These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Post if you are unsubing over the new inventory, as thats the only way CCP listens

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Karsa Egivand
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#221 - 2012-05-23 13:42:08 UTC
Commander A9 wrote:
I'm not going to unsubscribe over the inventory system, but I do oppose it (and I'll gladly join another Jita riot over it). I'd like to see us go back to the old inventory system.

We've rolled back before (remember the return of the ship hangar, albeit no ship wobble?). We can do it again.


your ship ain't wobbling?
Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#222 - 2012-05-23 13:43:40 UTC
I like the new inventory system, it's the first step to renew EvE Online UI.

People just don't like changes, if alot of people are crying about this small UI change, i can only imagine the riots when CCP actually starts doing some real changes, like FiS interface/grids.

CCP can't keep old stuff evertime they make a new iteration on the game! Just adapt, and help improve the UI.

The Tears Must Flow
Karsa Egivand
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#223 - 2012-05-23 13:45:23 UTC
Malice Redeemer wrote:

its easy, this post is not for people that like the new inventory, this post if for people to let ccp know that we are pissed about the new inventory. If you like it, great, make a thread about it, or post in the posi thread. Otherwise, your trolling.


ShockedRoll

Even as the OP, you do not own a thread. You cannot demand that people only post when they agree with you (wth?). If you label people who post to disagree with you ON-TOPIC as "trolls" you have a serious misunderstanding about how forum threads EVERYWHERE work.
Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#224 - 2012-05-23 13:48:59 UTC
Commander A9 wrote:


We've rolled back before (remember the return of the ship hangar, albeit no ship wobble?). We can do it again.


CCP can't keep old stuff evertime they make a new iteration on the game.

Also, people use the old ship hanger view? Really? I bet if the game and a full ascii/text client some people would use that... and would complain about text fonts....

The Tears Must Flow
Malice Redeemer
Kenshin.
Fraternity.
#225 - 2012-05-23 13:51:54 UTC
Vaju Enki wrote:
Commander A9 wrote:


We've rolled back before (remember the return of the ship hangar, albeit no ship wobble?). We can do it again.


CCP can't keep old stuff evertime they make a new iteration on the game.

Also, people use the old ship hanger view? Really? I bet if the game and a full ascii/text client some people would use that... and would complain about text fonts....


yes, everyone does, are you for real?
Malice Redeemer
Kenshin.
Fraternity.
#226 - 2012-05-23 13:54:23 UTC
Karsa Egivand wrote:
Malice Redeemer wrote:

its easy, this post is not for people that like the new inventory, this post if for people to let ccp know that we are pissed about the new inventory. If you like it, great, make a thread about it, or post in the posi thread. Otherwise, your trolling.


ShockedRoll

Even as the OP, you do not own a thread. You cannot demand that people only post when they agree with you (wth?). If you label people who post to disagree with you ON-TOPIC as "trolls" you have a serious misunderstanding about how forum threads EVERYWHERE work.


saying it fine, deal with it, its not disagreeing with me, its trolling. I know that passes for discourse on this forum, but sadly it is not.
Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#227 - 2012-05-23 13:56:07 UTC
Malice Redeemer wrote:
Vaju Enki wrote:
Commander A9 wrote:


We've rolled back before (remember the return of the ship hangar, albeit no ship wobble?). We can do it again.


CCP can't keep old stuff evertime they make a new iteration on the game.

Also, people use the old ship hanger view? Really? I bet if the game and a full ascii/text client some people would use that... and would complain about text fonts....


yes, everyone does, are you for real?


Everyone does? lol

The Tears Must Flow
Commander A9
This Was The Way
#228 - 2012-05-23 13:56:28 UTC
Karsa Egivand wrote:
Commander A9 wrote:
I'm not going to unsubscribe over the inventory system, but I do oppose it (and I'll gladly join another Jita riot over it). I'd like to see us go back to the old inventory system.

We've rolled back before (remember the return of the ship hangar, albeit no ship wobble?). We can do it again.


your ship ain't wobbling?


Only the camera wobbles. They got it right immediately after they reactivated the ship hangar on Singularity after the backlash over CQ...then no less than 24 hours later, they changed it, froze the ship in place, and made the camera wobble for some ungodly reason.

Sure, incidental, merely aesthetics, but a hangar isn't a hangar if the ship doesn't feel like it's a dynamic part of it. Make that bad boy move again!

Recommendations:

-enable ships wobbling in hangar view (pre-Captains Quarters)

-add more missions (NPC fleet vs. NPC fleets that actually shoot)

-STOP NERFING EVERYTHING!

Join Live Events!
Potrondal Morrison
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#229 - 2012-05-23 13:58:09 UTC
Karsa Egivand wrote:
Malice Redeemer wrote:

its easy, this post is not for people that like the new inventory, this post if for people to let ccp know that we are pissed about the new inventory. If you like it, great, make a thread about it, or post in the posi thread. Otherwise, your trolling.


ShockedRoll

Even as the OP, you do not own a thread. You cannot demand that people only post when they agree with you (wth?). If you label people who post to disagree with you ON-TOPIC as "trolls" you have a serious misunderstanding about how forum threads EVERYWHERE work.



Oh yes he can, hes the OWNER of this thread. And hes unsubbing. CCP are having an emergency meeting as we speak to see if they can keep the OP happy and keep his buisness to stop EVE going bankrupt.
Malice Redeemer
Kenshin.
Fraternity.
#230 - 2012-05-23 13:59:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Malice Redeemer
Potrondal Morrison wrote:
Karsa Egivand wrote:
Malice Redeemer wrote:

its easy, this post is not for people that like the new inventory, this post if for people to let ccp know that we are pissed about the new inventory. If you like it, great, make a thread about it, or post in the posi thread. Otherwise, your trolling.


ShockedRoll

Even as the OP, you do not own a thread. You cannot demand that people only post when they agree with you (wth?). If you label people who post to disagree with you ON-TOPIC as "trolls" you have a serious misunderstanding about how forum threads EVERYWHERE work.



Oh yes he can, hes the OWNER of this thread. And hes unsubbing. CCP are having an emergency meeting as we speak to see if they can keep the OP happy and keep his buisness to stop EVE going bankrupt.


the cute part, cutie, is that they are, on some level.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1346084#post1346084
Potrondal Morrison
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#231 - 2012-05-23 14:02:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Potrondal Morrison
Malice Redeemer wrote:
Potrondal Morrison wrote:
Karsa Egivand wrote:
Malice Redeemer wrote:

its easy, this post is not for people that like the new inventory, this post if for people to let ccp know that we are pissed about the new inventory. If you like it, great, make a thread about it, or post in the posi thread. Otherwise, your trolling.


ShockedRoll

Even as the OP, you do not own a thread. You cannot demand that people only post when they agree with you (wth?). If you label people who post to disagree with you ON-TOPIC as "trolls" you have a serious misunderstanding about how forum threads EVERYWHERE work.



Oh yes he can, hes the OWNER of this thread. And hes unsubbing. CCP are having an emergency meeting as we speak to see if they can keep the OP happy and keep his buisness to stop EVE going bankrupt.


the cute part, cutie, is that they are, on some level.



thanks honey xxxxx

oh, and can i haz your stuff?
Malice Redeemer
Kenshin.
Fraternity.
#232 - 2012-05-23 14:02:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Malice Redeemer
Potrondal Morrison wrote:
Malice Redeemer wrote:
Potrondal Morrison wrote:
Karsa Egivand wrote:
Malice Redeemer wrote:

its easy, this post is not for people that like the new inventory, this post if for people to let ccp know that we are pissed about the new inventory. If you like it, great, make a thread about it, or post in the posi thread. Otherwise, your trolling.


ShockedRoll

Even as the OP, you do not own a thread. You cannot demand that people only post when they agree with you (wth?). If you label people who post to disagree with you ON-TOPIC as "trolls" you have a serious misunderstanding about how forum threads EVERYWHERE work.



Oh yes he can, hes the OWNER of this thread. And hes unsubbing. CCP are having an emergency meeting as we speak to see if they can keep the OP happy and keep his buisness to stop EVE going bankrupt.


the cute part, cutie, is that they are, on some level.



thanks honey xxxxx

lolz

come on dude, I have to keep my stuff, so I have reason to come back when they fix it, wake up and smell the coffee
Kleiner Vance
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#233 - 2012-05-23 14:03:26 UTC
Love how you did not respond to my earlier post completely calling you out on your BS.
Malice Redeemer
Kenshin.
Fraternity.
#234 - 2012-05-23 14:04:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Malice Redeemer
Kleiner Vance wrote:
Love how you did not respond to my earlier post completely calling you out on your BS.


I absolutely did

wait didn't I?


I did

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1346227#post1346227
Kleiner Vance
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#235 - 2012-05-23 14:06:23 UTC
Malice Redeemer wrote:
Kleiner Vance wrote:
Love how you did not respond to my earlier post completely calling you out on your BS.


I absolutely did

wait didn't I?


Nope.

I pointed out people don't have to have an argument to disagree with you.

I also presented an argument myself, just to show that people DO disagree with you.
Malice Redeemer
Kenshin.
Fraternity.
#236 - 2012-05-23 14:09:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Malice Redeemer
Kleiner Vance wrote:
Malice Redeemer wrote:
Kleiner Vance wrote:
Love how you did not respond to my earlier post completely calling you out on your BS.


I absolutely did

wait didn't I?


Nope.

I pointed out people don't have to have an argument to disagree with you.

I also presented an argument myself, just to show that people DO disagree with you.


You know, you where right, I had missed one and then I started to reread the thread so I could, but it seems to me most of what I have comment on is people that don't seem to think I have the right to unsub over this. So I guess your wrong? but w/e

You all seem to agree with me that this window, while good, is missing crap, just not that I should be aloud to unsub over it, or give people a place to say they are as well.
Kleiner Vance
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#237 - 2012-05-23 14:12:46 UTC
Malice Redeemer wrote:
Kleiner Vance wrote:
Malice Redeemer wrote:
Kleiner Vance wrote:
Love how you did not respond to my earlier post completely calling you out on your BS.


I absolutely did

wait didn't I?


Nope.

I pointed out people don't have to have an argument to disagree with you.

I also presented an argument myself, just to show that people DO disagree with you.


You know, you where right, and then I started to read the thread so I could, but it seems to me most of what I have comment on is people that don't seem to think I have the right to unsub over this. So I guess your wrong? but w/e

You all seem to agree with me that this window, while good, is missing crap


You have the right to unsub over whatever the hell you want, its just when you tell me to unsub, or start making false generalizations or other fallacies, (like EVERYONE AGREES WITH ME) is where I have a problem.
Malice Redeemer
Kenshin.
Fraternity.
#238 - 2012-05-23 14:14:13 UTC
Vaju Enki wrote:
Malice Redeemer wrote:
Vaju Enki wrote:
Commander A9 wrote:


We've rolled back before (remember the return of the ship hangar, albeit no ship wobble?). We can do it again.


CCP can't keep old stuff evertime they make a new iteration on the game.

Also, people use the old ship hanger view? Really? I bet if the game and a full ascii/text client some people would use that... and would complain about text fonts....


yes, everyone does, are you for real?


Everyone does? lol


this is far more interesting to me now, show of hands, does ANYONE else use CQ over the ship hanger?
Malice Redeemer
Kenshin.
Fraternity.
#239 - 2012-05-23 14:15:56 UTC
Kleiner Vance wrote:
Malice Redeemer wrote:
Kleiner Vance wrote:
Malice Redeemer wrote:
Kleiner Vance wrote:
Love how you did not respond to my earlier post completely calling you out on your BS.


I absolutely did

wait didn't I?


Nope.

I pointed out people don't have to have an argument to disagree with you.

I also presented an argument myself, just to show that people DO disagree with you.


You know, you where right, and then I started to read the thread so I could, but it seems to me most of what I have comment on is people that don't seem to think I have the right to unsub over this. So I guess your wrong? but w/e

You all seem to agree with me that this window, while good, is missing crap


You have the right to unsub over whatever the hell you want, its just when you tell me to unsub, or start making false generalizations or other fallacies, (like EVERYONE AGREES WITH ME) is where I have a problem.


I never told or even asked for anyone to unsub, or whatever else you are accusing me of, what are you on about?
Kleiner Vance
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#240 - 2012-05-23 14:21:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Kleiner Vance
--Quote pyramid removed--
Malice Redeemer wrote:


I never told or even asked for anyone to unsub, or whatever else you are accusing me of, what are you on about?


You may not have done it directly, but you did belittle quite a few people who said they weren't unsubbing. You also made fallicious arguments to your point

Specifically the Ad Hominem fallacy, attacking anyone who disagreed with you as a "troll"