These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

A little scalability issue for Jita

Author
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#41 - 2013-01-23 19:20:38 UTC
No one is FORCING anyone to use Jita.

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?

Dave Stark
#42 - 2013-01-23 19:45:32 UTC
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
No one is FORCING anyone to use Jita.


irrelevant, it still shouldn't be an issue to use jita if you so choose.
Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#43 - 2013-01-23 20:23:41 UTC
You're talking, essentially, about the "bigger fleet" problem, OP. It's why they developed TiDi. You can't really fix it. If you tell the players they can have 1000 ships in a fight, they'll bring 2000. Tell them they can do 3000 and the players will bring 6000. If you up Jita to 5000 there'll be 10,000 alts trying to log in just to sit in Jita 4-4. There really isn't a solution until bandwidth and computer speed finally overtake the game. It's coming but there's not too much you can do about it now.

Signatures should be used responsibly...

Samroski
Middle-Earth
#44 - 2013-01-24 04:02:26 UTC
Gogela wrote:
there's not too much you can do about it now.

I don't believe that.

You get nowhere with this (defeatist) attitude. The world is changed by people who believe that they can do it- no matter what conventional wisdom says, and no matter what the odds.

Any colour you like.

Hir Miriel
Elves In Space
#45 - 2013-01-24 04:35:09 UTC
I understand the need for convenience and easy access.

But if Jita is upgraded then more people will use it because it's easier.

And then we find Jita starting to become laggy again, and so on.

And the surrounding hubs will see less use, much like supermarkets wipe out nearby competition.

For now I see it as part of the logistics problem that is supplying EVE and is reflected in the prices.

If more supplies can easily make it to Jita, then prices would tend to drop.

~ ~~ Thinking inside Schrodinger's sandbox. ~~ ~

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#46 - 2013-01-24 04:50:14 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Jita exists because it's the "min maxed best" place considering some dozens of different parameters and circumstances. If Jita did not exist another would born from the next best min maxed alternative.


I often wonder why Kusomonmon isn't the major trade hub, considering it's near-central hisec location, plentiful stations and location in the middle of the busiest pipe in hisec.

With any luck, the phenomenon that is Jita will sort itself out: if you increase the capacity of the Jita node, all that will happen is more people will squeeze into Jita until that node gets overloaded too.

CCP needs to approach this from the opposite direction: how low can they squeeze the population limit until Jita simply breaks. Reduce the throughput of star gates. Add volume/occupancy limits to space stations — "docking permission denied: Jita 4 Moon 4 Caldari Navy Assembly plant is full, please find another destination", add order limits to market processing systems in stations. Add market processors to POSes. Have broker fees scale as the market processor gets closer to saturation.

Jita is only as big as it is because everyone can go to Jita.
Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#47 - 2013-01-24 06:49:31 UTC
Samroski wrote:
Gogela wrote:
there's not too much you can do about it now.

I don't believe that.

You get nowhere with this (defeatist) attitude. The world is changed by people who believe that they can do it- no matter what conventional wisdom says, and no matter what the odds.

Try realist. You're like that guy in the park I walk by every day on my way to work, flapping his arms faster and faster with the intent of flying to the moon. I tell him "dude, your arms aren't built for flight and there's no atmosphere in space, so trying harder isn't going to be enough!"

What does he say to me?

"Dirk derk I'm a bird, and I'm sick of your defeatist attitude."

Fly safe, birdman. Fly safe.

Signatures should be used responsibly...

Xindi Kraid
Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries Ltd.
Arataka Research Consortium
#48 - 2013-01-24 08:25:18 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:


I often wonder why Kusomonmon isn't the major trade hub, considering it's near-central hisec location, plentiful stations and location in the middle of the busiest pipe in hisec.


I think it's because when Jita was first created, they gave its stations a fuckton of agents, so when yulai (the original super trade hub) was crippled by the dismantling of the superhighway, there were already a lot of mission bears in Jita selling their loot there, and the reason it was the caldari hub which became dominant was that most industry characters were made as Achura, since, at the time, Achura had the best attributes for most industry related activities.

Jita's size has given it enough inertia to keep going through all the various changes made to EvE
Gilbaron
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#49 - 2013-01-24 09:52:06 UTC
just log out everyone who is inactive for 20 minutes in jita

problem solved
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#50 - 2013-01-24 10:03:04 UTC
Zaknussem wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
When I have to bring in 20-30 freighters full of stuff it gets quite old to be stuck at the gate and spam warp for minutes.

Any idea?


Err... don't go to Jita during peak hours? Go there at a another time?


That's what I usually do.

But do you even have an idea at how many hours it takes to ferry in 20-30 *fleeted* freighters?
Even if I am quite well equipped (3 freighters + 1 JF, not so common for 1 player to have that) it still takes hours and hours to make them do the runs. You WILL end up overlapping prime time, expecially if you don't play Aussie times. Some had a fleet and this makes it even more of a chore to keep everybody of the fleet together.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#51 - 2013-01-24 10:04:43 UTC
Samroski wrote:
Gogela wrote:
there's not too much you can do about it now.

I don't believe that.

You get nowhere with this (defeatist) attitude. The world is changed by people who believe that they can do it- no matter what conventional wisdom says, and no matter what the odds.


Yeah. A lot of stuff is deemed impossible... until somebody without a clue but a big vision proves it is indeed possible. See the recent young French boy who had that new astronomy theory sorted.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#52 - 2013-01-24 10:18:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
Mara Rinn wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Jita exists because it's the "min maxed best" place considering some dozens of different parameters and circumstances. If Jita did not exist another would born from the next best min maxed alternative.


I often wonder why Kusomonmon isn't the major trade hub, considering it's near-central hisec location, plentiful stations and location in the middle of the busiest pipe in hisec.

With any luck, the phenomenon that is Jita will sort itself out: if you increase the capacity of the Jita node, all that will happen is more people will squeeze into Jita until that node gets overloaded too.

CCP needs to approach this from the opposite direction: how low can they squeeze the population limit until Jita simply breaks. Reduce the throughput of star gates. Add volume/occupancy limits to space stations — "docking permission denied: Jita 4 Moon 4 Caldari Navy Assembly plant is full, please find another destination", add order limits to market processing systems in stations. Add market processors to POSes. Have broker fees scale as the market processor gets closer to saturation.

Jita is only as big as it is because everyone can go to Jita.


Jita has a lot of tangential factors helping it be what it is. Being close to multiple regions (easy to cross check prices), close to low sec and much much more.

The one issue with Jita? Goods must go in there.

The brain-dead-easy solution that requires no servers upgrades?

We have remote trading skills already. We have remote research skills.
Just add a "listing" remote skill, so that goods placed within N systems off Jita are listed in Jita (not The Forge) market (one stop shop being one of the two factors that make Jita the preferred hub).

This would have the downside of having logistics in the teeth (the second factor that make Jita the preferred hub) because after buying 3 widgets you could have to go get them 1 in Perimeter, another 2 in another system.


Another solution: add a skill that lets people specify a target system for listing their goods. They will be able to take away stuff at their system. Effective at III+ (like some leadership skills are, not effective starting at I), adds one system radius per level . It's less sandboxy because it'd involve NPCs "magically" (a database query Blink) moving stuff deposited say in Perimeter or Urlen to Jita for you - at a price => ISK sink and we need ISK sinks. Of course Jita would see its item hangars removed or asking for an higher price than the above.

That's what I came up in 30 seconds, I am sure there are smarter and ingenous ways to tackle the issue.
Samroski
Middle-Earth
#53 - 2013-01-24 11:03:56 UTC
Part of the reason why Jita numbers are high is because of the gankers. Jita is not only about trade any more. I understand the need to think about alternative solutions, and no doubt there may be one perfect for the problem, though my perspective on this is still the same:

If people want to go there, then let them (just ensure that they can, and that there is no lag, no matter what the numbers).

Why make (and harp about) a sandbox game, and then put restrictions on activity?

Having said all that, I would not mind having another major trade hub (e.g. Kusomonmon as suggested above), just to avoid the pain of Jita :)

Any colour you like.

Myrissa Kistel
Planetary Logistics
#54 - 2013-01-24 14:22:39 UTC
Samroski wrote:

Having said all that, I would not mind having another major trade hub (e.g. Kusomonmon as suggested above), just to avoid the pain of Jita :)


Its called Amarr.
Shamus O'Reilly
Candy Cabal
#55 - 2013-01-24 14:27:18 UTC
Samroski wrote:
Part of the reason why Jita numbers are high is because of the gankers. Jita is not only about trade any more. I understand the need to think about alternative solutions, and no doubt there may be one perfect for the problem, though my perspective on this is still the same:

If people want to go there, then let them (just ensure that they can, and that there is no lag, no matter what the numbers).

Why make (and harp about) a sandbox game, and then put restrictions on activity?

Having said all that, I would not mind having another major trade hub (e.g. Kusomonmon as suggested above), just to avoid the pain of Jita :)

Then get a **** ton of players to create a trade hub there and spread the word around. no other way to do it

"I swear there are more people complaining over "nullsecers complaining" then actual nullsec people complaining."

Previous page123