These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Support from Concord needed.
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Red Frog Rufen
Red Frog Freight
Red-Frog
#1 - 2012-11-23 01:03:09 UTC
To: Concord.
From: Red Frog Freight and fellow freighters pilots.
Subject: Assistance needed.

To who it may concern.

As you may be aware, criminal activities are on the rise, particularly in 2 systems, which are Niarja and Uedama.

We are asking you today to revise your security over in those 2 neuralgic systems. You seem to struggle keeping the pirate at bay.

We know it might only move the problems, but as those 2 systems are inevitable if you want to go from Caldari Space to Minmatar, Amarr and Gallente Space, we would feel safer if there was a revision of the security status of those 2 solar system and the one nearby.

Thank you for your consideration.

Red Frog Freight.

Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#2 - 2012-11-23 01:17:00 UTC
o_O i dnt even....troll? hmm

ill wait to see what someone else does and jump on the band wagon...

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs
Red Frog Rufen
Red Frog Freight
Red-Frog
#3 - 2012-11-23 01:33:19 UTC
Well, I sent my message to the proper authority. :)

IRL, when a sector become problematic, they send more patrol. so the street gang just move somewhere else.

I just want to see if this can be applied here. I never saw any official request to change the security status of those system, so why not?
Danika Princip
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#4 - 2012-11-23 01:36:33 UTC
Obviously, both systems should be changed.

Into lowsec.
Red Frog Rufen
Red Frog Freight
Red-Frog
#5 - 2012-11-23 01:38:43 UTC
Danika Princip wrote:
Obviously, both systems should be changed.

Into lowsec.


our black frog division would love that! we could charge 200m per jump instead!

but I do not think this is the way CCP want to go..
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#6 - 2012-11-23 02:11:18 UTC
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#7 - 2012-11-23 02:17:21 UTC
Red Frog Rufen wrote:
Well, I sent my message to the proper authority. :)

IRL, when a sector become problematic, they send more patrol. so the street gang just move somewhere else.

I just want to see if this can be applied here. I never saw any official request to change the security status of those system, so why not?


is that what they did in vietnam and iraq?? cause i thought it went more like 'holy ****. time to GTFO!!'

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs
Red Frog Rufen
Red Frog Freight
Red-Frog
#8 - 2012-11-23 02:33:47 UTC
Daichi Yamato wrote:
Red Frog Rufen wrote:
Well, I sent my message to the proper authority. :)

IRL, when a sector become problematic, they send more patrol. so the street gang just move somewhere else.

I just want to see if this can be applied here. I never saw any official request to change the security status of those system, so why not?


is that what they did in vietnam and iraq?? cause i thought it went more like 'holy ****. time to GTFO!!'


IRAQ and Vietnam would be more like low/null sec.

we're talking High-sec here.
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#9 - 2012-11-24 01:59:55 UTC
why?

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs
Jin alPatar
Entertainment 7wenty
The Burning Contingent Alliance
#10 - 2012-11-24 02:38:55 UTC
Red Frog Rufen wrote:
To: Concord.
From: Red Frog Freight and fellow freighters pilots.
Subject: Assistance needed.

To who it may concern.

As you may be aware, criminal activities are on the rise, particularly in 2 systems, which are Niarja and Uedama.

We are asking you today to revise your security over in those 2 neuralgic systems. You seem to struggle keeping the pirate at bay.

We know it might only move the problems, but as those 2 systems are inevitable if you want to go from Caldari Space to Minmatar, Amarr and Gallente Space, we would feel safer if there was a revision of the security status of those 2 solar system and the one nearby.

Thank you for your consideration.

Red Frog Freight.




Even the Romans knew that success of the empire depended on the safety of the roads.

+1
Red Frog Rufen
Red Frog Freight
Red-Frog
#11 - 2012-11-24 04:37:17 UTC
Daichi Yamato wrote:
why?


why not?

isn't it worth a shot? :)
Paikis
Vapour Holdings
#12 - 2012-11-24 05:02:31 UTC
Not supported. There should always be a hazard to shipping.
Red Frog Rufen
Red Frog Freight
Red-Frog
#13 - 2012-11-24 05:17:07 UTC
Paikis wrote:
Not supported. There should always be a hazard to shipping.


this wouldn't remove every 0.5 system out there.

and even then, Burn Jita prooved that you can take even a JF down in a 1.0

it just take more pilots.
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#14 - 2012-11-24 10:21:29 UTC
no, why is vietnam and iraq like low or null?

they were small skirmishes and guerrilla tactics...just like high sec

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#15 - 2012-11-24 13:19:04 UTC
Red Frog Rufen wrote:
Daichi Yamato wrote:
why?
why not?
That is not a reason.

Quote:
isn't it worth a shot? :)
Not without a good reason, no.

So: why?
Val'Dore
PlanetCorp InterStellar
#16 - 2012-11-24 13:58:42 UTC
They are extremely unwilling to change a system's sec status.

Star Jump Drive A new way to traverse the galaxy.

I invented Tiericide
Jackal Datapaw
Doomheim
#17 - 2012-11-24 15:12:03 UTC
Red Frog Rufen wrote:
Danika Princip wrote:
Obviously, both systems should be changed.

Into lowsec.


our black frog division would love that! we could charge 200m per jump instead!

but I do not think this is the way CCP want to go..



hmm good way to put yourself out of business, I think the jump freighter for us charges us based on the amount of M3 we wish to transport, and it under a thousand per m3

200m per jump, they would just laugh in your face and tell you to gtfo. I'm a blockade runner, which I have to take a 71 jump trip through low AND null sec and I wouldn't even charge that much lol.

commonly suggest cloaking and local ideas

Red Frog Rufen
Red Frog Freight
Red-Frog
#18 - 2012-11-24 16:31:03 UTC
Jackal Datapaw wrote:
Red Frog Rufen wrote:
Danika Princip wrote:
Obviously, both systems should be changed.

Into lowsec.


our black frog division would love that! we could charge 200m per jump instead!

but I do not think this is the way CCP want to go..



hmm good way to put yourself out of business, I think the jump freighter for us charges us based on the amount of M3 we wish to transport, and it under a thousand per m3

200m per jump, they would just laugh in your face and tell you to gtfo. I'm a blockade runner, which I have to take a 71 jump trip through low AND null sec and I wouldn't even charge that much lol.



well, Black Frog always charged per jump, we they are doing 1000 contracts per months, so. (and they charges per jump, not gate, not contracts.)

and i'm not sure how your JF pilot can charge by M3. a BPO from outer ring is 0.1 M3, can worth a lot of money, and consum the same fuel that if you use all your cargo space...

imagine if, like the quote says, there would be no more high-sec route between the 4 empires.
Red Frog Rufen
Red Frog Freight
Red-Frog
#19 - 2012-11-24 16:32:41 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Red Frog Rufen wrote:
Daichi Yamato wrote:
why?
why not?
That is not a reason.

Quote:
isn't it worth a shot? :)
Not without a good reason, no.

So: why?


Ok, re-read my first post then, it's explained pretty well I think.

anyway, this post was more of a shot in the dark then anything else! :) I'm pretty sure the format made some people smile. :P
Mag's
Azn Empire
#20 - 2012-11-24 16:46:10 UTC
I think you'll find Concord already work in that area. They only punish though, so the actual aggressive act has to take place first.

Hope this helps.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
123Next pageLast page