These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[s]Mars[/s] EVE needs Women!

First post First post First post
Author
Shedemei Silfar
Miskatonic Mercantile
#561 - 2013-06-13 20:27:38 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
As far as the name calling, yup you're right... except for one minor thing.
These names are not based on the race, gender, sexual preference, etc. of the individual - i.e. things that have no effect on the game or the basic mechanics of the gameplay. It's based on the behaviour and commentary of the individuals in question.


So, hating isn't hating, but the kind of hating on someone, and from what it stems, makes it acceptable?

I wonder how "neckbeard" and "cavemen" apply because of how someone behaves...

Quote:
And personally, I like nerds.... I'd label most of the population who plays this game, myself included as a nerd. That part wasn't actually a slam


It might not have been meant as a slam, but some people might take it as one. And because they're offended by that, doesn't that make you in the wrong, by your own definitions?


Hating the behaviour is not hating the person. For instance, I find your lack of acknowledgement of your own justification of hatred abhorrent, but I don't hate you.

To be specific, neckbeard and caveman are used to apply to how men behaved at a time when they never shaved their necks and lived in caves. I don't really believe that the population of EvE lives in a cave.

However, the comments that have been cited in this thread are pretty decent proof of the belief that people are not good enough to be a part of the EvE community because of their gender, race, etc... not because of their behaviour. What about this is unclear?
Juny Wuny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#562 - 2013-06-13 20:28:43 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
1. a person not belonging to a particular group, set, party, etc.

I still believe they are belong to the same group as you do, EVE player.


...did you miss the part where we were talking about women? Or the part where I mentioned a 4% minority?

Yeah, we all play the game. That is apparent by the fact that we're all posting on this very forum. But context, yeesh.


What we are trying to say is that we classify "EVE players" differently. We are not assigning gender to the group of "EVE players." Instead, we are saying gender is a subset of the group called "EVE players." So basically in the group of "EVE Players" would include all genders of players. With the subgroups of "male EVE players", "female EVE players", "transgender EVE players", etc. Just because one of these subgroups is vastly larger than the other doesn't mean that the parent group doesn't include all the subgroups.

So let me ask you something here. Do you consider male school teachers to be outsiders among school teachers?
Amarra Mandalin
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#563 - 2013-06-13 20:44:07 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:

wrote stuff...


I guess you don't follow Internet law well very well whereas ISPs are responsible for their CUSTOMER'S behavior. Same goes with Facebook.

See: Newspaper

Also see dictionary for "inane."
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#564 - 2013-06-13 20:46:18 UTC
Amarra Mandalin wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:

wrote stuff...


I guess you don't follow Internet law well very well whereas ISPs are responsible for their CUSTOMER'S behavior. Same goes with Facebook.

See: Newspaper

Also see dictionary for "inane."


Please see the terms of service...

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Amarra Mandalin
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#565 - 2013-06-13 20:51:50 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Amarra Mandalin wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:

wrote stuff...


I guess you don't follow Internet law well very well whereas ISPs are responsible for their CUSTOMER'S behavior. Same goes with Facebook.

See: Newspaper

Also see dictionary for "inane."


Please see the terms of service...


If someone wants to debate intelligently anything I've said, to include "There is no personal or corporate responsibility to deal with issues that are morally wrong. Where, anywhere in United States law, is that written? (I'll give you a hint, you made it up)"
I'll be glad to.

You however have made clear how much you dislike women in prior posts -- probably why you spewed a bunch of ignorance and didn't realize it. I don't care to have an epeen contest with you as you're not even relevant to this discussion. You're just part of the blob that is part of the problem. Why would I respect anything you say?
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#566 - 2013-06-13 21:14:58 UTC
Amarra Mandalin wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Amarra Mandalin wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:

wrote stuff...


I guess you don't follow Internet law well very well whereas ISPs are responsible for their CUSTOMER'S behavior. Same goes with Facebook.

See: Newspaper

Also see dictionary for "inane."


Please see the terms of service...


If someone wants to debate intelligently anything I've said, to include "There is no personal or corporate responsibility to deal with issues that are morally wrong. Where, anywhere in United States law, is that written? (I'll give you a hint, you made it up)"
I'll be glad to.

You however have made clear how much you dislike women in prior posts -- probably why you spewed a bunch of ignorance and didn't realize it. I don't care to have an epeen contest with you as you're not even relevant to this discussion. You're just part of the blob that is part of the problem. Why would I respect anything you say?


You'll be glad to debate, but, you disqualify me as being worth debating...

That's pretty well not being glad to debate.

Remember what I said about the whole "not handwaving and declaring victory" thing?

You shouldn't have to respect anything I say. I don't respect anything you have to say, or you, for that matter.

I'm here. And I'm willing to talk. Are you? Or are you just going declare this over by default, by fiat?

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Dersen Lowery
The Scope
#567 - 2013-06-13 21:27:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Dersen Lowery
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Have the discussion. Don't just claim victory by fiat.


How is using a descriptive term declaring victory by fiat?

If I say, "that's sexist" to you, that does not mean "I win and you're worthless; get out FOREV4R!!!!1" It doesn't even mean that I think you're sexist; I've put my own foot in my own mouth more than once. It means that I think that the particular thing that you just said ("that") is discriminatory on the basis of sex ("sexist"). If you escalate it to mean more than that, then you've made any discussion impossible, because I can't even describe my position. It doesn't magically mean that I'm right, nor does it prevent you from disagreeing. It's an adjective, not a Dragon Shout. It's criticism, not censorship.

This is fundamentally about respecting the humanity of every player over every other consideration (including people with mental retardation and Asperger's, to name two classes of people that get **** on constantly here), and making the few and minor social adjustments necessary to do so. It's about what used to be known, and revered, as the Law of Hospitality. And it's about the game you'd like to see. Maybe you're happy having your sausage party in one corner of EVE. If you are, just put that in your corp description so women know not to apply, or create a private channel where you can rant with a few people who you know are similarly inclined. But in general, there's no good reason for us to be driving off what could be double the current player base for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with either the game or the metagame.

Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.

I voted in CSM X!

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#568 - 2013-06-13 21:45:37 UTC
Quote:
How is using a descriptive term declaring victory by fiat?


Look at Amarra Mandalin's comment above you. She is doing just that. It happens a lot. That's the part I really take exception to.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Amarra Mandalin
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#569 - 2013-06-13 22:12:10 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
How is using a descriptive term declaring victory by fiat?


Look at Amarra Mandalin's comment above you. She is doing just that. It happens a lot. That's the part I really take exception to.



I'll help you out.

Unlike you, I haven't made this personal whereas you have.

It began with your first inflammatory response to my post and ending with your statement above (i.e. I don't respect anything you have to say, or you, for that matter.) Additionally, I've read how you treated others (including when you last said you were leaving this thread).

Sorry, but why would I want a part of that? I don't in RL let alone on a game forum.

Additionally, this isn't a PvP match, and I've neither claimed victory nor defeat. I'm here for a reason other than to poke sticks at hot coals with my alt.

When you get to be of grandmotherly age you learn to pick your battles, recognize **** talk and waste less time on pettiness.

You want this conversation to evolve around you (see past posts) whereas others (agree, disagree or indifferent) seem to understand this thread is an issue and not a game to be won or lost. The winners and losers are the people affected.

It's really that simple.



Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#570 - 2013-06-13 22:21:19 UTC
Quote:
I'll help you out.

Unlike you, I haven't made this personal whereas you have.

It began with your first inflammatory response to my post and ending with your statement above (i.e. I don't respect anything you have to say, or you, for that matter.) Additionally, I've read how you treated others (including when you last said you were leaving this thread).

Sorry, but why would I want a part of that? I don't in RL let alone on a game forum.

Additionally, this isn't a PvP match, and I've neither claimed victory nor defeat. I'm here for a reason other than to poke sticks at hot coals with my alt.

When you get to be of grandmotherly age you learn to pick your battles, recognize **** talk and waste less time on pettiness.

You want this conversation to evolve around you (see past posts) whereas others (agree, disagree or indifferent) seem to understand this thread is an issue and not a game to be won or lost. The winners and losers are the people affected.

It's really that simple.


Here, let paraphrase this for you.

"I am glad to engage in a good intellectual debate. Except with you, you can't play, because you is sexist."

So, step up to the plate.

How did I flame you, btw? I am curious.

As for my statement, I don't respect you. I don't hand out respect for no reason. Especially not on a forum. How is that a flame?

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Juny Wuny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#571 - 2013-06-13 22:40:35 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
I'm here. And I'm willing to talk. Are you? Or are you just going declare this over by default, by fiat?


Are you really willing to talk Kaarous Aldurald?

Perhaps it wasn't clear that my post was directed at you before so I will ask the question again.

Do you consider male school teachers outsiders among school teachers?
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#572 - 2013-06-13 22:46:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Kaarous Aldurald
Juny Wuny wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
I'm here. And I'm willing to talk. Are you? Or are you just going declare this over by default, by fiat?


Are you really willing to talk Kaarous Aldurald?

Perhaps it wasn't clear that my post was directed at you before so I will ask the question again.

Do you consider male school teachers outsiders among school teachers?


My apologies, I missed your post entirely.

Yes.

Male school teachers are a significant minority, both in terms of numbers and representation amongst their union. Their perspective is that of an outsider looking into an established hierarchy.

Interestingly, amongst many universities, the trends are reversed.

[Edit: As an aside, both of these trends are entirely reversed in Japan. Male teachers makes up a significant majority amongst public schools, while female make up the larger part of the university faculty.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Juny Wuny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#573 - 2013-06-13 23:20:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Juny Wuny
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Juny Wuny wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
I'm here. And I'm willing to talk. Are you? Or are you just going declare this over by default, by fiat?


Are you really willing to talk Kaarous Aldurald?

Perhaps it wasn't clear that my post was directed at you before so I will ask the question again.

Do you consider male school teachers outsiders among school teachers?


My apologies, I missed your post entirely.

Yes.

Male school teachers are a significant minority, both in terms of numbers and representation amongst their union. Their perspective is that of an outsider looking into an established hierarchy.

Interestingly, amongst many universities, the trends are reversed.

[Edit: As an aside, both of these trends are entirely reversed in Japan. Male teachers makes up a significant majority amongst public schools, while female make up the larger part of the university faculty.


What you are saying is that when a minority is so small that it becomes awkward in social situations they can be viewed as an outsider. Okay. I get that.

However, I still adapt a different mindset mainly because I have to. Think about it this way, if I, a member of the minority, adapts the mindset of an outsider, then it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. I will always feel like an outsider. The fact that I am female will always be an issue because I will be making it an issue. Now if I adapt my mindset instead, that I'm not really a true outsider just that I'm different it changes things. It makes it so that I am no longer making an issue out of my gender. Instead, I only have to deal with gender issues when other people make it my issue. In a way I can police that by cutting contact with those I don't wish to talk to.

Now it is true that I would be considered an outsider in anything that is deemed "male only." Hell, I wouldn't even be surprised if I was denied entry to some social group in EVE because of my gender. It sucks yes. I just don't consider EVE Online as a whole to be male only. Even with the 96/4 split, CCP is still willing take to my money.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#574 - 2013-06-13 23:35:57 UTC
Quote:
What you are saying is that when a minority is so small that it becomes awkward in social situations they can be viewed as an outsider. Okay. I get that.


Eh, sort of. I am speaking more from a socio cultural standpoint. I made a reference a few pages ago to being the newbie in a police precinct, please view it. The analogy of being a diplomat to a foreign culture applies equally well.

Gender is another of those identifiers that can divide along a cultural standpoint. Male and female are both cultures, especially in Western society. It's entirely possible to belong to multiple overlapping cultures as well, even contradictory ones.

Quote:
However, I still adapt a different mindset mainly because I have to. Think about it this way, if I, a member of the minority, adapts the mindset of an outsider, then becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. I will always feel like an outsider. The fact that I am female will always be an issue because I will be making it an issue.


I dispute this. Deference to the reality of your social circumstances is quite different from a direct and deliberate change of self identity. Particularly when a status as an outsider is entirely transitory. Acceptance is inevitable in all but the most extreme of circumstances ( that being personally directed attacks, and in such a situation, the best bet is to bail), at which point you are a full fledged member of the group.

Quote:
Now it is true that I would be considered an outsider in anything that is deemed "male only." Hell, I wouldn't even be surprised if I was denied entry to some social group in EVE because of my gender. It sucks yes. I just don't consider EVE Online as a whole to be male only. Even with the 96/4 split, CCP is still willing take to my money.


Neither do I. EVE Online is a video game. The only people the game specifically excludes are minors, because a minor cannot enter into the legal contract of payment and obligation of payment. Minors can still play, obviously, but their guardian is the true owner of the account.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

NightCrawler 85
Phoibe Enterprises
#575 - 2013-06-13 23:49:48 UTC
Juny Wuny wrote:

What you are saying is that when a minority is so small that it becomes awkward in social situations they can be viewed as an outsider. Okay. I get that.

However, I still adapt a different mindset mainly because I have to. Think about it this way, if I, a member of the minority, adapts the mindset of an outsider, then it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. I will always feel like an outsider. The fact that I am female will always be an issue because I will be making it an issue. Now if I adapt my mindset instead, that I'm not really a true outsider just that I'm different it changes things. It makes it so that I am no longer making an issue out of my gender. Instead, I only have to deal with gender issues when other people make it my issue. In a way I can police that by cutting contact with those I don't wish to talk to.

Now it is true that I would be considered an outsider in anything that is deemed "male only." Hell, I wouldn't even be surprised if I was denied entry to some social group in EVE because of my gender. It sucks yes. I just don't consider EVE Online as a whole to be male only. Even with the 96/4 split, CCP is still willing take to my money.


Really hoping i did not misunderstand something in your post, if i did i apologize in advance.

I can agree to some extent but, and this is my own views, its not really possible to "stop" considering your self an "outsider" as its called here.
Honestly i dont feel that word is accurate. Different is better. It might just be because of my english but when someone says "outsider" i think about someone who cant fit into a certain social group no matter how hard they try.Saying that a female gamer is an "outsider" because of the gender just seems wrong with my mindset. Sorry.

But female gamers are more unusual, especially in EVE, thus we are different. And we know that, just like we know that there will sometimes be guys that thinks we will have cyber just because we are a female gamer, and that there will be people who will have no respect because of our gender. We can tell our self that "Nope, we are no different then the male gamers", but in my own opinion i know i would be lying to my self if i did that.
If i jump on a random TS or voice server i know there is a 90% chance that i will hear;
Your a female!
Bad attempts at flirting.
Even worse attempts at impressing me.
Someone who completely ignores me because im a female.

Male players in general dont have this.
*Please note that i do not think that female gamers are better or worse then male gamers, both genders have their issues and personalities we dont agree and/or get along with.

Just because you can accept that this can (and most likely will) happen does not mean that you are self fulfilling a prophecy.
However it does mean that you can deal with it easier and be able to tolerate it and not let it get to you, and from there evolve ways to counter it. One example you gave your self is to simply stop talking to those people. And honestly, if you truly feel that you are no different or "an outsider", you would not have had any needs to find ways to "police it" because you would not expect things to happen anyway.
Juny Wuny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#576 - 2013-06-14 00:22:18 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Eh, sort of. I am speaking more from a socio cultural standpoint. I made a reference a few pages ago to being the newbie in a police precinct, please view it. The analogy of being a diplomat to a foreign culture applies equally well.

Gender is another of those identifiers that can divide along a cultural standpoint. Male and female are both cultures, especially in Western society. It's entirely possible to belong to multiple overlapping cultures as well, even contradictory ones.

I dispute this. Deference to the reality of your social circumstances is quite different from a direct and deliberate change of self identity. Particularly when a status as an outsider is entirely transitory. Acceptance is inevitable in all but the most extreme of circumstances ( that being personally directed attacks, and in such a situation, the best bet is to bail), at which point you are a full fledged member of the group.


Right. Changing your identity is a big thing and changes all kinds of circumstances. I will always be an outsider to the male gamer group. I've no reasons or drive to change that. Just like male gamers are always outsiders to the female gamer group. When we split along gender lines it can get pretty polarizing.

When you say acceptance is inevitable I agree. I've had very few situations in online games where my gender acted as a wall or barrier of entry. In most cases it was an extreme reaction that barred entry. (Personal attacks) What I'm saying is that if I go around saying "Hey Look I'm a girl! You should give me stuff!" I'm much more likely to get an extreme reaction than if I don't. In some cases it just happens regardless of how you act.
Juny Wuny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#577 - 2013-06-14 00:29:34 UTC
NightCrawler 85 wrote:
Really hoping i did not misunderstand something in your post, if i did i apologize in advance.

I can agree to some extent but, and this is my own views, its not really possible to "stop" considering your self an "outsider" as its called here.
Honestly i dont feel that word is accurate. Different is better. It might just be because of my english but when someone says "outsider" i think about someone who cant fit into a certain social group no matter how hard they try.Saying that a female gamer is an "outsider" because of the gender just seems wrong with my mindset. Sorry.

But female gamers are more unusual, especially in EVE, thus we are different. And we know that, just like we know that there will sometimes be guys that thinks we will have cyber just because we are a female gamer, and that there will be people who will have no respect because of our gender. We can tell our self that "Nope, we are no different then the male gamers", but in my own opinion i know i would be lying to my self if i did that.
If i jump on a random TS or voice server i know there is a 90% chance that i will hear;
Your a female!
Bad attempts at flirting.
Even worse attempts at impressing me.
Someone who completely ignores me because im a female.

Male players in general dont have this.
*Please note that i do not think that female gamers are better or worse then male gamers, both genders have their issues and personalities we dont agree and/or get along with.

Just because you can accept that this can (and most likely will) happen does not mean that you are self fulfilling a prophecy.
However it does mean that you can deal with it easier and be able to tolerate it and not let it get to you, and from there evolve ways to counter it. One example you gave your self is to simply stop talking to those people. And honestly, if you truly feel that you are no different or "an outsider", you would not have had any needs to find ways to "police it" because you would not expect things to happen anyway.


We are kind of arguing the same thing but arguing semantics and word choice. I agree that as a female player I will never be "just like the guys." Then again I'm not trying to be a guy. I'm just being me, which includes being female. I am different from the guys that play EVE. Hell, NC I've talked to you before in game. I'm pretty different than some of the girls who play EVE to. That is okay.

I'm just saying you shouldn't focus on the fact you are different when you are playing a game online. You should focus on playing the game instead. Hopefully that should clarify what I meant.
Amarra Mandalin
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#578 - 2013-06-14 00:46:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Amarra Mandalin
Juny Wuny wrote:

We are kind of arguing the same thing but arguing semantics and word choice. I agree that as a female player I will never be "just like the guys." .



You ladies made some good points on the female experience as it were.

I just wanted to add that I've been able to be "just like one of the guys" in at least one corp and considered such most the time in another. Yet in casual chat there was also fun interaction sparked by diversity, where I had more of Big Sis role...kinda helped I was Director. ;)

But was it worth it? Hard to say on the former.

I know I made the mistake of trying too hard to be one of the guys when I first started. I even bought a male character. Since I was new to MMOs, I didn't realize the amount of corp diversity in EVE. "Oh, you mean not every corp has a jerk for a CEO that uses a stopwatch to measure how long it takes you to move your probes and emo rages at 3m SP characters?"

I'm not much for sacrificing who I am and do a really poor job at it. I've learned EVE is a lot like RL in some ways, but it can be much harder to find good people to hang with, given the limits of non-F2F interaction.

But there are many decent people in EVE, some whom I consider true friends. Generally, they are not the noisemakers and you might have to turn over a few rocks to find them.

I think it would be cool to have a corp finder app for women -- and the community at large. There is something similar in another MMO and I'd have to flesh out the details to explain it properly. But the jist of it is a search app that helps match people to corps -- based on whatever criteria is important to you.

Corps that welcome women and have certain qualities appealing to such (some, not all)-- may be more easily identifiable. And, of course, it would be voluntary.

ETA: TL;DR If you're flying with good mates the issue of gender matters less, in my opinion, as far as game enjoyment. It is just sometimes difficult to find such.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#579 - 2013-06-14 00:53:21 UTC
Juny Wuny wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Eh, sort of. I am speaking more from a socio cultural standpoint. I made a reference a few pages ago to being the newbie in a police precinct, please view it. The analogy of being a diplomat to a foreign culture applies equally well.

Gender is another of those identifiers that can divide along a cultural standpoint. Male and female are both cultures, especially in Western society. It's entirely possible to belong to multiple overlapping cultures as well, even contradictory ones.

I dispute this. Deference to the reality of your social circumstances is quite different from a direct and deliberate change of self identity. Particularly when a status as an outsider is entirely transitory. Acceptance is inevitable in all but the most extreme of circumstances ( that being personally directed attacks, and in such a situation, the best bet is to bail), at which point you are a full fledged member of the group.


Right. Changing your identity is a big thing and changes all kinds of circumstances. I will always be an outsider to the male gamer group. I've no reasons or drive to change that. Just like male gamers are always outsiders to the female gamer group. When we split along gender lines it can get pretty polarizing.

When you say acceptance is inevitable I agree. I've had very few situations in online games where my gender acted as a wall or barrier of entry. In most cases it was an extreme reaction that barred entry. (Personal attacks) What I'm saying is that if I go around saying "Hey Look I'm a girl! You should give me stuff!" I'm much more likely to get an extreme reaction than if I don't. In some cases it just happens regardless of how you act.


Yep, I agree almost exactly. It's the people who do behave like "Tee hee, give me stuff!" that I do not accept.

There are culture of just about everything out there. Just about anything you can find a subreddit for. My mother, a while ago, introduced me to the knitting culture, and it's surprisingly deep, and they hate the crochet subculture pretty fiercely. It's rather fascinating.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

NightCrawler 85
Phoibe Enterprises
#580 - 2013-06-14 00:54:31 UTC
Juny Wuny wrote:


We are kind of arguing the same thing but arguing semantics and word choice. I agree that as a female player I will never be "just like the guys." Then again I'm not trying to be a guy. I'm just being me, which includes being female. I am different from the guys that play EVE. Hell, NC I've talked to you before in game. I'm pretty different than some of the girls who play EVE to. That is okay.

I'm just saying you shouldn't focus on the fact you are different when you are playing a game online. You should focus on playing the game instead. Hopefully that should clarify what I meant.


It does clarify things and i will shamelessly blame my english for misreading what you meant Lol