EVE Information Portal

The Unified Inventory has enormous potential, but definitely needs more work. As always, thanks for listening and responding.

Apologies if some of these have already been suggested.

(1) When opening a container in space, the inventory should open to that container, not to the active ship's cargohold. I think this will be fixed in the 29 May patch.

(2) The "Loot All" button should be made bigger, or at least more noticeable. Maybe move it to the top of the window, or otherwise make it stand out somehow.

(3) Legacy shortcuts such as ALT+C should open the appropriate inventory spaces, not just the unified inventory window.

(4) The game should remember inventory window positioning. For example, if I open the ship's cargohold in a new window and then close it, the cargohold should open in a new window the next time I access it. Similarly, if I open a jetcan in a new window, and change its default position, that should be where all future jetcans are opened.

(5) Re-introduce tabs. If I drag-drop one inventory window onto another, the dragged window should become a tab. That will give players an additional axis along which to organize inventory and other containers.

(6) Give us the option of searching all containers and hangars in a station or on a grid using the inventory search, not just the active container. Maybe a checkbox for "Search All Station/Nearby Containers" or something. I keep trying to search for items while still in the ship hangar.

(7) The inventory lags something awful when moving a lot of items from one storage space to another, such as from the ship cargohold to the station item hangar. I think this is due to the new item value calculator.

(8) If a player cannot access a container, that container should not show up in the inventory. For example, if I do not have the right to access a POS's fuel bay or an SMA, I should not see either of those in the inventory.

(9) If a player drags ships and modules from his cargohold or a hangar into the item or ship hangar, the items should automatically go into their appropriate spaces.

On a related note, when you re-do the Assets window, please consider giving us options to sort by number of jumps/items/whatever in each station.

I intend to continue quoting these posts until it is no longer necessary

This

+1

If you guys insist on "improving" UI, can you please at least give us the option of choosing what suits us the best, Thanks

Also CCP - keep iterating, add explanations, features, back/forward buttons and some other bells and whistles, and in the end every QQing hater in this thread will just have to DEAL WITH IT.
[/quote]


What about adding a "Send To" or "Move To" option for moving things from one container to another in station?

Here is another Inventory UI issue that needs to be addressed. Please see this screenshot for detailed explaination.

http://www.neoncranium.com/inventory3.jpg

Here is the link to the previous screenshots in case they were overlooked.

http://www.neoncranium.com/inventory.jpg
http://www.neoncranium.com/inventory2.jpg

Devs, please consider these changes. I beg you.

I am intrigued by the idea of a single, stand-alone tree view.

Same ****, different expansion - unwanted feature, CCP refusing to back down an inch.

FFS, add the option to disable the damn estimated prices, which is useless and laggs out the inventory when there are hundreds of items in the hanger, I really enjoy watching that little white wheel thing zip around, was that the new feature?

Still dont want it, dont like it, not as good as what we had. Take it of TQ, fix it , roll it back out with an optionality added to the feature and you would get a round of applause. But no, you ignored the sisi feedback thread and forced this half baked dysfunctional laggy **** on us. And then look all surprised that there is rage.

INCARNA 2.0

All expansions beginning with the letter I are rubbish Incursion, Incarna, Inferno ****** ****** stuff..

So because it's probably coupled together, it's impossible to fix?

I'm sorry, but I've worked with apps that sent packets directly from the UI, and I still know that CCP is full of **** when they say it's impossible to do something.

1. They still have the code for it in SVN/GIT/CVS somewhere back in the revision history. Therefore, yes, revert is always an option as long as someone has the balls to do it.
2. They can still wrap the different UI event handlers/renderers/etc with if statements, ESPECIALLY if it's in python.
3. If it's NOT in an MVC layout, then they have bigger problems to worry about than there being multiple windows.

Unwanted, disliked, laggy, unresposnsive, buggy, slower than what we had and just plain stupid given the mountains of feedback prior to launch.

It's INCARNA 2.0

Step up and roll it back or make it optional - prove that you have learn't from the past and adapted and evolved from your Incarna moment. Dont roll this in to another 5k subsription loss moment of madness, get it back to Sisi, get it fixed then deploy it.