These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

GMs - Please weigh in on the boomerang maneuver. Exploit (y/n)?

First post
Author
Subdolus Venator
State War Academy
Caldari State
#41 - 2012-03-21 17:00:27 UTC
I'm mostly a Carebear - I have only one alt that regularly spends the majority of his time in lo- and nul-sec (this one, as it happens).

My take on the Boomerang is that it is NOT an Exploit.


The Boomerang is ingenious - a brilliant bit of max/min manipulation that ought to be rewarded - Very few are going to be able to make it work well, and those few will make EVE a much more colorful place - Even if I wind up losing a few hulls to it.

I figure it's only 'Evading the Concord' if you manage to dock-up or escape the system. Basically, I believe in the 'You Can Run, But You Can't Hide' doctrine. So long as the active criminal is playing hopscotch around the system, that's still hot pursuit, and no successful evasion has taken place. Sooner or later, the Concord will pin him down and grease-spot him. Until then, let him bounce around the system like a flea on a hot skillet.

EVE is EVE - Feaces will eventuate.

NightmareX
Pandemic Horde High Sec Division
#42 - 2012-03-21 18:13:30 UTC  |  Edited by: NightmareX
What i find to be very funny, that everyone is whining that doing a gank and warp away and warp back and gank another hulk or whatever and then warps away and then gets killed by Concord is a bad thing to do.

If that's such an issue for CCP or others, then why the freaking hell can't CCP just disable the warp function on your ship after you have gone global after killing someone in high sec then?

Wouldn't that just prevent alot of players to abuse a mechanic that EVERYONE can do so easily then?

And, i can kill 20 ships in one boom if i want. Just fit up a smartbombing ship and warp into a big group of small ships. Does that means i have to die 20 times for that?

Here is a list of my current EVE / PVP videos:

1: Asteroid Madness

2: Clash of the Empires

3: Suddenly Spaceships fighting in Tama

Lady Ayeipsia
BlueWaffe
#43 - 2012-03-21 18:22:54 UTC
Ah, but in low sec, you should be able to go gcc and warp away if you wish. So it really isn't that simple. Your suggestion would destroy low sec piracy.

As for requesting an answer from gms/ccp... Guys give them time. I doubt any one gms has the power to set a blanket policy. I would hope that in the least the gms must discuss the issue together and get input from higher ups. After all, gms are not the driving vision of eve. In an ideal world, I would hope they also ask the csm for input.

Think of it this way, would you go ask a beat cop to issue rulings on a new law? No, that comes from higher up in the judicial system.

In other words, give the gms and powers that be time to discuss this method and determine its nature.

The only way I would expect a quick response is if ccp already discussed this specific issue, which I doubt given it has only recently come into the public spotlight.
flakeys
Doomheim
#44 - 2012-03-21 18:29:46 UTC
Miner nor ganker here but i do find it oddd/stupid that a discussion topic get's locked because there has not been a GM response yet and will be closed untill that time.


Just throw a mail/shout to a GM to comment on it and leave the thread going till he/she does reply if or if not an exploit , it's not like people are discussing how to RMT now .... Roll

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

EnslaverOfMinmatar
You gonna get aped
#45 - 2012-03-21 19:18:40 UTC  |  Edited by: EnslaverOfMinmatar
BuzzyBeagle wrote:
EnslaverOfMinmatar wrote:
It's not an exploit because tornadoes can be prevented from warping by fitting a warp disruptor on hulks/mackinaws/orcas. Miners should just mine in tight packs.

this is the most pathetic bear response i have ever read.
please DO fit warp disruptors , it will just ensure you have less tank and easier to kill.


Thanks for the TEARS, Mr. Uber PVPer #56,687
LMAO

Every EVE player must read this http://www.eveonline.com/background/potw/default.asp?cid=29-01-07

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#46 - 2012-03-21 19:50:04 UTC
Subdolus Venator wrote:
Sooner or later, the Concord will pin him down and grease-spot him. Until then, let him bounce around the system like a flea on a hot skillet.

Except as I've stated repeatedly, it's possible to bounce around system for 15 minutes until the GCC runs out, at which point I'm perfectly safe - I can dock up, leave system, or just sit there - and CONCORD won't follow me or fire on my ship.

I've noticed that a lot of posts have said similar to what you've said. What I've shown to be possible is also considered by many to be an exploit. Now that you agree that it's an exploit, do you believe game mechanics should be changed to make this impossible?

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Sugar Von MurdererTits
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#47 - 2012-03-21 20:02:56 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
I never did a suicide kill in my Eve life, and avoid PVP (because I can't survive - check the Kbs), and I don't think it's an exploit.

Look, to be honest, this is the only game with consequences that matter. I can do WOW PVP all day, though I stopped playing in 2007, rack up honor points or whatever they were called, and not lose a thing except arrows (beast spec Hunter FTW).

Eve is still a game, but a hard game, and I pay for that game and like it like that even when I lose and get cheesed over that. Whereas I don't expect to go mining with an empty rack of midslots, and I would be first in line to point out some mechanics that favor bubble and blobs camps that should change, further nerfing do suicide attacks at this point is going to go too far.

We have a world that is full of people who think in terms of "it will never happen to me". They do that in RL. Because they think "it" will never happen to them, they actually facilitate a lot of problems in this world. If I could get everybody in the world to play this game and get suicided it just might, even for a moment, generate a neural pathway that is counter to this "never happen to me" BS and finally wake them out of their sleepwalking.

I am a lone wolf in this game. I spend more time running, and anything other than running means losing. But even I don't want to see this game made easier.

The day will come when someone will see my pimped drake pull up on station in structure and pop it, and I just about expect that to happen every time, just like I worry when taking a long trip without tools, or doing a security job without a backup gun - this game is where I practice the mindset that helps me in RL. Please don't let this game change.


This * 1000
Fishmaskle
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#48 - 2012-03-21 20:28:57 UTC
I have to admit but even the 15minute evasion till Concord stops chasing you shouldn't be considered an exploit.

The way I see it is like in real life, somebody does something bad, he runs from the cops before they get there, they chase him arround but he is fast, he eventually gets away.

A way this could be possibly mended is the higher negative sec status you are, then that increases the multiplier that determins the concord response time. The worse you are the faster they show. (never an immediate response, but it could make hisec even more risky but still fun). This may sound like a punishment of the pirates, but I am saying mix this with the official response that this is not an exploit so while it will take some major skill to survive the full 15min, if you do then you would be one of the Elite lol.

On top of that, it could also slap on another bit of multiplier for each time you evade concord (which could also become some sort of medal/counter to brag about ingame) that would keep it from being too heavily used over a short period of time.. This could be a timed "wanted" sort of increase possible (say 1st offense = 1hr, 2nd = 3hrs, 3rd = 12 hrs, etc).

Just a thought from a NulSec/HighSec player. Spent a little time in Low but I need to train up an alt to have more fun in them their waters..
If I helped you out, Technical Issue, enemy gank, popped your poor fit, hit the "Like" button.
Subdolus Venator
State War Academy
Caldari State
#49 - 2012-03-21 20:32:44 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Subdolus Venator wrote:
Sooner or later, the Concord will pin him down and grease-spot him. Until then, let him bounce around the system like a flea on a hot skillet.

Except as I've stated repeatedly, it's possible to bounce around system for 15 minutes until the GCC runs out, at which point I'm perfectly safe - I can dock up, leave system, or just sit there - and CONCORD won't follow me or fire on my ship.
Fair point, and excellent research, too.

Quote:
I've noticed that a lot of posts have said similar to what you've said. What I've shown to be possible is also considered by many to be an exploit. Now that you agree that it's an exploit, do you believe game mechanics should be changed to make this impossible?

:: pondering ::

The answer to your question is maybe.
I'd like to let the status quo remain for a bit, and see what happens. If, after a period of observation, it seems to be a largely benign loophole, I'd say grandfather it and let it ride. If, on the other hand, it gets out of hand, then I'd say make a minor tweak to game mechanics such that GCC flags in Hi-Sec lasts until Concord hunts you down, however long that takes.

I want to reward the brilliant kinds of thinking that produced The Boomerang, without causing a policy or gameplay problem. A few crazy jackrabbits with switchblades will make EVE more intersting. MANY murder-crazed mini-lops would become a problem.

EVE is EVE - Feaces will eventuate.

Ranger64511
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#50 - 2012-03-21 21:17:46 UTC
hmmm lots of theories out there cool...

Personally I don't see it as an exploit but that's just me. I can seethe point where some people might think it is and you all have valid arguments. Anyways should just file a petition as you would more then likely end up with a quicker response.

This is my gate. There are many others like it, but this one is mine. My gate is my best friend. It is my life. I must master it as I must master my life. Without me, my gate is useless. Without my gate, I am useless.

Evei Shard
Shard Industries
#51 - 2012-03-21 22:30:37 UTC
Herr Wilkus wrote:

Warping out after a gank allows your -10 character to avoid nasty, one-sided fights with other players while Concord holds you down and renders you helpless for 10-15 seconds. Until a few days ago, you could eject from a doomed ship before you are Concorded which allowed a pirate to make his escape, ahead of outlaw podding opportunists. Not anymore. So if anything, warping off is even MORE vital. Further, it also allows you to recover your own mods at a Safe-spot, Orca or no, rather than in the middle of a throng of pissed off carebears (and associated opportunists).


The irony here is quite humorous.

Profit favors the prepared

Xylorn Hasher
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#52 - 2012-03-22 00:06:56 UTC
Fishmaskle wrote:
I have to admit but even the 15minute evasion till Concord stops chasing you shouldn't be considered an exploit.

The way I see it is like in real life, somebody does something bad, he runs from the cops before they get there, they chase him arround but he is fast, he eventually gets away.

A way this could be possibly mended is the higher negative sec status you are, then that increases the multiplier that determins the concord response time. The worse you are the faster they show. (never an immediate response, but it could make hisec even more risky but still fun). This may sound like a punishment of the pirates, but I am saying mix this with the official response that this is not an exploit so while it will take some major skill to survive the full 15min, if you do then you would be one of the Elite lol.


^THIS^

But in the same time you can just bump from belt to belt killing Hulks / Macs and finally warp to safe spot to your alt who will be sitting there in POD, hit eject and quickly enter with your alt to your precious Tornado saving the ship from Concordokken.

Is this will be an exploit?
Hell yes, but as far as no one knows - there will be no petition and no Banhammer in use.

Ganking needs to be revisited by CCP for sure. For me if you can save your ship from Concord you should do it and it shouldn't be an exploit if you only use game mechanic.
Exploits simply shouldn't be possible to do without hacking the game.

All my posts are made shortly after Marihuana consumption.

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#53 - 2012-03-22 02:23:05 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Subdolus Venator wrote:
Sooner or later, the Concord will pin him down and grease-spot him. Until then, let him bounce around the system like a flea on a hot skillet.

Except as I've stated repeatedly, it's possible to bounce around system for 15 minutes until the GCC runs out, at which point I'm perfectly safe - I can dock up, leave system, or just sit there - and CONCORD won't follow me or fire on my ship.

I've noticed that a lot of posts have said similar to what you've said. What I've shown to be possible is also considered by many to be an exploit. Now that you agree that it's an exploit, do you believe game mechanics should be changed to make this impossible?

Update: Repeated this in an Oracle.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Annoying Trader
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#54 - 2012-03-22 02:24:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Annoying Trader
I have never been a ganker, and haven't mined mined for a long time. And yes posting with and alt, so have at me because of htat if you want. But here are my 2 cents.

I think the boomerang maneuver is not an exploit, for the most part. The part i think might be considered an explot is the part where your guns "magically" (as Herr put it) reload when you enter warp.

Now, why is this? Because CCP felt the need to ad a "cool" guns coming out of the ship graphics, so to implement this they have guns draw when you come out of warp, and be come back into the holster the second you enter warp.

The sad part is that CCP is much more likely to do something about the rest of the maneuver than about this (maybe because is the only thing they cand do while preserviung their cool graphic solution).

So the lesson, as always: CCP, don't mess with the game just to add cool new graphics (remember incarna anyone?).

Anyway, that's what i think

Edit.

Oh, and whoever says that if something is not supposed to be doable, then they should change the code so it is not doable anymore, you should be aware that in something so multi-layered i think the game code is after however many years eve has been successfully running, the law of unintended consequences is bound to apply.
Kelvan Hemanseh
Hole Exploitation Inc.
#55 - 2012-03-22 02:50:18 UTC
So CCP you can't even send someone here to tell us you're aware of this and working on a ruling? What gives? You're quick enough to send me a warning for annoying people in local but you can't spend two minutes letting us know whats going on.
Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC
#56 - 2012-03-22 02:54:50 UTC
Xylorn Hasher wrote:

^THIS^

But in the same time you can just bump from belt to belt killing Hulks / Macs and finally warp to safe spot to your alt who will be sitting there in POD, hit eject and quickly enter with your alt to your precious Tornado saving the ship from Concordokken.

Is this will be an exploit?
Hell yes, but as far as no one knows - there will be no petition and no Banhammer in use.

Ganking needs to be revisited by CCP for sure. For me if you can save your ship from Concord you should do it and it shouldn't be an exploit if you only use game mechanic.
Exploits simply shouldn't be possible to do without hacking the game.


Some misinformation here:

The last patch now prohibits GCC'd pirates from ejecting from your ship, or boarding a new one (in space) while GCC.
I believe this was done to prevent people from ejecting and allowing an Orca to scoop the gank-ship. (An obvious exploit)
The 'boarding' aspect was probably to kill off the tactic of wave-ganking with many Catalysts, boarding a new one after every gank, killing the target despite starting under a former GCC.

I get the feeling that CCP sometimes allows exploits to exist, because they are innocuous/rare and cause no real damage and would rather spend their time on other issue. The Orca exploit obviously became an issue, and was dealt with.

---As far as the other fellow goes, who is talking about 'warping until GCC expiry'...
I've tried it as well, on Tranquility.
Couple weeks ago, I popped four Mackinaws with a Tornado. Two of them were obviously AFK mining, because the pods just sat there next to the Orca. Standard practice was to immediately jump into a Thrasher (while GCC) and kill the pods. This could be accomplished within 2-3 minutes.

Unfortunately, one of the prebuilt Thrashers had no ammunition. So I just started warping around as an experiment - just to see how long I could avoid getting killed. Only could avoid death for about 2-3 minutes - maybe long 5-6 jumps - with no time between warps for theoretical shooting. This was in an 0.7 system.

Perhaps with a shuttle or interceptor built for quick alignment, in 0.5, and with preset circular bookmarks, you COULD do it. But a ganking Thrasher was caught relatively quickly, and a Tornado would be as well.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#57 - 2012-03-22 02:59:19 UTC
Annoying Trader wrote:
Oh, and whoever says that if something is not supposed to be doable, then they should change the code so it is not doable anymore, you should be aware that in something so multi-layered i think the game code is after however many years eve has been successfully running, the law of unintended consequences is bound to apply.

If this were deemed an exploit I could have easily done it without knowing it were. The consequence of this of course is a ban. Why should I get banned for something game mechanics allow me to do? Doesn't make sense.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Annoying Trader
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#58 - 2012-03-22 03:33:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Annoying Trader
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Annoying Trader wrote:
Oh, and whoever says that if something is not supposed to be doable, then they should change the code so it is not doable anymore, you should be aware that in something so multi-layered i think the game code is after however many years eve has been successfully running, the law of unintended consequences is bound to apply.

If this were deemed an exploit I could have easily done it without knowing it were. The consequence of this of course is a ban. Why should I get banned for something game mechanics allow me to do? Doesn't make sense.


Where i live, i have noticed that every now and then they would enact some new traffic law. In the roll out process they would give "courtesy tickets" say for a week or so, but after that it is your responsability as a driver to know what is allowed and what is not. Now that is RL.

In eve when dealing with stuff like this, i imagine you have to think whether or not whoever is doing it is really unaware of something being an exploit, or is some smartass using an alt to take advantage of the exploit . If you can not discern between the two, then you have to deal with both possibilities equally, that is as if whoever is doing it on purpose. In RL that would be called being criminally negligent, i think.

Now, i have never found myself in any situation like that, but i would assume that the ban process you are talking about the first time offense will be punished hard enough to discourage abuse of faulty game mechanics, but not to hit unduly hard the casual offender, with succesive offenses escalating the ban.

Now, you can consider this fair or not, but i don't see any other way to deal with the issue, as changing the code just to make one little change might be, and probably is, not feasible. That is just Reality.

Now, if you have trouble dealing with reality, i would recommend you play another game instead of eve. I hear that in the game of religion disregard of reality is not frowned upon, and in some cases even encouraged.
Diesel47
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#59 - 2012-03-22 04:07:12 UTC
Why would this be an exploit?

I can see how the orca thing could be, but not this?
Mokanor Lenak
Odd Fluffy Bunnies
#60 - 2012-03-22 05:55:34 UTC
Herr Wilkus wrote:


Warping out after a gank allows your -10 character to avoid nasty, one-sided fights with other players while Concord holds you down and renders you helpless for 10-15 seconds. Until a few days ago, you could eject from a doomed ship before you are Concorded which allowed a pirate to make his escape, ahead of outlaw podding opportunists. Not anymore. So if anything, warping off is even MORE vital. Further, it also allows you to recover your own mods at a Safe-spot, Orca or no, rather than in the middle of a throng of pissed off carebears (and associated opportunists).



Wait... wait...

You are saying that its not fair to be shot at by someone and having a one-sided fight, but warping in, alpha killing someone one-sided and warping out is fair?

On the irony! I'm drowning in ganker tears LolLol

Sorry mate, but that is the most stupid excuse I have read on this thread so far.

You are scared that someone will take your wreck or the gank ship's wreck? No one has every promised that you can recover your items. That is the reason why the ships are not insureable anymore.
You gank someone, you lose your ship, an orca with a tractor beam can steal your loot and salvage your wreck. C'est la vie.
No one promised your roses and gift cards for ganking someone in high sec. Its a risky business being a douchbag.