These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Goons 4x4ing through the Sandbox - Market Manipulation on a Grand Scale

First post First post First post
Author
MidnightWyvern
Fukamichi Corporation
SAYR Galactic
#661 - 2012-06-22 02:15:12 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Mikelii wrote:
Darius Johnson for CEO.

Never not ******* goons.



I genuinely ell oh elled at this because come on, the whole thing is pretty ******* funny

PLEASE stop writing lol as words.
Please.
It honestly hurts.
A lot.

Rattati Senpai noticed us! See you in the next FPS!

Alts: Saray Wyvern, Mobius Wyvern (Dust 514)

Xutech
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#662 - 2012-06-22 02:28:00 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Stensson
Edit: Please refrain from insulting of CCP staff - ISD Stensson
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#663 - 2012-06-22 02:30:41 UTC
...what the heck did I just read?

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo

Marconus Orion
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#664 - 2012-06-22 02:31:47 UTC
You guys need to ask yourself one question; if it did not say 'Goonswarm Federation' under the alliance name, would you still be chanting exploit?

I'll admit I am not the biggest fan of goons, but a few guys decided to play Spreadsheets-Online on total hell death mode and came out on top. Big smile It is no different than trying to figure out what item gives the best LP to ISK conversion when you are at the LP store after grinding some level 4 missions. Except on a much, much larger scale.
Della Monk
Monastery of Drakes
#665 - 2012-06-22 02:32:31 UTC
Apparently Iceland is home to the Fair Folk, who do not broker the words of man
Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#666 - 2012-06-22 02:36:07 UTC
Marconus Orion wrote:
You guys need to ask yourself one question; if it did not say 'Goonswarm Federation' under the alliance name, would you still be chanting exploit?


the only people chanting exploit are the usual "ra ra goons" npc alts, everyone else is just slow-clapping and moving on

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#667 - 2012-06-22 02:38:22 UTC
i move that the relatively low amount of gnashing of teeth in this thread is a ~CoNspIrAcY~ to avoid enabling us with said gnashing of teeth

your move

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

gulftobay
Mesotopia
#668 - 2012-06-22 02:41:16 UTC
Richard Desturned wrote:
the only people chanting exploit are the usual "ra ra goons" npc alts, everyone else is just slow-clapping and moving on


The OP used that term himself, feel free to go check. I'll wait.
Tenchi Sal
White Knights of Equestria
#669 - 2012-06-22 02:41:26 UTC
i wonder if ccp will break out the old ban hammer and start playing wack-a-mole
gulftobay
Mesotopia
#670 - 2012-06-22 02:42:51 UTC
Here, I'll make it easy for you:

gulftobay wrote:
Advice: Next time you find a game exploit and boast about it run it past your crack legal team first:


Aryth wrote:

As we’ve said, in most ways, Inferno was a bust. But a throwaway blog about an obscure part of the upcoming faction warfare revamp was much more interesting than it seemed. A small group of market and game mechanics wizards sat in a channel, put their heads together and designed a theoretical exploit to game the system. It succeeded beyond their wildest dreams..


Aryth wrote:

FW turned out to have a bug that rewarded LP for both dropped and exploded cargo, doubling the rewards. So we went to work..


Aryth wrote:
In order to cash out our illicit LP..


Dramaticus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#671 - 2012-06-22 02:43:53 UTC
Um we were not read our Space Miranda rights so none of that is eligible testimony

The 'do-nothing' member of the GoonSwarm Economic Warfare Cabal

The edge is REALLY hard to see at times but it DOES exist and in this case we were looking at a situation where a new feature created for all of our customers was being virtually curbstomped by five of them

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
#672 - 2012-06-22 02:46:42 UTC
I have one question, which I know will never be answered: Will someone get fired over this latest screw-up?
I mean, the messes that CCP has created in the past 3 months are mounting.

Is ANYONE ever held accountable?
CPT Plahnut
Perkone
Caldari State
#673 - 2012-06-22 02:48:06 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
I have one question, which I know will never be answered: Will someone get fired over this latest screw-up?
I mean, the messes that CCP has created in the past 3 months are mounting.

Is ANYONE ever held accountable?



I don't know, ask about that guy who blew up about BoB being dev fed, and the insuent cover-up, and the fact that they whiteashed the whole thing.

Dramaticus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#674 - 2012-06-22 02:49:57 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
I have one question, which I know will never be answered: Will someone get fired over this latest screw-up?
I mean, the messes that CCP has created in the past 3 months are mounting.

Is ANYONE ever held accountable?


This isn't the worst thing ever to occur in EVE by a longshot so no as much as I and the Jewbal deride CCP this is nothing anyone should get fired over.

The 'do-nothing' member of the GoonSwarm Economic Warfare Cabal

The edge is REALLY hard to see at times but it DOES exist and in this case we were looking at a situation where a new feature created for all of our customers was being virtually curbstomped by five of them

Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#675 - 2012-06-22 02:50:18 UTC
gulftobay wrote:
Here, I'll make it easy for you:


please continue to cherry-pick quotes to make yourself look right, it suits you

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Joben Andadare
Lightyears From Normal
#676 - 2012-06-22 02:54:18 UTC
What's with all the talk about people losing their jobs over this? Was it an oversight by the devs/coders in game mechanics, sure, is it worth someone losing a 'real world job' over? Not so much.
gulftobay
Mesotopia
#677 - 2012-06-22 02:59:08 UTC
Richard Desturned wrote:
gulftobay wrote:
Here, I'll make it easy for you:


please continue to cherry-pick quotes to make yourself look right, it suits you


Yeah, I'm not a fan of cherry-picking either.

However, the quotations were not out of context and if you like I will repost in entirity and highlight the terms exploit/bug/illicit again.
Marconus Orion
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#678 - 2012-06-22 03:06:19 UTC
Richard Desturned wrote:
gulftobay wrote:
Here, I'll make it easy for you:


please continue to cherry-pick quotes to make yourself look right, it suits you


We are getting cherry colored suits for Incarna? Hope it does not cost a lot of Aurum.
Exakt Kla'erlepi
Cyber Dragoons
Cyber Dragoons Alliance
#679 - 2012-06-22 03:08:16 UTC
Quote:
An exploit, in video games, is the use of a bug or design flaw including glitches, rates, hit boxes, or speed, etc. by a player to their advantage in a manner not intended by the game's designers.[1] It is often colloquially abbreviated sploit. Exploits have been classified as a form of cheating; however, the precise determination of what is or is not considered an exploit can be controversial. This debate stems from a number of factors but typically involves the argument that the issues are part of the game and require no changes or external programs to take advantage of them.[2]


Ok, so here is the definition of Exploit in a video game. Now let's see what the Goons have said:

1. As we’ve said, in most ways, Inferno was a bust. But a throwaway blog about an obscure part of the upcoming faction warfare revamp was much more interesting than it seemed. A small group of market and game mechanics wizards sat in a channel, put their heads together and designed a theoretical exploit to game the system. It succeeded beyond their wildest dreams.

Right there, they are admitting that they may have found a way to use the game mechanics to their advantage. Sure it was theoretical, but they have put it in practice.

2. The revamp to Faction Warfare in Inferno was the single biggest mistake CCP has ever made. It was bigger than guidance systems, which merely made us a couple of trillion isk. It was certainly bigger than deleting boot.ini, which merely cost CCP some bad press. It was possibly even bigger than Incarna, a potentially game ruining ‘expansion’ *** cash grab. Simply put, Inferno was released with a way to destroy the value of missions.

Again they are clearly stating that they may have found an exploit, still theoretical at this point, since there is no admission of using it.

3. The original theory came about as many of the theories in the Jewbal do: Aryth wondering what the implications of X may be if we did Y. Every theory in the collective is always vetted, and so, Mynnna went to work on a super spreadsheet. This sheet would end up breaking down every niche of FW into its components and checking them for leaks; much like everything in Spreadsheets Online, once created, the sheet had to be tested via running the numbers countless times. Luckily, they added up.

Here they are clearly stating that they ran simulations and that they did in fact show signs of an exploit.

4. When CCP originally released their devblog on Inferno and revealed the formula they intended to use, we sat in shock. I immediately stated a phrase I would repeat many times: “/10000 will not save them”. CCP made the assumption that rewarding a player 1/10th of the value of the player’s kill at 1K ISK/LP, for a total of 10K ISK destroyed CCP Value/1 ISK reward, would prevent manipulation of the system. While this was an understandable mistake, it turned out to be several orders of magnitude off.

Here they clearly show that the initial setup of the game mechanics for FW in a devblog, it also clearly states that CCP thought it would prevent manipulation, therefore stating the way it was intended to work.

5. The test quickly became even bigger than anticipated because upon release, FW turned out to have a bug that rewarded LP for both dropped and exploded cargo, doubling the rewards.

Here the Goons clearly state that the bug was in fact real once put to test in a live environment and that they used it to double their gains.

6. CCP reacted quickly and patched this out, but the damage was done (not that it really mattered since it would merely have delayed the inevitable); the cabal had our “seed” LP. From here on out, the next step was to manipulate the outcome of Faction Warfare to dictate the tier level of the Minmatar faction.

Now here we can see that CCP fixed it to a point where they thought it would work as intended. The Goons also stated that with the gain they have made, without reprimands following, they were able to manipulate the system of FW.

7. The “cost” in this equation was CCP’s own metric, which you can see by opening your cargo window or your station hangars and looking in the bottom right of the window. Therein lies the heart of the break — CCP’s item value calculation was very vulnerable to manipulation. If you picked the right item, loaded hundreds of thousands of them into a Badger, then blew it up in the context of Faction Warfare, you could generate as much LP as you want for practically no cost. As long as you did the math right, the result was foolproof.

Here they are stating exactly what they did and how to use it to their advantages. By also stating they could "Generate as much LP as you want for practically no cost" is another sign that it is an exploit, that the system wasn't working as intended.

8. At this point, we had a problem: we still had not puzzled out CCP’s pricing update mechanics formula. Fortunately, we caught a break. A person tasked to figure out the CCP formula was able to come up with a fair guess at the CCP Price of a given item – a three month EVE wide moving average.

Here we can see that they had found how CCP fixed it and therefore acknowledging that the exploit was still possible.

TO BE CONTINUED IN A SECOND POST

Ten Bulls
Sons of Olsagard
#680 - 2012-06-22 03:12:11 UTC
If only someone had told CCP that it was a bad idea to make FW about ISK and mercenaries.

Surely CCP would have listened if they had been told they where makign a mistake.

SURELY !!!