These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

War on Gankers

First post
Author
Kaely Tanniss
Black Lotus Society.
#121 - 2015-01-01 02:57:54 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Estella Osoka wrote:
Winning is subjective.

Players can easily win if they:

1. Don't go AFK
2. Watch d-scan
3. Watch local chat
4. Set known CODE members as red.
5. Dock up when you see them in system.
6. Don't sit still in a asteroid belt or stay at 0 on your mission gates.
7. Don't be a douche.

Of course, this is what CODE has been trying to educate players on for years.


Not worth the effort....too low of a probability of getting ganked to justify dscanning


Tell that to the thousands of angry carebears who get exploded on a daily basis. Oh...wait, no need to tell them..they won't do it anyways. Twisted

If I had a nickel for every time someone said women don't play eve, I'd have a bag of nickels to whack the next person who said it..

Kaely Tanniss
Black Lotus Society.
#122 - 2015-01-01 03:19:00 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Gorila Vengaza wrote:
I just want to Salute James 315 for sending in VEERS...

Once they get a good dose of Veers this new rebel leader will be come running to code just as I did.


Now who wants to help me catch Veers and put him back in the barn?


Yawn....grr veers detected.

Not to disappoint, but code doesnt have the bandwith to hunt me down and gank me. I suppose your ability to get on 57 concord killmails in a single day could change the equation.

But yes, running missions and incursions is still super safe, which means the good guys are winning.


Who are the "good" guys Veers...you? That's a matter of opinion and I can assure you the majority of opinion is it is not you. Ask yourself, who is the real cancer of Eve..Those who engage in the very thing the game is all about; emergent gameplay, social interaction, exploding spaceships, vying for economic and military control..etc...or is the ones who go to Mexican restaurant and demand Itallian food, claiming it is their right because they are "paying customers". The true "good" and "bad" guys are subjective. Eve is what it is, many play this ti its maximum...while other whine that Eve is not what they want it to be and cry for change. If you want Itallian, go to an italian restaurant..if you want Eve, meaning explosions, criminals, pvp, risk...then you've come to the right place.

After all Veers...opinions are like, well, you know...everyone's got one..and they all stink...Twisted

If I had a nickel for every time someone said women don't play eve, I'd have a bag of nickels to whack the next person who said it..

Gorila Vengaza
Ol-Silly Basterds
#123 - 2015-01-01 09:06:48 UTC
Would ya like to know my BEST day in AG???

The day I gagged Veers.

I know your ALL jealous.....
CODE Agent AC
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#124 - 2015-01-01 09:08:48 UTC
Gorila Vengaza wrote:
Would ya like to know my BEST day in AG???

The day I gagged Veers.

I know your ALL jealous.....



Thread locked.

The Rules:
5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that a person who CCP does not promote in anyway nor is attempting to represent them.

The Artist Formerly Known As AC. 

The terminal end of the digestive system. 

The Best CSM Candidate

Kaely Tanniss
Black Lotus Society.
#125 - 2015-01-01 09:10:02 UTC
Gorila Vengaza wrote:
Would ya like to know my BEST day in AG???

The day I gagged Veers.

I know your ALL jealous.....


Like you wouldn't believe...lol Cool

If I had a nickel for every time someone said women don't play eve, I'd have a bag of nickels to whack the next person who said it..

Kaely Tanniss
Black Lotus Society.
#126 - 2015-01-01 09:12:06 UTC
CODE Agent AC wrote:
Gorila Vengaza wrote:
Would ya like to know my BEST day in AG???

The day I gagged Veers.

I know your ALL jealous.....



Thread locked.

The Rules:
5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that a person who CCP does not promote in anyway nor is attempting to represent them.



Oh shush AC..let the man speak of his Veers silencing..hehehehe Blink

If I had a nickel for every time someone said women don't play eve, I'd have a bag of nickels to whack the next person who said it..

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#127 - 2015-01-01 11:31:19 UTC
Gorila Vengaza wrote:
Would ya like to know my BEST day in AG???

The day I gagged Veers.

I know your ALL jealous.....


Good Lord, I think I actually started salivating...

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#128 - 2015-01-01 13:46:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Veers Belvar
Gorila Vengaza wrote:
Would ya like to know my BEST day in AG???

The day I gagged Veers.

I know your ALL jealous.....


Absolutely. You were secretly a CODE sympathizer the ENTIRE time...I immediately identified you as a Benedict Arnold, but could not speak up because of your position. Not to mention a complete inability to grasp my actual proposal vis-a-vis bumping. Anyhow...what other accomplishments did you have? Wildly incompetent stewardship of AG fleets with a less than 1% success rate? Whoring on thousands of CONCORD killmails for who knows what reason? Running a confused blog that only served to make code look good? Rila, if you didn't exist, code would need to have invented you...you were always the perfect opponent for them, a perennial loser who would lead AG to defeat DAY AFTER DAY AFTER DAY. I mean, code couldn't have paid you to be a more incompetent adversary.
Gorila Vengaza
Ol-Silly Basterds
#129 - 2015-01-01 14:05:26 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Gorila Vengaza wrote:
Would ya like to know my BEST day in AG???

The day I gagged Veers.

I know your ALL jealous.....


Absolutely. You were secretly a CODE sympathizer the ENTIRE time...I immediately identified you as a Benedict Arnold, but could not speak up because of your position. Not to mention a complete inability to grasp my actual proposal vis-a-vis bumping. Anyhow...what other accomplishments did you have? Wildly incompetent stewardship of AG fleets with a less than 1% success rate? Whoring on thousands of CONCORD killmails for who knows what reason? Running a confused blog that only served to make code look good? Rila, if you didn't exist, code would need to have invented you...you were always the perfect opponent for them, a perennial loser who would lead AG to defeat DAY AFTER DAY AFTER DAY. I mean, code couldn't have paid you to be a more incompetent adversary.



lolololol he sounds mad ..Veers, Ill say this, I did a hellva lot more than you ever have. I dont think hee hawing loudly at ppl & CCP is playing EVE. I guess that's what you consider ELITE BRAYING...er i mean PVE.

Cool
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#130 - 2015-01-01 14:11:03 UTC
Gorila Vengaza wrote:



lolololol he sounds mad ..Veers, Ill say this, I did a hellva lot more than you ever have. I dont think hee hawing loudly at ppl & CCP is playing EVE. I guess that's what you consider ELITE BRAYING...er i mean PVE.

Cool


No, I feel vindicated as usual. Within a few minutes of meeting you I properly identified you as a turncoat. My judgment remains incredibly sharp and utterly correct. You did nothing for AG...all you did was justify "the code always wins" slogan. Not once did you materially impact the operations of code...all you did was provide them with entertainment, easy victories, and content. They loved you. They really don't love me....I provide them no victories and no entertainment...just endless frustration that someone can eloquently stand up for highsec PvE players on the foums.

That's how you beat code...not by blowing up their gank catalysts that are going to die anyway.
Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
#131 - 2015-01-01 14:13:39 UTC
Gorila Vengaza wrote:
ololol he sounds mad ..Veers, Ill say this, I did a hellva lot more than you ever have. I dont think hee hawing loudly at ppl & CCP is playing EVE. I guess that's what you consider ELITE BRAYING...er i mean PVE.

Cool


do you feel "cool" now that your a "ganker", turncoat.

@JerryTPepridge

Gorila Vengaza
Ol-Silly Basterds
#132 - 2015-01-01 14:20:39 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Gorila Vengaza wrote:



lolololol he sounds mad ..Veers, Ill say this, I did a hellva lot more than you ever have. I dont think hee hawing loudly at ppl & CCP is playing EVE. I guess that's what you consider ELITE BRAYING...er i mean PVE.

Cool


No, I feel vindicated as usual. Within a few minutes of meeting you I properly identified you as a turncoat. My judgment remains incredibly sharp and utterly correct. You did nothing for AG...all you did was justify "the code always wins" slogan. Not once did you materially impact the operations of code...all you did was provide them with entertainment, easy victories, and content. They loved you. They really don't love me....I provide them no victories and no entertainment...just endless frustration that someone can eloquently stand up for highsec PvE players on the foums.

That's how you beat code...not by blowing up their gank catalysts that are going to die anyway.



Veers, in my time playing eve, i have run missions, tried mining for 15 mins (hated it) lived in low, lived in null, lived in a wh, done exploration, run incursions, fought with Goons against TEST, Fought code and now I'm fighting WITH code. I've played the game and enjoyed every min. And along the way Ive made several friends who I enjoy playing the game with. What have you done? Run Incursions and run your mouth. That's IT.

Next?.Big smile
Gorila Vengaza
Ol-Silly Basterds
#133 - 2015-01-01 14:34:51 UTC
One last thing.

If I am "a perennial loser who would lead AG to defeat DAY AFTER DAY AFTER DAY. I mean, code couldn't have paid you to be a more incompetent adversary."

Why don't YOU step up Veers.
Lets see you lead AG to VICTORY. In other words, try putting up or try shutting up. It's wide open veers. Do something other than talk.

Sadly I suspect all Veers will do is bray LOUDLY at more people.

Excuses from Veers incoming!
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#134 - 2015-01-01 14:53:06 UTC
Gorila Vengaza wrote:
One last thing.

If I am "a perennial loser who would lead AG to defeat DAY AFTER DAY AFTER DAY. I mean, code couldn't have paid you to be a more incompetent adversary."

Why don't YOU step up Veers.
Lets see you lead AG to VICTORY. In other words, try putting up or try shutting up. It's wide open veers. Do something other than talk.

Sadly I suspect all Veers will do is bray LOUDLY at more people.

Excuses from Veers incoming!


The game mechanics overwhelmingly favor CODE. There is no point in playing whiteknight just to lose over and over again. Until CCP changes the mechanics to make it possible for whiteknights to actually harm CODE, it would be stupid and pointless to try and stop their ganking.

A smart man only acts when the benefits of doing so outweigh the costs, otherwise the status quo ante is preferable. I'm certainly far too competent to spend my valuable time tilting at windmills.
Gorila Vengaza
Ol-Silly Basterds
#135 - 2015-01-01 15:06:14 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Gorila Vengaza wrote:
One last thing.

If I am "a perennial loser who would lead AG to defeat DAY AFTER DAY AFTER DAY. I mean, code couldn't have paid you to be a more incompetent adversary."

Why don't YOU step up Veers.
Lets see you lead AG to VICTORY. In other words, try putting up or try shutting up. It's wide open veers. Do something other than talk.

Sadly I suspect all Veers will do is bray LOUDLY at more people.

Excuses from Veers incoming!


The game mechanics overwhelmingly favor CODE. There is no point in playing whiteknight just to lose over and over again. Until CCP changes the mechanics to make it possible for whiteknights to actually harm CODE, it would be stupid and pointless to try and stop their ganking.

A smart man only acts when the benefits of doing so outweigh the costs, otherwise the status quo ante is preferable. I'm certainly far too competent to spend my valuable time tilting at windmills.



As I expected veers, more excuses as to why you wont do anything but bray at CCP and code to make yourself seem relevant.
Concord Guy's Cousin
Doomheim
#136 - 2015-01-01 15:08:54 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Lazy and AFK players mean that the game mechanics overwhelmingly favor CODE. There is no point in playing whiteknight just to lose over and over again because gankers are usually far more familiar with game mechanics than most white knights are . Until CCP changes the mechanics to make it possible for whiteknights to actually harm CODE without expending effort, it would be stupid and pointless to try and stop their ganking.
FTFY

Quote:
A smart man only acts when the benefits of doing so outweigh the costs, otherwise the status quo ante is preferable. I'm certainly far too competent to spend my valuable time tilting at windmills.
Yet you seem to spend most of your time proving exactly how incompetent you are by tilting at the very windmills you claim not to be tilting at. You're not the smart man you think you are.

ISD LackOfFaith ~ "Your Catalyst was a hamster, and your Retriever smelt of elderberries"

NPC Forum Alt, because reasons.

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#137 - 2015-01-01 15:22:32 UTC
Concord Guy's Cousin wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Lazy and AFK players mean that the game mechanics overwhelmingly favor CODE. There is no point in playing whiteknight just to lose over and over again because gankers are usually far more familiar with game mechanics than most white knights are . Until CCP changes the mechanics to make it possible for whiteknights to actually harm CODE without expending effort, it would be stupid and pointless to try and stop their ganking.
FTFY

Quote:
A smart man only acts when the benefits of doing so outweigh the costs, otherwise the status quo ante is preferable. I'm certainly far too competent to spend my valuable time tilting at windmills.
Yet you seem to spend most of your time proving exactly how incompetent you are by tilting at the very windmills you claim not to be tilting at. You're not the smart man you think you are.



and failing to get it.....the mechanics are broken, they favor the gankers. 30 guys in 3 mil isk catalysts can blow up a 5 bil isk jump freighter. The punishment for doing so? loss of ship and a 15 minute timeout. That's a fundamentally broken criminal justice system. And the most the AG folks can do is blow up the catalysts. There is no way to compel gankers to undock in expensive ships and put significant isk at risk. There is no way to arrest and convict gankers and sentence them to months or years in eve jails.

To wit, there is no way to materially harm the gankers. I have never really tried to play whiteknight...and i would encourage all others to not do so until the mechanics are changed to force gankers to put significant assets at risk when ganking. Until then, don't bother trying, you will never win.
Gorila Vengaza
Ol-Silly Basterds
#138 - 2015-01-01 15:30:12 UTC
Can you imagine Veers horror if he were to play GTA??

Its rather simple, he fails to GET EVE.
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#139 - 2015-01-01 15:36:54 UTC
Gorila Vengaza wrote:
Can you imagine Veers horror if he were to play GTA??

Its rather simple, he fails to GET EVE.


Shrug...I play world of tanks all the time. I have no problem with violence in a game built around consequence free violence. What I do oppose is the lack of real consequences for suicide ganking in highsec which can destroy months of hard work in a few seconds. That's a major imbalance that is screaming out for a fix. There is no reason for concord punishments to be restricted to 15 minute timeouts.
Concord Guy's Cousin
Doomheim
#140 - 2015-01-01 15:39:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Concord Guy's Cousin
Veers Belvar wrote:
and failing to get it.....the mechanics are broken, they favor the gankers.
What favors the gankers is that they're prepared to work together and know how the mechanics work, unlike their victims for the most part. The mechanics aren't broken, it's the ability of their victims to understand and utilise the mechanics to their advantage that is broken.

Quote:
30 guys in 3 mil isk catalysts can blow up a 5 bil isk jump freighter.
Why is this a bad thing? The efforts of multiple players usually outweigh the efforts of a single player, it's a little thing called teamwork.

Quote:
The punishment for doing so? loss of ship and a 15 minute timeout. That's a fundamentally broken criminal justice system. And the most the AG folks can do is blow up the catalysts. There is no way to compel gankers to undock in expensive ships and put significant isk at risk. There is no way to arrest and convict gankers and sentence them to months or years in eve jails.
It's a game, not the real world. They are destroying pixels not physical items, as such the punishment matches the crime.

Quote:
To wit, there is no way to materially harm the gankers. I have never really tried to play whiteknight...and i would encourage all others to not do so until the mechanics are changed to force gankers to put significant assets at risk when ganking. Until then, don't bother trying, you will never win.
TL;DR you've got no idea what you're talking about and want CCP to change the mechanics so that gankers can be materially harmed without expending any effort.

FYI there are many ways to hit gankers in the wallet, fortunately for the gankers they require effort and some planning to achieve.

ISD LackOfFaith ~ "Your Catalyst was a hamster, and your Retriever smelt of elderberries"

NPC Forum Alt, because reasons.