Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Is that the best come back you have. I get you guys to war dec an inactive corp and move on so you waste your money and look like a pile of incompetent boobs and all I get is I dodged a war dec.

Yeah I did dodge it. It was aimed at me you missed like so many of Goonswarms ideas it was pure FAIL.

You guys are having a good year.
1) 10,058 wasted votes you got out meta gamed on.
2) Burn Jita as a leadership exercise just showed that Null needs changes if you can just walk away for a weekend. Imagine the Roman army in lawless space like Britain in say 72 AD. What do you think would have happened if the legionaries buggered off to London for a weekend. You showed very well Null is too safe.
3) You have shown the whole game you are a bunch of school yard bullies with your "They argued with me, lets war dec them" mentality.
4) Shown to everyone that you are just a bunch of carebears that love to hide in your null sec castles using locall to run away like scared children when ever you can't out number the enemy 5 to1 or more.
5) You are easily tricked into wasting money on war decing inactive corps.

Goonswarm have lost your way, you were one Great, now you are a Great joke

Hi we're holding a cooking contest with 45 billion ISK in prizes, we're funding Hulkageddon and we dropped 100 billion ISK on giving Tornadoes to a bunch of bored goons to celebrate things. If you think that wardec fees are anything resembling a "waste of money" for us you're pretty wrong.

You are absolutely clueless about nullsec gameplay, having lived in hisec the whole time you've played the game save for a few months you spent in a dying alliance that couldn't hold its own despite having a lot more supercapitals, a similar sized coalition and funny little events occurring in their favor like the bubbles disappearing from their supercapital staging tower. Your attempts to participate in this discussion only show how little you know - you only want local removed because you want to join the chorus around ~something~ and hey you might as well argue with teh gooniez about how risk averse they are when you dodge wardecs, lest anybody interrupt your peaceful mission running.

So your saying war dec fees are too cheap and should be scaled comparing the size of the aggressor to the size of the defender. What would you recommend as a fair price for a 9089 man alliance decing a 4 man corp, besides pathetic of course?


Well besides the insults I have spent alot more time than than in Null but left because it was BORING. I want local removed, Sov changed and Jump drives nerfed because Null is a stagnant sore on EvE.
Oh and as usual for your failed quotes I don't run missions either.

On the war dec we differ and this is probably why you like lord Zim don't seem to understand balance. You would consider a war of 9089 to 4 balanced, I however do not. Null is unbalanced and boring, how many opinions do you need before you see you are only speaking of your own interests.

Wardecs would still be cheap for us because ~80 tech moons~



Or you can admit that you are risk-averse and you want local removed because you don't want the enemies knowing that you're moving through their space because it's too hard to come up with tactics to mitigate local. You don't want nullsec to be hard, you want it to be hilariously easy for one side (see the idea you agreed with about showing only members of the sov-holding alliance in local) and completely broken for anybody who wishes to do anything in that space without being surrounded by 60 friendlies.

You don't care about balance, you care about getting easy kills. You dodged that wardec despite the easy opportunity to get a few kills out of it, while inviting everyone in the game to assist you (and get stuck at war with us, 'heh') because you cannot fight your own battles. This is why you ditched BTA, this is why you asked everyone to come to your aid.

I left BTA because they are a great alliance and I thought it was crappy that they got war dec'd because you were after me.

Like I have said before if you want safe in EvE try Hi-sec or more to your pace Hello Kitty.

As to the cost of war decs now you are saying you get too much isk from you tech moons. You keep saying Null should not be made more dangerous then keep giving reasons why it should be.

As to the war dec you got made a joke move on.

Oh, you mean tech moons are risk-free? It's not like anybody can form up a fleet to take them right off of your hands, no siree.

But you're digressing here - why should nullsec be more dangerous than wormholes for only a fraction of the rewards?

Good thing you didn't run away from a wardec screaming like a little girl, or this comment would look pretty ironic.


If only we did say that nullsec should be made more dangerous by, oh I dunno, making systems easier to take and lose, or for stations to be destructible.

If only...

You got made to look like fools move on, you war dec'd an inactive corp.

Oh and I do agree Sov needs to be changed amongst other things. I notice you seem to skip over the parts you cannot argue with or miss read them. You have had alot of people tell you are loosing the argument so I suppose you should be given points for stubbornness.

As I'm not a hi-sec resident I couldn't care about your war dec. Said it before, will say it again you guys are a joke and as noted in above posts have clearly shown for the whole of eve that Null is safe and Boring.

If you only think its us 2 saying your arguments fall flat keep reading.

As shown Goonswarm want a nice safe null sec. Keep up your complaining you really look like you only want to keep your easy lives in Null no matter what the cost.

No more exciting and changeable not stagnant and boring.