Test Server Feedback

Seems you don't really know how PLEX works...

CCP still makes more money because PLEX costs more than a 1 month subscription. Having a few percentage of players buy PLEX with ISK for their game time increases demand and decreases supply, causing inflation in PLEX prices, making it even more attractive to players with expendable RL income who need or want a quick boost to their EVE wallet.

No offense but that is a very ignorant point of view.

While I agree with you that the Tengu will be relatively unaffected by the coming changes aside from a slight range and DPS nerf, it is one of very few ships that will not be hit hard by the coming changes.

Every battleship or drone boat that rely's on drones for DPS or just defense dealing with small ships will be hit like a freight train by these changes.

Just because you believe these changes will have minimal impact on your own PVE does not mean they will not affect the majority of the player base.

Blob warfare is something that has been around for years. I really do not understand what that has to do with the current changes. Most players who have multiple accounts do not do so for PVP but for PVE. aside from off grid boosters multi boxing for PVP is generally a bad idea. Most multi boxing is done for PVE. Again you are in the minority.

PLEX brings in more revenue per unit than subscriptions do. When I sub for 6 months at a time I pay about $12 per month. PLEX if bought on sale, is at the cheapest $17 per unit or $20 at normal price. So every account subbed with PLEX actually puts more cash in CCP's pocket than an account payed thru a sub. It does not matter whether that PLEX was bought today or a year ago. It is still worth more real money than a regular sub. Every PLEX in game was bought by someone with real money. So no matter how many are floating around in the market every account subbed through PLEX is a bonus for CCP not a loss.

So you say the changes will not significantly affect your game play.
Then you say this terribad new A.I. must be fixed.
Well which is it. This change can not have minimal effect and be game breaking at the same time.

There are a few game play styles that will not be affected as much as others. How ever I have tested this new A.I. on Duallity and found it game breaking for my play style.

FOXFOUR has made some further changes I have not tested yet, I just hope they are enough. The positive side is She has stated that this as it will be released on Dec 4th is not a done deal but will still need tweaking. I am encouraged by this as if this change does break the game and need to be futher adjusted it is already in the que so will get addressed quicker.

When it comes to running missions in a PVP boat. sure it can be done. Although some of the harder lvl 4 missions would be very dificult. But a PVP boat will not have near the completion times of a PVE mission runner. Besides most mission runners are obsessed with isk/hr and a dedicated PVE ship completes them much faster. For the record a Tengu although it can be used for PVP is a prime PVE boat. T3 cruisers are the exception not the rule.

As Far as PLEX goes, you talk as if every PLEX in game bought bought years ago. This is so far from reallity. The simple fact that the number of PLEX is game has been relatively stable is proof that the number of PLEX used for subs is fairly balanced with the number of new PLEX purchased and brought into game.

If the use of PLEX for account game time increases the demand will go up. When the demand goes up the cost of those PLEX will go up. The higher the price gets the more players will buy PLEX to sell in game as they will get more isk for it. The supply vs demand of PLEX will always balance out. I do agree with you that the demand for PLEX used for game time will increase. In fact I expect to see PLEX prices closer to 1 bil by X-mas.

The effect of this though will be an increase in PLEX purchased for real money by players with disposable income. So in reality the more players that shift from paying subscriptions to buying PLEX in game will only increase CCP's income as more PLEX will be bought with real isk for higher prices than a normal sub in order to meet the demand for PLEX in game.

I understand what you are saying about PLEX that have been sitting in the market for some time is money CCP has already received, while active subscriptions produce fresh income. However it makes no difference if the PLEX was bought to day or two years ago. It still cost more than a monthly sub. Any company that ran their fiances in a way that would allow for your prediction to be true would go bankrupt very quickly. This is just not done.

It is like balancing your cheque book. Once you write a cheque you must treat that money as if it is already spent. If you do not when the cheque gets cashed it will bounce. I actually had a cheque I wrote for several hundred dollars once not get cashed until 8 months after I wrote it. Had I not accounted for that money already being spent it could have easily bounced. Like wise every time CCP sells a PLEX they must plan on that PLEX being applied and replacing a months sub at some future point. This is why PLEX will always cost more than a normal subscription. There is more work involved in financial planning with such things included. The advantage for CCP is they can have a PLEX sale to raise cash quickly when needed while the pay back of that cash is distributed slowly over a longer period of time thru the subscription fees that it offsets. Add to this the fact that PLEX in game can be destroyed or lost and they are even further ahead.

A month or so ago there was a freighter destroyed with several hundred PLEX in its cargo. Most of those PLEX were destroyed not dropped. now CCP no longer has to supply services for those lost PLEX. This may have even been a CCP DEV alt intentionally destroying PLEX as I do not believe any real player in EVE would be that stupid. But regardless no matter how you look at it. the PLEX system is a benefit to CCP not as burden. The few minor inconveniences it causes are worked into their financial model and have minimal impact.

Ok, since apparently reading is hard..

My PvE = Not affected because I can easily do 0.0 anoms and lvl4's without the use of drones, and there is no such thing as a "hard" lvl4 mission..
Actually I can fit less tank to my missionboats now, because I know agro will be distributed between them and none of them will take full agro..

My PvP = Broken cause I can no longer hunt ratters in a bomber or other small stuff solo..

Simple enough I should think..

As for the PLEX debate:

ALL PLEX on market have been paid for allready with RL cash.
The time they have been there is irrelevant, it is a I.O.U. from CCP to the person who redeems said PLEX.
If you stop supplying RL cash, it will show up in the "checkbook" because less money is going in and if this is going to balance then "someone" has to start buying more PLEX to make up for the loss in subs, or GTC's..
There are no two ways about that..

If you feel that you should keep paying CCP for adding the AI you allso dislike, feel free to do so..

PLEX will get more expensive regardless, simply because more people will have more ISK to spend so demand will rise..

Clear cut enough for you?
I hope so, cause im not argueing with you about this anymore.

Pay them if you want to, don't if you want to push them a little towards making proper changes sooner than later...
I for one am going to keep my money and let someone else with too much RL cash pay for Foxfours terrible AI that is going live despite the fact that Foxfour has infact stated that it will be replaced because it is not working as intended..
It should simply just not go live untill a proper AI is created..

Far more issues than just drones..

While I see what you want to achieve, I don't see it being done from a designer's POW.

As in, it makes not much sense. Could just remove the aggressive drone setting and call it a day.

Of course that would be a terrible idea, when you are jammed or dampened below the target's range. What about NPCs that do those, suddenly drones need to be on "auto pilot", but then they are ripped apart? Not good.

You could just call for disabling target swapping for drones, but allow new waves to target drones.
That would still require some presence from the player, and yet wouldn't be just a switch on the player's part, which is a bit silly.

Seriously though, CCP is trying to crackdown on farming, which sounds mostly legit. Dropping them in anoms and walking away yes is wrong, but active using your drones shouldnt get them nuked while there 30km and have no hope of making it back. Its like CCP gives drone users a reward in one hand(drone dps buff), then smacks the **** outta us with the other (dead drones). Hoever you can, please fix with either less aggro or no aggro for actively using my drones in anoms

Whenever I read something like this, I wonder if this is really 'your' goal, or 'our' goal. Perhaps it is both. Reading this makes it sound so enjoyable, I mean who doesn't like PvP? But when you delve a little deeper into this statement, you come up with some pretty nagging questions:

1) Will the NPC rats drop the nice deadspace booster that the last tengru I killed did? Perhaps then it will be worth my time.

2) CCP hates solo PvP and has said so on multiple occasions, face it. PvP in EvE is always a matter of 'bring more', as 'bring more' always wins. So missions will turn into affairs of 'bring more' with the proposed change? We already have team NPC stuff (incursions and sleepers), now all rats will require teams?

3) Maybe you're much better than I am, but I have never considered PvPing in a marauder, ever. Not to mention that active tanks in PvP become rather pointless as numbers grow. So are you changing Marauders into solo pwn mobiles, or removing them from the game? See marauders are suppose to be mission running ships, and not PvP ships (thus the minimal sensor strength and gimped grid on the vargur so you can't put neuts on it - remember that's what you told us when you released them) Can I have my sp refunded when they are removed from the game?

Face it, turning missions into solo PvP contests is rife with problems. Shield tanks are often gimped when they have to fit webs and scrams to hold NPC's while you kill them. But we can handle this in PvP since we don't solo in them, I love my hawk when I'm roaming in a gang, but for solo work I normally switch to the vengence.

I guess I applaud your decision to not allow NPC's to target drones multiple times until you fix the problems with NPC agression (because I like to hunt ratters too). But you need to fix other issues too, like frigates than can target you @ 70k and web you from 60. NPC's that you can't neut off their guns and reps. NPC torps that hit you from beyond t2 jav ranges. And the fact that tanking 20 NPC battleships shooting at you isn't all that difficult. When you give NPC's the same ships that players have, with the same limitations and drops, then by all means make me kill one or two of them and call it a mission, hell remove the bounties and let me live on random drops of faction/deadspace loot.

Oh and fix the marauders so that they work against these new NPC's or remove them and refund our sp's.

THIS... SO MUCH THIS!
Can I vote for you next CSM?