Jita Park Speakers Corner

You make it seem that you are any different? Or that those in you alliance leadership are not. Don't forget for years i was also in the -a- alliance leadership forums. There were a lot of what you call self serving turncoats, but you make it seem like no else does what they feel is in their best interest. You did the same by being in Rage in Terror did you not? So i guess the main question is should you be throwing personal assaults in a CSM thread or actually trying to post something useful instead of the same old usually sith8?

To answer the direct question what is wrong with your post, answer this question then what sov mechanics have actually worked that ccp have spit out? Everything up to this point has been trial and error instead of bitching and complaining at least some people are trying to find something that will work or be somewhat balanced. So maybe instead of armchair quarterbacking and going for personal assaults you could.........i don't know come post something useful and stop being a total ******.

So a ton of people are asking why we are against Seleene.
Here is quick snapshot:

Seleene misrepresented his intentions. Southern alliances would have never voted for him if he was in PL.
But that's not what is the most annoying. He screwed his own voters.

He had obligations to voters in his bloc and after the election, he has never contacted
anyone in the South to solicit feedback. Yes, his ticker changed but the people who elected him did not.
Seleene turned around and served his new masters tirelessly while ignoring
the people who voted for him.

So cut the b*llsh*t.
You are the sc*mbag who goes in front of voters - tells them what they want to hear and
than proceed to leave them hanging.

So has been the experience of people who voted for you in CSM 6.

M8, that goes both ways and I've left no one hanging. Anyone that wanted to talk to me, even you, about what was going on could have contacted me at any time or read about what I was doing. I made it a point to keep people as informed as I could as time allowed. I didn't ignore anyone that contacted me with a big issue, I wasn't "serving new masters" (cripes, even that sounds ridiculously dramatic) and I never bothered to check what anyone's alliance ticker said before I spoke to them either.

My OBLIGATION is to EVE, which is the game that we ALL play. I will never put the interests of one 'bloc' of EVE above any other. If you thought that voting for me was going to somehow influence how I conducted myself as a member of the CSM, you were wrong. I've done the best I could regardless of if someone voted for me or not. My alliance ticker is completely irrelevant to how I form opinions on what direction I would like to see EVE take.

Herc your petty anger is what holds you back. Can you link the unanswered e-mails you sent or in fact any correspondence that went unanswered to Seleene please. This whole with us or against us attitude is pretty bad and I would urge you to get some fresh air. You would be better served helping the candidate of your choice get elected to CSM than trying to kick sand in others face because let me tell you about kicking sand , sometimes the wind changes. With that said you know just have fun and play the game not everything is some giant conspiracy theory.


♥ Manny

Would this include "true exploration" and colonization?

It's because the people who rage against us the hardest only do so because they secretly want to join us. Just make peace with that and give in to the inevitable. I'm pretty sure we've got a spot in SAS saved for you brother.

We can wait. You're worth it.

PL has worked hard to accumulate the galaxy's foremost collection of terrible posters. Once we absorb the most prolific remaining AAA posters we'll be an unstoppable juggernaut of badposting like the world has never seen.

Be afraid.

Thanks, man (me too), so let's talk about RL then because you've nailed the main issue. I feel very comfortable in saying that I didn't do one thing different on the CSM regardless of who voted for me. I ran very openly as someone that does not have any intention of bias toward one alliance or style of gameplay. Sure, I have my personal priorities but those are all public record, moreso than many other CSMs. This nonsense that I somehow violated your trust implies that I actively worked against some secret agenda that I would never agree to in the first place.

You cannot offer anything that says I favored PL or any other alliance in my tenure on CSM 6. You have NOTHING but bitching about how I amd Manny and whoever else decided to do what we felt best for us and our bros. The reason you can't is because the CSM is an OUT OF GAME ORGANIZATION. When we sit down in Iceland or talk on Skype, I talk with real people about real issues in the game. I talk with people like Alex, Robert, Mikhal, Josh, Sean and Stephan. In fact, it's pretty funny how rare, if ever, anyone gets ~mad~ about in game politics. If someone comes in amd starts this tinfoil bullshit they are rapidly outcast.

If you are mad about some in game political thing, all right. But stop trying to connect it to the Real Life work that the CSM does on the video game we all play.

No Sel and you quoted the wrong part of my post .. the real question being asked is your trustworthiness based on your ingame actions after all you campaign with your ingame alias and your ingame avatar, feel free to move this campaign to Facebook if you want to mix your RL persona in this.
Take Mittens for example; he is quite possibly somekind of record holder in Eve for lying,swindling and being a complete bastard, but he is still a goon and never changed his colors.
You did Sel when it suited you and more than once and that is why I question you as a CSM candidate.