These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors

First post First post First post
Author
Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#421 - 2013-10-11 20:04:36 UTC
Even is SOMER has been completely honest and legit up until today, the point is this is EVE and if they want to wake up tomorrow and scam the crap out of everyone and walk away with a day's take - they CAN. And CCP shouldn't be involved if that happens. But the community devs simply don't get it.

And if SOMERblink does scam everyone at some point, CCP is now responsible since they sanction them as trustworthy.

So will CCP then undo the damage and return the isk everyone was scammed out of? That would be unprecedented.

The point is, they are an in game entity, CCP shouldn't be supporting them. The biggest argument CCP devs have for supporting them is that they have a lot of isk and spread it around. That is influence peddling. At this point, CCP Guard and the other community devs can not be trusted, as they are basically being influenced by the isk that SOMERblink tosses around.

CCP shouldn't be promoting/supporting any in game entity to the extent that they have SOMERblink. But the devs won't admit that.

The only real hope now is someone with a bit more insight and business ethics knowledge to intervene from higher up in CCP.

I've already unsubbed all my extra accounts, keeping what I need to run my corp for now. I suggest others start unsubbing as well, it's perhaps the only thing that will get noticed by someone who can make a difference.
Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#422 - 2013-10-11 20:05:30 UTC
Sai Talos wrote:
Those of you calling SOMER's contributions to the Eve community into question, lets make one thing clear:

They have time and time again sponsored people and organizations who create content for our community so they can continue creating content without the need to make ISK. If you're wondering, just ask a SOMER employee what all they have sponsored.

Needed to clear the air there.

And no, I'm not a SOMER employee, and I'm out tens of billions thanks to them ;)

Edit: And you know what, CCP hasn't gifted me anything for the hundreds of hours I've spent editing videos, but that doesn't give me the right to throw rocks at them for trying to give back to content creators.



Coat tailing is not legitimate content creation.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Din Chao
#423 - 2013-10-11 20:15:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Din Chao
Argus Sorn wrote:
Even is SOMER has been completely honest and legit up until today, the point is this is EVE and if they want to wake up tomorrow and scam the crap out of everyone and walk away with a day's take - they CAN. And CCP shouldn't be involved if that happens. But the community devs simply don't get it.

And if SOMERblink does scam everyone at some point, CCP is now responsible since they sanction them as trustworthy.

Exactly. Imagine what would have happened if CCP had officially endorsed EBank.
raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
#424 - 2013-10-11 20:24:50 UTC  |  Edited by: raven666wings
CCP Guard wrote:
I've answered this but I can clarify. It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few. This mixed into a feeling that we should contact them and do stuff with them around EVE Vegas and upcoming tournaments. One thing we are doing more of and looking to do more of is E-sports and online tournaments and if you look at any team sport today you see a lot of betting sites doing sponsorship as that makes sense in sports...so it's just a relationship that we wanted to explore and which we will continue exploring. Doesn't take away from anything other people are doing that is totally different and brings a different kind of value to our universe.


One scams the playerbase for isk using lotteries and engages in RMT using isk tokens.
The other scams the playerbase for real money to be buried in side projects while halting the game's development and turns a blind eye on RMT.

CCBlink Blink Another great partnership brought to you by CCP Marketing 2013
Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#425 - 2013-10-11 20:41:35 UTC
War Kitten wrote:
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
No one is arguing against somers - or anyone elses - ability to try and make a profit. That is basically what this entire game is about - ruthless space capitalism.


Yes they are. The words "For profit" are creeping into many arguments as if it was an evil thing.

Quote:

What we object to are the creators of the game unfairly and arbitrarily stepping in and granting their personal favourites massive advantages to their business or massive personal rewards for succeeding in the game.


How is it unfair and arbitrary? CCP has explained a couple times why they rewarded the SCL and SOMER employees with these fake spaceships with different paintjobs.

Success breeds success and should be rewarded.

Failure shouldn't be rewarded or subsidized. That just encourages more failure. (Welfare anyone?)

Random lotteries shouldn't be the way to recognize people - does anyone think Joe Schmoe who got his name picked out of a hat is worthy of a reward? No - he just got lucky. Nobody gives a damn.

Success is what should be recognized and rewarded.




There is nothing wrong with being a skunk.

There is nothing wrong about being a cat.

There is something wrong with calling a skunk a cat.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
#426 - 2013-10-11 20:47:29 UTC  |  Edited by: raven666wings
Btw guyz, dont forget to buy more PLEX here. Oh wait... no hereBlink
Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#427 - 2013-10-11 20:49:24 UTC
War Kitten wrote:
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
Additionally, why can't the "meaningful" rewards be ones that don't give a direct in-game advantage over other players?


A scorpion... marginally useful by itself....with lesser stats than other scorpions.... and a fancy paintjob. Oh big in-game advantage there.

The only value is the rarity, and that's a value that can be made liquid and useful a few times only. Once the collectors have the 1 they "NEED" for their collection, who else is that ship worth billions of isk to really?

The Mona Lisa is valuable because there is one of it. 132 exact duplicates of the Mona Lisa are not worth 132x as much as the one Mona Lisa.

Quote:

How about a non-transferable t-shirt for your char that has "SOMER" stamped on it? How about a USB rifter hub?

You understand that rewards can be meaningful and fair at the same time, yes?


An out of game reward can be sold on ebay and turned into plex too. What's the difference?



There is nothing wrong with scavenging your own trophies.

But that's not the case here is it? You have shown that you obviously care about the value inherit in this discussion....

So, if we were take "value" to it... why didn't CCP just hand over 150 isk then? Screw the hull, give them the value of it.

Or rather, why NOT the rifter usb, even they ebay it then?

Yeah, let's go with your idea. We should give them rifter usb dongles instead.

Good idea. Much better than just yet another mona lisa.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#428 - 2013-10-11 20:50:29 UTC
War Kitten wrote:
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
War Kitten wrote:
You're right... everyone should get a blue ribbon and a plaque for participation.

Trophies for everyone!

That would be meaningful.


That's not what I said at all. Creating strawman arguments just makes you look like a troll.

You claimed anyone could do this and get the same 'reward' - and I'm pointing out that others have done these same things and not been treat the same way or been given the same things. That is me demonstrating that your statements are false.

Please be mature


It's not a straw man if you present the same argument again in your reply.

TheGunslinger42 wrote:

I'm pointing out that others have done these same things and not been treat the same way or been given the same things.


That right there is exactly what I'm replying to.

"We made a website too, where's our free stuff?"

"We played football too, where's our trophy for participating?"

You have to win.

You may not know ahead of time what the criteria is for winning in this case, but I guarantee you it doesn't include whining about the others who have won.

Relevant.


But community sites are not competition. They are there for the betterment of Eve.

The fact you compete in the first place is proof as to why they wouldn't fit.

Thanks for proving our point though =)

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

sally Deninard
mss industry
#429 - 2013-10-11 20:59:48 UTC
Ok Guard i`m gonna be real simple about this because if I ask politely the question doesn`t get f%^&i% answered.

The CSM had pre warned you that not everybody in EVE could participate in the blink and asked you to add functions into the lottery.

CCP knew the blink lottery was skewed and still let it go ahead.

WHY THE HELL DID YOU LET A TILTED LOTTERY GO AHEAD?????

It seemed to me at the time that CCP was more interested in protecting SOMERS public image than their own?

But 1 more last time....

CSM said the draw was flawed , why did you let it run?
StuckAtTheLock
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#430 - 2013-10-11 21:00:59 UTC
People are forgetting that blink makes a cut of successful transactions through 3rd party sales through referrals. Since somer has more isk than anybody knows wha to do with- what can they do with it in game? The answer is nothing. What about out of game? Well, if somer could find a way to offload his extra isk as cash, then he'd be sitting pretty.

This is exactly what he is doing. He is losing out on 200m isk for each successful plex sale and pocketing a percentage of the Cash transaction(through mar dragon). Since he is providing a plex for the same cost as ccp- but giving the purchaser +200m isk over current market value- who wouldn't take advantage of this?

Somer is losing 200m isk for every plex purchase through their site, but gaining real money. Convenient way to offload a basically worthless supply of infinite isk?

This is absolutely RMT. You can split hairs however you like but you can't deny that somer's model is to give up 200m isk to gain real cash.

The worst part is not that ccp sanctioned this action publicly- but they encouraged it and labelled it as the most deserving(helpful) community service project. Disgusting.
Xtreem
Knockaround Guys Inc.
#431 - 2013-10-11 21:20:24 UTC
Thanks for the update.

Something that has annoyed alot of traders myself included is that previously when ships have been given out it was always kept at that number and more were not subsequently given out again so people could trade the commodity.

I and others will be out some considerable ISK as the change in the giving out of unique was not communicated.
Mitch's Forum Alt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#432 - 2013-10-11 22:03:30 UTC
Xtreem wrote:
Thanks for the update.

Something that has annoyed alot of traders myself included is that previously when ships have been given out it was always kept at that number and more were not subsequently given out again so people could trade the commodity.

I and others will be out some considerable ISK as the change in the giving out of unique was not communicated.

it was communicated. to somer and employees. it was only kept secret from everyone else Roll i believe they call what happened insider trading.
raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
#433 - 2013-10-11 22:05:49 UTC
StuckAtTheLock wrote:

This is absolutely RMT. You can split hairs however you like but you can't deny that somer's model is to give up 200m isk to gain real cash.

The worst part is not that ccp sanctioned this action publicly- but they encouraged it and labelled it as the most deserving(helpful) community service project. Disgusting.


Well, look at it on the bright side. At least you have puppets like the CSM members and CCP Guard being sent to this thread by the chief marketing officer and company stakeholders to try and pour some water in the fire, just to close themselves in hearts and back out again when the real matters start being discussed Twisted
Pingu
Cosmos Butt Pirates
#434 - 2013-10-11 22:07:08 UTC
Argus Sorn wrote:
Pingu wrote:
DNSBLACK wrote:
Running a penny lottery is not hard CCP so why don't you run it yourself?


Montmazar wrote:
In other news, we still don't know why CCP loves Somer so much. We did at least get to find out eventually why they loved BoB. Looking forward to future leaks, because the explanations given so far do not make sense.


*sigh*

CCP are not legally permitted to set up any form of lottery themselves due to Icelandic law.

Gambling attracts real life cash from morons who gamble away all their in game isk and need to spend more real life cash than they should.

Greed is good.

CCP want to have gambling in their game because it makes them money and since they cannot do it themselves Somer Blink are a godsend to them.



Can SOMERblink legally give away prizes that have real cash value in the "real world"? These items are subject to taxes in the United States and there are other laws regarding their distribution that have the potential to be violated as well. What is the mailing address for SOMERblink should I have a grievance? Who can I call?

If what you say about icelandic law is true, then is SOMERblink being used as a dummy corporation in order to circumvent Icelandic law? Sounds crazy, but if CCP can't run the auction because of Icelandic law, and instead they use a corporation that only REALLY exists in a game they created to run the same auction... well yeah, that's sketchy no? Not sure if that whole "Icelandic Law" thing is true tho to be fair.

Frankly I am surprised any US based member of SOMER would want the attention of this because if they are paid enough game time/isk as 'payment in kind' it also could be subject to taxes (although I admit I am not an accountant, so correct me if I am wrong).

Why not have the casino help run the lottery for the items? They can legally raffle off whatever they want, and have actual "out of game" credentials to do so. Or why not the EVE Vegas folks themselves?

The point is, CCP screwed up bad by getting into bed with SOMER and the only acceptable course of action is to get out. Going ahead with this lottery through SOMER, is a bad path to go down. Yet all we get from devs is "but... but... but...". No confidence here.


Read the Icelandic legal position on this for yourself: http://eng.innanrikisraduneyti.is/laws-and-regulations/english/lotteries/

I found this to be an interesting read too, http://www.frixo.com/sbook/regions/iceland.asp especially these quotes:

-According to Articles 183 and 184 of the Criminal Code, in effect since 1998, “it is a punishable offense to engage in gambling and betting on a professional basis, to encourage others to participate in these activities and to derive direct or indirect income from having the activities take place on one’s premises."

-For all gambling activities, proper licenses must be obtained from the Ministry of Justice. Revenues must go toward helping not-for-profit charitable causes, such as philanthropic activities and sports clubs. Raffles without the permission of a police commissioner are absolutely forbidden.

(see also the original articles http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=190914 )

Do CCP have a gambling license? Nope. Are they likely to get one? Nope. You sure? Yip. The 'encouraging others' part is also very relevant here and makes me wonder who at CCP authorised a link to Somer.
Shad Duken
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#435 - 2013-10-11 22:07:57 UTC
So what I'm seeing here is CCP answering what EVERYONE said was the "key problem" of the secrecy SOMER asked their employees to use when selling the ships. Now they've answered that in a conclusive fashion, everyone has now decided that the secrecy actually wasn't the problem (because CCP answered and the drama over it is over) it's now about the value of the ships.

Make your fricking minds up.


As several other people have said, SOMER were chosen primarily because they are, without any shadow of a doubt, THE most successful lottery site in EVE history. They may not be the longest running, but they've definitely made the most of what they've created. CCP have obviously looked at that success and said "Hey, they're the clear market leader, so let's use them to give out some stuff" because they have the capability of doing it and it getting to the largest playerbase.

As Guard said, if your problem is that it's a "for-profit" site then nothing anyone says or does will satisfy your prejudice against them.
If your problem is that 30 of the ships were given out, then who out of the 30 SOMER employees does CCP not give a ship to?
All the bleating about SOMER favouritism and no-one has mentioned that BIG Lottery got one of these ships given to them earlier in the year. I'm guessing that it wasn't made a biog deal of because they're so much smaller than SOMER and it therefore went under the radar to a large degree. Why were they given a ship before their much more successful competitor? Perhaps because CCP wanted to help them grow - thus giving THEM an advantage over their competitors?

As for the "RMT" issue, I believe CCP has looked into it - or I hope so anyway - because they seem 100% positive that there has been no RMTing from SOMER.
Covering the "it's all RMTing because they make money off each referral" - so does every other site that refers you to a GTC site. CCP has clearly decided that this is acceptable for one reason or another (I'd guess because the site owners are having to pay RL cash for the sites?)


CCP has answered all the relevant questions and inferred the answers for most others. Yes, I'm white-knighting CCP here but not because I think they need it - more because there's a lot of hate being spewed about for something that CCP has already answered to a satisfactory level for anyone that can read and reason.
Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#436 - 2013-10-11 22:15:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Kirren D'marr
Shad Duken wrote:
As several other people have said, SOMER were chosen primarily because they are, without any shadow of a doubt, THE most successful lottery site in EVE history. They may not be the longest running, but they've definitely made the most of what they've created. CCP have obviously looked at that success and said "Hey, they're the clear market leader, so let's use them to give out some stuff" because they have the capability of doing it and it getting to the largest playerbase.


It was more like, "Hey, they're the clear market leader, so let's cement that position by giving them a distinct advantage over their competition and drive even more people to their site. Oh, and an official endorsement of their reliability would help too!"

Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.     _ - Kina Ayami_

Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#437 - 2013-10-11 22:16:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Gogela
Careby wrote:
Gogela wrote:
... This GTC cannot be re-sold for real money. This is CCPs policy...

Unless you are Somer Blink.

There you go confusing a spaceship barbie with a real human being again. The guy that created the character "SOMER"... the human being, has an affiliate arrangement of some type with CCP. I guarantee you CCP is getting the bulk of any RL money being processed. Every. Time. It has nothing to do with SOMER the spaceship barbie. Spaceship barbie SOMER only trades in GTCs and ISK. The real life human being behind him may sell GTCs on CCP's behalf, by their guidelines, for a tiny fraction of what goes to CCP. As I said, that's how a lot of internet marketing works. I thought by making the spaceship barbie analogy I'd get through... guess I need to go look for posterboard, a hand puppet, and a box of crayons.

Careby wrote:
Gogela wrote:
... There is only one point in the transaction where real money comes into play. At that point in the transaction there are 3 real people involved. The person who created the video game character SOMER, the guy who created the capsuleer that needed the ISK, and CCP. These are real entites and CCP gets most of the money per normal business practices.

What happens afterwards is where some of you are confused. After the initial transaction real money is not involved. The initial transaction was the same as any PLEX purchase. The latter transaction are not transactions... they are games being played by spaceship barbies in an internet game. The inability of some players to make the differentiation between real life people and spaceship barbie is starting to blow my mind.


Let's compare buying a GTC from Markee Dragon via affiliate link on Somer Blink's website and buying a GTC from another retailer like Amazon.com. In both cases CCP gets the wholesale price of one GTC. In both cases the EVE player gets a GTC. But in the first case, the EVE player is also given ISK credit, separate from the GTC. This ISK credit has value, therefore some of the cash paid by the player was paid for that ISK, and the rest was paid for the GTC. Part of the transaction was effectively Somer Blink trading ISK to the player for cash. Now what makes that part of the transaction different than "bannable RMT"? Is it only because it is relatively small compared to the GTC sale that occurs at the same time? Because while CCP gets their money for the GTC part of the deal, they get nothing for the additional ISK sold with it. Now you may say the ISK credit is a free bonus, and that Somer Blink gets nothing for it in return, and that the only money they get is incidental ad revenue from ads on their website that just coincidentally happen to be for EVE time codes. If so then nothing I say is likely to change your mind. I have bought time codes from Markee Dragon, and I know why I did it.

Here, I concede you have a point. I didn't know about that credit and you didn't mention it. I just checked SOMER's site and this is what it says:

Quote:
You must click an affiliate button and complete your purchase in the same browser to receive credit. You can use any browser, not just the IGB.

You will receive 200M Blink credit for each 60-Day GTC (100M credit for 30-Day GTCs).

I've made thousands in RL from affiliate links. That part is just normal business on the net. Paying people additional ISK on top of the GTC for RL cash is bannable RMT according to CCPs policy. If SOMER were offering the additional ISK as part of the GTC trade in it would not be RMT, because it's on the Blink side of the transaction and there's no money involved. If you want to pay a premium in ISK for PLEX or GTCs that's your prerogative. However, now that I understand SOMER's affiliate relationship a bit better from seeing the site, I have to concede this point. Offering ISK for clicking on an affiliate link is RMT. There's no getting around it. I could do the same thing. I could put an affiliate link on my site and offer 300 million isk to click my affiliate link and buy PLEX. I could commodify my entire EvE online account if I did that. ...and that is exactly what SOMER is doing.

Crap.

Well guys. Let's test the water and find out what's going on here.



ATTN: CCP Guard



I would like to put up a link on a web property I own that sells 30, 60, and 90 day GTCs via affiliate link. I would like the same return on referrals that SOMER gets, and I want to offer 150, 300, and 450 million isk to players who purchase GTCs via my affiliate link. Is this possible?




AttentionQuestionIdeaAttentionQuestionIdeaAttentionQuestionIdeaAttentionQuestionIdeaAttentionQuestionIdeaAttentionQuestionIdeaAttentionQuestionIdeaAttentionQuestionIdeaAttentionQuestionIdeaAttentionQuestionIdeaAttentionQuestionIdeaAttentionQuestionIdea

Signatures should be used responsibly...

Din Chao
#438 - 2013-10-11 22:17:09 UTC
Shad Duken wrote:
As for the "RMT" issue, I believe CCP has looked into it - or I hope so anyway - because they seem 100% positive that there has been no RMTing from SOMER.

You hear that guys? Shad Duken "believes" and "hopes" CCP has looked into it because they "seem" like they think there isn't anything shady going on with SOMER. So shut up, ok?
raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
#439 - 2013-10-11 22:24:06 UTC  |  Edited by: raven666wings
Pingu wrote:

Read the Icelandic legal position on this for yourself: http://eng.innanrikisraduneyti.is/laws-and-regulations/english/lotteries/

I found this to be an interesting read too, http://www.frixo.com/sbook/regions/iceland.asp especially these quotes:

-According to Articles 183 and 184 of the Criminal Code, in effect since 1998, “it is a punishable offense to engage in gambling and betting on a professional basis, to encourage others to participate in these activities and to derive direct or indirect income from having the activities take place on one’s premises."

-For all gambling activities, proper licenses must be obtained from the Ministry of Justice. Revenues must go toward helping not-for-profit charitable causes, such as philanthropic activities and sports clubs. Raffles without the permission of a police commissioner are absolutely forbidden.

(see also the original articles http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=190914 )

Do CCP have a gambling license? Nope. Are they likely to get one? Nope. You sure? Yip. The 'encouraging others' part is also very relevant here and makes me wonder who at CCP authorised a link to Somer.


That's what their legal team is working on right now - measuring any possible litigations that can arise from having this lottery service "hosted" inside the game. For the isk tokens' RMT they can just turn the blind eye on the EULA section that forbids it, it's their game they are the rulemakers and can do whatever they want.
Shad Duken
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#440 - 2013-10-11 22:25:18 UTC
Din Chao wrote:
Shad Duken wrote:
As for the "RMT" issue, I believe CCP has looked into it - or I hope so anyway - because they seem 100% positive that there has been no RMTing from SOMER.

You hear that guys? Shad Duken "believes" and "hopes" CCP has looked into it because they "seem" like they think there isn't anything shady going on with SOMER. So shut up, ok?


Thanks for proving my point about using reason.

Rather than making a valid and reasoned response, you vilify me for having an opinion. GF m8.