These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

The Sandbox

Author
Boooop
Doomheim
#21 - 2012-06-02 03:28:00 UTC
Courthouse wrote:
I just popped in your sandbox.



It's spelled poop
EnslaverOfMinmatar
You gonna get aped
#22 - 2012-06-02 03:38:37 UTC
Boooop wrote:
Courthouse wrote:
I just popped in your sandbox.



It's spelled poop

Do you eat poopcorn too?

Every EVE player must read this http://www.eveonline.com/background/potw/default.asp?cid=29-01-07

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#23 - 2012-06-02 04:06:33 UTC
Kimmi Chan wrote:
James 315 wrote:
The concept of the "sandbox" means that players can do as they please without the interference of CCP. The highsec miners have reinterpreted the concept to mean that they can do as they please without the interference of other players. To prevent other players from interfering with the mining, the miners demand CCP interfere. Ironically, this is precisely the opposite of what is intended by a "sandbox" in the first place.

The more you know Idea


I am really glad you posted James. I was curious what your thoughts might be. Our definitions are similar in my opinion. In the end it comes down to content that is generated by the players and not by bonuses or constraints from CCP. Thanks for posting. o7

Big problem with your hypothesis is a little thing called 'Checks and Balances'.

When the sand gets all pushed up to one side of the box, CCP will most definitely step in and redistribute the sand back evenly within the box. They've done it before in the past and will surely do it again in the future. The only problem is it usually takes time for CCP to do it.

The term sandbox actually refers more to how a game is played, e.g. not scripted. As in a physical sandbox, the player is allowed the ability to interact with it creatively resulting in there being "no right way" of playing the game.

However, Developers of sandbox games will implement changes and enforce restrictions at various times within the game environment, either due to existing aspects of the game becoming unbalanced by adding new game play content or when players gain an unfair advantage from exploiting something unforeseen by Developers in game play content previously implemented.

Sansha Incursion 'Vanguard' Sites, Magnetar Worm-hole effects, Probe immune ship fits, Nano speed fits, Titan DD's, etc. These are just some examples of the many times CCP has stepped in and redistributed the sand after it get's piled up in one side of the box..
Frederick Sanger
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#24 - 2012-06-02 04:10:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Frederick Sanger
Darth Tickles wrote:
A "million miners march" into vfk would dwarf anything the goons have ever done. Unfortunately, it would require talking to other people and, like, having fun and stuff.

You guys should really do this. It would be a powerful statement of solidarity.

E: How long does it take to train smartbombs?
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#25 - 2012-06-02 04:31:48 UTC
So I was playing with my alt account tonight, when a guy starts asking about mining in his hulk. People start to ***** about goons and "don't do it, you'll just get blown up".

I could only suggest that EVE is as much a social game as anything else. It's a sandbox, you're not limitted to flying around in your hulk and mining alone.

"Why would I pay someone to help me!"
"I shouldn't have to tank."
"ISK PER HOUR!!!!"

I ended with suggesting he play EVE like a social game. Use the forums. Organize a mining OP, preferebly in a lower sec of space were everyone would make more ISK. He responded with, "that's a really great idea."

To many people trying to play the game one way.

To me, that's the deffinition of a sandbox. Divergent gameplay. The ability to come at a situation from a multitude of angles. You don't have to get someone to help you, but you can. You dont' have to tank your hulk, but you can. You don't have to fill you low slots with expanders, but you can.

EVE provides more divergent gameplay then any MMO on the market; that's what a real sandbox does.

People angry at goons for being the largest powerblock in game and demanding CCP "do something about it" have absolutely no idea what a sandbox is. People complaining about hulkageddon, ganking, or being forced into stuff by other people, have no idea what a sandbox is. CCP has provided all of the tools anyone needs to "do soemthing about it". If you choose not to, or you decide that there's nothing you can do so instead you'll just curl up int he fetal position that's fine, but that doesn't change the reality of it.

The reality is, no matter how tight a ball you curl up in, we'll just keep kicking the **** out of you. Because it's funny.
Malphilos
State War Academy
Caldari State
#26 - 2012-06-02 04:54:57 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Because it's funny.


What's funny is that for all your praise of "divergent gameplay" your advice was "do it this way".

And that you don't get it. That's pretty funny too.
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#27 - 2012-06-02 04:57:21 UTC
Malphilos wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Because it's funny.


What's funny is that for all your praise of "divergent gameplay" your advice was "do it this way".

And that you don't get it. That's pretty funny too.


If that's what you got from all of my "you can come at a situation from a multitude of angles."

Well....

I honesly don't know what to say. I'm sorry your brain doesn't work. Damn shame.
Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
#28 - 2012-06-02 05:04:22 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
So I was playing with my alt account tonight, when a guy starts asking about mining in his hulk. People start to ***** about goons and "don't do it, you'll just get blown up".

I could only suggest that EVE is as much a social game as anything else. It's a sandbox, you're not limitted to flying around in your hulk and mining alone.

"Why would I pay someone to help me!"
"I shouldn't have to tank."
"ISK PER HOUR!!!!"

I ended with suggesting he play EVE like a social game. Use the forums. Organize a mining OP, preferebly in a lower sec of space were everyone would make more ISK. He responded with, "that's a really great idea."

To many people trying to play the game one way.

To me, that's the deffinition of a sandbox. Divergent gameplay. The ability to come at a situation from a multitude of angles. You don't have to get someone to help you, but you can. You dont' have to tank your hulk, but you can. You don't have to fill you low slots with expanders, but you can.

EVE provides more divergent gameplay then any MMO on the market; that's what a real sandbox does.

People angry at goons for being the largest powerblock in game and demanding CCP "do something about it" have absolutely no idea what a sandbox is. People complaining about hulkageddon, ganking, or being forced into stuff by other people, have no idea what a sandbox is. CCP has provided all of the tools anyone needs to "do soemthing about it". If you choose not to, or you decide that there's nothing you can do so instead you'll just curl up int he fetal position that's fine, but that doesn't change the reality of it.

The reality is, no matter how tight a ball you curl up in, we'll just keep kicking the **** out of you. Because it's funny.


Great post Nat. I am in complete agreement with you. I wonder who they would blame had you guys not extended HAG. I see HAG as an expansion. But instead of an expansion being released by CCP, its been released by fellow players and that is what I think makes Eve a sandbox and that is what makes these kind of things terrific. Thanks for your input! +1

"Grr Kimmi  Nerf Chans!" ~Jenn aSide

www.eve-radio.com  Join Eve Radio channel in game!

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
#29 - 2012-06-02 05:09:55 UTC
Malphilos wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Because it's funny.


What's funny is that for all your praise of "divergent gameplay" your advice was "do it this way".

And that you don't get it. That's pretty funny too.


"Do it this way", as you put it is not an attempt to tell you how to play. If anything, some of these people might actually be trying to help.

This for example. Written by another high sec miner who shares his knowledge. A lot of the same knowledge that the suicide gankers and griefers and Goons have been sharing with everyone here. Its your choice whether to adopt some or any of the concepts.

Being a member of a sandbox means making choices that have consequences, not subsidizing your game play, and taking responsibility for your own fun.

"Grr Kimmi  Nerf Chans!" ~Jenn aSide

www.eve-radio.com  Join Eve Radio channel in game!

Josef Djugashvilis
#30 - 2012-06-02 05:13:01 UTC
James 315 wrote:
The concept of the "sandbox" means that players can do as they please without the interference of CCP. The highsec miners have reinterpreted the concept to mean that they can do as they please without the interference of other players. To prevent other players from interfering with the mining, the miners demand CCP interfere. Ironically, this is precisely the opposite of what is intended by a "sandbox" in the first place.

The more you know Idea


If you tell this lie to yourself, (that hi-sec miners believe they should be able to mine without interference from others) you may actually come to believe it.

I suspect you are daft enough to believe it already.

This is not a signature.

Malphilos
State War Academy
Caldari State
#31 - 2012-06-02 05:13:17 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Malphilos wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Because it's funny.


What's funny is that for all your praise of "divergent gameplay" your advice was "do it this way".

And that you don't get it. That's pretty funny too.


If that's what you got from all of my "you can come at a situation from a multitude of angles."

Well....

I honesly don't know what to say. I'm sorry your brain doesn't work. Damn shame.



It's what I got from your advice, you can call one angle a multitude I guess.

You can even pretend that makes sense.
Haldor Rune
State War Academy
Caldari State
#32 - 2012-06-02 05:16:16 UTC
Malphilos wrote:
It's what I got from your advice, you can call one angle a multitude I guess.

You can even pretend that makes sense.

No one cares how many angles you can go at it from. There's only so many right (effective) angles.
Malphilos
State War Academy
Caldari State
#33 - 2012-06-02 05:19:21 UTC
Kimmi Chan wrote:
"Do it this way", as you put it is not an attempt to tell you how to play. If anything, some of these people might actually be trying to help.


Help, by telling you how to play.

It's pretty inescapable: "Look, here's how it should be done". Of course no one is forcing anyone, but it's been made clear that they'll "keep kicking the **** out of you" otherwise. Truth be told they'll probably keep that up anyway, but the point is being made.

It is what the game is, let's not pretend it's something else.
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#34 - 2012-06-02 05:20:50 UTC
Malphilos wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Because it's funny.


What's funny is that for all your praise of "divergent gameplay" your advice was "do it this way".

And that you don't get it. That's pretty funny too.

What I got from it is he wants the Hulks to join together and go into low sec resulting in less risk and more kills easily obtained for the gankers.
Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
#35 - 2012-06-02 05:27:52 UTC
Malphilos wrote:
Kimmi Chan wrote:
"Do it this way", as you put it is not an attempt to tell you how to play. If anything, some of these people might actually be trying to help.


Help, by telling you how to play.

It's pretty inescapable: "Look, here's how it should be done". Of course no one is forcing anyone, but it's been made clear that they'll "keep kicking the **** out of you" otherwise. Truth be told they'll probably keep that up anyway, but the point is being made.

It is what the game is, let's not pretend it's something else.


No one is saying, "Do it this way or we'll keep kicking the **** out of you". If that is the way you are taking it then I guess it can't be helped and you will keep getting the **** kicked out of you.

I prefer to read and assess the infomation, of which there is plenty, from multiple sources and viewpoints, and simply adapt my play to suit my desire for fun while at the same time taking responsibility for my own well-being. In the end they are still my choices.

If this, as Nat put it, divergent gameplay (i.e. Goons creating content that focuses on destruction of Exhumers for economic gain), annoys you then you are more than welcome and I would hope capable of either finding ways to adapt to it, again based on volumes of information on how to do so, OR organize and create your own player driven divergent gameplay.


"Grr Kimmi  Nerf Chans!" ~Jenn aSide

www.eve-radio.com  Join Eve Radio channel in game!

Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#36 - 2012-06-02 05:29:23 UTC
Malphilos wrote:
Kimmi Chan wrote:
"Do it this way", as you put it is not an attempt to tell you how to play. If anything, some of these people might actually be trying to help.


Help, by telling you how to play.

It's pretty inescapable: "Look, here's how it should be done". Of course no one is forcing anyone, but it's been made clear that they'll "keep kicking the **** out of you" otherwise. Truth be told they'll probably keep that up anyway, but the point is being made.

It is what the game is, let's not pretend it's something else.


Ohhh, I get it now.

You're one of those people that thinks that advice is ordering, and help is a command. There's nothing anyone can say to you. You're living in this closed off little box where apparently everything revolved entirely around you, and your inability to think rationaly, logicaly, or with anything that resembles common sense.

Malphilos
State War Academy
Caldari State
#37 - 2012-06-02 05:36:36 UTC
Kimmi Chan wrote:
No one is saying, "Do it this way or we'll keep kicking the **** out of you". If that is the way you are taking it then I guess it can't be helped and you will keep getting the **** kicked out of you.


Just because that's so hilarious.

It was a pretty clear paraphrase. And of course there is still a choice, but to pretend there's no intent to influence (at the very least) behavior is silly. That's what it is to exercise power.

The discomfort with that clear reality is palpable.
Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
#38 - 2012-06-02 05:36:38 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Malphilos wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Because it's funny.


What's funny is that for all your praise of "divergent gameplay" your advice was "do it this way".

And that you don't get it. That's pretty funny too.

What I got from it is he wants the Hulks to join together and go into low sec resulting in less risk and more kills easily obtained for the gankers.


What I want is less whining and more content. If you want to do it by organizing and marching into nullsec space and taking down those that oppress your efforts - that is one option.

Another is to organize a miner's strike. I have seen a lot of claims from high sec miners that if they didn't mine the market would be OMGWTFPWNd by their absence. Let's see how that would work. Let that play out.

In one or two years we can all say, "I was there during the Great Miner Strike of 2012".

Your enemy is very well organized. You might consider doing some organization of your own.*




*DISCLAIMER: This is not me telling you how to play. It is just a simple suggestion from a fellow player.

"Grr Kimmi  Nerf Chans!" ~Jenn aSide

www.eve-radio.com  Join Eve Radio channel in game!

Malphilos
State War Academy
Caldari State
#39 - 2012-06-02 05:37:52 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:


Ohhh, I get it now.



I don't think so, but clear it up: why that particular advice?
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#40 - 2012-06-02 05:44:34 UTC
Malphilos wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:


Ohhh, I get it now.



I don't think so, but clear it up: why that particular advice?


What advice?

Did you really not get that the very last thing I said in the post you're upset about, was written for only one reason? Well, two if you count my own immediate laugher, because I was laughing while I wrote it.

Think about what you're doing, and then ask yourself why I would've included that one assinine line in what was otherwise a serious post?

Is it not obvious?


And for the record. I've never shot at another persons ship. I don't pvp. I mostly sit in a station and build **** with this guy, and every now and then do some sort of random activety with my alt account. Which btw, had 3 guys try to gank me in high sec tonight; funny ****.
Previous page123Next page