These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A "Ganker's" View on Mining "Buffs"

Author
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#161 - 2012-09-27 00:40:12 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:

Funny how it's "not RL" when you justify the ganks but you use RL economic theory to do so.

And my point is made exaclty. The change in prices was temporary. Period.

BUT, and this is my point, the anger/anghst/whine whatever you want to call it over the interdiction bought about an EXTERNAL force to circumvent it.

Why? Because the impact to the game and the players (in this, a VR world) was seriously causing a problem. CCP saw it for what it was and "fixed it".

We cannot call "God" in RL when things go bad and to be perfectly honest CCP played "God" to fix the problem. Whether I or you or anyone else agrees is irrelevant.

>> CCP's RL economic reality required a fix. And so it came to be.

Bring back manic ganking again and it'll simply happen again.

I stand by all this talk about gank, not gank to manipulate prices is purely faffing.

You have to come up with another way.


Ice prices stablised at around 900 isk/unit for seven months, this was not a temporary blip. Its also wrong to say gankers were cause mass unsubbing given that subs have been growing the entire time this was happening.

The only problem was that a lot of people were too dumb/greedy to fit a tank. We are seeing exactly the same thing with our freighter gank. There is a single person who has lost 3 freighters in the last few days in exactly the same system doing the same thing. The only difference between miners and freighter is the scale of the botting which is massive in mining.

People such as yourself are destroying your own profession with your blind hatred of ganking.
Piugattuk
Litla Sundlaugin
#162 - 2012-09-27 02:07:49 UTC
Not blind hatred, sure ganking a freighter full of doodoo is one thing but to blanket target miners because as we all know every single mining barge is a bot is stupidity, there's this obsession with hating miners its the reason CCP had to intervene and buff the ships why is it we should all fly around a$$ grabbing each other all the time around every corner is beyond me, i mean if blowing up everything in sight is all that you want there's 0.0 and dull sec, low sec, WH, FW, all the a$$ grabbing you want empire is only a small part of eve...WTF more do you want.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#163 - 2012-09-27 02:10:13 UTC
Piugattuk wrote:
Not blind hatred, sure ganking a freighter full of doodoo is one thing but to blanket target miners because as we all know every single mining barge is a bot is stupidity, there's this obsession with hating miners its the reason CCP had to intervene and buff the ships why is it we should all fly around a$$ grabbing each other all the time around every corner is beyond me, i mean if blowing up everything in sight is all that you want there's 0.0 and dull sec, low sec, WH, FW, all the a$$ grabbing you want empire is only a small part of eve...WTF more do you want.


You do realise that if you fit a tank you are more or less safe right?

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#164 - 2012-09-27 02:11:11 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Piugattuk wrote:
Not blind hatred, sure ganking a freighter full of doodoo is one thing but to blanket target miners because as we all know every single mining barge is a bot is stupidity, there's this obsession with hating miners its the reason CCP had to intervene and buff the ships why is it we should all fly around a$$ grabbing each other all the time around every corner is beyond me, i mean if blowing up everything in sight is all that you want there's 0.0 and dull sec, low sec, WH, FW, all the a$$ grabbing you want empire is only a small part of eve...WTF more do you want.


You do realise that if you fit a tank you are more or less safe right?


Also if you mine aligned. This is even better actually because then you can fit for yield.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#165 - 2012-09-27 02:20:16 UTC
baltec1 wrote:

You do realise that if you fit a tank you are more or less safe right?

Not this old argument again. sigh...

I don't recall CCP sending out an email to remind the miners of this point.

I don't recall the email where CCP told all the miners to HTFU.

I do recall it causing a LOT of anger and it DID cause unsubs (that's why CCP reacted - it's the ONLY reason they would.

I do recall your whingy/whiney/moan that you're doing the miners a favour.

Oh wait. You're STILL doing it.....

And you reckon the MINERS haven't learned anything. Sheesh Baltec. Just sheesh!

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#166 - 2012-09-27 02:38:03 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:
baltec1 wrote:

You do realise that if you fit a tank you are more or less safe right?

Not this old argument again. sigh...

I don't recall CCP sending out an email to remind the miners of this point.

I don't recall the email where CCP told all the miners to HTFU.

I do recall it causing a LOT of anger and it DID cause unsubs (that's why CCP reacted - it's the ONLY reason they would.

I do recall your whingy/whiney/moan that you're doing the miners a favour.

Oh wait. You're STILL doing it.....

And you reckon the MINERS haven't learned anything. Sheesh Baltec. Just sheesh!


You are exactly the kind of village idiot who we love. CCP changed the barges to give them all a role to play, the skiff got the tank job but because the mack has a tank that makes it unprofitable to kill the skiff is simply not needed. This is a problem CCP wanted to fix.

I would also like to see these mass unsubs given that over the past year EVE has returned to steady growth. I also find it rather funny that you require CCP to hold your hand and tell you that a ship should be fitted with a tank for protection.
Tarinara
Doomheim
#167 - 2012-09-27 02:54:07 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:
-snip-
BUT, and this is my point, the anger/anghst/whine whatever you want to call it over the interdiction bought about an EXTERNAL force to circumvent it.

Why? Because the impact to the game and the players (in this, a VR world) was seriously causing a problem. CCP saw it for what it was and "fixed it".

We cannot call "God" in RL when things go bad and to be perfectly honest CCP played "God" to fix the problem. Whether I or you or anyone else agrees is irrelevant.
-snip-

Just like CCP 'fixed' mission drops because miners ( who obviously sucked at mining ) QQ'd that mission runners were getting too many minerals from mission drops. One person boo-hoo'd about how unfair it was after they had trained up all those skills for mining ( as opposed to the racial BS, weapon and defense systems a mission runner trains. I have both - mining was 'easy'... ).

Just how many times does CCP have to come riding in to play White Knight for the mining 'community' who refuses to play smart and adapt?
Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#168 - 2012-09-27 03:08:26 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
the usual fluff about how good he is....

I was referring to this oft repeated "tank your barge" and this belief that you do miners "a favour" by being a moron.

And for CCP to hold my hand - it was never asked for - it is a MINING BARGE - any tank fitted was so it could be used AS A MINING BARGE. NO tank is or ever was big enough to stop ganks. The tank stops rats. A completely different purpose.

Besides, the converse is actually true that CCP could be kicking your ass is the same thing, just from my side of the fence. We differ only by choice of playstyle.

The miner is and always has been the victim. You guys just repeatedly defend your moronic playstyle as a neccessity to justify it.

Why do you even bother if you are so right?

Said it before baltec and I'll say it again. Ganking is fun. Stop trying to justify it with bla bla about economics, charitable sacrifice to the Eve community bla bla. Call it for the fun it is and have done with it.

I'm fascinated with this wannabe manipulation of the Eve economy and yet now it seems it's not "economical" to do a gank. duh....

There IS a way baltec. Buy ALL the minerals on the market and KILL ALL the miners. Now sell all the minerals. PROFIT.

Oh. You can't? Too hard? Want CCP to hold YOUR hand. Or maybe 10,000 of yer mates?

So shutup already and stop playing MinerCop.

MinerMan does it hard. He does it solo.

Deal with it.

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#169 - 2012-09-27 03:11:56 UTC
Tarinara wrote:

Just like CCP 'fixed' mission drops because miners ( who obviously sucked at mining ) QQ'd that mission runners were getting too many minerals from mission drops. One person boo-hoo'd about how unfair it was after they had trained up all those skills for mining ( as opposed to the racial BS, weapon and defense systems a mission runner trains. I have both - mining was 'easy'... ).

Just how many times does CCP have to come riding in to play White Knight for the mining 'community' who refuses to play smart and adapt?

How does a miner "adapt" to drone alloys and reprocessed loot from another profession?
Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#170 - 2012-09-27 03:45:36 UTC
Tarinara wrote:
Touval Lysander wrote:
-snip-
BUT, and this is my point, the anger/anghst/whine whatever you want to call it over the interdiction bought about an EXTERNAL force to circumvent it.

Why? Because the impact to the game and the players (in this, a VR world) was seriously causing a problem. CCP saw it for what it was and "fixed it".

We cannot call "God" in RL when things go bad and to be perfectly honest CCP played "God" to fix the problem. Whether I or you or anyone else agrees is irrelevant.
-snip-

Just like CCP 'fixed' mission drops because miners ( who obviously sucked at mining ) QQ'd that mission runners were getting too many minerals from mission drops. One person boo-hoo'd about how unfair it was after they had trained up all those skills for mining ( as opposed to the racial BS, weapon and defense systems a mission runner trains. I have both - mining was 'easy'... ).

Just how many times does CCP have to come riding in to play White Knight for the mining 'community' who refuses to play smart and adapt?

I played at MinerMan during the loot drop days. Never bothered me. Never complained.

And the MINOR changes CCP have made to benefit miners specifically could be counted on one hand. The significant benefits to everyone else in game (FW, Incursions, sovereignty, PI, supers) etc. has been ongoing.

All have plusses (for the users), all have negatives (for the non-users).

Game gotta evolve for EVERYONE.

In fact, why is it even neccessary to bash an individuals playstyle because it doesn't suit you? What gives with that?

Look to enhance and enjoy what YOU do. If the topic is the economies about ganking, then learn to adapt your play and make it happen "economically" or do something else. (although it's perverse to think you should be able to make money blowing up a miner if you haven't got a way to make it profitable - like Goons did - albeit temporarily - during Icegate).

Maybe you can ask to make all miners tank Officer fit if they beyond 20m SP. You know, pick some arbitrary number that benefits you and roll with it.

MinerMan complain you blow him up. You complain you can't and you waz even given nice shiney toys to do it.

MinerMan STILL miining. Who adapted?

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#171 - 2012-09-27 04:49:42 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Tarinara wrote:

Just like CCP 'fixed' mission drops because miners ( who obviously sucked at mining ) QQ'd that mission runners were getting too many minerals from mission drops. One person boo-hoo'd about how unfair it was after they had trained up all those skills for mining ( as opposed to the racial BS, weapon and defense systems a mission runner trains. I have both - mining was 'easy'... ).

Just how many times does CCP have to come riding in to play White Knight for the mining 'community' who refuses to play smart and adapt?

How does a miner "adapt" to drone alloys and reprocessed loot from another profession?

But I thought the resources were infinite. What difference does where they come from make?

You don't think an increase in the mining population will look an awful lot like the drone regions' contribution did?

I guess time will tell. But I think initial indications are "It probably will."

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

Tarinara
Doomheim
#172 - 2012-09-27 05:19:17 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Tarinara wrote:

Just like CCP 'fixed' mission drops because miners ( who obviously sucked at mining ) QQ'd that mission runners were getting too many minerals from mission drops. One person boo-hoo'd about how unfair it was after they had trained up all those skills for mining ( as opposed to the racial BS, weapon and defense systems a mission runner trains. I have both - mining was 'easy'... ).

Just how many times does CCP have to come riding in to play White Knight for the mining 'community' who refuses to play smart and adapt?

How does a miner "adapt" to drone alloys and reprocessed loot from another profession?

-Step 1: *Adapt* just like I had to when fighting the 'Mineralz iz free!' crowd in manufacturing. If all us evil mission runners were dumping minerals so damn cheap -> Step 2: do a little research to figure out where they're being dumped, put up buy orders and snag all those evil, cheap minerals. You won't get your mining ship ganked while sitting in a station either ( until my idea of having 'terrorists' blow up mining ships in the hanger is implemented anyway... ).

As for reprocessed loot: Minerals go in, we take 'em out. Pick up any BP and you see how much goes in. Depending on a couple skills, you get a certain percentage back out again. Then look at step #2 up there and think 'Crap loot drops'. Or let the mission runner take the refining hit and see Step #2 when it applied to minerals.

As for drone poo - I don't remember a lot of HiSec 'roids that dropped those minerals. Those were mostly Null or W-Space. You remember like Mittens said about W-Space opening up right into Jita so worm holer's could just hop right out in Jita and sell freighters full of that stuff ... *snicker*
Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#173 - 2012-09-27 05:21:01 UTC
Darth Gustav wrote:
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Tarinara wrote:

Just like CCP 'fixed' mission drops because miners ( who obviously sucked at mining ) QQ'd that mission runners were getting too many minerals from mission drops. One person boo-hoo'd about how unfair it was after they had trained up all those skills for mining ( as opposed to the racial BS, weapon and defense systems a mission runner trains. I have both - mining was 'easy'... ).

Just how many times does CCP have to come riding in to play White Knight for the mining 'community' who refuses to play smart and adapt?

How does a miner "adapt" to drone alloys and reprocessed loot from another profession?

But I thought the resources were infinite. What difference does where they come from make?

You don't think an increase in the mining population will look an awful lot like the drone regions' contribution did?

I guess time will tell. But I think initial indications are "It probably will."

Oddly enough, I agree on this point but as I've carried for a long time, why should anybody care one way or the other.

I'm completely confused why non-miners and presumably non-industrialists are bothered about ore prices being too low.

Doesn't that actually make their gameplay easier?

Why would anyone ASK for ways to make stuff more expensive? It defies logic.

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#174 - 2012-09-27 09:40:38 UTC  |  Edited by: baltec1
Touval Lysander wrote:


Deal with it.


Well well well.

Firstly, tanking your barge to the point where you are not profitable to gank is a very viable tactic. If it wasnt then why are all of these untanked macks in 0.7 belts going untouched?

Secondly our "evil ganking" wiped out the bot armies in high sec and resulted in ice prices shooting up to three time more profitable than before our campain and stayed there. Its a fact that this happened and it was good for miners who took the very simple steps to protect themselves.

Thirdly, the skiff is designed to be the barge to protect yourself from ganks but because the mack can do this untanked the skiff is pointless to fly. CCP changed the barges to stop a single ship (the hulk) from being king of mining so its only right they alter the mack to stop it from doing the skiffs job.

And lastly, your genious idea of buying all minerals and killing all miners would cost more than the net worth of ALL 0.0 powerblocks. If you stopped to think about it for even a split seconds you would realise the impossibility of buying trillions of isk worth of trit alone.

Miners such as yourself are shooting yourselves in the foot while stabbing yourselves repeatedy in the back and destroying all the good things that have happened to you over the last 9 months. Ice is only the first to tank in price, the other minerals are going to follow at a slow but gradual pace and once again miner income will pathetic. I will end up gaining from that with cheaper POS fuel, ships and mods as well as ganking other things such as poorly tanked haulers and bling mission runners. You however will once again be relegated to bottom feeder status as miners once again become the $1 a week worker.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#175 - 2012-09-27 09:46:30 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:


I'm completely confused why non-miners and presumably non-industrialists are bothered about ore prices being too low.

Doesn't that actually make their gameplay easier?

Why would anyone ASK for ways to make stuff more expensive? It defies logic.


So let me get this right. As a miner, you think it is better for say, trit prices to go from 6-7isk/unit to 3isk/unit?
Mars Theran
Foreign Interloper
#176 - 2012-09-27 09:51:18 UTC
I don't suppose it has occurred to anybody that all the ganking in recent months, long forum blogs about miners and the willful destruction of their ships, and all that other stuff actually helped bring attention to the issue, and raised the average miners bile enough for them to bother coming here and posting how they felt.

That last bit is the important part btw.

Aside from that, I never read the OP, but I do have to say this.

Miners > Production and Manufacturing > Ships and modules > Pilots in Space

zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub
Kryss Darkdust
The Skulls
#177 - 2012-09-27 12:11:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Kryss Darkdust
Its odd that people don't connect the dots between lack of PvP activity and miner ganking.

The logic seems obvious to me.

Miners get ganked
Fewer people mine
Resource costs go up
ship and modules costs go up
fewer people can afford ships and modules
people get more careful in PvP because they are afraid of losing ships they can't easily replace
less PvP takes place
People come on the forums and complain that their isn't enough PvP
They go to high sec and suicide gank miners for ***** and giggles
the cycle starts again

All this lack of PvP is blamed on a lot of things but it rests squarely in the suicide ganking of miners and is I would say about 90% responsible for the shortage of PvP in Eve. Which is exactly why CCP aggressively persued ways to stop it. Because this is a PvP game but PvP activity drops and rises with the drops and rises of ship costs.

Its really not that complicated. Just in the last month since CCP fixed mining ships the amount of PvP I'm getting has trippled and is steadily rising.

The reality of Eve is that, if you don't love it like it is today, you should probobly go ahead and unsub. 

Tarvos Telesto
Blood Fanatics
#178 - 2012-09-27 13:38:22 UTC
Its ok, more kamikze you bring to asteroid belts, more you pay for minerals and ships, dont be a fool, harder to get minerals more they cost, at last people stop seling minerals cheap, miners never stop mining even they die everyday, they never give up.

All those heaters who hulkadegon them lose this war agains miners, not because mining change, just because miners are immortal, and they buy new hulks even they cost like 500mil each, because is like one day incomes per pro miner who mining with alt or fleet, rest oncomes are pure profit after investment.

EvE isn't game, its style of living.

Tarinara
Doomheim
#179 - 2012-09-27 17:57:27 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
So let me get this right. As a miner, you think it is better for say, trit prices to go from 6-7isk/unit to 3isk/unit?

Or how about the 1.70 or so wasn't it that it cratered to back around '08-'09 time frame?
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#180 - 2012-09-27 18:04:08 UTC
Tarinara wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
So let me get this right. As a miner, you think it is better for say, trit prices to go from 6-7isk/unit to 3isk/unit?

Or how about the 1.70 or so wasn't it that it cratered to back around '08-'09 time frame?


This is good for miners how?