These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Inferno Features on Singularity

First post First post
Author
Salpun
Global Telstar Federation Offices
#301 - 2012-05-02 22:28:02 UTC
An those with the fastist down load speed winsSad

If i dont know something about EVE. I check https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/ISK_The_Guide

See you around the universe.

GeeShizzle MacCloud
#302 - 2012-05-02 22:29:13 UTC
holy functional servers CCP Batman!
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
It Burns When I'm PvPing
#303 - 2012-05-02 22:32:41 UTC
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
Cearain wrote:
I'm starting to think we are being trolled.


I don't even know what to say to this.

Quote:
Last time I heard "just wait it will be awesome" was right before incarna.


It WILL be awesome, if you own the systems. If you don't it will suck balls.



I suppose we should see if they make it more difficult to join the side that will have it awesome if you are on the side that sucks balls.



Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
[


But that's the point. players have been begging for reward and consequence for years now, this is even one of the consequences that is player-requested (Many other FW pilots begged for it even though I personally hated the idea).

But again, until its been live on Tranquility, in the context of the rest of the game, and wars have been fought for some time with this new change, it is all just speculation at this point.


Yes the faction war community wanted consequences. But the "no docking" idea was by and large repeatedly rejected by the faction war community. If I am wrong please point me to the assembly hall thread or other thread where this idea ever really got allot of support from those in faction war.


That said it sounds like there are allot of good things in this expansion for faction war so I am not going to be overly negative.



Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Dr Prometheus
Gears of Construction
Gears Confederation
#304 - 2012-05-02 22:33:05 UTC
Update installed and connecting...

And logged in.

Dude, where is my Quafe Megathron?

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
#305 - 2012-05-02 22:33:56 UTC
After all this sitting on the edge of our chairs, was the news about "server will be up tomorrow" just another troll by CCP?

[b]Don't worry about posting with your main!  Post with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."[/b]

Metal Icarus
Wraithguard.
The Wraithguard.
#306 - 2012-05-02 22:39:14 UTC
Its online.... all of it..... my god....

Its.... the missles.... they......






....yes
Aberadon Blackheart
Southern Deviance Inc.
#307 - 2012-05-02 22:41:04 UTC
Dr Prometheus wrote:
So no-one has started SISI? So it has reached self awerness?


Seen this? ==> self awareness
TheButcherPete
Blackbase Incorporated
#308 - 2012-05-02 22:41:48 UTC
HOLY SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

927mb??!

[b]THE KING OF EVE RADIO

If EVE is real, does that mean all of us are RMTrs?[/b]

Nalha Saldana
The Vomit Comets
#309 - 2012-05-02 22:46:41 UTC
It has been confirmed, this patch is full of win

Extract: patch_win.exe... 100%
Oppon's Pull
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#310 - 2012-05-02 22:48:08 UTC
The drake looks... interesting
Ziven0x
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#311 - 2012-05-02 23:00:14 UTC
The new mods need to be seeded please.
Salpun
Global Telstar Federation Offices
#312 - 2012-05-02 23:00:28 UTC
Having drake rendering issues BR#134188What?

If i dont know something about EVE. I check https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/ISK_The_Guide

See you around the universe.

Nalha Saldana
The Vomit Comets
#313 - 2012-05-02 23:09:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Nalha Saldana
There is one BIG issue, the cargohold ui and station items are bound to each other. I want a nice big inventory in station and a small cargo box in the corner of my screen when undocked.
Where the hell am i going to put this box so i can get the best of both? Its impossible =/

Also there is no way to see which ship is currently active, bring back the white box around it.


EDIT: Shift-clicking opens another copy of that window and your current ship is removed and put into the left menu. Forget both of these issues.
Alexa Coates
Coalition Of Misfits
#314 - 2012-05-02 23:12:06 UTC
5 minutes to download? NOT FAST ENOUGH

/me glares at my router and modem.

That's a Templar, an Amarr fighter used by carriers.

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
#315 - 2012-05-02 23:14:07 UTC
Okay, So far I'm really digging the look of the new missile launcher system. The graphics are great. But the sound... Yeah. The sounds I think need to be beefed up a whole ton. I just don't get the feeling of OMG when I shoot these babies off. Especially when compared to something like the 1400mms.

[b]Don't worry about posting with your main!  Post with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."[/b]

Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#316 - 2012-05-02 23:31:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Hans Jagerblitzen
Cearain wrote:
Yes the faction war community wanted consequences. But the "no docking" idea was by and large repeatedly rejected by the faction war community. If I am wrong please point me to the assembly hall thread or other thread where this idea ever really got allot of support from those in faction war.


This has always been one of the hot topics that caused much controversy. And you're right, in the end there were more people rejecting than embracing the idea. But that doesn't mean there weren't a good number of people that suggested it, which is all that I said.

This community feedback, along with my own opposition to total lockout (I personally favored station fire and denial of station services) is exactly what I shared with CCP.

We've got a couple of months at least before we find out whether the handful of doomsday predictions about FW actually come true, and at that point we will be able to give much more accurate feedback based on things we've actually seen happen.

....so now, back to oooohing and aaaaaahing about missiles!! (I can't wait to get home from work and grab some bombers)

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

CCP Ytterbium
C C P
C C P Alliance
#317 - 2012-05-02 23:40:39 UTC
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
sYnc Vir wrote:


No, the point is losing space when asleep cause it can be done in 5 hours. There is no fun to be had with that. However should it take longer then its something we can live with.


I absolutely agree 100%, this was something I was very firm with the developers about. Cool


I can quote that for great justice, the CSM has been most helpful with discussing FW changes and bringing good points forward. We'll get started on a blog that explains most of the changes, expect it next week.
CCP Goliath
C C P
C C P Alliance
#318 - 2012-05-02 23:45:20 UTC
Ziven0x wrote:
The new mods need to be seeded please.


Will get on this early tomorrow morning

CCP Goliath | QA Director | EVE Illuminati | @CCP_Goliath

Seleene
Body Count Inc.
Pandemic Legion
#319 - 2012-05-02 23:55:30 UTC
CCP Ytterbium wrote:
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
sYnc Vir wrote:


No, the point is losing space when asleep cause it can be done in 5 hours. There is no fun to be had with that. However should it take longer then its something we can live with.


I absolutely agree 100%, this was something I was very firm with the developers about. Cool


I can quote that for great justice, the CSM has been most helpful with discussing FW changes and bringing good points forward. We'll get started on a blog that explains most of the changes, expect it next week.


Hero dev post. Hans will probably send you flowers now. Cool

2004-2008: Mercenary Coalition Boss

2007-2010: CCP Game Designer | 2011-2013: CSM6 Delegate & CSM7 Chairman

2011-2015: Pandemic Legionnaire

2015- : Mercenary Coalition Boss

Follow Seleene on Twitter!

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#320 - 2012-05-03 00:00:38 UTC
Please give CCP (and Hanns) a break here guys. I'm very new to Faction Warfare (as a full participant) but I've paid a lot of interest to the feature as an involved outsider since its introduction and I think the kind of changes coming are just the thing needed to spur a renewal of interest and violence. Its true what Hanns says - players of Faction Warfare have asked for occupancy to be significant for years now - don't get cold feet about the implications at the 11tth hour!

What needs to happen (and I think we can all help make it happen) is for CCP to commit long term to iterating properly on Faction Warfare and make it all it can be through a sequence of play balanced, play tested, and fully assessed changes. Maybe the occupancy might be a problem or need tweaking but who can really tell if you don't try it on the live server. I personally think it'll be great and will put the focus of combat away from station docking ramps and into the plexes and missions and whatnot where it should be happening.

But perhaps CCP won't get the plexing mechanics right first time - so they need to be encouraged to keep working on it until it is right.

From my perspective finally being able to do these plexes I think its an utter nonsense that minor (frigate/dessie) only plexes give as many vps as major (larger ship) plexes in a fraction of the capture time. I think a larger plex with more ship size allowed that needs longer to capture should certainly yield more capture points - but thats just a single example really of where the existing mechanics are awful.

Lets see what the whole system looks like as a whole before running around like headless chickens.

Poor hanns looks utterly frustrated about knowing what that whole looks like without being able to tell anyone due to :NDA: fingers crossed its good, but if it isn't then lets hold CCP to their promise to keep iterating and developing it until its right.

The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom