These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

PL gets 15trillion isk banned in recent RMT bannings

First post First post
Author
Bloutok
Perkone
Caldari State
#221 - 2012-04-01 05:45:29 UTC
I actually intended to try to flame a bit, but it's sooo not me hahahaha.

No, i do not hate goons or PL, or any of those mega alliances/corps. Or else, i hate them all.

The RMT and some other problems of that nature. Would it only be one single player with 6 bots mining in an high sec island between low sec systems only, I saw one of those yesterday. Affect the game directly. And i really find it weird that the RMT is not randomly distributed, like it's all bunched up within a few groups, one being targeted by the mob.

So, again, How come the result of the bans are not random all across Eve population ?
Or, is it that scrub#42 does not register a bleep on any radar ?
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#222 - 2012-04-01 06:10:36 UTC
Those gate camps, the ones that keep people put of 0.0... you can imagine how people can do that all the time.


Just like work?



Because there's money in it.


Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Markus Reese
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#223 - 2012-04-01 06:22:10 UTC
Bloutok wrote:
I actually intended to try to flame a bit, but it's sooo not me hahahaha.

No, i do not hate goons or PL, or any of those mega alliances/corps. Or else, i hate them all.

The RMT and some other problems of that nature. Would it only be one single player with 6 bots mining in an high sec island between low sec systems only, I saw one of those yesterday. Affect the game directly. And i really find it weird that the RMT is not randomly distributed, like it's all bunched up within a few groups, one being targeted by the mob.

So, again, How come the result of the bans are not random all across Eve population ?
Or, is it that scrub#42 does not register a bleep on any radar ?


CCP did say that they cannot say anything about evidence or how it is found out. Only that only a few were proven erroneous. Most likely it is a matter of papertrail Not every botter is a RMT. Alot bot to earn extra income to feed to a pvp character or pay for alliance goods. Like any investigation, it takes time to follow the clues. The most major ones would be the easiest to find and prove. Quite possibly PL might be the first ones because they are/were the most seriously active group in eve right now involved in rmt. Smaller source tradings will take longer and be harder to prove or follow. I am sure we will see them or if they have happened, somebody hit for -500m probably isn't going to say anything.

To quote Lfod Shi

The ratting itself is PvE. Getting away with it is PvP.

Tiger Pennies
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#224 - 2012-04-01 06:51:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Tiger Pennies
CCP Sreegs wrote:
Aranakas wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
I got banned during Unholy Rage even though my account was expired at the time, but hey I got it unbanned quick enough so nbd.


This sort of thing is worrying to me. I put a lot of effort into EVE and if I got banned by some script for suspicious behavior like donating isk to IRL friends, I'd be pretty pissed off.


I'd recommend saving the worrying for if something actually happens. :)


Fine then. Something bad about CCP.





The truth shall live on in alt quotes Bear
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#225 - 2012-04-01 07:05:56 UTC
I have between 10 and 16 active characters on 6 to 8 accts at any one time. It's been like this for years.

I have been moving billions per week between characters for just as long and not once has CCP stepped in and banned any of these accts.

I believe that any accts they are banning now are suffering with good reason. I'd be extremely confident in saying that CCP has less than a 5% error rate from what I've seen over the years. Sure it's going to happen that someone gets dinged that doesn't deserve it, but I think CCP does a pretty good job of getting it sorted based on what I've seen posted in the forums for the last 6 years or so.

Mr Epeen Cool
Thabiso
Merchants of the Golden Goose
#226 - 2012-04-01 07:09:20 UTC
Mr Epeen wrote:
I have between 10 and 16 active characters on 6 to 8 accts at any one time. It's been like this for years.

I have been moving billions per week between characters for just as long and not once has CCP stepped in and banned any of these accts.

I believe that any accts they are banning now are suffering with good reason. I'd be extremely confident in saying that CCP has less than a 5% error rate from what I've seen over the years. Sure it's going to happen that someone gets dinged that doesn't deserve it, but I think CCP does a pretty good job of getting it sorted based on what I've seen posted in the forums for the last 6 years or so.

Mr Epeen Cool

You make 5% sound like nothing. Numbers around the block is they have 300.000 active accounts - 5% is 15.000; so they damned better be near 0.0007% error rate.
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#227 - 2012-04-01 07:14:02 UTC
Thabiso wrote:
Mr Epeen wrote:
I have between 10 and 16 active characters on 6 to 8 accts at any one time. It's been like this for years.

I have been moving billions per week between characters for just as long and not once has CCP stepped in and banned any of these accts.

I believe that any accts they are banning now are suffering with good reason. I'd be extremely confident in saying that CCP has less than a 5% error rate from what I've seen over the years. Sure it's going to happen that someone gets dinged that doesn't deserve it, but I think CCP does a pretty good job of getting it sorted based on what I've seen posted in the forums for the last 6 years or so.

Mr Epeen Cool

You make 5% sound like nothing. Numbers around the block is they have 300.000 active accounts - 5% is 15.000; so they damned better be near 0.0007% error rate.


Kinda dumb aren't you.

Try to figure out where you are totally out in left field with that statement. Here's a hint. It's not 5% of the entire player base. Unless you feel that is how many RMT.

Mr Epeen Cool
Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#228 - 2012-04-01 07:17:39 UTC
Tiger Pennies wrote:
What are you paid by the minute to be a moron? It did happen and you dropped the ball. Look it up MORON!

Customers of this game should be able to know if their work is safe from morons, if they don't they should get their money back.

If you don't like what CCP is doing, or in this case not doing, vote with your wallet.

They don't care anyways, with their elitist attitude that we are just numbers and bank accounts and not actual people. Enjoy your bag of dicks CCP, that's what you want playing the game.


pro-tip: don't try to rail against anybody with a "CCP" tag

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#229 - 2012-04-01 07:18:34 UTC
Thabiso wrote:
Mr Epeen wrote:
I have between 10 and 16 active characters on 6 to 8 accts at any one time. It's been like this for years.

I have been moving billions per week between characters for just as long and not once has CCP stepped in and banned any of these accts.

I believe that any accts they are banning now are suffering with good reason. I'd be extremely confident in saying that CCP has less than a 5% error rate from what I've seen over the years. Sure it's going to happen that someone gets dinged that doesn't deserve it, but I think CCP does a pretty good job of getting it sorted based on what I've seen posted in the forums for the last 6 years or so.

Mr Epeen Cool

You make 5% sound like nothing. Numbers around the block is they have 300.000 active accounts - 5% is 15.000; so they damned better be near 0.0007% error rate.


5% of the accounts nailed for RMT or botting, not the whole population, and I'd say it's pretty certain the number is far below that.

I wouldn't worry about who has and who has not been nailed yet, I'm sure there are many more to come in the near future.

I also wouldn't worry about false positives, they've had one (possibly two) people dinged because of a glitch since this started a couple of years ago... unless you are involved in RMT of course.

Then you should worry... alot. Blink

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Ildryn
IDLE INTENTIONS
#230 - 2012-04-01 07:29:31 UTC
Pallidum Treponema wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
Pallidum Treponema wrote:
I don't think it's fair to throw around accusations of RMT right now. All we know is that we cannot access the API for the wallet char. Until we've spoken to Shamis, we don't know what happened.

For all we know, this could have perfectly reasonable explanations.

okay I can't wait to hear them


The best explainations we have right now is that the account either ran out of subscription, or that it was flagged for doing a lot of ISK transactions to people, IE ship reimbursements, titan purchases etc.

There's a lot of ugly rumors going around, suggesting for instance that we bought 15T isk from RMT. That's just ridiculous. Why would we buy that much ISK with the amount of tech and supercaps we sell?

Until we know what's happened, any accusations of RMT are completely unfounded.



Bwahahaha hahahah OMG OMG hahahahahaha

Change that last word to founded. Oops


Tiger Pennies
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#231 - 2012-04-01 07:49:07 UTC
Richard Desturned wrote:
Tiger Pennies wrote:
What are you paid by the minute to be a moron? It did happen and you dropped the ball. Look it up MORON!

Customers of this game should be able to know if their work is safe from morons, if they don't they should get their money back.

If you don't like what CCP is doing, or in this case not doing, vote with your wallet.

They don't care anyways, with their elitist attitude that we are just numbers and bank accounts and not actual people. Enjoy your bag of dicks CCP, that's what you want playing the game.


pro-tip: don't try to rail against anybody with a "CCP" tag


Really? And what is that big bad meanie CCP gonna do? They already ban people for no reason, so I might as well give them one.

O and if it gets me to a quicker solution with my bank, charging back these fraudulent bastards after their bullshit will not only be justified, but feel good.
Wyke Mossari
Staner Industries
#232 - 2012-04-01 07:52:48 UTC

CCP Sreegs said at fanfest, that appeals had so far only identified One false positive.
Francisco Bizzaro
#233 - 2012-04-01 07:53:10 UTC
Thabiso wrote:

You make 5% sound like nothing. Numbers around the block is they have 300.000 active accounts - 5% is 15.000; so they damned better be near 0.0007% error rate.

For a company that pays its bills based on subscriptions, there is a *really* strong incentive not to chase away innocent subscribers [Hint: it has to do with the subscriptions]

One of the reasons botting is the problem that it is is that its much better for them to err on the side of false negatives than false positives. I'd guess that the True Innocents who were banned and not able to successfully argue for their right to continue to give CCP money numbers in the handful.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#234 - 2012-04-01 07:56:01 UTC
Lapine Davion wrote:
But he is a goonie and teh gooniez are bad people and you haet them. Right?

Pubbie haet goonie.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#235 - 2012-04-01 07:59:06 UTC
Pallidum Treponema wrote:

The best explainations we have right now is that the account either ran out of subscription, or that it was flagged for doing a lot of ISK transactions to people, IE ship reimbursements, titan purchases etc.

There's a lot of ugly rumors going around, suggesting for instance that we bought 15T isk from RMT. That's just ridiculous. Why would we buy that much ISK with the amount of tech and supercaps we sell?

Yes, that does seem to make sense, actually. Unless you're like certain alliances who had tech and RMTed the isk from selling plex.

That said, 15T isk would buy you enough titans to give everyone two reships or something, it's a little insane.

What were Riverini's leaked intel numbers on the number of Titans PL has/had?

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Chokichi Ozuwara
Perkone
Caldari State
#236 - 2012-04-01 08:04:23 UTC
Not to defend Goons, but aren't their finances transparent?

Wouldn't that make it harder for them to RMT?

Tears will be shed and pants will need to be changed all round.

XIRUSPHERE
In Bacon We Trust
#237 - 2012-04-01 08:05:12 UTC
I love all the cries of ship reimbursement or alliance level wallets being exempt from taint because they are dealing with large volumes of people. Simple fact is that is the most probable shell for attempting to launder dirty isk or hide transactions. If CCP were going to drop nukes like this they have more than likely done their homework and followed the dirty money.

Good riddance to all the scum and keep up the good work CCP, here's one person who isn't surprised that a institution that caters to carebears who want zero risk also caters to individuals who aren't interested in the games integrity.

The advantage of a bad memory is that one can enjoy the same good things for the first time several times.

One will rarely err if extreme actions be ascribed to vanity, ordinary actions to habit, and mean actions to fear.

Thodoros
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#238 - 2012-04-01 08:09:53 UTC
Tiger Pennies wrote:
Richard Desturned wrote:
Tiger Pennies wrote:
What are you paid by the minute to be a moron? It did happen and you dropped the ball. Look it up MORON!

Customers of this game should be able to know if their work is safe from morons, if they don't they should get their money back.

If you don't like what CCP is doing, or in this case not doing, vote with your wallet.

They don't care anyways, with their elitist attitude that we are just numbers and bank accounts and not actual people. Enjoy your bag of dicks CCP, that's what you want playing the game.


pro-tip: don't try to rail against anybody with a "CCP" tag


Really? And what is that big bad meanie CCP gonna do? They already ban people for no reason, so I might as well give them one.

O and if it gets me to a quicker solution with my bank, charging back these fraudulent bastards after their bullshit will not only be justified, but feel good.



=======>> Door
bb
Florestan Bronstein
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#239 - 2012-04-01 08:23:39 UTC
Wyke Mossari wrote:

CCP Sreegs said at fanfest, that appeals had so far only identified One false positive.

I hope Sreegs will correct me if I'm wrong but my impression is that:

(a) this only applies to botting, not to RMT (context of the FF presentation)
(b) this only applies to his automated detection methods, not to "bots" caught because of petitions (otherwise Sreegs would be lying)
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#240 - 2012-04-01 08:24:28 UTC
Chokichi Ozuwara wrote:
Not to defend Goons, but aren't their finances transparent?

Wouldn't that make it harder for them to RMT?

Yes, that;s the point of it.

But you see, if you ask the many pubbies here *looks for hands shooting up* they'll tell you it's all fake.

Yes, our reimbursement gives out the same stuff that the titans we sell to reds are made of.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?