These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Erotica 1 for CSM 9

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Kiryen O'Bannon
SUNDERING
Goonswarm Federation
#21 - 2014-03-13 02:53:53 UTC
Why don't you come out to Sendaya? There's about 14000 of us who are most likely not going to vote for you, that you can try some Extra Enforcement on?

Really, why would anyone actually vote for you? Leaving aside the obvious self-aggrandizement going on here, how do you represent my interests as a low-sec PVPer? Ganking miners? So.. mineral prices go up, ship prices go up.. I have to pay more for Thoraxes which we apparently ran Jita completely out of for several hours this past week.

Yeah.. no. High sec miners are really only a problem for people that want to gank in highsec, or just spend all their time worrying about the "Carebear menace" on the forum. You simply don't represent a significant number of people.

Eternal Father, King of birth, /Who didst create the heaven and earth, /And bid the planets and the sun/ Their own appointed orbits run; /O hear us when we seek thy grace /For those who soar through outer space.
Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations
#22 - 2014-03-14 11:45:32 UTC
Brave Newbies, more enforcement. Thanks!

See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did.
Tear Jar
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#23 - 2014-03-18 17:27:17 UTC
Tarojan wrote:
Would a removal of concord help or hinder the game? Thats a very good question. I too would like to hear the ops thoughts on this. Its one way to ensure miner interaction as they are all forced to spam dscan or die.


As an active suicide ganker, I think there should be a Concord. Concord does not make ganking impossible, it just shifts the risk/reward curve. I think Concord is in a good spot right now.

My main issue would be with CCPs slow reaction time to real bots. I have seen 23/7 bots in my local system and CCP has ignored my reports for over a month.
Makie Tachibana
Knights in White Satin
#24 - 2014-03-20 17:54:49 UTC
Erotica 1 wrote:

...
If highsec miners are, instead, afk for the vote, then they are effectively voting for a dramatic increase in enforcement actions until satisfactory compliance objectives are met.


Erotica 1, how would you go about enacting this increase in enforcement actions?
Malcolm Shinhwa
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2014-03-21 23:25:35 UTC
Along with Psychotic Monk, I support Erotica 1 for CSM. Eve needs more ganky and a ton more panky. They will both be on my ballot.

[i]"The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental[/i]."
Tengu Grib
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#26 - 2014-03-24 17:22:59 UTC
Erotica 1 will be on ALL my ballots. More content in high sec, more content for everyone.

Rabble Rabble Rabble

Praise James, Supreme Protector of High Sec.
Josef Djugashvilis
#27 - 2014-03-24 20:35:25 UTC
Erotica 1 wrote:
I'm okay with all of the highsec miners quitting EVE, if that's what happens. We can replace them with new miners who want to be at their keyboards for some sort of active mining mechanic.

You can't make decisions based on pro-themepark carebears crying.


I may vote for you so that I can spend a year laughing at you when CCP pat you on the head when you tell them to lose customers.

CCP will not give you a free supply of mayonnaise, so there is no real point in you standing, even for giggles.

I take it you still have the goons backing you? Smile

This is not a signature.
okoolos rimmer
Napkin Nation
#28 - 2014-03-25 10:54:08 UTC  |  Edited by: okoolos rimmer
I just read Jester's article and listened to the recording of your "bonus room". Despicable doesn't even begin to describe it. I really hope you get permanently banned. You deserve it.
Jaari Val'Dara
Grim Sleepers
#29 - 2014-03-25 10:58:07 UTC
What does that extra enforcement even mean? That just sounds stupid.
Nytoxias
ISB Banner Interstellar Operations
#30 - 2014-03-25 11:43:09 UTC
As a former null security space pilot, carebear, incursion-runner, scam victim, general PvPer and tryer-of-all-things shooty, I have an extreme disagreement with you trying to be elected to any committee with oversight to the EVE Online community. I have no qualms with your operations alongside James315 or the New Order Organisation - I personally operated a miner ganking team on other characters with two gankers and a scout and generally didn't mind the New Order's presence.

My issue with you is your activities in you knowingly evading the EVE Online Terms of Service in order to take part in activities that you know would get you banned otherwise.

You are a known scammer - and that's perfectly okay.

You are an individual who selects victims and takes them into external services in order to bully and harass them for the entertainment of you and your friends. That is not okay.

There are no major rules in place in EVE to protect player assets, but you are an individual who willfully circumvents the rules set in place by the game to protect player well-being. You then have the gall to pretend to be a candidate on an oversight committee for these players.

You are a textbook extremist politician. You stand here claiming that you will improve a part of space, but all you'll do is propose idiotic suggestions that waste people's time. You know your suggestions will be struck down because of their extremism, but you'll propose them anyway to waste people's time. You hold extremist views and take part in extremist actions while circumventing rules and customs, then you claim to stand for the good of the community.

You're no candidate for the Council of Stellar Management. You're just a disgusting human being who wants more attention.

Add me to your extra enforcement all you like. I'm retired from EVE Online.
Tarojan
Tarojan Corporation
#31 - 2014-03-25 12:02:11 UTC
Nytoxias wrote:
As a former null security space pilot, carebear, incursion-runner, scam victim, general PvPer and tryer-of-all-things shooty, I have an extreme disagreement with you trying to be elected to any committee with oversight to the EVE Online community. I have no qualms with your operations alongside James315 or the New Order Organisation - I personally operated a miner ganking team on other characters with two gankers and a scout and generally didn't mind the New Order's presence.

My issue with you is your activities in you knowingly evading the EVE Online Terms of Service in order to take part in activities that you know would get you banned otherwise.

You are a known scammer - and that's perfectly okay.

You are an individual who selects victims and takes them into external services in order to bully and harass them for the entertainment of you and your friends. That is not okay.

There are no major rules in place in EVE to protect player assets, but you are an individual who willfully circumvents the rules set in place by the game to protect player well-being. You then have the gall to pretend to be a candidate on an oversight committee for these players.

You are a textbook extremist politician. You stand here claiming that you will improve a part of space, but all you'll do is propose idiotic suggestions that waste people's time. You know your suggestions will be struck down because of their extremism, but you'll propose them anyway to waste people's time. You hold extremist views and take part in extremist actions while circumventing rules and customs, then you claim to stand for the good of the community.

You're no candidate for the Council of Stellar Management. You're just a disgusting human being who wants more attention.

Add me to your extra enforcement all you like. I'm retired from EVE Online.



...and thats an extreme view you hold. You openly say you gank, have multiple ganker characters and a scout so we can assume perhaps you arent part of the carebear menace. This make yr extreme opinion on Erotica all the more befuddling. You appear to have forgotten the first rule of eve online: EVE ONLINE IS A GAME NOT AN EXTENSION OF REALITY.

Will gank for food
Tarojan
Tarojan Corporation
#32 - 2014-03-25 12:16:05 UTC
Erotica my second vote, does it go here or to Monk? Cos high secs worth fighting for and we could really use a candidate who understands the need for more content not less.

Will gank for food
Orrin Kuvakei
Quorum of Truth
#33 - 2014-03-25 17:10:16 UTC
Having just read Ripard's article about your "bonus room" and listened to the complete soundcloud, all I can really say is that I do not think you have any business running for CSM9, playing Eve, and I certainly wouldn't want anyone have to serve with you on any form of delegation. I feel there are things in game that people partake that are not seen as above board: killing, destroying, ransoming, scamming, drug dealing, pirating, back stabbing, trolling, et al; but what I just listened to was beyond the scope of anything I would classify as part of the Eve Online gameplay.

I am not a Saint by any stretch of the imagination, and although I see your campaign thread as a troll thread in this sub-forum, you have no place on any CSM, and I am surprised that you still have an active account in this game. Players shouldn't waste their votes or time on you, and although I imagine this is a troll and you are not even sincere about releasing your personal information to the playerbase, I want to make sure that people that visit this thread can see this:

http://jestertrek.blogspot.com.au/2014/03/the-bonus-round.html

https://soundcloud.com/kalorned/erotica1bonusroom_sohkar

Brother Orrim Kuvakei, Quorum of Truth Speaker of Truths and Former Adjudicator
Feyth Yinleq
Doomheim
#34 - 2014-03-25 17:15:59 UTC
I just read the Jester's article too and listened to your bonus-room session.

I do not have words to describe how much you disgust me. Please leave these forums and never post again. Leave the posting to decent human beings.

Even better, leave the game.
mynnna
State War Academy
Caldari State
#35 - 2014-03-25 17:33:05 UTC
Tarojan wrote:
You appear to have forgotten the first rule of eve online: EVE ONLINE IS A GAME NOT AN EXTENSION OF REALITY.

...then why are you supporting a candidate whose signature and defining characteristic is a reveling in his repeated insistence to carry EVE into reality at all, much less in a way such as he does?

Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal
Brusanan
Sons of Seyllin
Pirate Lords of War
#36 - 2014-03-25 18:05:20 UTC
I'm glad I checked in on this thread, because otherwise I never would have learned of Jester's hilarious article about the bonus room. Every argument he makes against the bonus room breaks down when you remember that it is all voluntary, and the client can leave at any time.

And of course Ero is going to be my #2 vote for all of my accounts, right below Monk.
Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#37 - 2014-03-25 19:10:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Gogela
Jester's Trek brought me here, and after listening to two hours of this: Erotica1BonusRoom_Sohkar, I have to say I am shocked.

Shocked, that something so crazy and awesome could happen in EvE.

I've never heard anything like this. It was a long and careful psychological tour the 2am radio host-esq narrator guided us on in that well balanced rollercoaster of a recording. ...and just think about the public service being provided! Some people here, demonizing simply with hues of vulgarity, are missing the deeper picture. Greed, ignorance, and blind faith drove the victim to a disastrous and humiliating end. What a phenomenal life lesson! Sure the EvE-character-victim in this case got rocked back to 0 in holdings, but what were the takeaways for the person behind the character? Think he'll be more savvy in business affairs? Careful with the ladies? Wary of the odd pyramid scheme or get-rich-quick scam? Sometimes the deepest trumas provide us with the most deeply ingrained and profound life lessons. You might see psychological torture. I see an invaluable life lesson being provided by true humanitarians in a game about internet spaceships.

This is all very incidental. From a broader standpoint, I see Erotica 1 as someone who stirs the pot. While listening to that broadcast, I felt almost like I was there. I got the very visceral sensation that I was successfully scamming someone in this way, and felt the elation of all this pod's hard work and effort being contracted over to my toon. The debate and debacle this created @ reddit and amongst the blogs draws more curious people into the game. The scope of what's being done here... the complete effective seizure of all funds and assets in another players account in this way, simply isn't possible in any other online game I'm aware of. That in itself is impressive enough to give EvE a spin, for the spectacle if nothing else.

In short, Erotica 1 isn't the menace you make him out to be. He is:

  • Enriching the lives of those who need it most, improving their judgement, their world view, and general savvy

  • Entertaining the entire EvE player base through innovative gameplay and quality media

  • Driving media attention and marketing to an entire new generation of internet spaceship pirates and like scum

  • Educating the current player base by proxy, making (almost) everyone's EvE game play a little better


"The Bonus Room" was one of the most insightful and entertaining things I've listened to in quite some time.

I therefor offer my full endorsement of Erotica 1, and for those who appreciate the virtues I've described above or those who simply like stirring a stagnant pot, I encourage you to join me in voting Erotica 1 for CSM.

Thank you, and god bles

Signatures should be used responsibly...
Josef Djugashvilis
#38 - 2014-03-25 19:57:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Josef Djugashvilis
Dear Erotica 1, before I read Jester's bog and listened to most of the recording, I found you mildly amusing and mildly annoying with the CODE nonsense.

Now, you are the only player I have ever wanted to see leave Eve Online, preferably banned rather than allowing you to quit.

Sure, you will get the usual teen-age Eve 'hard men' trolls defending your behaviour, but I would suggest that the overwhelming majority of folk who are aware of your antics would be glad if you no longer had access to Eve Online.

You should not be allowed to stand for, let alone get a place on the CSM.

This is not a signature.
Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#39 - 2014-03-25 21:09:26 UTC
Seriously, that's TWO reports of RL threats I've had to make to the ISDs in this thread now. And I do not report things lightly.

That's more than I've encountered in a couple years of EVE and hell, it's worse than anything I saw when I was a WOW player years ago.

The Erotica 1 hate club have demonstrated their total and utter lack of credibility here.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com
Hello Monument Visitor
Doomheim
#40 - 2014-03-25 21:21:36 UTC
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:
Seriously, that's TWO reports of RL threats I've had to make to the ISDs in this thread now. And I do not report things lightly.

That's more than I've encountered in a couple years of EVE and hell, it's worse than anything I saw when I was a WOW player years ago.

The Erotica 1 hate club have demonstrated their total and utter lack of credibility here.


Oooh just you wait... I'm going to tickle your nads with a feather if you don't... Oh. I'm not sure if that is a RL threat or not. You may be more interested if it were a promise I guess.

Anyway, as vile as Erotica 1's actions are, Sabriz Adoudel makes a valid point. Please people, leave the RL threats out of it and plan your revenge / justice in-game or use meta gaming to increase pressure on CCP to act morally.