Player Features and Ideas Discussion

:(

I can understand nerfing the moros tracking but optimal also?

was the Nags tracking actually too high? It has to shield tank really so it doesnt have tracking computers with tracking scripts in the mids like the armor dreads can, this will mean a fit nag will have less tracking than a Rev is that intended?

Regarding pheonix I think a massive improvement would be to change the 5% kinetic damage per level to 5% missile damage per level so it can take advantage of the multiple damage types of missiles. Also reduce the volume of capital missiles a bit so a variety can be kept in cargo.

Doing 100% kinetic damage is a massive massive weakness of a pheonix its too easy to tank 1 damage type

About time my beloved Phoenix gets some actual love.

YOU DONT TALK BACK TO CCP M8

Ouch!

Nobody will be training for the minnie dread now. The whole point was that it would be excellent tracking but now why even bother. Will remain unused with such a heavy handed nerf.

The moros nerf is especially hard. I'd suggest an optimal nerf of -5 to -7km, while mantaining the falloff bonus, and not touching the tracking.

Dreads and especially titans don't track for **** without tp's or webs unless shooting at bc's or drakes so I simply don't understand this nerf. These are not being over-used or abused and seem like they're fufilling a good niche to counter sub-caps. This simply takes another tool out of the hand to counter massive bs or bc blobs with such a heavy-handed nerf.

It will also skew autocannon optimal v blaster optimal with XL unless XL autocannons are also getting knocked back to 16000 base optimal. Also wondering if the reason XL blasters were pushed up to 30000 optimal originally has been forgotten/fixed or there could be some further issues relating to this.

Nobody except all of PL. Work on your propaganda.

The tracking IS the major problem on the Moros. The optimal and falloff were high for a "close range" weapon, but -5/+5 would have probably sufficed.

Imagine this: Titans and Dreads, being capitals, are supported by a smaller, more agile fleet. Not a fleet of capitals, mind you. Perhaps a fleet of sub-capitals. Ships that support the big one in doing its job. Not everyone drops 50 Supers on frig, or thinks "Hey we have a fleet of subcaps to kill here....get the Titans spooled up."

#PLProblems

Fozzie, I think that you should read this: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=228586&find=unread

This is something really interesting that you could have a good use for it.

It is realted to caldari and galente.

There should be a way to downvote someone. This isn't even related to anything dealing with XL weapons. You should really just let the Devs find your post and comment on it without crossposting it everywhere.

So galente are still best at something...caps and supers, cause quite honestly everything else still sucks, apart from a few select ships. Medium blasters and rails are still worthless compared to any other platform. Small are fine, but they are smalls, who really cares. Larges are really only a viable platform on a non-gal ship, which makes me rather sad.

While the moros nerf, now that I looked more closely at the math still leaves it as the best dread, the gap from moros to say rev is now much narrower than the gap between amarr bs and galente bs, which honestly no one really flies seriously. Now this might change with the upcoming domi which seems to be op, but I doubt much will change with the rest. Time will tell what works and what doesn't.

Next thing you are gonna nerf the nyx right? cause clearly it's op as well and people should fly Hels.

Is this also aplied to POS guns???

Oh btw, will you guys revamp it or not?