These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CSM 7 - We Should Not Accept This Behavior!!

First post First post
Author
michaelthered
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#121 - 2012-03-27 18:02:21 UTC
Revolution Rising wrote:
[quote=michaelthered][quote=Frying Doom]

Lets face it, I haven't seen the US start wars with China like they have with every 3rd world country that couldn't fight back. It's entirely cultural to prey on the weak.




I'm american and i can see you have a point. But hold off on the China thing...soon as them and Russia want to go off the dollar as the worlds reserve you'll see your China war. True story.
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#122 - 2012-03-27 18:06:25 UTC
Revolution Rising wrote:

Lets face it, I haven't seen the US start wars with China like they have with every 3rd world country that couldn't fight back. It's entirely cultural to prey on the weak.


Let's face it, its entirely genetic to prey on the weak. That's more or less the definition of the predator / prey relationship and is seen in behavior of every species on earth.

Perhaps when your "every 3rd world country" starts preying on it's neighbors or poking at large animals with sticks, it would do well to remember there are much bigger predators out there.

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#123 - 2012-03-27 18:19:51 UTC
Seleene wrote:
Vile rat wrote:
You see Issler that's the problem. You are coming from a CSM time (CSM 3) where events were formal, people had meetings that accomplished little, and the entire thing was one big crowd facing publicity stunt for the people involved. Before you even have sat down to work with the other members you've already taken a stand that you're going to do your best to make a lot of political hay out of attacking one of them. I'd take some time to work with the other people first before you try to pull this ****.


I'm going to +1 this for a couple reasons:

The last CSM was very effective because we worked hard to stay in touch and not get publicly combative and look dysfunctional. Issler, you should probably sort out your NDA and get into Skype with the rest of us. We obviously have an issue to resolve but this isn't the way to go about it. Hell, some of us are asleep, just waking up or even still in Iceland. Smile


I have had my NDA in place since CSM 2. Waiting for the Skype information now. I am very sure Mittens had a lot to do with the success of the CSM 6 but as other people have pointed out there is a higher standard applied to leaders. I am not at all happy to have had to take this stand. I did want to work with Mittens but I think he crossed a line and I am surprised to see you not stand by me and support that this was planned before the incident and showed an extreme lack of judgement. It hurt the CSM in the player's eyes (you even have goons calling for him to resign) and it is a black eye for Eve in the general public.

I've promised everyone that voted for me I'd speak the truth and that is exactly what I'm doing here. It is my job to fight for the integrity of the CSM and to be open and honest to the players of Eve. I'm doing what I promised.

Issler
Blake Zacary
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#124 - 2012-03-27 18:35:48 UTC
Seleene wrote:
Vile rat wrote:
You see Issler that's the problem. You are coming from a CSM time (CSM 3) where events were formal, people had meetings that accomplished little, and the entire thing was one big crowd facing publicity stunt for the people involved. Before you even have sat down to work with the other members you've already taken a stand that you're going to do your best to make a lot of political hay out of attacking one of them. I'd take some time to work with the other people first before you try to pull this ****.


I'm going to +1 this for a couple reasons:

The last CSM was very effective because we worked hard to stay in touch and not get publicly combative and look dysfunctional. Issler, you should probably sort out your NDA and get into Skype with the rest of us. We obviously have an issue to resolve but this isn't the way to go about it. Hell, some of us are asleep, just waking up or even still in Iceland. Smile
I have to disagree with this.This isn't an ingame matter or something covered with the NDA,this was a real life mistake that even Alex said he feels absolutely ashamed about.

I'm sure I'm not the only voter who is curious as to what each individual CSM rep thinks about this.This isn't the time to go into your CSM channels and work out some joint damage control.This is one of those times where people have to stand up and be counted as individuals and not hide behind a collective !



Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#125 - 2012-03-27 18:39:08 UTC
I started this thread because I saw repeated posted in other threads that asked the CSM for their position related to this event.

If the rest of the CSM 7 can't find it in themselves to take a stand then I wonder how they think they deserve their position in the CSM.

I really am disappointed that Mittens did this. He ultimately let down the 10K folks that supported him in this election. Clearly many of those voters don't seem to care, but many clearly do.

At first I thought the apology would be enough, but as I thought more about it I couldn't accept that Mittens set out to do this before the panel and in a sober state of mind. In addition his initial responses and the "I didn't know until I got home and watched the video because I was so drunk" in my mind is a failure on his part to "own it" as he repeatedly said on stage.

So I'm sorry, I'm asking him to "own it" and I think for the benefit of the CSM and Eve, that means at a minimum he is out of the CSM this term. I also agree with folks that pointed out this seems to be a clear violation of the ToS and many have been removed from Eve with less evidence. We also need to hold CCP accountable and demand they clearly explain whatever action they take relative to enforcement against less famous players.

And to say I'm doing this for power is insane. I knew this would further polarize any opinions about me but I didn't sign up for this to win some sort of popularity contest. I did this to server the players of Eve and it looks to me like a lot of them want more than just a "I'm sorry, I was drunk and was an asshat, can we hug and make up, I swear I'll never do it again".

I really looked forward to working with Mittens, by all accounts he is very effective in the CSM and I wanted to see how the "new" structure of the CSM worked compared to the older and less effective model I was involved in.

Here is one final point. The original purpose if the CSM was to make sure that the players had direct representation when scandals in Eve occurred. To give the player's a voice when scandals happen. If this isn't a scandal then I'm confused about the meaning of the word.

Issler
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#126 - 2012-03-27 18:41:03 UTC
Blake Zacary wrote:
Seleene wrote:
Vile rat wrote:
You see Issler that's the problem. You are coming from a CSM time (CSM 3) where events were formal, people had meetings that accomplished little, and the entire thing was one big crowd facing publicity stunt for the people involved. Before you even have sat down to work with the other members you've already taken a stand that you're going to do your best to make a lot of political hay out of attacking one of them. I'd take some time to work with the other people first before you try to pull this ****.


I'm going to +1 this for a couple reasons:

The last CSM was very effective because we worked hard to stay in touch and not get publicly combative and look dysfunctional. Issler, you should probably sort out your NDA and get into Skype with the rest of us. We obviously have an issue to resolve but this isn't the way to go about it. Hell, some of us are asleep, just waking up or even still in Iceland. Smile
I have to disagree with this.This isn't an ingame matter or something covered with the NDA,this was a real life mistake that even Alex said he feels absolutely ashamed about.

I'm sure I'm not the only voter who is curious as to what each individual CSM rep thinks about this.This isn't the time to go into your CSM channels and work out some joint damage control.This is one of those times where people have to stand up and be counted as individuals and not hide behind a collective !





I wish I could triple like this post!

Issler
Doctor Eezee
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#127 - 2012-03-27 19:12:12 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:
I also agree with folks that pointed out this seems to be a clear violation of the ToS and many have been removed from Eve with less evidence.



How is something a player does in the real life against the ToS?

"My rule is: If you meet the weakest vessel, attack; if it is a vessel equal to yours, attack; and if it is stronger than yours, also attack..." - Admiral Stepan O. Makarov

Weloriavia
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#128 - 2012-03-27 19:34:55 UTC
War Kitten wrote:
Weloriavia wrote:
True true, got your attention though didnt it? Blink


Wait, so you said something over-the-top that you didn't really mean, just to get people's attention?

Hmm, I wonder if anyone else in this thread may have been found guilty of such a low, despicable act.

BTW, how did you turn ridiculing someone's suicidal cry for attention into slander against religions that abhor suicide? Aren't you trying to stretch the victim list just a wee bit here?


Not at all. I used an extreme scenario that is still relevant to the topic. There is nothing despicable about what I said at all.
Again, not at all. He is a representative of the community. If this was just another player being slanderous towards then im sure CCP would have instigated a ban on the account. This however is the chairman of CSM7.
Personally speaking I have no issue with The Mittani, his comment however hit a moral chord and I was simply trying to prove a point that a member of CSM has to think about every word that comes out.
Stand down or not, it does not worry me. He seems genuinely apologetic and at the end of the day one can but hope that such comments would not be made again.
The fact he recognised his behavior as being abhorrent to also shows that he has genuinely considered his actions.
I am not on a witch hunt and I appreciate your viewpoint as well.

This is a game however when people are offended, someone needs to speak up. I would hope anyone with half a conscience would stand up for what they believe in. Smile
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#129 - 2012-03-27 19:35:12 UTC
Doctor Eezee wrote:
Issler Dainze wrote:
I also agree with folks that pointed out this seems to be a clear violation of the ToS and many have been removed from Eve with less evidence.



How is something a player does in the real life against the ToS?


By asking someone to harass someone else in game.

Issler
Doctor Eezee
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#130 - 2012-03-27 19:39:02 UTC
Maybe you should read the ToS again.

Quote:
We are not responsible for actions taken by our subscribers that occur outside the jurisdiction of our game servers or web site.

"My rule is: If you meet the weakest vessel, attack; if it is a vessel equal to yours, attack; and if it is stronger than yours, also attack..." - Admiral Stepan O. Makarov

Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#131 - 2012-03-27 19:45:15 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:
If the rest of the CSM 7 can't find it in themselves to take a stand then I wonder how they think they deserve their position in the CSM.


As Seleene already said, the CSM is discussing the matter internally before making any public statements. You should probably think about participating, if this is an important matter to you.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Kerensky White
K-EDEN
Winger Aerospace
#132 - 2012-03-27 19:46:15 UTC
My question is this. Did the harassed individual in question accept Mittens personal, in game apology.
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#133 - 2012-03-27 19:46:39 UTC
Doctor Eezee wrote:
Maybe you should read the ToS again.

Quote:
We are not responsible for actions taken by our subscribers that occur outside the jurisdiction of our game servers or web site.


Possible monkey-wrench in that argument: His actions were broadcast live through their website.

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.

Seleene
Body Count Inc.
Mercenary Coalition
#134 - 2012-03-27 19:48:18 UTC
Blake Zacary wrote:
Seleene wrote:
Vile rat wrote:
You see Issler that's the problem. You are coming from a CSM time (CSM 3) where events were formal, people had meetings that accomplished little, and the entire thing was one big crowd facing publicity stunt for the people involved. Before you even have sat down to work with the other members you've already taken a stand that you're going to do your best to make a lot of political hay out of attacking one of them. I'd take some time to work with the other people first before you try to pull this ****.


I'm going to +1 this for a couple reasons:

The last CSM was very effective because we worked hard to stay in touch and not get publicly combative and look dysfunctional. Issler, you should probably sort out your NDA and get into Skype with the rest of us. We obviously have an issue to resolve but this isn't the way to go about it. Hell, some of us are asleep, just waking up or even still in Iceland. Smile
I have to disagree with this.This isn't an ingame matter or something covered with the NDA,this was a real life mistake that even Alex said he feels absolutely ashamed about.

I'm sure I'm not the only voter who is curious as to what each individual CSM rep thinks about this.This isn't the time to go into your CSM channels and work out some joint damage control.This is one of those times where people have to stand up and be counted as individuals and not hide behind a collective !


No one is hiding behind anything, m8. But, as I said before, the CSM is a group of people and we've worked hard to not just REACT to things. Mittens / Alex did something really dumb and I've no doubt there will be consequenses.

2004-2008: Mercenary Coalition Boss

2007-2010: CCP Game Designer | 2011-2013: CSM6 Delegate & CSM7 Chairman

2011-2015: Pandemic Legionnaire

2015- : Mercenary Coalition Boss

Follow Seleene on Twitter!

Seleene
Body Count Inc.
Mercenary Coalition
#135 - 2012-03-27 19:49:44 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:
Seleene wrote:
Vile rat wrote:
You see Issler that's the problem. You are coming from a CSM time (CSM 3) where events were formal, people had meetings that accomplished little, and the entire thing was one big crowd facing publicity stunt for the people involved. Before you even have sat down to work with the other members you've already taken a stand that you're going to do your best to make a lot of political hay out of attacking one of them. I'd take some time to work with the other people first before you try to pull this ****.


I'm going to +1 this for a couple reasons:

The last CSM was very effective because we worked hard to stay in touch and not get publicly combative and look dysfunctional. Issler, you should probably sort out your NDA and get into Skype with the rest of us. We obviously have an issue to resolve but this isn't the way to go about it. Hell, some of us are asleep, just waking up or even still in Iceland. Smile


I have had my NDA in place since CSM 2. Waiting for the Skype information now.


Regardless, you've got email waiting to be answered it seems. v0v

Issler Dainze wrote:
I started this thread because I saw repeated posted in other threads that asked the CSM for their position related to this event. If the rest of the CSM 7 can't find it in themselves to take a stand then I wonder how they think they deserve their position in the CSM.


This kind of talk is only going to alienate every other member of the CSM before you are even involved. Right now I think it's beyond debate that Mittens did something really dumb. He's owned it and apologized for it. Now we need to decide what the result of all this is. It is only fair that we allow every member of the CSM to have time to do things like get back from Iceland before any decisions are made. (Two Step is literally IN THE AIR as I type this).

I considered doing a point by point to many of your statements but I'll just leave it at this: the campaign is over and most of your posts on this subject read like you are still campaigning for something. You've earned your spot on the team so come on board and start being a team member. o7 o7 Smile

2004-2008: Mercenary Coalition Boss

2007-2010: CCP Game Designer | 2011-2013: CSM6 Delegate & CSM7 Chairman

2011-2015: Pandemic Legionnaire

2015- : Mercenary Coalition Boss

Follow Seleene on Twitter!

Highauger's animated corpse
Jove Observation And Neutrality Negotiations Act
#136 - 2012-03-27 19:50:10 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:
Blake Zacary wrote:
Seleene wrote:
Vile rat wrote:
You see Issler that's the problem. You are coming from a CSM time (CSM 3) where events were formal, people had meetings that accomplished little, and the entire thing was one big crowd facing publicity stunt for the people involved. Before you even have sat down to work with the other members you've already taken a stand that you're going to do your best to make a lot of political hay out of attacking one of them. I'd take some time to work with the other people first before you try to pull this ****.


I'm going to +1 this for a couple reasons:

The last CSM was very effective because we worked hard to stay in touch and not get publicly combative and look dysfunctional. Issler, you should probably sort out your NDA and get into Skype with the rest of us. We obviously have an issue to resolve but this isn't the way to go about it. Hell, some of us are asleep, just waking up or even still in Iceland. Smile
I have to disagree with this.This isn't an ingame matter or something covered with the NDA,this was a real life mistake that even Alex said he feels absolutely ashamed about.

I'm sure I'm not the only voter who is curious as to what each individual CSM rep thinks about this.This isn't the time to go into your CSM channels and work out some joint damage control.This is one of those times where people have to stand up and be counted as individuals and not hide behind a collective !





I wish I could triple like this post!

Issler



Your kind of bias is percisely why you can't 'triple like this post.'

In fact when you think about it 'OP' that says quite alot doesn't it.

Cheap and tasteless, gotta be said tho, it has something in common
with Alex's comments that began all this.

However, he sir has recognised publicly his error. So do you continue
now to persue?, with your motives this clear for all to see.
Highauger's animated corpse
Jove Observation And Neutrality Negotiations Act
#137 - 2012-03-27 19:52:23 UTC
Seleene wrote:
Issler Dainze wrote:
Seleene wrote:
Vile rat wrote:
You see Issler that's the problem. You are coming from a CSM time (CSM 3) where events were formal, people had meetings that accomplished little, and the entire thing was one big crowd facing publicity stunt for the people involved. Before you even have sat down to work with the other members you've already taken a stand that you're going to do your best to make a lot of political hay out of attacking one of them. I'd take some time to work with the other people first before you try to pull this ****.


I'm going to +1 this for a couple reasons:

The last CSM was very effective because we worked hard to stay in touch and not get publicly combative and look dysfunctional. Issler, you should probably sort out your NDA and get into Skype with the rest of us. We obviously have an issue to resolve but this isn't the way to go about it. Hell, some of us are asleep, just waking up or even still in Iceland. Smile


I have had my NDA in place since CSM 2. Waiting for the Skype information now.


Regardless, you've got email waiting to be answered it seems. v0v

Issler Dainze wrote:
I started this thread because I saw repeated posted in other threads that asked the CSM for their position related to this event. If the rest of the CSM 7 can't find it in themselves to take a stand then I wonder how they think they deserve their position in the CSM.


This kind of talk is only going to alienate every other member of the CSM before you are even involved. Right now I think it's beyond debate that Mittens did something really dumb. He's owned it and apologized for it. Now we need to decide what the result of all this is. It is only fair that we allow every member of the CSM to have time to do things like get back from Iceland before any decisions are made. (Two Step is literally IN THE AIR as I type this).

I considered doing a point by point to many of your statements but I'll just leave it at this: the campaign is over and most of your posts on this subject read like you are still campaigning for something. You've earned your spot on the team so come on board and start being a team member. o7 o7 Smile




Respect
Shalee Lianne
Banana-Republic.
Shadow Cartel
#138 - 2012-03-27 19:59:05 UTC
It is revolting that Mittens said what he did, and he should suffer heavy consequences for his casual disregard for someone suffering.

He should suffer more than stepping down from CSM as chair, he should be OFF CSM. He should not be allowed to represent the players of EVE at all.

You people give this jerk entirely too much pretend power.
http://amarrian.blogspot.com/  ~ Roleplay blog. http://sovereigntywars.wordpress.com/ ~ Faction War blog.
Doctor Eezee
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#139 - 2012-03-27 19:59:16 UTC
Also, while I completely agree that it was out of line to ask for other people to message him, somehow there are a few things people are forgetting.

1. CCP had access to all presentations beforehand and obviously didn't object to anything. The Alliance Panel is traditionally pretty laissez-faire. People presenting drunk is not something new on this particular panel and CCP obviously doesn't mind.

2. Mittens wasn't on the alliance panel in his capacity as a CSM member. He was there to represent Goonswarm. I wasn't a particular fan of the slide in question, since Depression is unfortunately a pretty serious condition, but other people didn't seem to mind.
During the CSM panel where he actually spoke in an official capacity, he was not drunk and he behaved completely professional, doing exactly the job that was expected from him.

3. Nobody seemed to mind for 2 days after the alliance panel was presented. There were no sanctions by CCP, very few comments on the slide. Not even Evenews picked it up and Riverini and Mittens are not exactly the closest of friends.


I agree he did something wrong, but he apologized and I seriously doubt he will anything like that ever happen again. The absolute most he should do is step down as chairman of the CSM and let TwoStep take over, while remaining on the CSM panel as a normal member.
Removing him from the CSM alltogether will undoubtedly hurt Eve and that can't be in the interest of any player.

"My rule is: If you meet the weakest vessel, attack; if it is a vessel equal to yours, attack; and if it is stronger than yours, also attack..." - Admiral Stepan O. Makarov

Retar Aveymone
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#140 - 2012-03-27 20:01:09 UTC
michaelthered wrote:

I know the person who the apology was sent to personally.....and no the apology didn't "cut it". lawls

no you don't