These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Eve showcased at MoMA?

First post
Author
John DaiSho
One Risky Click
Snuffed Out
#41 - 2012-11-29 21:03:28 UTC
I visited a collection of the museum in Berlin yeeeeears ago, when being in school. There was a red steel thingy lying in front of a red metal radiator. A small sign at the wall told us that this "art" was called something with red steel or so, I dont remember right but it was an absolutely unexciting name. So my frinds and I sat down on the red steel thingy, looking at the radiator and wondering why that should be art. And the bench we were sitting on was really cold, no pillows or anything!

Didnt take long until a watchman came over and wanted to throw us out, fortunately we could explain our behavior and he took it with a smile :)

Another "art" thingy was a frontwheel of a bicycle mounted on a wooden stool.

Buuuuuut, even if I dont really know what modern art is, EvE is beautiful.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#42 - 2012-11-29 21:12:31 UTC
John DaiSho wrote:
I visited a collection of the museum in Berlin yeeeeears ago, when being in school. There was a red steel thingy lying in front of a red metal radiator. A small sign at the wall told us that this "art" was called something with red steel or so, I dont remember right but it was an absolutely unexciting name. So my frinds and I sat down on the red steel thingy, looking at the radiator and wondering why that should be art. And the bench we were sitting on was really cold, no pillows or anything!

Didnt take long until a watchman came over and wanted to throw us out, fortunately we could explain our behavior and he took it with a smile :)

Another "art" thingy was a frontwheel of a bicycle mounted on a wooden stool.

Buuuuuut, even if I dont really know what modern art is, EvE is beautiful.


That would be this: http://www.moma.org/collection/object.php?object_id=81631

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#43 - 2012-11-29 22:05:33 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
I thnk it's a safe bet to say that MoMA picked EVE based on the ability of players to interact with each other, and less so on it's aesthetics.

Not only does it garner CCP and the game national news coverage, it gets them into the Museum of Modern Art.

Why do people play this game again?



Most modern art is hack work. Nice to see EVE in a museum, but christ did it have to be MoMA?
******* cameras.



Whether youlike it or not, New York's MoMA is considered the cream of the crop Internationally.


So?

Just because people pay millions for a Van Goth doesn't mean the dude knew how to paint, or Pollock for that matter.

I can tell you're one of those people that thinks "anything can be art". I'd like to say as someone with real talent that that is a bunch of bullshit.

Monet, who you obviously know as being the "modern" artist of his time, is rolling in his grave. Yes, I'm one of those people that beleives that actual talent is needed to make art, and that art post 1950's (Modern art) isn't art. I don't care if it looks pretty hanging voer your TV becuse it matches your carpet and drapes.

It's not "Art" when everyone can do it. EVE is art, as are many other games, but they belong in a real museum, not MoMA. MoMA is were you go when you want to see what people do in the absense of talent and dignity.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#44 - 2012-11-29 22:38:51 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
I thnk it's a safe bet to say that MoMA picked EVE based on the ability of players to interact with each other, and less so on it's aesthetics.

Not only does it garner CCP and the game national news coverage, it gets them into the Museum of Modern Art.

Why do people play this game again?



Most modern art is hack work. Nice to see EVE in a museum, but christ did it have to be MoMA?
******* cameras.



Whether youlike it or not, New York's MoMA is considered the cream of the crop Internationally.


So?

Just because people pay millions for a Van Goth doesn't mean the dude knew how to paint, or Pollock for that matter.

I can tell you're one of those people that thinks "anything can be art". I'd like to say as someone with real talent that that is a bunch of bullshit.

Monet, who you obviously know as being the "modern" artist of his time, is rolling in his grave. Yes, I'm one of those people that beleives that actual talent is needed to make art, and that art post 1950's (Modern art) isn't art. I don't care if it looks pretty hanging voer your TV becuse it matches your carpet and drapes.

It's not "Art" when everyone can do it. EVE is art, as are many other games, but they belong in a real museum, not MoMA. MoMA is were you go when you want to see what people do in the absense of talent and dignity.



Keep Troll-Attempting with your narrow minded view.

A narrow minded artist, imagine that.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#45 - 2012-11-29 22:47:32 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
I thnk it's a safe bet to say that MoMA picked EVE based on the ability of players to interact with each other, and less so on it's aesthetics.

Not only does it garner CCP and the game national news coverage, it gets them into the Museum of Modern Art.

Why do people play this game again?



Most modern art is hack work. Nice to see EVE in a museum, but christ did it have to be MoMA?
******* cameras.



Whether youlike it or not, New York's MoMA is considered the cream of the crop Internationally.


So?

Just because people pay millions for a Van Goth doesn't mean the dude knew how to paint, or Pollock for that matter.

I can tell you're one of those people that thinks "anything can be art". I'd like to say as someone with real talent that that is a bunch of bullshit.

Monet, who you obviously know as being the "modern" artist of his time, is rolling in his grave. Yes, I'm one of those people that beleives that actual talent is needed to make art, and that art post 1950's (Modern art) isn't art. I don't care if it looks pretty hanging voer your TV becuse it matches your carpet and drapes.

It's not "Art" when everyone can do it. EVE is art, as are many other games, but they belong in a real museum, not MoMA. MoMA is were you go when you want to see what people do in the absense of talent and dignity.



Keep Troll-Attempting with your narrow minded view.

A narrow minded artist, imagine that.

I consider EVE mondern art, a lot of other games as well.

Having taste and sensebility doesn't make me narrow minded. It just means that the stuff my nephews draw for me are cute, but they aren't "Art".

EVE offers something worthwhile that doesn't require anyone to interpurt or have meaning beyond the capacity of the viewer to understand because it's hidden as a "white on white" painting, you know, real art.
Esrevid Nekkeg
Justified and Ancient
#46 - 2012-11-30 09:44:55 UTC
The discussion about what is art, is almost as old as art itself. So it's rather pointless to continue that discussion here, as we will never reach a consensus. Just like IRL the art professionals never have reached a consensus on that matter.

That being said, it makes me proud to fly around in what one of the most influential and important museums in the world constitutes as art.
And I congratulate and thank the artists (yes you are!) that have made that possible!

Now I'm just going to undock to scratch some paint and vandalise...eh...alter a work of art....Twisted

Here I used to have a sig of our old Camper in space. Now it is disregarded as being the wrong format. Looking out the window I see one thing: Nothing wrong with the format of our Camper! Silly CCP......

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#47 - 2012-11-30 12:11:12 UTC
Esrevid Nekkeg wrote:
The discussion about what is art, is almost as old as art itself. So it's rather pointless to continue that discussion here, as we will never reach a consensus. Just like IRL the art professionals never have reached a consensus on that matter.

That being said, it makes me proud to fly around in what one of the most influential and important museums in the world constitutes as art.
And I congratulate and thank the artists (yes you are!) that have made that possible!

Now I'm just going to undock to scratch some paint and vandalise...eh...alter a work of art....Twisted



I know. He even kept on at it vehemently after I typed "to each his own".

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#48 - 2012-11-30 12:24:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Natsett Amuinn
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Esrevid Nekkeg wrote:
The discussion about what is art, is almost as old as art itself. So it's rather pointless to continue that discussion here, as we will never reach a consensus. Just like IRL the art professionals never have reached a consensus on that matter.

That being said, it makes me proud to fly around in what one of the most influential and important museums in the world constitutes as art.
And I congratulate and thank the artists (yes you are!) that have made that possible!

Now I'm just going to undock to scratch some paint and vandalise...eh...alter a work of art....Twisted



I know. He even kept on at it vehemently after I typed "to each his own".

Almost like I have my own opinion.

Or maybe instead of being in school for art, art is actually my life. This is what will define my life after I'm dead.

Edit: That and I genuinely dispice "modern" art. Praising modern art is like praising someone with a genetic disorder as being evolved.

I suppose you were taught that pollock was inovative and talented as well, even though he wasn't the first to do "action" art, and all it is dripping paint on canvas; which is usuallyt he very first thing that happens when someone picks up a paintbrush for the very first time. When they're like 4.

Or maybe it's just your high and might attitude as you through out things like cubism and minimalism, something most people here will have no idea WTF you're even talking about.
pussnheels
Viziam
#49 - 2012-11-30 12:25:35 UTC
I always knew EvE online was a piece of fine art
well done toCCP s artistic team for that

I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire

Herr Hammer Draken
#50 - 2012-11-30 12:43:03 UTC
So I am trying to figure out why Pac Man was selected to be in the museum of modern art?

Are they looking at the art work in the game or do they consider the game play as part of the art?

Either way I do not see Pac Man as being a fit example of modern art.

Its only a few steps above pong. With 16 colors.

Herr Hammer Draken "The Amarr Prophet"

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#51 - 2012-11-30 12:43:46 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Esrevid Nekkeg wrote:
The discussion about what is art, is almost as old as art itself. So it's rather pointless to continue that discussion here, as we will never reach a consensus. Just like IRL the art professionals never have reached a consensus on that matter.

That being said, it makes me proud to fly around in what one of the most influential and important museums in the world constitutes as art.
And I congratulate and thank the artists (yes you are!) that have made that possible!

Now I'm just going to undock to scratch some paint and vandalise...eh...alter a work of art....Twisted



I know. He even kept on at it vehemently after I typed "to each his own".

Almost like I have my own opinion.

Or maybe instead of being in school for art, art is actually my life. This is what will define my life after I'm dead.

Edit: That and I genuinely dispice "modern" art. Praising modern art is like praising someone with a genetic disorder as being evolved.

I suppose you were taught that pollock was inovative and talented as well, even though he wasn't the first to do "action" art, and all it is dripping paint on canvas; which is usuallyt he very first thing that happens when someone picks up a paintbrush for the very first time. When they're like 4.

Or maybe it's just your high and might attitude as you through out things like cubism and minimalism, something most people here will have no idea WTF you're even talking about.


Wow. You just do not stop do you.

To dismiss all modern art as trash is ignorant.

Like anything else, be it literature or Internet games, 95% of it is BS.

It's a matter of finding the 5% that is the true gems. I cannot stand country and western music in general. Hate it, but I can list 5 artists who I really like and will listen to, so I cannot say all C & W is trash.

You are the one with the sadly closed mind....AND there are libraries full of critical opinions that negate yours utterly.

Even my (RIP) Father, who HATED 'modern art' went into shock when he walked into the Rothko Chapel, and actually 'got' his work. Even he had to recant.

But go ahead and live in your own mental cave.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#52 - 2012-11-30 12:46:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Krixtal Icefluxor
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:
So I am trying to figure out why Pac Man was selected to be in the museum of modern art?

Are they looking at the art work in the game or do they consider the game play as part of the art?

Either way I do not see Pac Man as being a fit example of modern art.

Its only a few steps above pong. With 16 colors.



It is brilliant in it's simplicity while actually being quite complex at heart. Easy to learn quickly just by simple observation. The mazes themselves have a rather elegant design, of variable patterns.

First of it's kind.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#53 - 2012-11-30 13:42:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Natsett Amuinn
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:

Wow. You just do not stop do you.

To dismiss all modern art as trash is ignorant.

Like anything else, be it literature or Internet games, 95% of it is BS.

It's a matter of finding the 5% that is the true gems. I cannot stand country and western music in general. Hate it, but I can list 5 artists who I really like and will listen to, so I cannot say all C & W is trash.

You are the one with the sadly closed mind....AND there are libraries full of critical opinions that negate yours utterly.

Even my (RIP) Father, who HATED 'modern art' went into shock when he walked into the Rothko Chapel, and actually 'got' his work. Even he had to recant.

But go ahead and live in your own mental cave.

No, I don't quit.

Would you expect someone that builds custom motorcycles to "just quit" a discussion about custom motorcycles? I wouldn't.

I'm not just some dude that "likes to draw".

And in typcal internet fashion, you failed to read.
I said MOST modern art is crap, a hack job. There's very little "good" modern art, such that it's actually art, or involved some level of real talent. Most of the time it's the equivilant of a really bad novel that requires the artist to explain the plot for anyone to remotely grasp it; that someone group of people decided was worthy of displaying in a museum and calling "Art", when it is not. Which may be why MoMA isn't taken seriously by a lot of artists, and why it's NOT the pinacle of "Art" today.

EVE is worthy of far more then MoMA. It doesn't belong in a musuem that considers a 3inch piece of rope tacked to a wall "Art", or balck canvas "Art", or splattering paint randomly on canvas "Art".

But what can be expected when the people who decide what art is tend to be the collectors and displayers of art, and not the artists themselves; as it's always been. It's no different then Monet being repeatedly turned away from the Salon, because they didn't think impressionism was "Art, and therefore not worthy. Today it just happens to be the arguement of whether or not literal crap is considered art.

PS: And if you think I'm bad here, imagine what it's like to be the person with me when I start screaming and strorming out of a modern art museum, infuriated by the idiocy I witnessed.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#54 - 2012-11-30 14:03:33 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:

Wow. You just do not stop do you.

To dismiss all modern art as trash is ignorant.

Like anything else, be it literature or Internet games, 95% of it is BS.

It's a matter of finding the 5% that is the true gems. I cannot stand country and western music in general. Hate it, but I can list 5 artists who I really like and will listen to, so I cannot say all C & W is trash.

You are the one with the sadly closed mind....AND there are libraries full of critical opinions that negate yours utterly.

Even my (RIP) Father, who HATED 'modern art' went into shock when he walked into the Rothko Chapel, and actually 'got' his work. Even he had to recant.

But go ahead and live in your own mental cave.

No, I don't quit.

Would you expect someone that builds custom motorcycles to "just quit" a discussion about custom motorcycles? I wouldn't.

I'm not just some dude that "likes to draw".

And in typcal internet fashion, you failed to read.
I said MOST modern art is crap, a hack job. There's very little "good" modern art, such that it's actually art, or involved some level of real talent. Most of the time it's the equivilant of a really bad novel that requires the artist to explain the plot for anyone to remotely grasp it; that someone group of people decided was worthy of displaying in a museum and calling "Art", when it is not. Which may be why MoMA isn't taken seriously by a lot of artists, and why it's NOT the pinacle of "Art" today.

EVE is worthy of far more then MoMA. It doesn't belong in a musuem that considers a 3inch piece of rope tacked to a wall "Art", or balck canvas "Art", or splattering paint randomly on canvas "Art".

But what can be expected when the people who decide what art is tend to be the collectors and displayers of art, and not the artists themselves; as it's always been. It's no different then Monet being repeatedly turned away from the Salon, because they didn't think impressionism was "Art, and therefore not worthy. Today it just happens to be the arguement of whether or not literal crap is considered art.

PS: And if you think I'm bad here, imagine what it's like to be the person with me when I start screaming and strorming out of a modern art museum, infuriated by the idiocy I witnessed.



It's such a subjective area of thought that your passion makes all your posts suspect.

edit: corrected a typo

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#55 - 2012-11-30 14:15:01 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:


It's such a subjective area of thought that your passion makes all your posts suspect.

edit: corrected a typo

I know.

It's that passion that keeps me from feeling that it's subjective. Trash is trash. No matter how much fabreeze I spray on my trash, no matter how much like a rose it looks, it's still trash.

And MoMA is a landfill. EVE deserves better than a landfill.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#56 - 2012-11-30 14:16:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Krixtal Icefluxor
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:


It's such a subjective area of thought that your passion makes all your posts suspect.

edit: corrected a typo

I know.

It's that passion that keeps me from feeling that it's subjective. Trash is trash. No matter how much fabreeze I spray on my trash, no matter how much like a rose it looks, it's still trash.

And MoMA is a landfill. EVE deserves better than a landfill.


History and critical thinking place you in an extrememly small minority. To each his own trolling I guess.

My God. EVE actually gets recognized by the critical art community and the trolls STILL can't leave it alone. Disgusting.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#57 - 2012-11-30 14:35:05 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:


History and critical thinking place you in an extrememly small minority. To each his own trolling I guess.

My God. EVE actually gets recognized by the critical art community and the trolls STILL can't leave it alone. Disgusting.

I think it's great they're getting recognized, just sucks it's gotta be MoMA that's doign the recognition.

And no, I'm not the minority. I don't care how many proffesors tell you that "modern art" is the pinacle of art today.

Like I said, history has demonstrated that "what is art" has rarely ever been decided by the people that actually make the art; it's decided by collecters and exhibitors, and something most artists have always been a bit at odds with.

In fact, artist throughout history, sinse the rise of the art musuem have traditionally been at odds with museums in general. Generally it's not enjoyable to have to gain the exceptance of even your peers, it's another when you're practically required to gain the acceptance of people who aren't your peers.

When you get done art school, and if you decide that you want to do traditional art, you'll eventually end up just like me. You tend to reach this point when you get to know intimately that what people think of as "art" is usually not decided by the artists or the art itsetlf, but "someone" else.


Why do you think history is full of so many bitter, alchoholic, and drug addicted artists. Something makes us this way.
MoMA is a pretty good example of one of those things.



On a serious note. I'd love to hear what CCP's artists think about this.
CCP Eterne
C C P
C C P Alliance
#58 - 2012-11-30 16:24:08 UTC
I've seen a few posts from this reported, though I don't deem them to be breaking any rules. I'll just say that while the definition of "art" is a valid subject for discussion, this is not the place for it. So please cease and desist, or I'll start removing posts.

EVE Online/DUST 514 Community Representative ※ EVE Illuminati ※ Fiction Adept

@CCP_Eterne ※ @EVE_LiveEvents

Doddy
Excidium.
#59 - 2012-11-30 16:32:22 UTC
Luke Visteen wrote:
Chribba wrote:
I for one am happy I got the original case with manual and all that.

/c


how thick is the manual ? it covers only game installation and subscription setup or also game mechanics ?


Hell it even covers stuff they are only just getting in. Get this, there is a bounty hunter profession!.

For real quite alot of the manual is about picking your character blood lines etc and how that effects you, all of which is superfluous now. As is much of the mechanics that have changed, and the ship selection has rather improved :).
Doddy
Excidium.
#60 - 2012-11-30 16:39:11 UTC
Also this list is missing pretty much all of the great artistic games, so it doesn't really do eve any favours.