These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Pulling the Plug on WiS

First post First post First post
Author
Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
Goonswarm Federation
#101 - 2012-11-23 10:00:10 UTC
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:
I can only hope WiS gets axed forever.

FPS style play has no place in space simulation combat game.

If you want FPS play, then play dust that is what it is for.



Well it could have been a really interesting link to Dust players to be honest. I personally do not have the CQ - environment activated as it is pointless to stare at the exit door...
Probably WIS just is beyond the server capabilities....one solution may have been to instance the station environment on special servers (I really hate to bring the WoW excample here but I have to). I am sure they looked at all possibilities abd found that the technical possibilities are just not given at the moment....(Time dilataion in a station environment REALLY would suck ...).

I think the effort may be made if and once DUST performs well.

TunDraGon is recruiting! "Also, your boobs [:o] "   CCP Eterne, 2012 "When in doubt...make a diȼk joke." Robin Williams - RIP

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#102 - 2012-11-23 10:01:13 UTC
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:
I can only hope WiS gets axed forever.

FPS style play has no place in space simulation combat game.

If you want FPS play, then play dust that is what it is for.




WiS isn't "FPS", it's a 3rd-person avatar engine.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Herr Hammer Draken
#103 - 2012-11-23 10:13:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Herr Hammer Draken
Malcanis wrote:
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:
I can only hope WiS gets axed forever.

FPS style play has no place in space simulation combat game.

If you want FPS play, then play dust that is what it is for.




WiS isn't "FPS", it's a 3rd-person avatar engine.


That is where you are so wrong. The very next thing for WiS is to give players guns to shoot at each other in stations.

That is what ships are for in eve. Why do we encourage WiS players? What good can it add to eve?
What roll can it play? All it does is eat system resources that are needed already elsewhere.

WiS adds nothing to the economic model of eve. It adds nothing to PvP unless you add guns and that is what dust is for.
It is only a distraction to the game. Hey already we have so many threads about nerf high sec because the PvP players want more targets. If you add WiS to eve a whole lot more players will become unavailable for PvP because they will be WiS!
WTF! It is so backwards to what eve is about.

The whole idea of WiS is detrimental to eve game play. It eats sytem resources, it occupies players that should be elsewhere, it occupies CCP employees that should be doing eve programing fixes instead.

Herr Hammer Draken "The Amarr Prophet"

Vilnius Zar
SDC Multi Ten
#104 - 2012-11-23 10:29:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Vilnius Zar
CCP, pay no attention to the above poster other than to point and laugh at him.

Here's the deal:

Yes, EVE IS a pewpew in spaceships game and its focus needs to remain that way (and stay as "harsh" as possible) but expanding on the whole setting, giving us more stuff to do ensures the longevity of the game and makes it more... colourful. I never was a fan of it as such but it DOES add to the game when done right.

What CCP has to realise is that when we raged at Incarna in CCP's darkest hour we weren't really raging at Incarna itself but rather at the :18 months:, the state of the game as it was and an overall lack of :excellence:. We LIKE the idea of incarna as long as it doesn't happen at the expensive of core gameplay. So please DO keep WiS on your todo list, even if it's a long term project, it'll ensure we stay interested in the game because we can "clown around" doing different stuff.

EVE is in a better state than ever and with the rebalancing, UI changes etc around the corner. Once you complete it and had a look at SOV/POS stuff you can take the pressure off a bit and focus elsewhere, let that be WiS.
Herr Hammer Draken
#105 - 2012-11-23 10:38:43 UTC
Vilnius Zar wrote:
CCP, pay no attention to the above poster other than to point and laugh at him.

Here's the deal:

Yes, EVE IS a pewpew in spaceships game and its focus needs to remain that way (and stay as "harsh" as possible) but expanding on the whole setting, giving us more stuff to do ensures the longevity of the game and makes it more... colourful. I never was a fan of it as such but it DOES add to the game when done right.

What CCP has to realise is that when we raged at Incarna in CCP's darkest hour we weren't really raging at Incarna itself but rather at the :18 months:, the state of the game as it was and the lack of focus you guys had on core EVE gameplay. We LIKE the idea of incarna as long as it doesn't happen at the expensive of said core gameplay. So please DO keep WiS on your todo list, even if it's a long term project, it'll ensure we stay interested in the game because we can "clown around" doing different stuff.

EVE is in a better state than ever and with the rebalancing, UI changes etc around the corner. Once you complete it and had a look at SOV/POS stuff you can take the pressure off a bit and focus elsewhere, let that be WiS.



IMHO you are just looking for something else to do while you are station camped. What a waste for CCP to add WiS to eve.
I can see all of the nerf WiS threads already. The complaints against it will be epic if it ever gets done.

Herr Hammer Draken "The Amarr Prophet"

Vilnius Zar
SDC Multi Ten
#106 - 2012-11-23 10:51:57 UTC
I don't GET station camped, so yet another nonsense post by you it seems.
Herr Hammer Draken
#107 - 2012-11-23 11:01:45 UTC
Vilnius Zar wrote:
I don't GET station camped, so yet another nonsense post by you it seems.


Does not matter if you do not, a whole lot of people do get station camped and they will be laughing at the campers in local while hanging out in WiS environment. And that will lead to an epic backlash to nerf WiS on the forums.

Herr Hammer Draken "The Amarr Prophet"

Arduemont
Rotten Legion
#108 - 2012-11-23 12:16:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Arduemont
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:
Vilnius Zar wrote:
I don't GET station camped, so yet another nonsense post by you it seems.


Does not matter if you do not, a whole lot of people do get station camped and they will be laughing at the campers in local while hanging out in WiS environment. And that will lead to an epic backlash to nerf WiS on the forums.



Your an idiot. People already do that. It's called alt tab.

Also, their plan for exploration WiS wouldn't change what your saying, because it would only be in WH space and only in anomalies that are scanned down. If anything it gives you more opportunity to station camp, not less. Plus, someone could just steal their ship whilst they're in there.. No need to camp. Just turn up and take their **** if you want.

"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." www.stateofwar.co.nf

Herr Hammer Draken
#109 - 2012-11-23 12:57:58 UTC
Arduemont wrote:
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:
Vilnius Zar wrote:
I don't GET station camped, so yet another nonsense post by you it seems.


Does not matter if you do not, a whole lot of people do get station camped and they will be laughing at the campers in local while hanging out in WiS environment. And that will lead to an epic backlash to nerf WiS on the forums.



Your an idiot. People already do that. It's called alt tab.

Also, their plan for exploration WiS wouldn't change what your saying, because it would only be in WH space and only in anomalies that are scanned down. If anything it gives you more opportunity to station camp, not less. Plus, someone could just steal their ship whilst they're in there.. No need to camp. Just turn up and take their **** if you want.


If you want to play with dolls I have a ton of my kids barbie dolls to sell to you.

Herr Hammer Draken "The Amarr Prophet"

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#110 - 2012-11-23 13:13:33 UTC
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:
I can only hope WiS gets axed forever.

FPS style play has no place in space simulation combat game.

If you want FPS play, then play dust that is what it is for.




WiS isn't "FPS", it's a 3rd-person avatar engine.


That is where you are so wrong. The very next thing for WiS is to give players guns to shoot at each other in stations..


You don't actually know what "FPS" means, do you? It's OK to admit this.

Why don't you look up "first person" and familiarise yourself with the meaning, then we'll continue.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Herr Hammer Draken
#111 - 2012-11-23 13:29:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Herr Hammer Draken
Malcanis wrote:
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:
I can only hope WiS gets axed forever.

FPS style play has no place in space simulation combat game.

If you want FPS play, then play dust that is what it is for.




WiS isn't "FPS", it's a 3rd-person avatar engine.


That is where you are so wrong. The very next thing for WiS is to give players guns to shoot at each other in stations..


You don't actually know what "FPS" means, do you? It's OK to admit this.

Why don't you look up "first person" and familiarise yourself with the meaning, then we'll continue.


You sound like a reasonable person. So what is the reason to add WiS to eve? Why spend game resources on it? What will it add to the game that is themattic to eve? Give me a good reason other than I want it.

No reason listed in this thread is worth it. All I see are several good reasons to not add WiS to eve.

Herr Hammer Draken "The Amarr Prophet"

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#112 - 2012-11-23 13:52:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:
No reason listed in this thread is worth it. All I see are several good reasons to not add WiS to eve.


then you're a closed-minded luddite and an idiot.

EVE is not a spaceships game, it's a science-fiction game that for the time being happens to be almost exclusively confined to the arena of spaceships. There are a lot of people (myself included) who want to see the face-to-face interaction side of things expand, see new markets to exploit.

I want to own a casino where I trade black-market boosters, weapons and modules in the VIP lounge over drinks. I want to be able to sneak aboard enemy POS structures and plant a bomb that'll go off when it tries to go into Reinforced mode or when somebody starts to build a supercapital. I want to raid incursion sites with a strike team to steal high-tech Sansha goodies so I can reverse-engineer them. I want to walk into my agent's office and throw those damn Quafe bottles in his face.

And frak you if you think your narrow-mindedness and lack of vision is a good enough reason to deprive other players of the features they want.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#113 - 2012-11-23 14:34:54 UTC
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:
I can only hope WiS gets axed forever.

FPS style play has no place in space simulation combat game.

If you want FPS play, then play dust that is what it is for.




WiS isn't "FPS", it's a 3rd-person avatar engine.


That is where you are so wrong. The very next thing for WiS is to give players guns to shoot at each other in stations..


You don't actually know what "FPS" means, do you? It's OK to admit this.

Why don't you look up "first person" and familiarise yourself with the meaning, then we'll continue.


You sound like a reasonable person. So what is the reason to add WiS to eve? Why spend game resources on it? What will it add to the game that is themattic to eve? Give me a good reason other than I want it.

No reason listed in this thread is worth it. All I see are several good reasons to not add WiS to eve.


With pleasure.

After nearly 10 years, EVE has a fantastic number of ships and game mechanics. Not only have most of the "obvious" niches been filled, making it creatively much more difficult to think of new things to do, it is also developmentally more expensive too - whatever new ship, module or game mechanic is proposed, it must be very slowly and carefully developed to make sure it won't break anything that already exists in game. In mathematical terms, it's an NP! type problem, and EVE's "P" is getting really large now.

WiS literally offers an end run (OK, walk) around this problem. It's wide open because there's currently nothing to do in it. It is therefore a huge opportunity for CCP to score lots of "easy wins" in developing new things for us to do that won't interfere with the code of existing things, and won't obselete of the things that we do in ships. Additionally, they could use their experience to avoid some of the design mistakes that have plagued EVE over the years.

And finally, since CCP have already invested a huge amount of resources on the Carbon engine, i think it'd be nice if we actually saw some return on that. The :18 months: was bad enough. To end up with getting nothing from it would be worse. It's ridiculous to say that there's no gameplay possibilities for WiS - there are hundreds of avatar based games out there and thousands of good ideas CCP could easily lift and adapt into EVE.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Asuka Solo
I N E X T R E M I S
Tactical Narcotics Team
#114 - 2012-11-23 14:42:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Asuka Solo
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:

You sound like a reasonable person. So what is the reason to add WiS to eve? Why spend game resources on it? What will it add to the game that is themattic to eve? Give me a good reason other than I want it.


Lets see... the ability for me to dock up when your too chicken **** to undock with your 6 month old npc alt... find your CQ, gank your good for nothing big mouth clone while your ship spinning and moaning about avatar gameplay, steal your stuff and watch you emo rage on the forums over legitimate tactics when you realize you got schooled with WiS....

Yea. Sounds about right.

Eve is about Capital ships, WiS, Boobs, PI and Isk!

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
#115 - 2012-11-23 15:02:46 UTC
Beside in this interview David Reid from CCP:


Quote:
“Your DUST marine can walk into a station and meet an EVE avatar, and rather than negotiate a contract over text chat, you could do it ‘virtually in person.’”

This also includes the addition of “space elevators,” which will allow players to travel to the DUST 514 battleground or onto an EVE space station, when playing either title.

Such links between the two games won’t occur until DUST 514′s open beta, which is scheduled for sometime in early 2013.



While, i think David Reid is a marketting guy in CCP. And in IT related companies marketting guys often has, how to say, a different point of view in respect of developers...


But jsut to see the possible general idea.
Jame Jarl Retief
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#116 - 2012-11-23 15:22:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Jame Jarl Retief
Sura Sadiva wrote:
Beside in this interview David Reid from CCP:


Quote:
“Your DUST marine can walk into a station and meet an EVE avatar, and rather than negotiate a contract over text chat, you could do it ‘virtually in person.’”

This also includes the addition of “space elevators,” which will allow players to travel to the DUST 514 battleground or onto an EVE space station, when playing either title.

Such links between the two games won’t occur until DUST 514′s open beta, which is scheduled for sometime in early 2013.



While, i think David Reid is a marketting guy in CCP. And in IT related companies marketting guys often has, how to say, a different point of view in respect of developers...


But jsut to see the possible general idea.


Yeeeeah...I'll believe it when I see it. And even then, I probably won't believe it... Roll

Herr Hammer Draken wrote:
Vilnius Zar wrote:
I don't GET station camped, so yet another nonsense post by you it seems.


Does not matter if you do not, a whole lot of people do get station camped and they will be laughing at the campers in local while hanging out in WiS environment. And that will lead to an epic backlash to nerf WiS on the forums.



Ah, but would you still be opposed to WiS if you could actually engage war targets within station itself? This would be a natural progression for WiS. That is, stations would not be safe any more. If a war target is in the same station with you, you'll have to watch your back, because they might kick your door down and shoot you in the face.

In a way, WiS could mean MORE PvP in EVE, albeit not ship PvP, compared to current state. I don't see how anyone can object to that.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#117 - 2012-11-23 15:46:33 UTC
When WiS is eventually brought into the game, the possibilities are endless, the game could be taken to a whole new level with people specialising in assassinating clones of war targets in stations, destruction of station bound assets, shooting another player in the face over a game of cards, stealing other peoples ships while they're busy doing an EVA exploration, putting your own team into an exploration site with the aim of either beating others to the objective or just plain killing them after they've gotten to it and stealing whatever they found.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Pak Narhoo
Splinter Foundation
#118 - 2012-11-23 15:47:25 UTC
Arduemont wrote:
For those of you interested in WiS content, like myself, you will be disheartened to find out that it seems CCP have pulled the plug on using Carbon as the engine for the World of Darkness game.

http://www.wodnews.net/Home/tabid/41/Article/750/exclusive-incarnacarbon-forked-between-eve-and-wod-mmo.aspx


Omg, someone needs to reskin that asap . WOD doesn't mean items, websites etc. related to it, should be unreadable and look bad at the same time.
You can go dark and look good while retaining readability. What?
Nylith Empyreal
Sutar Rein
#119 - 2012-11-23 15:47:30 UTC
I laugh when people talk of dolls and barbies, I'm sure anyone with a sister has played with them before and your whole displeasure of them now is misguided. After all your zooming toy spaceships with terrible dimensions, unrealistic movements, much like a child making that buzzing noise as he runs around with an airplane. Get over yourselves.

Who's the more foolish the fool or the fool who replies to him?

Ghazu
#120 - 2012-11-23 15:58:43 UTC
Jame Jarl Retief wrote:


In a way, WiS could mean MORE PvP in EVE, albeit not ship PvP, compared to current state. I don't see how anyone can object to that.

Did you know that for some dudes all they want for wis is just to dress up and emote each other cus they want to be "griefed by pvpers"? true story.

http://www.minerbumping.com/ lol what the christ https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2299984#post2299984