EVE Information Portal

I applaud the efforts your team has achieved so far, but there is one glaring problem that simply cannot be left unaddressed. If you're not going to remove the immunity to negative EWAR effects such as jamming from supercapitals, then allowing then to still take advantage of positive EWAR effects such as target painting is unbalanced. This should not be difficult to understand. It should not be easy for capital ships to swat frigates out of space. They should have to fight their battles in accompaniment with smaller ships who have that function.

As the tracking of Dreads is still aweful the only thing they can hit are posses. Any BS can "speed tank" a dread. Worthless junk of metals they are unless you need to tak edown a POS, and for that they are too expensive and logistic intensive.

The Moros change is drastic. For gank setups, the Moros (blasters, triple MFS) right now with no drones does 6416 theoretical dps. Add 25% RoF and it will now hit 8555 dps(!) - that's far above any other dread's damage output. Considering the last dread rebalance made dreads very much alike with regard to range, there is no particular advantage over blasters anymore.

Additionally, capital missiles take serious damage drawbacks against moving targets (10% dps reduction even against a moving carrier for citadel cruises), which reduces the effectiveness of Phoenixes and Naglfars even further.

The drone bonus of the Moros right now adds about 8% raw damage over the Naglfar - I do not quite see how a 33% damage bonus is supposed to compensate for that. These changes will make the Moros vastly more powerful than any other dread. Please try to re-think this to keep the different dreads closer to each other.

BAD: No remote tracking link / titan tracking nerf - (Make Ewar immunity = no RTL's or any other form of electronic remote assistance)
BAD: No shield/armor EHP balancing - (deadspace invuls)
BAD: No real solution to supercarrier/titan roles - (they just seem to be cap killers?)
BAD: Weird dread changes, Moros capacitor is ****** now, Naglfar pointless again - (Moros should tank better than it will, Naglfar should come close to out ganking the moros (due to split weapons).

Just ask for Capital Mining Lasers. If 'you' ask nicely they just might do it.


@CCP

1. Please improve dread tracking.
2. Move Remote ECM Burst to Dreads and give Dreads an extra slot for it.
3. Have the fighter nerf only affect SC.
4. Please extend that even all the positive remote ewar (remore tracking links and sensor boosters) does not work for supers.

titans and dreads have special roles, you dont jump a titan or dread in to kill a battlecruiser u nubbincake, that hurricane should fly around you all day long

lol i agree with ya my sin is just as dusty.... even my phoenix was used more recently

Yes I will consider it.

Translation for the stupid people that post on the forums.



All nerfs are subject to change based on feed back on the test server forums. If you think some of these changes are bad, please state which nerf is bad, and give us a well thought out and well written reason on why.

We wont listen to random whining.


But if you give good supporting issues / arguement and dont rage we will listen.


Anyway after reading some of the posts.


Fighter changes are hit or miss 400 maybe too extreme. change it to 350 or 325 so it can hit battleships effectively.

Dreads - dont remove drone bays, while in siege mode set the amount of controllable drones to 0, either by direct mechanic of say -10532890532 bandwidth while in siege mode.

please look at tracking for normal dreads

for normal carriers look at a boost for them for regular fighters and drones to make them more benificial.



Finally - tactics are coming back to eve online.

Now that supercarriers can't run Sanctums, the top, titan-owning 1% of EVE will get richer. Is this what you call balance?

occupyiceland.org