These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two

First post First post First post
Author
Amyclas Amatin
SUNDERING
Goonswarm Federation
#2121 - 2015-03-05 09:06:28 UTC
Timezone-locked faction warfare. What could possibly go wrong?

For more information on the New Order of High-Sec, please visit: http://www.minerbumping.com/

Remember that whenever you have a bad day in EVE, the correct reponse is "Thank you CCP, may I please have another?"

Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#2122 - 2015-03-05 09:07:30 UTC
SilentAsTheGrave
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#2123 - 2015-03-05 09:09:50 UTC
Rain6637 wrote:
If you want to hear Mittens speak about Sov and breaking down the enemy with exhaustive threats of invasion, find a recording of his EVE Vegas 2012 presentation. Then relate that to how easy it is to present a credible threat with this Entosis laser. Then come back and read what Aryth, Alp Khan, Querns, Arrendis, and Gevlon have said in this thread.

The fear mongering you guys keep doing is getting tiresome.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#2124 - 2015-03-05 09:10:06 UTC
Rain6637 wrote:
You'd end up with an Australia that nobody touches.


So basically, Turn 3 of Risk?
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#2125 - 2015-03-05 09:16:15 UTC
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:
Rain6637 wrote:
If you want to hear Mittens speak about Sov and breaking down the enemy with exhaustive threats of invasion, find a recording of his EVE Vegas 2012 presentation. Then relate that to how easy it is to present a credible threat with this Entosis laser. Then come back and read what Aryth, Alp Khan, Querns, Arrendis, and Gevlon have said in this thread.

The fear mongering you guys keep doing is getting tiresome.

m8 you're confused. That post has the most candor of any of my posts in this thread so far.
Amyclas Amatin
SUNDERING
Goonswarm Federation
#2126 - 2015-03-05 09:17:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Amyclas Amatin
Timezone locked faction warfare is not an idea that ANY null-sec entity will get on-board with.

But then you can't trust the CFC because we're here to ruin everyone else's game. And you can't trust N3 either because they are dirty mega-renters.

Listen to the Empire players, the heart and soul of a dynamic and inclusive EVE. They will surely love this timezone-locked faction warfare content for the revolutionary innovation in gaming that it truly is.

For more information on the New Order of High-Sec, please visit: http://www.minerbumping.com/

Remember that whenever you have a bad day in EVE, the correct reponse is "Thank you CCP, may I please have another?"

Dark Spite
Ascendance
Goonswarm Federation
#2127 - 2015-03-05 09:21:47 UTC
Rain6637 wrote:
If you want to hear Mittens speak about Sov and breaking down the enemy with exhaustive threats of invasion, find a recording of his EVE Vegas 2012 presentation. Then relate that to how easy it is to present a credible threat with this Entosis laser. Then come back and read what Aryth, Alp Khan, Querns, Arrendis, and Gevlon have said in this thread.


I dont doubt that many of the gamers in goons/cfc want the game to be fun! I had a great time rolling around with Topgoon last time I was subbed in 2014. But what is this above meant to prove? Is it that CFC/The Mittani will use all tools including those of a physcological nature that dont have an ingame mechanic in order to wear down their enemy. Check, we knew that!!! Its pretty much how CFC won the Tribute war against NC.

You can sh*t all over other entities, we know that. But what the game lacks now is a chance for smaller entities and newer groups to be part of nullsec sov-holding. The large exception to it being impossible are the variouss reddit-born groups that have come onto eve during the last years. Maybe some of these mechanics like the Entosis module need to be tuned, but focusing capitals towards fighting capitals as is a great thing. Finally I can use my dreads and carriers for combat and even when in a smaller group. Having sov space again would be fun and I would like to help my alliancemates who never had the chance for null get in at an entry level. Not everyone is suited for the coalitions, and the game desperately needs mechanics that are focused on serving the smaller and mid-sized groups. Large coalitions will still be superstrong but holding all the empty territories will be harder and less motivating for the line members, which is a good thing tbh.

I dont want to be a renter and I dont want to be part of the larger coalitions this time around because I have absolutely NO impact on what content is generated for me with the exception of a roam or so. Not that I have all the answers, but the best gametime for me was when in small to mid-sized alliances without a bloated bluelist.

That sov levels are based on mining and ratting is a far greater issue imo. Mining and running anomalies are really bad parameters with regards to providing security to other players and fuelling the industry that alliances really need in order to function combatwise and provide SRP to members. Industry has other indexes after Crius that would be much more relavant to use. For security its more tricky, since any linking of pvp-kills/value can be exploited as proven by goon finance cabal when revamped FW was introduced.
SilentAsTheGrave
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#2128 - 2015-03-05 09:22:21 UTC
For those who are claiming they will take over half the galaxy in 40 minutes with their swarms of interceptors; what are your plans for protecting your space while you are away? Do you honestly think no one will do the same thing to you?

You claim that any small group will be crushed by your thousand upon thousands, but you leave the rest of your territory wide open. So you will lose it just as fast as you gain it.

Your other option is to spread your blog out across your territory in order to hold it. Your so called blob to blot out the sun is now thinned out. Now instead of that small group facing thousands and thousands of you at once, they enjoy only having to fight smaller sections at a time. Thus, greatly increasing their odds of winning.

Everyone knows that without massive numbers, most large blocs do terrible in smaller scale combat compared to the average player due to how much they relied on massive numbers to do anything. I can't help but think that is the reason for all this fear mongering you all have been doing. The idea of having to fight a smaller group without bringing every single member of your coalition bloc frightens you.

It's OK to be afraid. I have faith your pilots will learn how to use more than just the F1 key. Blink
Arrendis
TK Corp
#2129 - 2015-03-05 09:25:52 UTC
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:
For those who are claiming they will take over half the galaxy in 40 minutes with their swarms of interceptors; what are your plans for protecting your space while you are away? Do you honestly think no one will do the same thing to you?


Actually, if you check the comments in the trollceptor article on TMC, I did the math: CONDI could mount an active defense of every sov structure it owns and still theoretically have 50% of its 11,997 members available to troll.

Quote:
I have faith your pilots will learn how to use more than just the F1 key. Blink


Really? Cuz we don't. :)
SilentAsTheGrave
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#2130 - 2015-03-05 09:31:46 UTC
Rain6637 wrote:
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:
Rain6637 wrote:
If you want to hear Mittens speak about Sov and breaking down the enemy with exhaustive threats of invasion, find a recording of his EVE Vegas 2012 presentation. Then relate that to how easy it is to present a credible threat with this Entosis laser. Then come back and read what Aryth, Alp Khan, Querns, Arrendis, and Gevlon have said in this thread.

The fear mongering you guys keep doing is getting tiresome.

m8 you're confused. That post has the most candor of any of my posts in this thread so far.

Sorry, but taking into consideration mittens past, I can't take anything that guy has to say seriously. Everything he says and does is just super market, tabloid style propaganda. Straight

That aside, I am looking forward to these separate issue threads CCP Fozzie was talking about and hopefully any kinks in this new sov system can be ironed out before it hits Tranquility.

I'm just really tired of this thread. All I see are bloc members screaming with tear filled eyes how this change will be the end of the game. The same tears were spilled over the jump fatigue mechanic and that change has proven to be very healthy for the game as a whole, despite the vocal minority who relied so heavily on teleporation to do even the most basic things in the game. They became fat, lazy and rich. Now they are very upset they can't continue to parade around as digital cancer to the game.

Again, I look forward to the new threads and engaging in healthy dialog with everyone, no matter who they are. But, I will not suffer fools.
Lurifax
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#2131 - 2015-03-05 09:32:58 UTC
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:
For those who are claiming they will take over half the galaxy in 40 minutes with their swarms of interceptors; what are your plans for protecting your space while you are away? Do you honestly think no one will do the same thing to you?

You claim that any small group will be crushed by your thousand upon thousands, but you leave the rest of your territory wide open. So you will lose it just as fast as you gain it.

Your other option is to spread your blog out across your territory in order to hold it. Your so called blob to blot out the sun is now thinned out. Now instead of that small group facing thousands and thousands of you at once, they enjoy only having to fight smaller sections at a time. Thus, greatly increasing their odds of winning.

Everyone knows that without massive numbers, most large blocs do terrible in smaller scale combat compared to the average player due to how much they relied on massive numbers to do anything. I can't help but think that is the reason for all this fear mongering you all have been doing. The idea of having to fight a smaller group without bringing every single member of your coalition bloc frightens you.

It's OK to be afraid. I have faith your pilots will learn how to use more than just the F1 key. Blink


The point will not be to hold, but to grief you. Unachor the Ihub and destroy the upgrades then reanchor it again. Now you have to bring in a new ihub and upgrades.
Adrie Atticus
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#2132 - 2015-03-05 09:34:41 UTC
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:


It's OK to be afraid. I have faith your pilots will learn how to use more than just the F1 key. Blink


Put Entosis Link behind F1, problem solved.
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#2133 - 2015-03-05 09:35:15 UTC
Hey Dark Spite, I didn't mean for it to make anyone upset. I mentioned it for anyone interested in proof of how Entosis sov will be used by goons.

The summary of Mittenz' talk was how to run sov warfare. So it is very relevant. He also mentions that Sov is EVE's best / only undeniable win condition. You can measure battles in ISK and ships, but the final flag that is planted is Sov. So. Sov has ISK benefits, but it's not about that, it's about planting that flag.

The other interesting thing about his talk is the date. 2012. At the time, his example for griefing was fake-out cynos, for days on end. Light random cynos in the space you intend to invade, and bring nothing through it. They'll respond and get amped up initially, but over time it will just wear them down.

Not sure if you're aware, but groups in EVE fall apart without so much as a shot fired, due to things like stress.

In 2015, it won't be cynos, it will be Entosis modules. The tactics he discussed in that presentation work even better with Entosis sov.

And then you have the people who have posted in this thread. They are warning everyone that Entosis sov will be bad. Gevlon included, and his comments can be taken as acknowledgement that it will be abused by you know who. Goon comments can be taken as gloating, or whatever you like.
Nat Silverguard
Aideron Robotics
Aideron Robotics.
#2134 - 2015-03-05 09:39:20 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:
For those who are claiming they will take over half the galaxy in 40 minutes with their swarms of interceptors; what are your plans for protecting your space while you are away? Do you honestly think no one will do the same thing to you?


Actually, if you check the comments in the trollceptor article on TMC, I did the math: CONDI could mount an active defense of every sov structure it owns and still theoretically have 50% of its 11,997 members available to troll.

Quote:
I have faith your pilots will learn how to use more than just the F1 key. Blink


Really? Cuz we don't. :)


that article is d*mb, what's the value of the "trollceptor's" speed, mobility and range if all the defender needs to do is just sit right next to the node and capture it with it's own entosis thingy to stop the "capturing event's" progress? they don't even need to attack, just tank the assault and endure it for 4 hrs...

Just Add Water

SilentAsTheGrave
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#2135 - 2015-03-05 09:41:20 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:
For those who are claiming they will take over half the galaxy in 40 minutes with their swarms of interceptors; what are your plans for protecting your space while you are away? Do you honestly think no one will do the same thing to you?


Actually, if you check the comments in the trollceptor article on TMC, I did the math: CONDI could mount an active defense of every sov structure it owns and still theoretically have 50% of its 11,997 members available to troll.

Goons are incapable of fighting alone in such small numbers. So to entertain the idea that they would fair well in small scale combat is laughable - much less solo pvp. Blink

I'm just taking playful jabs by the way. I mean no harm. P
SilentAsTheGrave
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#2136 - 2015-03-05 09:42:54 UTC
Adrie Atticus wrote:
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:


It's OK to be afraid. I have faith your pilots will learn how to use more than just the F1 key. Blink


Put Entosis Link behind F1, problem solved.

Oh god... This is a bad idea! Shocked
Lurifax
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#2137 - 2015-03-05 09:43:02 UTC
Nat Silverguard wrote:
Arrendis wrote:
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:
For those who are claiming they will take over half the galaxy in 40 minutes with their swarms of interceptors; what are your plans for protecting your space while you are away? Do you honestly think no one will do the same thing to you?


Actually, if you check the comments in the trollceptor article on TMC, I did the math: CONDI could mount an active defense of every sov structure it owns and still theoretically have 50% of its 11,997 members available to troll.

Quote:
I have faith your pilots will learn how to use more than just the F1 key. Blink


Really? Cuz we don't. :)


that article is d*mb, what's the value of the "trollceptor's" speed, mobility and range if all the defender needs to do is just sit right next to the node and capture it with it's own entosis thingy to stop the "capturing event's" progress? they don't even need to attack, just tank the assault and endure it for 4 hrs...


That is going to be 4 lovely hours sitting there with the defence beam. Sounds like a good mechanic right ? The attacker has everything to win and nothing to lose.
Sgt Ocker
What Corp is it
#2138 - 2015-03-05 09:45:36 UTC
CCP Phantom wrote:
While the current sovereignty system worked fine for many years, we see the need for a fundamental overhaul.

We are excited to present the plans for a new sov system coming early this summer including:
1) No more grinding through hitpoints
2) Meaningful combat events distributed over the whole constellation
3) Space activity results in defensive bonus
4) Designated daily "Prime time" for alliances when their structures become vulnerable

Read all about this new sov system, the mechanics and the fine details in CCP Fozzie's latest blog Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two!

1) so much easier for large groups to conquer (only need 100 Ishtars instead of 300)
2) so much easier for large groups to cover and conquer (small groups won't be able to undertake activities over a constellation)
3) LOL
4) How biased is that gong to be - Large group picks "Prime Time" and only a larger group will stand a chance of defeating them. Small group picks prime time and large group kick crap out of them.
Large groups can cover all time zones, small group 1, if they are a well focused group who all live in the same part of the world.

Quote:
Bringing more players will always have some value, as it will provide advantages in direct fleet combat with your opponents. But a system that allows small numbers of players to conquer space as quickly as larger numbers ensures that if your fleet has the capability to win the fight, you automatically have enough people to take the Sovereignty objectives.

In one short paragraph you spelled out how easily only the large entities will take or hold sov to the exclusion of anyone they don't want there.
Seriously - What small group is going to go try to take sov with a 40,000 man coalition within range.
I'm sure a few small groups will try initially but it won't be long before they just give up and either join one of the giant coalitions or go back to npc nul.
Quote:
Our realistic goal for the new Sovereignty system is that a very small group of players in virtually any ship types should be able to completely conquer an undefended system with a few ~10-30 minute sessions spread across a few days

As long as large groups can move to counter any attempts by "small numbers of players" "spread over a few days". No small group is going to be able to take sov.

The only thing likely to be achieved here is small tracts of SovNul that never have anyone take sov. The big groups don't need to take any more sov than they want and simply stop anyone else from taking the vacant bits in between that they don't want..

Good try but -1

My opinions are mine.

  If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - - Just don't bother Hating - I don't care

It really is getting harder and harder to justify $23 a month for each sub.

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#2139 - 2015-03-05 09:46:07 UTC
CCP I spoke to some ex-players about this change, most of who left due to sov being meh, and so far everyone who I spoke to were positive and were thinking about re-subbing so they can carve out their own space even if its precarious. Stick to your guns on this, its being well received by people who left because doing sov was impossible with supers on line.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

SilentAsTheGrave
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#2140 - 2015-03-05 09:48:58 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
CCP I spoke to some ex-players about this change, most of who left due to sov being meh, and so far everyone who I spoke to were positive and were thinking about re-subbing so they can carve out their own space even if its precarious. Stick to your guns on this, its being well received by people who left because doing sov was impossible with supers on line.

Silence you! Only the current blocs should be allowed to own sov! Any changes to the game that allows a group not affiliated to an existing coalition to take even a single system is heresy!