around two trillion in assets in about nine years, for CCP to give somer 600 billion in Scorps, easily 2 trillion+ in five unique ships for nothing is like a kick in the balls to me. (changed to 3 unique ships and 2 all expenses paid trips, still with a potential worth of, what, 1.4 trillion?) Can you understand this? Nine years gameplay versus a few server clicks to generate some space pixels. If you cannot see why this is wrong then we have no common ground. Dont get me started on how the actual wealth it made somer was possibly 35 trillion (which becomes close to a potential eight hundred thousand US dollars of rmt, oh, and the endorsement and advertising from CCP made them how much in real life cash?).
CCP Guard wrote:
We may make mistakes here and there but we're not dumb enough to think we can use Jedi mind tricks on you guys :)
Every answer from CCP is like a jedi mind trick. Getting the information we want from you is like pulling teeth. Will give you an example to illustrate this, here are three easy questions for you to (not?) answer... Big list of all the give aways please, by this I mean ships or things created by CCP that were not given to the entire playerbase. You have said nothing was given away in secret, so because it is not a secret there is nothing stopping you from telling us. Pop it all in this thread in one convenient post for people to see, as it is not a secret. If the list is too massive then a link to where you have published it will do. Can we see that which is not secret? Could you could also tell us how many GTC's have been sold by Somer (or their related gtc selling site). What is their $ value profit per GTC sold and how many have they sold; how real life profitable are they? I have two trillion I could convert to ISK so how do I get to become an affiliate to rmt my isk as gtc's for $48,000? Three easy questions to answer: what has been given away, how much has somer/their-rmt-site made and how do I get on the isk to $ conversion gravy train. Let's see how CCP do on these easy questions.


----------------------------------
Well said. Could you could also tell us how many GTC's have been sold by Somer (or their related gtc selling site). What is their $ value profit per GTC sold and how many have they sold; how real life profitable are they? THIS IS THE SMOKING GUN!!!!!!!!!

I also have trillions of isk made over 8 years of playing this game. Can I create a currency (Black Credits) out of game and sell GTC and give it away 200 mil at a clip and I promise I wont even use in game stuff . I will sell ( raffle is what they call it) prostitution. So you heard it here DNSBlack will give you free black credits to buy tickets on a women or man of your choice. Just buy GTC from my web site and play for free or send me 200 mil for the ticket in game and I will convert it to black credits so you can play. The selling (raffle)will begin when 500 GTC are sold: But you dont know that. Don't worry prostitution is legal in my country and state and I am not breaking any Icelandic laws. Do you see how absurd that is and now you add in the mix kids are playing your game. CCP should not be in bed with this organization and they should not allow there eve to be pimped out. This is just a bad business model. I hope someone who is addicted to gambling drives himself into debt so bad buying your isk CCP that he threatens to commit suicide cause he lost all his isk on somer blink. Cause from what I heard you take people threatening to do that very seriously or has that changed. CCP you are on the wrong side of this fight period. Pull everything and distance your self from this as fast as you can.
Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#513 - 2013-10-12 12:37:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Argus Sorn
You know oddly enough, through the creation of SOMERisk, SOMERblink has basically created their own form of AURUM that is only usable for bidding on SOMERblink item sales.

I wonder how many of SOMERblink's customers were outraged over aurum.

The fact that CCP would tolerate a player created, cash-for-isk, parallel economy that is not controllable by them is shocking. SOMERblink can basically 'print' SOMERisk to their hearts content. They are then selling this SOMERisk for both real isk and real cash, and functioning as an exchange bank.

Except CCP apparently thinks they are nifty.

The impact of this on the economy is actually above me. Can we here from CCP Economist, Dr. Gudmundsson on this?

Does he think they are nifty too?

As an aside, as of a few days ago I paid very little attention to SOMERblink. I do not have access to api's, account data, etc.. All I did was go to their website and saw a big fat button that said "buy a gtc and we'll give you isk". This is far from an in depth look. A couple of days ago I opened an account and bought some GTC just to get a feel for how it worked so I could speak with some insight.

Yet CCP devs stated that they carefully looked at SOMERblink and deemed them worthy of thousands of dollars in prizes and billions of isk in ships. That is shameful, as there clearly no one did the slightest bit of investigation here, if the most cursory investigation by a player resulted in uncovering what amounts to RMT'ing. And most of my friends who have been playing SOMERblink knew about this for a while now. Why hasn't anything been done CCP?
adarma
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#514 - 2013-10-12 12:41:30 UTC
CCP Guard, thank you for paying attention and following this issue. If you have been reading this thread so far, you must have quite an opinion and a good, overall understanding of the concerns of gamers.

What you give them aside, gambling websites "themselves" are a major problem with incredible isk advantage, RMT suspicions, almost zero in-game effort, etc. They owe their existence to a few legal allowances, exploit them like hell, and vacuum the community like a black hole. They do not even have to play the game in order to do this!!

They must be shut down ASAP and all ties to the actual gameworld must be cut off. It is not an issue of whether we like them or not. We sometimes play, sometimes win and sometimes lose. This is irrelevant. What is relevant is that they "always" win. "Always" win is NOT EVE!!!!

Shut them down!
raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
#515 - 2013-10-12 12:48:29 UTC  |  Edited by: raven666wings
At the current state of things Somer Blink could even start gifting out isk tokens for chocolate or candy bar sales from any other 3rd party site. Buy x product from 3rd party site, get isk token. The only problem with that situation would be that CCP probably wouldn't turn a blind eye on it because the "product" wouldn't be GTC's anymore and they wouldn't be profiting from its sales.
Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#516 - 2013-10-12 12:51:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Argus Sorn
On a different note, does anyone know if EVE Vegas themselves sanctioned the use of their name in regards to the SOMER auctions for the SOE ships, etc.?

Clearly those prizes, which amount to possibly thousands of dollars in real cash value due to the trips to Iceland, which were given to SOMERblink by CCP devs and could ultimately be converted into cash through SOMER's RMT scheme, actually have NOTHING to do with EVE Vegas (especially since the event is still a week away and the auctions/lotteries already occurred) other than the fact that SOMER and CCP said they do.

So I am curious if they at least at EVE Vegas's blessing to conduct this, despite there being no apparent relationship between the auctions and the event other than in name?
Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#517 - 2013-10-12 13:00:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Kirren D'marr
Argus Sorn wrote:
[Did CCP basically used SOMER as a front to violate Icelandic law? Is there something worth reporting to Icelandic legal authorities here or is it all smoke?

But CCP Guard will probably argue that SOMERblink is a charity, lol.


It looks like a legal gray area, which we as players posting on a forum are not likely to unravel. There are a lot of factors at work here which could make for loopholes in the previously quoted Icelandic law (lotteries taking place in a virtual world, servers located in England, etc.). The bottom line is that it's probably going to take some lawyers on both sides of the issue hashing it out and an official ruling from the Icelandic legal system in order for anything to be decided.

Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.     _ - Kina Ayami_

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#518 - 2013-10-12 13:23:50 UTC
Just went through the entire thread reading CCP Guard's replies. None of the feedback on the situation that CCP Guard has given justifies SOMER's treatment by CCP.

CCP Navigator's endorsement of SOMER's trustworthiness alone goes beyond a mere business relationship. What I get out of the wording and the tone of it is the relationship between CCP and SOMER is closer than a typical business agreement. CCP did put its reputation on the line when Navigator, in terms of absolutes, vouched for SOMER.

Quote:
SOMER Blink have a history of being trustworthy and honoring every blink played without exception.

Quote:
...to date they have been 100% trustful


Seriously, CCP accounted for every isk they ever paid out, all whatever quadrillion? Riiiight. Only one way that could happen, is if it's a CCP commissioned site ran by CCP employees under the guise of a completely different company name. Or CCP has a vetting process that includes detailed auditing of every blink and every toon that ever blinked. Out of the two, I know which one I believe is more likely.

Now, CCP Guard, you might be telling yourself that this is complete rumor mongering. And sure, it may be. But there's a point to be made here which is if CCP is intent on being this cozy with a RL business operating in game and CCP doesn't want us, the players aka your customers, concluding that the sandbox is broken because of inappropriate relationships and disproportionate favoring then there needs to be more transparency and rules of conduct in game for said businesses.

Don't ban me, bro!

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad
#519 - 2013-10-12 15:07:22 UTC  |  Edited by: DNSBLACK
This has been rolling around in my head.

1. If Somer is sponsering eve vegas: How is somer doing this. Events take real money not isk right? I fthey aren't then why are they involved shouldn't the eve vagas be getting the free promotional stuff.

2. Why weren't the trips and gear given away at the event. Isn't that standard business practice. Promoters use give away like this. " Hey eve players come to eve vegas and you will be entered into a drawing to win a trip to 2014 fanfest. This prize was dontated by CCP" " We also have a lot of other swag to give away so don't miss out on the most exciting player run event ever"

3. Why is this drawing over.

4. I am having disconnect in this player run eve vegas event--- CCP---- real money to help sponser the event ---- How giving somer all the swag to blink off is accomplishing this.???????????????????

5 I thought somer was needing isk to sponsor the pvp tourney at the event is that the only reason and why would they need money or isk when all of that can be run on the test server for free??????
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#520 - 2013-10-12 15:54:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Doc Fury
CCP Guard wrote:

You've asked for more clarifications a few times before in this thread and I´m not sure how I can clarify this to your satisfaction. I think it's fairly well covered in my reply why we thought it would make sense to explore a relationship with them during a time when we are thinking a lot about more tournaments and competitive events. If you just plain don't like lottery sites or SOMER in particular then of course you're just going to disagree with that judgement call and that's perfectly natural.

What was that you were saying before about not trying to Jedi mind-trick us?

Simply answering my direct questions INDIVIDUALLY with SPECIFIC answers instead of vague generalizations would satisfy me. Otherwise your responses thus far seem to be intentionally vague and evasive word crafting, and as such I am requesting that you be more specific regarding certain aspects of your response.

Also lets be very clear, I'm asking these questions so I and others can make informed decisions. I have not stated any position regarding lottery sites, or SOMER, but, putting your assumptions aside, if you provide answers to my very simple questions without trying to spin or be evasive you may assist me and others in forming an opinion one way or another. It would also help restore some of the the respect and trust I and others are presently losing for you specifically, and CCP in general.

I suppose I could play this game with you and make assumptions about your position, and say you just plain don't like the questions because the answers are embarrassing and that's perfectly natural, so it's to be expected that you are just going to continue to evade them, stating they've already been answered.

PLEASE prove me wrong, by just answering the following questions individually, without being evasive.

CCP Guard wrote:
It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few.

The above statement that is intended to provide answers contains several vague generalizations and does not address the questions asked. As such, please clarify your post quoted above:


  1. SB has an "overall track record" of doing what exactly? This is not disclosed in your response.

  2. When you refer to capability, what "capability" exactly are you referring to? There is no way to determine this from your response.

  3. What "niche" exactly are you referring to? There is no way to determine this from your response.

  4. Regardless of whether or not they are registered as one, does CCP consider SB to be a "fansite"? Yes or No?

  5. Is CCP's official stance that SB is a trusted entity, and that players using its services can have a reasonable expectation they won't be scammed? Yes, or No are the possible answers here as well.

These are not difficult questions. If you simply do not understand the language being used, I'd be happy to clarify. If you simply don't want to answer them, or need to stall for more time so your legal & marketing departments can advise you, just say so, and I'll communicate that to my peers.

CCP Guard wrote:

To answer the fansite question, they haven't been a registered fansite but we work with other types of enterprises than registered fansites.

Understood, however the above does not answer the question directly as it was a very simple yes or no question. As such I am asking again above including further clarification on my part.

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.