These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Odyssey 1.1] Heavy Assault Cruisers - round two

First post First post First post
Author
Kane Fenris
NWP
#1081 - 2013-07-31 22:32:47 UTC
Kais Fiddler wrote:
Naomi Knight wrote:
btw ishtar gets lame double bonuses why other ships cant get those?
like 7.5% optimal and tracking for med hybrids instead of 10% optimal /lvl for the eagle?

oh any other bonuses gets implemented into the ship hull
then why cant the 4%/lvl resist bonus put directly into the eagle hull and give it another bonus?

The resist bonus is far more powerful than the speed or cap recharge bonus.



somebody here hasnt learned yet that naomi is a dedicated troll
Menehune Ho'okele
Perkone
Caldari State
#1082 - 2013-07-31 22:34:08 UTC
It seems like there are fitting problems for obvious goto weapons on a couple of ships (deimos, vaga come to mind) a fitting reduction for ranged weapons struck me as a possible solution for the deimos, but I'm not sure how keen peple are for arty vagas. Still, something that makes the preferred ( not trying to insist on rail deimos, just trying to be brief) weapons easier to fit without adding an open ended fittings buff might be worth a thought.

Generally this 2nd pass looks like some woryhwhile improvements. Thanks.
Kais Fiddler
Perkone
Caldari State
#1083 - 2013-07-31 22:34:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Kais Fiddler
Naomi Knight wrote:

btw speed bonus if better ,if you sig tank anyway , not only it lowers the chance you being hit/missile dmg, it allows you to control range which is probably the most important part of pvp in eve

Perhaps. CCP doesn't seem to see eye to eye with you on that considering their recent nerf to resistance bonuses.

As an aside I suspect the mwd role bonus is far more powerful than most people are thinking.
Kais Fiddler
Perkone
Caldari State
#1084 - 2013-07-31 22:35:34 UTC
Kane Fenris wrote:
Kais Fiddler wrote:
Naomi Knight wrote:
btw ishtar gets lame double bonuses why other ships cant get those?
like 7.5% optimal and tracking for med hybrids instead of 10% optimal /lvl for the eagle?

oh any other bonuses gets implemented into the ship hull
then why cant the 4%/lvl resist bonus put directly into the eagle hull and give it another bonus?

The resist bonus is far more powerful than the speed or cap recharge bonus.



somebody here hasnt learned yet that naomi is a dedicated troll

I generally don't post on these forums, but this is something I apparently care a lot about, which is somewhat surprising to be honest.
XvXTeacherVxV
Be Nice Inc.
Prismatic Legion
#1085 - 2013-07-31 22:36:19 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:
Diesel47 wrote:
Make the vaga the arty / autocannon boat and the munnin the missile ship.



Taht is simply DUMB. the Missile hull for minmatar cruisers is the bellicose.


You mean the "t1 missile hull" is the bellicose. The point I'm making here is that Minmatar missile pilots are still getting the shaft because their options are so limited. The Bellicose is not even close to filling a t2 HAC role.

I also don't think it's productive to call someone's idea "dumb", especially with only the most minimal argument as to why. Try to stay constructive guys.
Can you see the rapier?: http://imgur.com/aFelCpv,GH6lqDE
XvXTeacherVxV
Be Nice Inc.
Prismatic Legion
#1086 - 2013-07-31 22:51:22 UTC
Minmatar Missile Boat Progression: Breacher > Talwar > (Hound) > Bellicose > 1/2 Huginn > Cyclone > Typhoon.
Minmatar Projectile Boat Progression: Everything else.

At least we also have the Fleet Scythe now I guess, but the point remains that EVERY other race has more options for each weapon system (except perhaps Amarr, which sort of has three systems: lasers, drones, missiles).
Can you see the rapier?: http://imgur.com/aFelCpv,GH6lqDE
M1k3y Koontz
Speaker for the Dead
Stay Feral
#1087 - 2013-07-31 22:54:58 UTC
Hannott Thanos wrote:
Diesel47 wrote:
Vagabad needs PWG buff.

I want to use arties/425mm on it.

The Deimos needs 13.000 pwg and 800 CPU. I want to use Large guns and double XL ASB.


Post constructively or don't post, we're trying to make the Vaga a useful ship that can actually use its shield booster bonus without having to fit an ACR.

How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp.

Bouh Revetoile
In Wreck we thrust
#1088 - 2013-07-31 23:42:22 UTC
M1k3y Koontz wrote:
Hannott Thanos wrote:
Diesel47 wrote:
Vagabad needs PWG buff.

I want to use arties/425mm on it.

The Deimos needs 13.000 pwg and 800 CPU. I want to use Large guns and double XL ASB.


Post constructively or don't post, we're trying to make the Vaga a useful ship that can actually use its shield booster bonus without having to fit an ACR.

He was underlining a bit sarcasticaly that asking for your ship to be able to fit everything you can possibly need is unreasonable. You are asking too much sir, and it's not christmas yet.

Because if you think about it, the Vagabond can fit guns and ASB to profit from all of its bonus. You're only asking more without real reasons.
Joelleaveek
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#1089 - 2013-08-01 00:06:09 UTC
I really dislike that the Deimos is keeping the MWD bonus instead of tracking. It also seems like the Ishtar is getting one bonus split into to slots to waste one of them. Still don't get the shield boost bonus on the Vagabond.
I'm Down
Macabre Votum
Northern Coalition.
#1090 - 2013-08-01 00:07:54 UTC
I love how people's understanding of the Vaga is:

If it can't fit an XL ASB, then **** it.


Player level competence trying to fit a BS sized mod on every cruiser class ship.... You know what, why not let it fit a 100mn AB too, and for that matter, get an agility boost when using it.
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#1091 - 2013-08-01 00:35:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Omnathious Deninard
Harvey James wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
The damage is inline with the range, but the Deimos fall off bonus kinda makes the range on bonus on the Eagle kinda underwhelming. If the falloff bonus on the Deimos was changed to a tracking bonus they would both be very useful as both blaster or rail platforms.
The lack of low slots also hurt the eagle...2/4 is mags just too get 370 dps at 15km with null at lv5 HAC i might add doing about 1600m/s with a massive sig and only 2 slots left for a choice of either nano/TE or damage control... for 200mil i mean come on its taking the **** when a Talos can do 900dps at 15km and what 1700m/s for a overall shorter training time and and half the price..

[Eagle 1.1, Egale]

5x Heavy Neutron Blaster II (Void M)

10MN Microwarpdrive II
2x Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
Large Ancillary Shield Booster (Navy Cap Booster 150)
Large Shield Extender II
Faint Warp Disruptor I

2x Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Tracking Enhancer II
Damage Control II

Medium Hybrid Collision Accelerator I
Medium Ancillary Current Router I

[Statistics - All Skills 5]
Effective HP: 44,059 (Eve: 24,571)
Tank Ability: 632.64 DPS

Damage Profile - (EM: 25.00%, Ex: 25.00%, Ki: 25.00%, Th: 25.00%)
Shield Resists - EM: 63.78%, Ex: 81.89%, Ki: 89.13%, Th: 92.76%
Armor Resists - EM: 57.50%, Ex: 23.50%, Ki: 68.13%, Th: 88.31%

Capacitor (Lasts 1m)

Volley Damage: 1,696.51
DPS: 551.82 @8.3km + 3.7km Falloff 2 Magnetic Field Stabilizer II 1 Tracking Enhancer II
DPS: 474.40 @ 9km + 4.4km Falloff 1 Magnetic Field Stabilizer II 2 Tracking Enhancer II

Harvey James wrote:
Again with the tracking bonus on Deimos is pointless as the thorax or brutix navy issue can do the exact same thing at least as a mini durable talos that can armour tank or shield tank well and is much more mobile than the talos it has a useful role and some uniqueness rather than a T2 thorax
The falloff bonus is just a bad tracking bonus that only is usable with null or antimatter charges. Less most forget there are more than just those types of charges. I always viewed the role of the Deimos as a close range high damage specialist ship, which is almost does.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

SMT008
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#1092 - 2013-08-01 00:37:10 UTC
I'm Down wrote:
I love how people's understanding of the Vaga is:

If it can't fit an XL ASB, then **** it.


Player level competence trying to fit a BS sized mod on every cruiser class ship.... You know what, why not let it fit a 100mn AB too, and for that matter, get an agility boost when using it.


I would use the LASB. If it wasn't super-bad. So instead, I prefer to seriously gimp my ship and shoehorn an XLASB.

Let's try something alright, get a cruiser-class ship, doesn't matter which one. Then use a medium shield booster. Any medium shield booster except deadspace ones. And then see if it's of any use in PVP.

It's not.
Ronny Hugo
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#1093 - 2013-08-01 00:40:59 UTC
Just one thing I've just noticed, the laser-ship (Zealot) has less capacitor than the missile ship (sacrilege)... Are you sure the capacitor values aren't backwards?
Vayn Baxtor
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1094 - 2013-08-01 00:57:10 UTC
Vaga: Well, can call it tweaking. I still find it not a good idea to be making it all fancy for ASB fits. But apparently, people don't fancy other bonuses instead, either.

Using tablet, typoes are common and I'm not going to fix them all.

Sol Mortis
An Heroes
#1095 - 2013-08-01 02:40:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Sol Mortis
HACs should get a third rig slot if they are really being balanced to be competitive with tech 1 and faction ships. It would be a solid but balanced buff to all of them; with the normal trade-offs between speed, tank, and fitting we're all used to with rigs.
Mire Stoude
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#1096 - 2013-08-01 03:25:33 UTC
CCP Rise wrote:
For the Deimos ... We did look closely at the MWD cap use bonus and in the end decided that there wasn't any replacement compelling enough to warrant a change.\


Literally anything at all would be better than the MWD cap bonus; A hull bonus, tank bonus, a range bonus, a drone hit points bonus, an agility bonus... ANYTHING.

On second thought, a missile bonus would be even less useful. But I think that's about it.
Lord Eremet
The Seatbelts
#1097 - 2013-08-01 03:58:25 UTC
In the offchance that you are still reading this thread, CCP RISE, move those light drones you gave the cerberus to the eagle. It won't need drone defence when six HAM's will skewer tackiling frigates and drones with ease. I'm positive the cerberus will become the BEST kiter ingame even without em.

And 25 mbit drone bandwith, not 15 thats for frigates.

Kthxbye
NinjaStyle
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#1098 - 2013-08-01 04:14:35 UTC
well I guess these changes are final regardless any input we post since some of the ship changes where fairly well recived.
Leskit
Pure Victory
#1099 - 2013-08-01 04:27:10 UTC
AstraPardus wrote:
Amarr: That's nice, capacitor recharge is nice for most Amarr ships, but IMO is too much on a missile boat.



It was great when you were active tanked+mwd+neut in the utility high. didn't need a cap booster.
Devon Weeks
Asteroid Mining Industries
Salt Mining Industrialists
#1100 - 2013-08-01 04:42:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Devon Weeks
Quote:
Literally anything at all would be better than the MWD cap bonus; A hull bonus, tank bonus, a range bonus, a drone hit points bonus, an agility bonus... ANYTHING.

On second thought, a missile bonus would be even less useful. But I think that's about it.


Agreed. Although, now you've got me thinking about a HAM Deimos... could be fun, or funny. But, seriously, I find it hard to believe that there is no compelling change besides a MWD bonus to make.

For those saying that Deimos pilots are asking too much, let me point something out. I don't care if the Deimos gets a single point more of DPS. I don't care if it gets the ability to fit neutrons with a 1600mm plate (been flying it with electrons for quite a while on two characters and think it works well enough). I don't care if it loses the utility high as long as the math works out to fit a comparable cap booster to make up for it, which it looks like it has. I don't care if it gets an active rep bonus (I buffer tank the thing most of the time or run a nos/repper setup). I don't care if it gets more speed (I catch most targets just fine, at least the ones the Deimos is intended to fight). I don't care if it or any other HAC gets an additional slot.

My point is simply this. Where CCP found no compelling bonus to give the Deimos, I find no compelling reason whatsoever to reduce its tank. I find no compelling reason, at all.

CCP_Rise, please be so kind as to explain why the Deimos needed a hit to its tank. I think by this point in the thread it's pretty obvious that no one has been able to grasp the reasoning behind it. Even those "defending" it are only saying its new tank is merely adequate, but no one has provided a reason it needs to be softer (cue the trolls). Is a blaster Deimos really supposed to be something we go Captain Ahab on targets with? If so, why is it as costly as it is?

**DEATH OF A DEIMOS**

Inspired by Moby D i c k

"And, he piled upon the great, white hump,
a sum of all the rage and hate.
If his chest had been a cannon,
he'd have shot his heart upon it."

Into the great, blue depths they fell
locked in a battle of wills,
neither caring to survive,
both hell bent to kill.
The outcome was certain,
as most seemed to know.
One's skin was so thin
his bones often showed.
The sea drank life
as it oozed from their hides
from the wounds they had dealt
on the turbulent tides.
Looking back to those depths,
the children would say,
"There sank Captain Deimos.
The whale got away."