EVE Information Portal

Yeah right, that's what Grayscale said about the anom nerf. Grayscale has less credibility than anyone at CCP, even Hilmar. Short answer, is that whatever happens with these will be to the benefit of the CCP RMT friends, not to the benefit and health of EVE has a whole, especially with Grayscale running it.

Build it on the POS. Obviously, I don't know whether they'll let it be built in say an equipment assembly array (which incidentally has mild fitting requirements and cost), but that seems the likely solution to your concern above.

From my point of view a very good example for improving the communication between CCP and the community!

Hold that course!

Please don't nerf faction towers :(

I have to agree that simply adding more space is not the right thing to do, then whats the point of it? I thought they were supposed to save money. I don't know who you guys were talking to about them, but they obviously don't know what they are talking about in regards to faction towers.

Other changes are great tho. I would be interested to see the stats on the BPOs, even if they are not final - such as number of runs, and the ME/PE of them (hopefully they are maxed without research).

Maybe CCP could adjust the cycle duration of the faction towers instead of the fuel hold.


Edit: towers -> faction towers

Alliances. Nullsec. 5 B ISK.

What about us small corps of 1-2 players playing EVE causually and running POSses in lowsec, producing stuff for the markets for the benefit of all you others out there?! Fuel pellets will make it a bit easier on us, but there is currently no plan to reduce the really tediuous work; transporting POS fuel to lowsec.

"Use a rorq" or " buy a jump freighter" you say. Well, they are WAY to expensive for a small corp!

"Flying blockade runners through low sec makes for good targets for pirates/gankers etc - thats good for EVE, and have a nice day!". Nope. I have flown through soo many gate camps in low sec and they never catch a blockade runner anyway (cloaky, warp core stabbed etc).

So why then, has no one in this simulated future ultra-capitalistic world invented a ship to solve an obvious need on the market!?

Might I suggest to you CCP that you consider introduction of a "jump hauler", i.e. a Iteron hull ship with a jump drive that is affordable for small corps (like an Orca maybe?) but has reduced cargo capacity (20000 m3 maybe). Make it work in only lowsec, if it in some way otherwise could impact the "balance" in null (what do I care about nullsec anyway?). Make it easier to maintain POSes in lowsec, and let us spend more time with pewpew instead!

Fuel pellets are good, but it will not reduce the workload for low sec POS owners significantly. Jump haulers would!

Comments, anyone? CCP?

At least someone is getting the point, I wanted to make. But even you are looking at the sympoms and not on the problem.
Why does that sh*t have to be so large....

Goes offline, if you dont have any fuel blocks in it...
you can through in both kind of Fuel, blocks and parts but after the change, only the fuel blocks will work...

Re-read the blog. That's already been explained.

WOW i cant beleave that everyone is excited about this.besides the fact that ccp is gonna put another hand in our pockets sort of speek when it comes to pos fuel,why do we need another thing to manifacture?like we dont already have enough to build.in the long run this will drive up fuel prices due to a middle man manifactureing ur blocks,or if u want to do it urself lets waste some manifactureing slots on already needed toons to do stuff that really dosnt make alot of sence,ya it will make fueling ur pos easier but is gonna cost us more[like fueling these damn towers isnt expensive enough]theres no way u can intruduce a middle man into the process and not have the prices go up,ccp dosnt control the market,we do. i really wish ccp would stop trying to change stuff to so called make stuff easier and fix the *&^$%$ problems that we already have with the game.if they spent 1% of the effort into fixing some of the smaller issues ingame instead of tryin to radicaly change what is already there they wouldnt be loseing there 5 year older players to this kind of bs.tx for twisting the knife one more time ccp