EVE Information Portal

The thing that everyone's pissed about isn't really the whole "HERE'S YOUR ******* UI, NOW EAT IT AND SHUT UP" deal, although that attitude is definitely not helping. It's that CCP didn't even consider any of the feedback from SiSi before deploying this horrible mess. There's hundreds of posts on SiSi about how and why Inferno wasn't ready for deployment, but CCP basically sent them a few halfhearted platitudes and deployed it anyway, with CCP Soundwave farting in everyone's general direction by stating that they weren't going to roll it back.

Please explain why CCP will not be rolling it back and continuing iteration on SiSi? Your company literally had server daemons crashing when this crap was deployed, and while I understand a lot of that was just stuff that only showed up when 40k people played, but there was plenty of well-reasoned posts about why Inferno was a no-go. I also refuse to believe that your internal tests didn't show any problems, considering the volume of bug reports and node crashes. I realize you guys have a deadline, but certainly people could wait a bit longer while you ironed out the big problems on SiSi. Sure, Crucible wasn't perfect in many ways, but goddamnit, it was playable.

Sure, you'll take a PR hit for rolling back a feature, but at least you'll show that you're listening to the players, something your company has championed from the beginning.

In the future, make a topic in SiSi asking for a go/no-go on deployment to TQ, and this time, ******* listen.

(Also, why is the forum censored when in-game chat isn't?)

You almost found the right word.

It is a Masohist evolution

When my customers tell me something is hugely broken, I don't just scream TOO BAD, YOU'RE GETTING IT ANYWAY. I go to the team leader, let him know of the problem, and then we figure out what's wrong and how to fix it. If there's isn't time left before the next release, we either don't deploy that change and hold it for the next release, or we hold the entire release altogether if it's a showstopper. We have an closed testing team made of handpicked players who we know provide good bug reports, and this testing team goes over the pre-release version of the game before deployment. The last round of internal testing revealed a plethora of enormous bugs (due to physics changes). We listened to our customers and fixed them, and then deployed after the serious bugs were fixed. Our other users now enjoy a much higher quality of game than before we instituted this system.

CCP should learn from this and listen to the SiSi testers, no matter how hard the facts are to swallow. If a feature isn't ready, then it shouldn't be deployed.

Firstly my pos is in storgae so not concerned about pos's at the moment. But I am finding the inventory system a real pain with the new changes.

If I am in a mining fleet and I no ;longer can right click on a ship and always open the appropriate inventory or hold, certainly not as quickly or easily as I used to be able to.
If I do successfully open up a new window then when I go to open up my cargo it opens up over the seperate window that I just opened up....AAHHHH!!!!!!.

It worked fine before and was simple to use, not impressed had similar trouble with hangar stuff until I realised uyou could open up new window, if you found the correct menu that is.

Can,t we just have a simpler inventory for non pos stuff please. It worked before

If I am missing something please feel free to tell me.

Double post

New wallpaper for you: UI based "The Door"

so... after reading all of that, why are these useless people still alive? sounded like the writer thought CSM7 was doing quite a FUBAR job to put it politely....

The part about Darius III not even being invited to their own meeting, and was asking questions (not answering them) via an in-game channel speaks volumes.

Awesome.

And the classic quote from that blog....



So, what happened to that, then ?